Loading…

The value of rapid on-site evaluation during EBUS-TBNA

AbstractBackgroundRapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has the potential to increase endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) accuracy in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions and lung cancer staging. However, studies have reported controversial results.The purpose of o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista portuguesa de pneumologia (English ed.) 2015-09, Vol.21 (5), p.253-258
Main Authors: Cardoso, A.V, Neves, I, Magalhães, A, Sucena, M, Barroca, H, Fernandes, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:AbstractBackgroundRapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has the potential to increase endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) accuracy in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions and lung cancer staging. However, studies have reported controversial results.The purpose of our study was to evaluate the influence of ROSE on sample adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA.MethodsProspective observational study that enrolled 81 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for investigation of hilo-mediastinal lesions or lung cancer staging. The first 41 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA with ROSE (ROSE group) and the last 40 patients without ROSE (non-ROSE group). Sample adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in both groups were compared.ResultsAdequate samples were obtained in 93% of the patients in the ROSE group and 80% in non-ROSE group ( p= 0.10). The diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA was 91% in ROSE group and 83% in non-ROSE group ( p= 0.08). Analyzing the EBUS-TBNA purpose, in the subgroup of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for investigation of hilo-mediastinal lesions, these differences between ROSE and non-ROSE group were higher compared to lung cancer staging, 93% of patients with adequate samples in the ROSE group vs. 75% in the non-ROSE group ( p= 0.06) and 87% of diagnostic accuracy in ROSE group vs. 77% in non-ROSE group ( p= 0.10). ConclusionsDespite the lack of statistical significance, ROSE appears to be particularly useful in the diagnostic work-up of hilo-mediastinal lesions, increasing the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA.
ISSN:2173-5115
2173-5115
DOI:10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.02.003