Loading…

Risk of recurrent molar pregnancies following complete and partial hydatidiform moles

STUDY QUESTION What is the risk of further molar pregnancies for women with one or more hydatidiform moles (HM) in relation to molar subtype. SUMMARY ANSWER Women with a complete hydatidiform mole (CM) have a 1 in 100 and 1 in 4 risk of further CM after one or two consecutive CM, respectively, while...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2015-09, Vol.30 (9), p.2055-2063
Main Authors: Eagles, N., Sebire, N.J., Short, D., Savage, P.M., Seckl, M.J., Fisher, R.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:STUDY QUESTION What is the risk of further molar pregnancies for women with one or more hydatidiform moles (HM) in relation to molar subtype. SUMMARY ANSWER Women with a complete hydatidiform mole (CM) have a 1 in 100 and 1 in 4 risk of further CM after one or two consecutive CM, respectively, while women with a partial hydatidiform mole (PM) have only a small increase in risk for further molar pregnancies. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Women with a molar pregnancy have an increased risk of further HM. A small subgroup of women with recurrent HM has an autosomal recessive condition, familial recurrent hydatidiform moles (FRHM), that predisposes them to molar pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A retrospective study of subsequent pregnancies in 16 000 women registered at a centralized referral centre, with a CM or PM, between 1990 and 2009. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS One hundred and sixty-six women with two or more molar pregnancies were identified from electronic records and patient notes. Histopathological features of all molar tissue were reviewed in these cases and genotyping performed where diagnosis was not possible on the basis of histopathological features alone. In addition, genotyping of molar tissue was performed in all cases of women with three or more CM to establish whether the tissue was diploid and biparental or androgenetic. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE This study confirms an increased recurrence risk of ∼1% for a second molar pregnancy and in addition that this risk is associated with CM rather than PM. The data further indicate that the risk of a third HM is associated almost exclusively with CM and enabled an estimate that 1 in 640 women registered with a CM has the rare condition FRHM. The study also found that there was no significant difference between the risk of developing gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) for typical sporadic CM and the diploid biparental CM associated with FRHM (GTN; proportion difference 0.05, Z = 0.87, P = 0.29). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION While pathology was reviewed for all women with two or more molar pregnancies, not all cases registered underwent central review particularly those women registered in the early 1990s. It is therefore possible that the total number of CM and PM may differ slightly from that stated. While women were followed for a minimum of 5 years, it is possible that some women may subsequently have further molar pregnancies that will not have been included i
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dev169