Loading…

Turning Inward or Focusing Out? Navigating Theories of Interpersonal and Ethical Cognitions to Understand Ethical Decision-Making

The literature on ethical decision-making is rooted in a cognitive perspective that emphasizes the role of moral judgment. Recent research in interpersonal dynamics, however, has suggested that ethics revolves around an individual's perceptions and views of others. We draw from both literatures...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of business ethics 2015-08, Vol.130 (2), p.467-484
Main Authors: Albert, Lumina S., Reynolds, Scott J., Turan, Bulent
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The literature on ethical decision-making is rooted in a cognitive perspective that emphasizes the role of moral judgment. Recent research in interpersonal dynamics, however, has suggested that ethics revolves around an individual's perceptions and views of others. We draw from both literatures to propose and empirically examine a contingent model. We theorize that whether the individual relies on cognitions about the ethical issue or perceptions of others depends on the level of social consensus surrounding the issue. We test our hypotheses in three studies. Results suggest that not only does social consensus determine whether an individual relies on ethical cognitions about the issue or perceptions of others, but also that an individual's view of self is an important moderator in these relationships. We conclude by considering implications of this research for theory and practice.
ISSN:0167-4544
1573-0697
DOI:10.1007/s10551-014-2236-2