Loading…

Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerala, India

In Kerala, based on management systems, sacred groves can be categorised into three groups namely those managed by individual families, by groups of families and by the statutory agencies for temple management (Devaswom Board). Ollur Kavu, S.N. Puram Kavu and Iringole Kavu which represent above ment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forest ecology and management 1998-12, Vol.112 (1), p.165-177
Main Authors: Chandrashekara, U.M., Sankar, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-a1ecf25a58cbdd9da54252e7368a6e9bda28e6bc274d7c1fb365acd6dd643c6f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-a1ecf25a58cbdd9da54252e7368a6e9bda28e6bc274d7c1fb365acd6dd643c6f3
container_end_page 177
container_issue 1
container_start_page 165
container_title Forest ecology and management
container_volume 112
creator Chandrashekara, U.M.
Sankar, S.
description In Kerala, based on management systems, sacred groves can be categorised into three groups namely those managed by individual families, by groups of families and by the statutory agencies for temple management (Devaswom Board). Ollur Kavu, S.N. Puram Kavu and Iringole Kavu which represent above mentioned management systems, respectively, were studied for their tree species composition and vegetation structure. The study was also designed to assess the strengths and weaknesses of present management systems and role of different stakeholder groups in conserving the sacred groves. Of the three sacred groves, the one managed by individual family (Ollur Kavu) is highly disturbed as indicated by low stem density of mature trees (367 ha −1) and poor regeneration potential with the ratio between mature trees and saplings is 1:0.4. In order to quantify the level of disturbance in these sacred groves, Ramakrishnan index of stand quality (RISQ) was calculated. The values obtained for all the three tree layers (i.e., mature trees, saplings and seedlings) in single family managed sacred grove (Ollur Kavu) was between 2.265 and 2.731, an indicator of the dominance of light demanding species in the population, suggested that the grove is highly disturbed one. Whereas, other two sacred groves are less disturbed as indicated by lower `RISQ' values (between 1.319 and 1.648). Iringole Kavu and S.N. Puram Kavu were compared with some other evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India for the parameters like stem density, basal area and species diversity of trees (gbh≥10.1 cm). Values obtained for these parameters in the two sacred groves are within the range obtained for other forests. Stakeholder importance value index (SIVI) was calculated based on the attributes like the proximity of the stakeholder to the sacred grove, contribution of stakeholders in managing the sacred grove, benefits being enjoyed by the stakeholder due to involvement with sacred grove and attitude of the stakeholder group towards the conservation and management of sacred grove. This indicated that local people, temple trust and/ or sacred grove owners are the major stakeholders, while in general some other stakeholder groups such as youth clubs, schools, forest department, municipality and local Panchayat with lower SIVI are comparatively neutral in conserving and managing the groves. Some of the major strategies to be adopted are self-imposed complete ban on the removal of biomass for the revitalis
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00326-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17101152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112798003260</els_id><sourcerecordid>17101152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-a1ecf25a58cbdd9da54252e7368a6e9bda28e6bc274d7c1fb365acd6dd643c6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQgOEgCtaPnyDuQUTB1UmyyWZPIlI_sOBBPYdpMlsi240mVei_d2tFj55yeWYyvIwdcDjnwPXFE8jalJyL-qQxpwBS6BI22IibWpQ1VGKTjX7JNtvJ-RUAlKrMiJmxi12cLQvsfTHHHmc0p35RxLbI6BL5YpbiJ-Ui9MUDJezwrLjvfcA9ttVil2n_591lLzfj5-u7cvJ4e399NSldZcyiRE6uFQqVcVPvG4-qEkpQLbVBTc3UozCkp07Ula8db6dSK3Ree68r6XQrd9nxeu9biu8flBd2HrKjrsOe4ke2vB4acCX-h5UCqbQcoFpDl2LOiVr7lsIc09JysKug9juoXdWyjbHfQS0Mc0c_H2B22LUJexfy3_BwsAE1sMM1azFanKWBvDwJ4BJEAyB4NYjLtaCh22egZLML1DvyIZFbWB_DP6d8AZFrkhI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14503563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerala, India</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Chandrashekara, U.M. ; Sankar, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chandrashekara, U.M. ; Sankar, S.</creatorcontrib><description>In Kerala, based on management systems, sacred groves can be categorised into three groups namely those managed by individual families, by groups of families and by the statutory agencies for temple management (Devaswom Board). Ollur Kavu, S.N. Puram Kavu and Iringole Kavu which represent above mentioned management systems, respectively, were studied for their tree species composition and vegetation structure. The study was also designed to assess the strengths and weaknesses of present management systems and role of different stakeholder groups in conserving the sacred groves. Of the three sacred groves, the one managed by individual family (Ollur Kavu) is highly disturbed as indicated by low stem density of mature trees (367 ha −1) and poor regeneration potential with the ratio between mature trees and saplings is 1:0.4. In order to quantify the level of disturbance in these sacred groves, Ramakrishnan index of stand quality (RISQ) was calculated. The values obtained for all the three tree layers (i.e., mature trees, saplings and seedlings) in single family managed sacred grove (Ollur Kavu) was between 2.265 and 2.731, an indicator of the dominance of light demanding species in the population, suggested that the grove is highly disturbed one. Whereas, other two sacred groves are less disturbed as indicated by lower `RISQ' values (between 1.319 and 1.648). Iringole Kavu and S.N. Puram Kavu were compared with some other evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India for the parameters like stem density, basal area and species diversity of trees (gbh≥10.1 cm). Values obtained for these parameters in the two sacred groves are within the range obtained for other forests. Stakeholder importance value index (SIVI) was calculated based on the attributes like the proximity of the stakeholder to the sacred grove, contribution of stakeholders in managing the sacred grove, benefits being enjoyed by the stakeholder due to involvement with sacred grove and attitude of the stakeholder group towards the conservation and management of sacred grove. This indicated that local people, temple trust and/ or sacred grove owners are the major stakeholders, while in general some other stakeholder groups such as youth clubs, schools, forest department, municipality and local Panchayat with lower SIVI are comparatively neutral in conserving and managing the groves. Some of the major strategies to be adopted are self-imposed complete ban on the removal of biomass for the revitalisation of ecosystem, creation of awareness among local people and all stakeholder groups, identification of the type of contribution a stakeholder group can offer in managing the sacred grove and encouragement of all stakeholders to participate without either directly or indirectly adversely affecting the ecosystem as well as the wisdom and interest of the major stakeholder groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00326-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECMDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>basal area ; Biological and medical sciences ; biomass ; botanical composition ; ecosystems ; forest ecology ; Forest management ; Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration ; Forestry ; forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; natural regeneration ; Ramakrishnan index of stand quality (RISQ) ; Sacred groves ; shade ; species diversity ; Stakeholder importance value index (SIVI) ; Stakeholder role index value (SRIV) ; stand characteristics ; stand density ; stems ; tolerance ; tree age ; vegetation ; Vegetation structure</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 1998-12, Vol.112 (1), p.165-177</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-a1ecf25a58cbdd9da54252e7368a6e9bda28e6bc274d7c1fb365acd6dd643c6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-a1ecf25a58cbdd9da54252e7368a6e9bda28e6bc274d7c1fb365acd6dd643c6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1643805$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chandrashekara, U.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankar, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerala, India</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>In Kerala, based on management systems, sacred groves can be categorised into three groups namely those managed by individual families, by groups of families and by the statutory agencies for temple management (Devaswom Board). Ollur Kavu, S.N. Puram Kavu and Iringole Kavu which represent above mentioned management systems, respectively, were studied for their tree species composition and vegetation structure. The study was also designed to assess the strengths and weaknesses of present management systems and role of different stakeholder groups in conserving the sacred groves. Of the three sacred groves, the one managed by individual family (Ollur Kavu) is highly disturbed as indicated by low stem density of mature trees (367 ha −1) and poor regeneration potential with the ratio between mature trees and saplings is 1:0.4. In order to quantify the level of disturbance in these sacred groves, Ramakrishnan index of stand quality (RISQ) was calculated. The values obtained for all the three tree layers (i.e., mature trees, saplings and seedlings) in single family managed sacred grove (Ollur Kavu) was between 2.265 and 2.731, an indicator of the dominance of light demanding species in the population, suggested that the grove is highly disturbed one. Whereas, other two sacred groves are less disturbed as indicated by lower `RISQ' values (between 1.319 and 1.648). Iringole Kavu and S.N. Puram Kavu were compared with some other evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India for the parameters like stem density, basal area and species diversity of trees (gbh≥10.1 cm). Values obtained for these parameters in the two sacred groves are within the range obtained for other forests. Stakeholder importance value index (SIVI) was calculated based on the attributes like the proximity of the stakeholder to the sacred grove, contribution of stakeholders in managing the sacred grove, benefits being enjoyed by the stakeholder due to involvement with sacred grove and attitude of the stakeholder group towards the conservation and management of sacred grove. This indicated that local people, temple trust and/ or sacred grove owners are the major stakeholders, while in general some other stakeholder groups such as youth clubs, schools, forest department, municipality and local Panchayat with lower SIVI are comparatively neutral in conserving and managing the groves. Some of the major strategies to be adopted are self-imposed complete ban on the removal of biomass for the revitalisation of ecosystem, creation of awareness among local people and all stakeholder groups, identification of the type of contribution a stakeholder group can offer in managing the sacred grove and encouragement of all stakeholders to participate without either directly or indirectly adversely affecting the ecosystem as well as the wisdom and interest of the major stakeholder groups.</description><subject>basal area</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>botanical composition</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>natural regeneration</subject><subject>Ramakrishnan index of stand quality (RISQ)</subject><subject>Sacred groves</subject><subject>shade</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Stakeholder importance value index (SIVI)</subject><subject>Stakeholder role index value (SRIV)</subject><subject>stand characteristics</subject><subject>stand density</subject><subject>stems</subject><subject>tolerance</subject><subject>tree age</subject><subject>vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation structure</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQgOEgCtaPnyDuQUTB1UmyyWZPIlI_sOBBPYdpMlsi240mVei_d2tFj55yeWYyvIwdcDjnwPXFE8jalJyL-qQxpwBS6BI22IibWpQ1VGKTjX7JNtvJ-RUAlKrMiJmxi12cLQvsfTHHHmc0p35RxLbI6BL5YpbiJ-Ui9MUDJezwrLjvfcA9ttVil2n_591lLzfj5-u7cvJ4e399NSldZcyiRE6uFQqVcVPvG4-qEkpQLbVBTc3UozCkp07Ula8db6dSK3Ree68r6XQrd9nxeu9biu8flBd2HrKjrsOe4ke2vB4acCX-h5UCqbQcoFpDl2LOiVr7lsIc09JysKug9juoXdWyjbHfQS0Mc0c_H2B22LUJexfy3_BwsAE1sMM1azFanKWBvDwJ4BJEAyB4NYjLtaCh22egZLML1DvyIZFbWB_DP6d8AZFrkhI</recordid><startdate>19981214</startdate><enddate>19981214</enddate><creator>Chandrashekara, U.M.</creator><creator>Sankar, S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981214</creationdate><title>Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerala, India</title><author>Chandrashekara, U.M. ; Sankar, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-a1ecf25a58cbdd9da54252e7368a6e9bda28e6bc274d7c1fb365acd6dd643c6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>basal area</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>botanical composition</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>natural regeneration</topic><topic>Ramakrishnan index of stand quality (RISQ)</topic><topic>Sacred groves</topic><topic>shade</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Stakeholder importance value index (SIVI)</topic><topic>Stakeholder role index value (SRIV)</topic><topic>stand characteristics</topic><topic>stand density</topic><topic>stems</topic><topic>tolerance</topic><topic>tree age</topic><topic>vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation structure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chandrashekara, U.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankar, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chandrashekara, U.M.</au><au>Sankar, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerala, India</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>1998-12-14</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>165-177</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><coden>FECMDW</coden><abstract>In Kerala, based on management systems, sacred groves can be categorised into three groups namely those managed by individual families, by groups of families and by the statutory agencies for temple management (Devaswom Board). Ollur Kavu, S.N. Puram Kavu and Iringole Kavu which represent above mentioned management systems, respectively, were studied for their tree species composition and vegetation structure. The study was also designed to assess the strengths and weaknesses of present management systems and role of different stakeholder groups in conserving the sacred groves. Of the three sacred groves, the one managed by individual family (Ollur Kavu) is highly disturbed as indicated by low stem density of mature trees (367 ha −1) and poor regeneration potential with the ratio between mature trees and saplings is 1:0.4. In order to quantify the level of disturbance in these sacred groves, Ramakrishnan index of stand quality (RISQ) was calculated. The values obtained for all the three tree layers (i.e., mature trees, saplings and seedlings) in single family managed sacred grove (Ollur Kavu) was between 2.265 and 2.731, an indicator of the dominance of light demanding species in the population, suggested that the grove is highly disturbed one. Whereas, other two sacred groves are less disturbed as indicated by lower `RISQ' values (between 1.319 and 1.648). Iringole Kavu and S.N. Puram Kavu were compared with some other evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India for the parameters like stem density, basal area and species diversity of trees (gbh≥10.1 cm). Values obtained for these parameters in the two sacred groves are within the range obtained for other forests. Stakeholder importance value index (SIVI) was calculated based on the attributes like the proximity of the stakeholder to the sacred grove, contribution of stakeholders in managing the sacred grove, benefits being enjoyed by the stakeholder due to involvement with sacred grove and attitude of the stakeholder group towards the conservation and management of sacred grove. This indicated that local people, temple trust and/ or sacred grove owners are the major stakeholders, while in general some other stakeholder groups such as youth clubs, schools, forest department, municipality and local Panchayat with lower SIVI are comparatively neutral in conserving and managing the groves. Some of the major strategies to be adopted are self-imposed complete ban on the removal of biomass for the revitalisation of ecosystem, creation of awareness among local people and all stakeholder groups, identification of the type of contribution a stakeholder group can offer in managing the sacred grove and encouragement of all stakeholders to participate without either directly or indirectly adversely affecting the ecosystem as well as the wisdom and interest of the major stakeholder groups.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00326-0</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-1127
ispartof Forest ecology and management, 1998-12, Vol.112 (1), p.165-177
issn 0378-1127
1872-7042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17101152
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects basal area
Biological and medical sciences
biomass
botanical composition
ecosystems
forest ecology
Forest management
Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration
Forestry
forests
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
natural regeneration
Ramakrishnan index of stand quality (RISQ)
Sacred groves
shade
species diversity
Stakeholder importance value index (SIVI)
Stakeholder role index value (SRIV)
stand characteristics
stand density
stems
tolerance
tree age
vegetation
Vegetation structure
title Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerala, India
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A10%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecology%20and%20management%20of%20sacred%20groves%20in%20Kerala,%20India&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Chandrashekara,%20U.M.&rft.date=1998-12-14&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=165-177&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft.coden=FECMDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00326-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17101152%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-a1ecf25a58cbdd9da54252e7368a6e9bda28e6bc274d7c1fb365acd6dd643c6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14503563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true