Loading…
The research-teaching nexus among academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, Mainland China
For long, the research-teaching nexus has maintained the interest of the scholarly community. The present study introduced a process variable-teaching styles-into the investigation of the association between research and teaching. The study adopted a predominantly quantitative-driven, mixed research...
Saved in:
Published in: | Higher education 2015-09, Vol.70 (3), p.375-394 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b0687db7b5520321dd3f1405b9648c2bdd1f232964bed5a39c9bf9c499f044973 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b0687db7b5520321dd3f1405b9648c2bdd1f232964bed5a39c9bf9c499f044973 |
container_end_page | 394 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 375 |
container_title | Higher education |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Zhang, Li-Fang Shin, Jung Cheol |
description | For long, the research-teaching nexus has maintained the interest of the scholarly community. The present study introduced a process variable-teaching styles-into the investigation of the association between research and teaching. The study adopted a predominantly quantitative-driven, mixed research method design, with a questionnaire survey supplemented by insiders' views. Three hundred and fifty-four academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, P. R. China, responded to the Thinking Styles in Teaching Inventory and reported their research publications for 3 years. The quantitative findings suggested that after key demographics and contextual factors were controlled for, teaching styles were related to research productivity largely in the anticipated directions. Subsequently, four additional academics who met the criteria of possessing expertise in teaching styles and of having experiences as academics in China were invited to explain the quantitative findings concerning the relationships between specific teaching styles and particular types of publications. It was concluded that although the magnitude of the relationship between teaching and research is rather small, the research-teaching nexus does exist. Theoretical significance is discussed and practical implications of the findings are proposed for academics and for university senior managers.(HRK / Abstract übernommen). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10734-014-9836-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1710254203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1072168</ericid><jstor_id>43648876</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43648876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b0687db7b5520321dd3f1405b9648c2bdd1f232964bed5a39c9bf9c499f044973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEuLFDEUhYM4YDv6A0SEgBsXZrw3j0plqc34GGZwM4LgIqSS1HSarqo2qQL996YpGQY3rpLL-e65h0PIC4QLBNDvCoIWkgFKZlrRsPYR2aDSgqGW3x-TDQC2DFUDT8jTUvYAwFGJDflxu4s0xxJd9js2R-d3abyjY_y1FOqGqf6ddyEOyRfa52mgqGgay5zmZU7TWOpAP8S0r1tv6Y1L48GNgW6ri3tGznp3KPH53_ecfPt4ebv9zK6_fvqyfX_NvEQxsw6aVodOd0pxEBxDED1KUJ1pZOt5FwL2XPA6dTEoJ4w3XW-8NKYHKY0W5-TN6nvM088lltkOqfh4qEnitBSLGoErWc0r-vofdD8teazpKgXSCKVbqBSulM9TKTn29pjT4PJvi2BPddu1blvrtqe6bVt3Xq07MSd_z19eVZBjc9L5qpeqjXcxP7j8f9N9mad87ypFbabVTdVfrnpIx4chtYJa7R9RNJy4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1704935780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The research-teaching nexus among academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, Mainland China</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Li-Fang ; Shin, Jung Cheol</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li-Fang ; Shin, Jung Cheol</creatorcontrib><description>For long, the research-teaching nexus has maintained the interest of the scholarly community. The present study introduced a process variable-teaching styles-into the investigation of the association between research and teaching. The study adopted a predominantly quantitative-driven, mixed research method design, with a questionnaire survey supplemented by insiders' views. Three hundred and fifty-four academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, P. R. China, responded to the Thinking Styles in Teaching Inventory and reported their research publications for 3 years. The quantitative findings suggested that after key demographics and contextual factors were controlled for, teaching styles were related to research productivity largely in the anticipated directions. Subsequently, four additional academics who met the criteria of possessing expertise in teaching styles and of having experiences as academics in China were invited to explain the quantitative findings concerning the relationships between specific teaching styles and particular types of publications. It was concluded that although the magnitude of the relationship between teaching and research is rather small, the research-teaching nexus does exist. Theoretical significance is discussed and practical implications of the findings are proposed for academics and for university senior managers.(HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-1560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10734-014-9836-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HREDAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B. V</publisher><subject>Academic publications ; Attitude Measures ; Ausland ; Author productivity ; Careers ; China ; China (Beijing) ; Cognitive Style ; Collaboration ; College Faculty ; Colleges & universities ; Community ; Correlation ; Criteria ; Demography ; Education ; Educational research ; Expertise ; Foreign Countries ; Forschung ; Higher Education ; Hochschule ; Hochschullehrer ; Intellectual Disciplines ; Inventory ; Meta Analysis ; Mixed Methods Research ; Pedagogy ; Productivity ; Quantitative analysis ; Questionnaires ; Research design ; Research Methodology ; Surveys ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Teacher Researchers ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Teaching Styles ; Universities ; University research</subject><ispartof>Higher education, 2015-09, Vol.70 (3), p.375-394</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b0687db7b5520321dd3f1405b9648c2bdd1f232964bed5a39c9bf9c499f044973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b0687db7b5520321dd3f1405b9648c2bdd1f232964bed5a39c9bf9c499f044973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1704935780/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1704935780?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,21378,21387,21394,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224,33611,33612,33877,33878,33985,33986,36060,36061,43733,43880,43948,44363,58238,58471,62661,62662,62664,62677,74196,74221,74397,74468,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1075041$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1072168$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Jung Cheol</creatorcontrib><title>The research-teaching nexus among academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, Mainland China</title><title>Higher education</title><addtitle>High Educ</addtitle><description>For long, the research-teaching nexus has maintained the interest of the scholarly community. The present study introduced a process variable-teaching styles-into the investigation of the association between research and teaching. The study adopted a predominantly quantitative-driven, mixed research method design, with a questionnaire survey supplemented by insiders' views. Three hundred and fifty-four academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, P. R. China, responded to the Thinking Styles in Teaching Inventory and reported their research publications for 3 years. The quantitative findings suggested that after key demographics and contextual factors were controlled for, teaching styles were related to research productivity largely in the anticipated directions. Subsequently, four additional academics who met the criteria of possessing expertise in teaching styles and of having experiences as academics in China were invited to explain the quantitative findings concerning the relationships between specific teaching styles and particular types of publications. It was concluded that although the magnitude of the relationship between teaching and research is rather small, the research-teaching nexus does exist. Theoretical significance is discussed and practical implications of the findings are proposed for academics and for university senior managers.(HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><subject>Academic publications</subject><subject>Attitude Measures</subject><subject>Ausland</subject><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>China (Beijing)</subject><subject>Cognitive Style</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Forschung</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>Hochschullehrer</subject><subject>Intellectual Disciplines</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Teacher Researchers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Teaching Styles</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>University research</subject><issn>0018-1560</issn><issn>1573-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEuLFDEUhYM4YDv6A0SEgBsXZrw3j0plqc34GGZwM4LgIqSS1HSarqo2qQL996YpGQY3rpLL-e65h0PIC4QLBNDvCoIWkgFKZlrRsPYR2aDSgqGW3x-TDQC2DFUDT8jTUvYAwFGJDflxu4s0xxJd9js2R-d3abyjY_y1FOqGqf6ddyEOyRfa52mgqGgay5zmZU7TWOpAP8S0r1tv6Y1L48GNgW6ri3tGznp3KPH53_ecfPt4ebv9zK6_fvqyfX_NvEQxsw6aVodOd0pxEBxDED1KUJ1pZOt5FwL2XPA6dTEoJ4w3XW-8NKYHKY0W5-TN6nvM088lltkOqfh4qEnitBSLGoErWc0r-vofdD8teazpKgXSCKVbqBSulM9TKTn29pjT4PJvi2BPddu1blvrtqe6bVt3Xq07MSd_z19eVZBjc9L5qpeqjXcxP7j8f9N9mad87ypFbabVTdVfrnpIx4chtYJa7R9RNJy4</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Zhang, Li-Fang</creator><creator>Shin, Jung Cheol</creator><general>Springer Science+Business Media B. V</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>The research-teaching nexus among academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, Mainland China</title><author>Zhang, Li-Fang ; Shin, Jung Cheol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b0687db7b5520321dd3f1405b9648c2bdd1f232964bed5a39c9bf9c499f044973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Academic publications</topic><topic>Attitude Measures</topic><topic>Ausland</topic><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>China (Beijing)</topic><topic>Cognitive Style</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Forschung</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>Hochschullehrer</topic><topic>Intellectual Disciplines</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Teacher Researchers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Teaching Styles</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>University research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Jung Cheol</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Li-Fang</au><au>Shin, Jung Cheol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1072168</ericid><atitle>The research-teaching nexus among academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, Mainland China</atitle><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle><stitle>High Educ</stitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>375-394</pages><issn>0018-1560</issn><eissn>1573-174X</eissn><coden>HREDAN</coden><abstract>For long, the research-teaching nexus has maintained the interest of the scholarly community. The present study introduced a process variable-teaching styles-into the investigation of the association between research and teaching. The study adopted a predominantly quantitative-driven, mixed research method design, with a questionnaire survey supplemented by insiders' views. Three hundred and fifty-four academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, P. R. China, responded to the Thinking Styles in Teaching Inventory and reported their research publications for 3 years. The quantitative findings suggested that after key demographics and contextual factors were controlled for, teaching styles were related to research productivity largely in the anticipated directions. Subsequently, four additional academics who met the criteria of possessing expertise in teaching styles and of having experiences as academics in China were invited to explain the quantitative findings concerning the relationships between specific teaching styles and particular types of publications. It was concluded that although the magnitude of the relationship between teaching and research is rather small, the research-teaching nexus does exist. Theoretical significance is discussed and practical implications of the findings are proposed for academics and for university senior managers.(HRK / Abstract übernommen).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science+Business Media B. V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10734-014-9836-8</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-1560 |
ispartof | Higher education, 2015-09, Vol.70 (3), p.375-394 |
issn | 0018-1560 1573-174X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1710254203 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Springer Nature; PAIS Index; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Education Collection |
subjects | Academic publications Attitude Measures Ausland Author productivity Careers China China (Beijing) Cognitive Style Collaboration College Faculty Colleges & universities Community Correlation Criteria Demography Education Educational research Expertise Foreign Countries Forschung Higher Education Hochschule Hochschullehrer Intellectual Disciplines Inventory Meta Analysis Mixed Methods Research Pedagogy Productivity Quantitative analysis Questionnaires Research design Research Methodology Surveys Teacher Effectiveness Teacher Researchers Teaching Teaching methods Teaching Styles Universities University research |
title | The research-teaching nexus among academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, Mainland China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A04%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20research-teaching%20nexus%20among%20academics%20from%2015%20institutions%20in%20Beijing,%20Mainland%20China&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education&rft.au=Zhang,%20Li-Fang&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=375-394&rft.issn=0018-1560&rft.eissn=1573-174X&rft.coden=HREDAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10734-014-9836-8&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43648876%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b0687db7b5520321dd3f1405b9648c2bdd1f232964bed5a39c9bf9c499f044973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1704935780&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1072168&rft_jstor_id=43648876&rfr_iscdi=true |