Loading…

The development and assessment of high-throughput mass spectrometry-based methods for the quantification of a nanoparticle drug delivery agent in cellular lysate

The safe use of lipid‐based drug delivery agents requires fast and sensitive qualitative and quantitative assessment of their cellular interactions. Many mass spectrometry (MS) based analytical platforms can achieve such task with varying capabilities. Therefore, four novel high‐throughput MS‐based...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of mass spectrometry. 2014-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1171-1180
Main Authors: Buse, Joshua, Purves, Randy W., Verrall, Ronald E., Badea, Ildiko, Zhang, Haixia, Mulligan, Christopher C., Peru, Kerry M., Bailey, Jonathan, Headley, John V., El-Aneed, Anas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-93fc4e10730e9957c119d69500d09818ce01e4667bd21f9513977891e1c5cafe3
cites
container_end_page 1180
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1171
container_title Journal of mass spectrometry.
container_volume 49
creator Buse, Joshua
Purves, Randy W.
Verrall, Ronald E.
Badea, Ildiko
Zhang, Haixia
Mulligan, Christopher C.
Peru, Kerry M.
Bailey, Jonathan
Headley, John V.
El-Aneed, Anas
description The safe use of lipid‐based drug delivery agents requires fast and sensitive qualitative and quantitative assessment of their cellular interactions. Many mass spectrometry (MS) based analytical platforms can achieve such task with varying capabilities. Therefore, four novel high‐throughput MS‐based quantitative methods were evaluated for the analysis of a small organic gene delivery agent: N,N‐bis(dimethylhexadecyl)‐1,3‐propane‐diammonium dibromide (G16‐3). Analysis utilized MS instruments that detect analytes using low‐resolution tandem MS (MS/MS) analysis (i.e. QTRAP or linear ion trap in this work) or high‐resolution MS analysis (i.e. time of flight (ToF) or Orbitrap). Our results indicate that the validated fast chromatography (FC)‐QTRAP‐MS/MS, FC‐ LTQ‐Orbitrap‐MS, desorption electrospray ionization‐collision‐induced dissociation (CID)‐MS/MS and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization‐ToF/ToF‐MS MS methods were superior in the area of method development and sample analysis time to a previously developed liquid chromatography (LC)‐CID‐MS/MS. To our knowledge, this is the first evaluation of the abilities of five MS‐based quantitative methods that target a single pharmaceutical analyte. Our findings indicate that, in comparison to conventional LC‐CID‐MS/MS, the new MS‐based methods resulted in a (1) substantial reduction in the analysis time, (2) reduction in the time required for method development and (3) production of either superior or comparable quantitative data. The four new high‐throughput MS methods, therefore, were faster, more efficient and less expensive than a conventional LC‐CID‐MS/MS for the quantification of the G16‐3 analyte within tissue culture. When applied to cellular lysate, no significant change in the concentration of G16‐3 gemini surfactant within PAM212 cells was observed between 5 and 53 h, suggesting the absence of any metabolism/excretion from PAM212 cells. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jms.3444
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709170742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3494383611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-93fc4e10730e9957c119d69500d09818ce01e4667bd21f9513977891e1c5cafe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhSMEoj8g8QTIEhs2KXZsx_YSVaWASpFKEewsX2dy40sSp7ZTmsfhTXFoKRIbWFgz1nw6M6M5RfGM4COCcfVqN8Qjyhh7UOwTrOpSSSkfrrmoS04E2ysOYtxhjJVi9eNir-JUcULpfvHjsgPUwDX0fhpgTMiMDTIxQoy_vr5Fndt2ZeqCn7fdNCc05DKKE9gU_AApLOXGRGhQzjvfRNT6gFJWvZrNmFzrrEnOj6uSQaMZ_WRCcrbPbcO8zb17dw1hQWa79nMjstD3c28C6pdoEjwpHrWmj_D0Lh4Wn9-cXB6_Lc8-nr47fn1WWsYFKxVtLYO8McWgFBeWENXUimPcYCWJtIAJsLoWm6Yi7bq9EkIqAsRya1qgh8XLW90p-KsZYtKDi-ssZgQ_R00EVvkJVv0brVlVCVlX8j_QfAtGM5_RF3-hOz-HMe-8UkySWmKSqed31LwZoNFTcIMJi_590gyUt8B318NyXydYr1bR2Sp6tYp-_-HTGv_wLia4uedN-KZrQQXXX85PNf16Li-44vqC_gTtT8Cb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1624816801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The development and assessment of high-throughput mass spectrometry-based methods for the quantification of a nanoparticle drug delivery agent in cellular lysate</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Buse, Joshua ; Purves, Randy W. ; Verrall, Ronald E. ; Badea, Ildiko ; Zhang, Haixia ; Mulligan, Christopher C. ; Peru, Kerry M. ; Bailey, Jonathan ; Headley, John V. ; El-Aneed, Anas</creator><creatorcontrib>Buse, Joshua ; Purves, Randy W. ; Verrall, Ronald E. ; Badea, Ildiko ; Zhang, Haixia ; Mulligan, Christopher C. ; Peru, Kerry M. ; Bailey, Jonathan ; Headley, John V. ; El-Aneed, Anas</creatorcontrib><description>The safe use of lipid‐based drug delivery agents requires fast and sensitive qualitative and quantitative assessment of their cellular interactions. Many mass spectrometry (MS) based analytical platforms can achieve such task with varying capabilities. Therefore, four novel high‐throughput MS‐based quantitative methods were evaluated for the analysis of a small organic gene delivery agent: N,N‐bis(dimethylhexadecyl)‐1,3‐propane‐diammonium dibromide (G16‐3). Analysis utilized MS instruments that detect analytes using low‐resolution tandem MS (MS/MS) analysis (i.e. QTRAP or linear ion trap in this work) or high‐resolution MS analysis (i.e. time of flight (ToF) or Orbitrap). Our results indicate that the validated fast chromatography (FC)‐QTRAP‐MS/MS, FC‐ LTQ‐Orbitrap‐MS, desorption electrospray ionization‐collision‐induced dissociation (CID)‐MS/MS and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization‐ToF/ToF‐MS MS methods were superior in the area of method development and sample analysis time to a previously developed liquid chromatography (LC)‐CID‐MS/MS. To our knowledge, this is the first evaluation of the abilities of five MS‐based quantitative methods that target a single pharmaceutical analyte. Our findings indicate that, in comparison to conventional LC‐CID‐MS/MS, the new MS‐based methods resulted in a (1) substantial reduction in the analysis time, (2) reduction in the time required for method development and (3) production of either superior or comparable quantitative data. The four new high‐throughput MS methods, therefore, were faster, more efficient and less expensive than a conventional LC‐CID‐MS/MS for the quantification of the G16‐3 analyte within tissue culture. When applied to cellular lysate, no significant change in the concentration of G16‐3 gemini surfactant within PAM212 cells was observed between 5 and 53 h, suggesting the absence of any metabolism/excretion from PAM212 cells. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-5174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jms.3444</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25395133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Animals ; Assessments ; Cell Extracts - chemistry ; Cell Line ; Cellular ; Chromatography, Liquid - methods ; Desorption ; desorption electrospray ionization ; drug delivery ; Drug delivery systems ; Drug Delivery Systems - methods ; fast chromatography ; gemini surfactants ; High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods ; Linear Models ; liquid chromatography ; Mass spectrometry ; matrix assisted laser desorption ionization ; Mice ; Nanoparticles - analysis ; Nanoparticles - chemistry ; Nanoparticles - metabolism ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism ; Production methods ; quantification ; Reduction ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Transfection</subject><ispartof>Journal of mass spectrometry., 2014-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1171-1180</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-93fc4e10730e9957c119d69500d09818ce01e4667bd21f9513977891e1c5cafe3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25395133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buse, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purves, Randy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verrall, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badea, Ildiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Haixia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Christopher C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peru, Kerry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Headley, John V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Aneed, Anas</creatorcontrib><title>The development and assessment of high-throughput mass spectrometry-based methods for the quantification of a nanoparticle drug delivery agent in cellular lysate</title><title>Journal of mass spectrometry.</title><addtitle>J. Mass Spectrom</addtitle><description>The safe use of lipid‐based drug delivery agents requires fast and sensitive qualitative and quantitative assessment of their cellular interactions. Many mass spectrometry (MS) based analytical platforms can achieve such task with varying capabilities. Therefore, four novel high‐throughput MS‐based quantitative methods were evaluated for the analysis of a small organic gene delivery agent: N,N‐bis(dimethylhexadecyl)‐1,3‐propane‐diammonium dibromide (G16‐3). Analysis utilized MS instruments that detect analytes using low‐resolution tandem MS (MS/MS) analysis (i.e. QTRAP or linear ion trap in this work) or high‐resolution MS analysis (i.e. time of flight (ToF) or Orbitrap). Our results indicate that the validated fast chromatography (FC)‐QTRAP‐MS/MS, FC‐ LTQ‐Orbitrap‐MS, desorption electrospray ionization‐collision‐induced dissociation (CID)‐MS/MS and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization‐ToF/ToF‐MS MS methods were superior in the area of method development and sample analysis time to a previously developed liquid chromatography (LC)‐CID‐MS/MS. To our knowledge, this is the first evaluation of the abilities of five MS‐based quantitative methods that target a single pharmaceutical analyte. Our findings indicate that, in comparison to conventional LC‐CID‐MS/MS, the new MS‐based methods resulted in a (1) substantial reduction in the analysis time, (2) reduction in the time required for method development and (3) production of either superior or comparable quantitative data. The four new high‐throughput MS methods, therefore, were faster, more efficient and less expensive than a conventional LC‐CID‐MS/MS for the quantification of the G16‐3 analyte within tissue culture. When applied to cellular lysate, no significant change in the concentration of G16‐3 gemini surfactant within PAM212 cells was observed between 5 and 53 h, suggesting the absence of any metabolism/excretion from PAM212 cells. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Cell Extracts - chemistry</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cellular</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Desorption</subject><subject>desorption electrospray ionization</subject><subject>drug delivery</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems - methods</subject><subject>fast chromatography</subject><subject>gemini surfactants</subject><subject>High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>matrix assisted laser desorption ionization</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - analysis</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - chemistry</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - metabolism</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>quantification</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Transfection</subject><issn>1076-5174</issn><issn>1096-9888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhSMEoj8g8QTIEhs2KXZsx_YSVaWASpFKEewsX2dy40sSp7ZTmsfhTXFoKRIbWFgz1nw6M6M5RfGM4COCcfVqN8Qjyhh7UOwTrOpSSSkfrrmoS04E2ysOYtxhjJVi9eNir-JUcULpfvHjsgPUwDX0fhpgTMiMDTIxQoy_vr5Fndt2ZeqCn7fdNCc05DKKE9gU_AApLOXGRGhQzjvfRNT6gFJWvZrNmFzrrEnOj6uSQaMZ_WRCcrbPbcO8zb17dw1hQWa79nMjstD3c28C6pdoEjwpHrWmj_D0Lh4Wn9-cXB6_Lc8-nr47fn1WWsYFKxVtLYO8McWgFBeWENXUimPcYCWJtIAJsLoWm6Yi7bq9EkIqAsRya1qgh8XLW90p-KsZYtKDi-ssZgQ_R00EVvkJVv0brVlVCVlX8j_QfAtGM5_RF3-hOz-HMe-8UkySWmKSqed31LwZoNFTcIMJi_590gyUt8B318NyXydYr1bR2Sp6tYp-_-HTGv_wLia4uedN-KZrQQXXX85PNf16Li-44vqC_gTtT8Cb</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>Buse, Joshua</creator><creator>Purves, Randy W.</creator><creator>Verrall, Ronald E.</creator><creator>Badea, Ildiko</creator><creator>Zhang, Haixia</creator><creator>Mulligan, Christopher C.</creator><creator>Peru, Kerry M.</creator><creator>Bailey, Jonathan</creator><creator>Headley, John V.</creator><creator>El-Aneed, Anas</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>The development and assessment of high-throughput mass spectrometry-based methods for the quantification of a nanoparticle drug delivery agent in cellular lysate</title><author>Buse, Joshua ; Purves, Randy W. ; Verrall, Ronald E. ; Badea, Ildiko ; Zhang, Haixia ; Mulligan, Christopher C. ; Peru, Kerry M. ; Bailey, Jonathan ; Headley, John V. ; El-Aneed, Anas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-93fc4e10730e9957c119d69500d09818ce01e4667bd21f9513977891e1c5cafe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Cell Extracts - chemistry</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cellular</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Desorption</topic><topic>desorption electrospray ionization</topic><topic>drug delivery</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems - methods</topic><topic>fast chromatography</topic><topic>gemini surfactants</topic><topic>High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>matrix assisted laser desorption ionization</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - analysis</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - chemistry</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - metabolism</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>quantification</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Transfection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buse, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purves, Randy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verrall, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badea, Ildiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Haixia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Christopher C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peru, Kerry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Headley, John V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Aneed, Anas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of mass spectrometry.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buse, Joshua</au><au>Purves, Randy W.</au><au>Verrall, Ronald E.</au><au>Badea, Ildiko</au><au>Zhang, Haixia</au><au>Mulligan, Christopher C.</au><au>Peru, Kerry M.</au><au>Bailey, Jonathan</au><au>Headley, John V.</au><au>El-Aneed, Anas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The development and assessment of high-throughput mass spectrometry-based methods for the quantification of a nanoparticle drug delivery agent in cellular lysate</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mass spectrometry.</jtitle><addtitle>J. Mass Spectrom</addtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1171</spage><epage>1180</epage><pages>1171-1180</pages><issn>1076-5174</issn><eissn>1096-9888</eissn><abstract>The safe use of lipid‐based drug delivery agents requires fast and sensitive qualitative and quantitative assessment of their cellular interactions. Many mass spectrometry (MS) based analytical platforms can achieve such task with varying capabilities. Therefore, four novel high‐throughput MS‐based quantitative methods were evaluated for the analysis of a small organic gene delivery agent: N,N‐bis(dimethylhexadecyl)‐1,3‐propane‐diammonium dibromide (G16‐3). Analysis utilized MS instruments that detect analytes using low‐resolution tandem MS (MS/MS) analysis (i.e. QTRAP or linear ion trap in this work) or high‐resolution MS analysis (i.e. time of flight (ToF) or Orbitrap). Our results indicate that the validated fast chromatography (FC)‐QTRAP‐MS/MS, FC‐ LTQ‐Orbitrap‐MS, desorption electrospray ionization‐collision‐induced dissociation (CID)‐MS/MS and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization‐ToF/ToF‐MS MS methods were superior in the area of method development and sample analysis time to a previously developed liquid chromatography (LC)‐CID‐MS/MS. To our knowledge, this is the first evaluation of the abilities of five MS‐based quantitative methods that target a single pharmaceutical analyte. Our findings indicate that, in comparison to conventional LC‐CID‐MS/MS, the new MS‐based methods resulted in a (1) substantial reduction in the analysis time, (2) reduction in the time required for method development and (3) production of either superior or comparable quantitative data. The four new high‐throughput MS methods, therefore, were faster, more efficient and less expensive than a conventional LC‐CID‐MS/MS for the quantification of the G16‐3 analyte within tissue culture. When applied to cellular lysate, no significant change in the concentration of G16‐3 gemini surfactant within PAM212 cells was observed between 5 and 53 h, suggesting the absence of any metabolism/excretion from PAM212 cells. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25395133</pmid><doi>10.1002/jms.3444</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-5174
ispartof Journal of mass spectrometry., 2014-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1171-1180
issn 1076-5174
1096-9888
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709170742
source Wiley
subjects Analytical chemistry
Animals
Assessments
Cell Extracts - chemistry
Cell Line
Cellular
Chromatography, Liquid - methods
Desorption
desorption electrospray ionization
drug delivery
Drug delivery systems
Drug Delivery Systems - methods
fast chromatography
gemini surfactants
High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods
Linear Models
liquid chromatography
Mass spectrometry
matrix assisted laser desorption ionization
Mice
Nanoparticles - analysis
Nanoparticles - chemistry
Nanoparticles - metabolism
Pharmaceutical Preparations - analysis
Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry
Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism
Production methods
quantification
Reduction
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods
Transfection
title The development and assessment of high-throughput mass spectrometry-based methods for the quantification of a nanoparticle drug delivery agent in cellular lysate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A15%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20development%20and%20assessment%20of%20high-throughput%20mass%20spectrometry-based%20methods%20for%20the%20quantification%20of%20a%20nanoparticle%20drug%20delivery%20agent%20in%20cellular%20lysate&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mass%20spectrometry.&rft.au=Buse,%20Joshua&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1171&rft.epage=1180&rft.pages=1171-1180&rft.issn=1076-5174&rft.eissn=1096-9888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jms.3444&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3494383611%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-93fc4e10730e9957c119d69500d09818ce01e4667bd21f9513977891e1c5cafe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1624816801&rft_id=info:pmid/25395133&rfr_iscdi=true