Loading…

Modelling of the ionosphere/thermosphere behaviour during the April 2002 magnetic storms: A comparison of the UAM results with the ISR and NRLMSISE-00 data

The global numerical upper atmosphere model (UAM) has been used to investigate the effects of the April 2002 magnetic storms on the Earth’s ionosphere and thermosphere. Results of UAM simulations have been compared with experimental plasma density and temperatures obtained by seven incoherent scatte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in space research 2006, Vol.37 (2), p.380-391
Main Authors: Namgaladze, A.A., Zubova, Yu.V., Namgaladze, A.N., Martynenko, O.V., Doronina, E.N., Goncharenko, L.P., Van Eyken, A., Howells, V., Thayer, J.P., Taran, V.I., Shpynev, B., Zhou, Q.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-5a206965631fba479502af0ccbb4ea49c82d0a5559dee35efc444bb0919c7c943
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-5a206965631fba479502af0ccbb4ea49c82d0a5559dee35efc444bb0919c7c943
container_end_page 391
container_issue 2
container_start_page 380
container_title Advances in space research
container_volume 37
creator Namgaladze, A.A.
Zubova, Yu.V.
Namgaladze, A.N.
Martynenko, O.V.
Doronina, E.N.
Goncharenko, L.P.
Van Eyken, A.
Howells, V.
Thayer, J.P.
Taran, V.I.
Shpynev, B.
Zhou, Q.
description The global numerical upper atmosphere model (UAM) has been used to investigate the effects of the April 2002 magnetic storms on the Earth’s ionosphere and thermosphere. Results of UAM simulations have been compared with experimental plasma density and temperatures obtained by seven incoherent scatter radars and with neutral composition and temperature data provided by the NRLMSISE-00 model. The UAM calculations of plasma density and temperatures were performed using three versions of neutral constituents: (1) the NRLMSISE-00 neutral composition and temperature; (2) fully self-consistently determined theoretical neutral composition and temperature obtained using NRLMSISE-00 as an initial condition; (3) the same as in (2) but with simulations starting from the steady state theoretical thermosphere solution as an initial condition on April 15, 2002. The model calculations with the “theoretical thermosphere” give a larger thermospheric response to the magnetic storm (neutral temperature increase and O/N2 ratio decrease) and a more distinct negative ionospheric storm effect than the calculations with the NRLMSISE, resulting in N e, T i and T e calculations closer to the radar observations. In most cases, when the model used the MSIS-specified neutral atmosphere, it performed the worst, indicating that an interactive thermosphere is needed to model the ionosphere accurately.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17076042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0273117705004199</els_id><sourcerecordid>17076042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-5a206965631fba479502af0ccbb4ea49c82d0a5559dee35efc444bb0919c7c943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUFu2zAQJIoWqJvmAb3x1JuUJUWJZnsygqQxYLdAnJwJilrFNCTRJakUfUs_G7pOrz0tZjEzi9kh5BODkgFrrg6liaHkAHUJogRWvSELtpSqYEos35IFcFkVjEn5nnyI8QDAuJSwIH-2vsNhcNMT9T1Ne6TOTz4e9xjwKsMwvgLa4t48Oz8H2s3hxD-RV8fgBprPcjqapwmTszQmH8b4ha6o9ePRBBf99M_8cbWlAeM8pEh_ubT_u1zv7qmZOvr9frPdrXc3BQDtTDIfybveDBEvX-cFeby9ebi-KzY_vq2vV5vCVnyZitpwaFRTNxXrWyOkqoGbHqxtW4FGKLvkHZi6rlWHWNXYWyFE24JiykqrRHVBPp99j8H_nDEmPbpo81fMhH6OmkmQDQieiexMtMHHGLDXOf5owm_NQJ9q0Aeda9CnGjQInWvImq9nDeYEzw6DjtbhZLFzAW3SnXf_Ub8AvdmQpQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17076042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling of the ionosphere/thermosphere behaviour during the April 2002 magnetic storms: A comparison of the UAM results with the ISR and NRLMSISE-00 data</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Namgaladze, A.A. ; Zubova, Yu.V. ; Namgaladze, A.N. ; Martynenko, O.V. ; Doronina, E.N. ; Goncharenko, L.P. ; Van Eyken, A. ; Howells, V. ; Thayer, J.P. ; Taran, V.I. ; Shpynev, B. ; Zhou, Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Namgaladze, A.A. ; Zubova, Yu.V. ; Namgaladze, A.N. ; Martynenko, O.V. ; Doronina, E.N. ; Goncharenko, L.P. ; Van Eyken, A. ; Howells, V. ; Thayer, J.P. ; Taran, V.I. ; Shpynev, B. ; Zhou, Q.</creatorcontrib><description>The global numerical upper atmosphere model (UAM) has been used to investigate the effects of the April 2002 magnetic storms on the Earth’s ionosphere and thermosphere. Results of UAM simulations have been compared with experimental plasma density and temperatures obtained by seven incoherent scatter radars and with neutral composition and temperature data provided by the NRLMSISE-00 model. The UAM calculations of plasma density and temperatures were performed using three versions of neutral constituents: (1) the NRLMSISE-00 neutral composition and temperature; (2) fully self-consistently determined theoretical neutral composition and temperature obtained using NRLMSISE-00 as an initial condition; (3) the same as in (2) but with simulations starting from the steady state theoretical thermosphere solution as an initial condition on April 15, 2002. The model calculations with the “theoretical thermosphere” give a larger thermospheric response to the magnetic storm (neutral temperature increase and O/N2 ratio decrease) and a more distinct negative ionospheric storm effect than the calculations with the NRLMSISE, resulting in N e, T i and T e calculations closer to the radar observations. In most cases, when the model used the MSIS-specified neutral atmosphere, it performed the worst, indicating that an interactive thermosphere is needed to model the ionosphere accurately.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ionosphere ; IS Radar ; Thermosphere</subject><ispartof>Advances in space research, 2006, Vol.37 (2), p.380-391</ispartof><rights>2005 COSPAR</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-5a206965631fba479502af0ccbb4ea49c82d0a5559dee35efc444bb0919c7c943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-5a206965631fba479502af0ccbb4ea49c82d0a5559dee35efc444bb0919c7c943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Namgaladze, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubova, Yu.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namgaladze, A.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martynenko, O.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doronina, E.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goncharenko, L.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Eyken, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howells, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thayer, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taran, V.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shpynev, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling of the ionosphere/thermosphere behaviour during the April 2002 magnetic storms: A comparison of the UAM results with the ISR and NRLMSISE-00 data</title><title>Advances in space research</title><description>The global numerical upper atmosphere model (UAM) has been used to investigate the effects of the April 2002 magnetic storms on the Earth’s ionosphere and thermosphere. Results of UAM simulations have been compared with experimental plasma density and temperatures obtained by seven incoherent scatter radars and with neutral composition and temperature data provided by the NRLMSISE-00 model. The UAM calculations of plasma density and temperatures were performed using three versions of neutral constituents: (1) the NRLMSISE-00 neutral composition and temperature; (2) fully self-consistently determined theoretical neutral composition and temperature obtained using NRLMSISE-00 as an initial condition; (3) the same as in (2) but with simulations starting from the steady state theoretical thermosphere solution as an initial condition on April 15, 2002. The model calculations with the “theoretical thermosphere” give a larger thermospheric response to the magnetic storm (neutral temperature increase and O/N2 ratio decrease) and a more distinct negative ionospheric storm effect than the calculations with the NRLMSISE, resulting in N e, T i and T e calculations closer to the radar observations. In most cases, when the model used the MSIS-specified neutral atmosphere, it performed the worst, indicating that an interactive thermosphere is needed to model the ionosphere accurately.</description><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>IS Radar</subject><subject>Thermosphere</subject><issn>0273-1177</issn><issn>1879-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UUFu2zAQJIoWqJvmAb3x1JuUJUWJZnsygqQxYLdAnJwJilrFNCTRJakUfUs_G7pOrz0tZjEzi9kh5BODkgFrrg6liaHkAHUJogRWvSELtpSqYEos35IFcFkVjEn5nnyI8QDAuJSwIH-2vsNhcNMT9T1Ne6TOTz4e9xjwKsMwvgLa4t48Oz8H2s3hxD-RV8fgBprPcjqapwmTszQmH8b4ha6o9ePRBBf99M_8cbWlAeM8pEh_ubT_u1zv7qmZOvr9frPdrXc3BQDtTDIfybveDBEvX-cFeby9ebi-KzY_vq2vV5vCVnyZitpwaFRTNxXrWyOkqoGbHqxtW4FGKLvkHZi6rlWHWNXYWyFE24JiykqrRHVBPp99j8H_nDEmPbpo81fMhH6OmkmQDQieiexMtMHHGLDXOf5owm_NQJ9q0Aeda9CnGjQInWvImq9nDeYEzw6DjtbhZLFzAW3SnXf_Ub8AvdmQpQ</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Namgaladze, A.A.</creator><creator>Zubova, Yu.V.</creator><creator>Namgaladze, A.N.</creator><creator>Martynenko, O.V.</creator><creator>Doronina, E.N.</creator><creator>Goncharenko, L.P.</creator><creator>Van Eyken, A.</creator><creator>Howells, V.</creator><creator>Thayer, J.P.</creator><creator>Taran, V.I.</creator><creator>Shpynev, B.</creator><creator>Zhou, Q.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Modelling of the ionosphere/thermosphere behaviour during the April 2002 magnetic storms: A comparison of the UAM results with the ISR and NRLMSISE-00 data</title><author>Namgaladze, A.A. ; Zubova, Yu.V. ; Namgaladze, A.N. ; Martynenko, O.V. ; Doronina, E.N. ; Goncharenko, L.P. ; Van Eyken, A. ; Howells, V. ; Thayer, J.P. ; Taran, V.I. ; Shpynev, B. ; Zhou, Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-5a206965631fba479502af0ccbb4ea49c82d0a5559dee35efc444bb0919c7c943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>IS Radar</topic><topic>Thermosphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Namgaladze, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubova, Yu.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namgaladze, A.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martynenko, O.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doronina, E.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goncharenko, L.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Eyken, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howells, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thayer, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taran, V.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shpynev, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in space research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Namgaladze, A.A.</au><au>Zubova, Yu.V.</au><au>Namgaladze, A.N.</au><au>Martynenko, O.V.</au><au>Doronina, E.N.</au><au>Goncharenko, L.P.</au><au>Van Eyken, A.</au><au>Howells, V.</au><au>Thayer, J.P.</au><au>Taran, V.I.</au><au>Shpynev, B.</au><au>Zhou, Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling of the ionosphere/thermosphere behaviour during the April 2002 magnetic storms: A comparison of the UAM results with the ISR and NRLMSISE-00 data</atitle><jtitle>Advances in space research</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>380</spage><epage>391</epage><pages>380-391</pages><issn>0273-1177</issn><eissn>1879-1948</eissn><abstract>The global numerical upper atmosphere model (UAM) has been used to investigate the effects of the April 2002 magnetic storms on the Earth’s ionosphere and thermosphere. Results of UAM simulations have been compared with experimental plasma density and temperatures obtained by seven incoherent scatter radars and with neutral composition and temperature data provided by the NRLMSISE-00 model. The UAM calculations of plasma density and temperatures were performed using three versions of neutral constituents: (1) the NRLMSISE-00 neutral composition and temperature; (2) fully self-consistently determined theoretical neutral composition and temperature obtained using NRLMSISE-00 as an initial condition; (3) the same as in (2) but with simulations starting from the steady state theoretical thermosphere solution as an initial condition on April 15, 2002. The model calculations with the “theoretical thermosphere” give a larger thermospheric response to the magnetic storm (neutral temperature increase and O/N2 ratio decrease) and a more distinct negative ionospheric storm effect than the calculations with the NRLMSISE, resulting in N e, T i and T e calculations closer to the radar observations. In most cases, when the model used the MSIS-specified neutral atmosphere, it performed the worst, indicating that an interactive thermosphere is needed to model the ionosphere accurately.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.013</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1177
ispartof Advances in space research, 2006, Vol.37 (2), p.380-391
issn 0273-1177
1879-1948
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17076042
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Ionosphere
IS Radar
Thermosphere
title Modelling of the ionosphere/thermosphere behaviour during the April 2002 magnetic storms: A comparison of the UAM results with the ISR and NRLMSISE-00 data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A53%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20of%20the%20ionosphere/thermosphere%20behaviour%20during%20the%20April%202002%20magnetic%20storms:%20A%20comparison%20of%20the%20UAM%20results%20with%20the%20ISR%20and%20NRLMSISE-00%20data&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20space%20research&rft.au=Namgaladze,%20A.A.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=380&rft.epage=391&rft.pages=380-391&rft.issn=0273-1177&rft.eissn=1879-1948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17076042%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-5a206965631fba479502af0ccbb4ea49c82d0a5559dee35efc444bb0919c7c943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17076042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true