Loading…
Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study
1. An experimental approach, manually pollinating all the flowers of individual plants, was used to measure the effect of pollen limitation on female fecundity of the hummingbird-pollinated perennial shrub Echeveria gibbiflora in the ecological preserve of Pedregal de San Angel around Mexico City, M...
Saved in:
Published in: | Functional ecology 1998-08, Vol.12 (4), p.591-595 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13 |
container_end_page | 595 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 591 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Parra-Tabla, V. Vargas, C. F. Eguiarte, L. E. |
description | 1. An experimental approach, manually pollinating all the flowers of individual plants, was used to measure the effect of pollen limitation on female fecundity of the hummingbird-pollinated perennial shrub Echeveria gibbiflora in the ecological preserve of Pedregal de San Angel around Mexico City, Mexico. Eleven randomly selected plants were manually over-pollinated in all their flowers and another 11 were left to be freely visited by natural pollinators. 2. Manually pollinated plants produced significantly more fruit and seeds than control plants (1.38 and 1.74 times, respectively). There was no change in average mass of fruits. 3. Considering individual fruit production per plant sampled three times in one season, decreases in fruit mass and average seeds per fruit were observed within the same reproductive season for both treatments. For the manually pollinated plants, from the start to the end of the reproductive season, seed set decreased 55.9%; while in control plants seed set decreased 33.4% in the same period. For both treatments, average fruit mass decreased 26%. 4. Vegetative growth was not significantly different between control and experimental plants but hand-pollinated plants showed a smaller reproduction probability for the following year. 5. It is concluded that female fecundity in E. gibbiflora is limited by pollen early in the reproductive season and by resources in the middle and the end of the season. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00229.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17102614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2390441</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2390441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF2L1DAUhoMoOK7-Ay9yIaIX7earaQKCDMOMLgzsgnod0vREM2TaMWnX6b-3dZb1dq8SOO_znsODEKakpETI60NJuawKJnhVUq1VSQhjujw_Q6vHwXO0IkzqQgnJX6JXOR8IIbpibIX8TcZb9wvuIQWLf4amCT72yeIPm2RzHqN1YOEj3oEbuzYME96HYxigxc2E7_oYocPrexuibUKcx5_xusPb82muO0I32Ii_DWM7vUYvvI0Z3jy8V-jHbvt987XY33652az3hROM6KJVAqqae127mte2Ac9AeMIUSFkJq7RTjZCKQ8PaWksnaltVzNat14rqlvIr9P7Se0r97xHyYI4hO4jRdtCP2dCaziaomIPqEnSpzzmBN6f5YpsmQ4lZxJqDWfyZxZ9ZxJp_Ys15Rt897LDZ2eiT7VzI_3lJuBTLhk-X2J8QYXpyvdltN_Nnxt9e8EMe-vSIM66JEJT_BZxPlN8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17102614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Parra-Tabla, V. ; Vargas, C. F. ; Eguiarte, L. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parra-Tabla, V. ; Vargas, C. F. ; Eguiarte, L. E.</creatorcontrib><description>1. An experimental approach, manually pollinating all the flowers of individual plants, was used to measure the effect of pollen limitation on female fecundity of the hummingbird-pollinated perennial shrub Echeveria gibbiflora in the ecological preserve of Pedregal de San Angel around Mexico City, Mexico. Eleven randomly selected plants were manually over-pollinated in all their flowers and another 11 were left to be freely visited by natural pollinators. 2. Manually pollinated plants produced significantly more fruit and seeds than control plants (1.38 and 1.74 times, respectively). There was no change in average mass of fruits. 3. Considering individual fruit production per plant sampled three times in one season, decreases in fruit mass and average seeds per fruit were observed within the same reproductive season for both treatments. For the manually pollinated plants, from the start to the end of the reproductive season, seed set decreased 55.9%; while in control plants seed set decreased 33.4% in the same period. For both treatments, average fruit mass decreased 26%. 4. Vegetative growth was not significantly different between control and experimental plants but hand-pollinated plants showed a smaller reproduction probability for the following year. 5. It is concluded that female fecundity in E. gibbiflora is limited by pollen early in the reproductive season and by resources in the middle and the end of the season.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00229.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: British Ecological Association</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Demecology ; Echeveria gibbiflora ; Ecological genetics ; Ecological history ; Fecundity ; Female fecundity ; Flowers ; Fruits ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ecology ; hummingbird pollination ; México ; Plants ; Plants and fungi ; Pollen ; pollen limitation ; Pollination ; resource limitation ; Seed set</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 1998-08, Vol.12 (4), p.591-595</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>1998 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2390441$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2390441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1603644$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parra-Tabla, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguiarte, L. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>1. An experimental approach, manually pollinating all the flowers of individual plants, was used to measure the effect of pollen limitation on female fecundity of the hummingbird-pollinated perennial shrub Echeveria gibbiflora in the ecological preserve of Pedregal de San Angel around Mexico City, Mexico. Eleven randomly selected plants were manually over-pollinated in all their flowers and another 11 were left to be freely visited by natural pollinators. 2. Manually pollinated plants produced significantly more fruit and seeds than control plants (1.38 and 1.74 times, respectively). There was no change in average mass of fruits. 3. Considering individual fruit production per plant sampled three times in one season, decreases in fruit mass and average seeds per fruit were observed within the same reproductive season for both treatments. For the manually pollinated plants, from the start to the end of the reproductive season, seed set decreased 55.9%; while in control plants seed set decreased 33.4% in the same period. For both treatments, average fruit mass decreased 26%. 4. Vegetative growth was not significantly different between control and experimental plants but hand-pollinated plants showed a smaller reproduction probability for the following year. 5. It is concluded that female fecundity in E. gibbiflora is limited by pollen early in the reproductive season and by resources in the middle and the end of the season.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Echeveria gibbiflora</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Ecological history</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Female fecundity</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>hummingbird pollination</subject><subject>México</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and fungi</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>pollen limitation</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>resource limitation</subject><subject>Seed set</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF2L1DAUhoMoOK7-Ay9yIaIX7earaQKCDMOMLgzsgnod0vREM2TaMWnX6b-3dZb1dq8SOO_znsODEKakpETI60NJuawKJnhVUq1VSQhjujw_Q6vHwXO0IkzqQgnJX6JXOR8IIbpibIX8TcZb9wvuIQWLf4amCT72yeIPm2RzHqN1YOEj3oEbuzYME96HYxigxc2E7_oYocPrexuibUKcx5_xusPb82muO0I32Ii_DWM7vUYvvI0Z3jy8V-jHbvt987XY33652az3hROM6KJVAqqae127mte2Ac9AeMIUSFkJq7RTjZCKQ8PaWksnaltVzNat14rqlvIr9P7Se0r97xHyYI4hO4jRdtCP2dCaziaomIPqEnSpzzmBN6f5YpsmQ4lZxJqDWfyZxZ9ZxJp_Ys15Rt897LDZ2eiT7VzI_3lJuBTLhk-X2J8QYXpyvdltN_Nnxt9e8EMe-vSIM66JEJT_BZxPlN8</recordid><startdate>199808</startdate><enddate>199808</enddate><creator>Parra-Tabla, V.</creator><creator>Vargas, C. F.</creator><creator>Eguiarte, L. E.</creator><general>British Ecological Association</general><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199808</creationdate><title>Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study</title><author>Parra-Tabla, V. ; Vargas, C. F. ; Eguiarte, L. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Echeveria gibbiflora</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Ecological history</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Female fecundity</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>hummingbird pollination</topic><topic>México</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and fungi</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>pollen limitation</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>resource limitation</topic><topic>Seed set</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parra-Tabla, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguiarte, L. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parra-Tabla, V.</au><au>Vargas, C. F.</au><au>Eguiarte, L. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>1998-08</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>595</epage><pages>591-595</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>1. An experimental approach, manually pollinating all the flowers of individual plants, was used to measure the effect of pollen limitation on female fecundity of the hummingbird-pollinated perennial shrub Echeveria gibbiflora in the ecological preserve of Pedregal de San Angel around Mexico City, Mexico. Eleven randomly selected plants were manually over-pollinated in all their flowers and another 11 were left to be freely visited by natural pollinators. 2. Manually pollinated plants produced significantly more fruit and seeds than control plants (1.38 and 1.74 times, respectively). There was no change in average mass of fruits. 3. Considering individual fruit production per plant sampled three times in one season, decreases in fruit mass and average seeds per fruit were observed within the same reproductive season for both treatments. For the manually pollinated plants, from the start to the end of the reproductive season, seed set decreased 55.9%; while in control plants seed set decreased 33.4% in the same period. For both treatments, average fruit mass decreased 26%. 4. Vegetative growth was not significantly different between control and experimental plants but hand-pollinated plants showed a smaller reproduction probability for the following year. 5. It is concluded that female fecundity in E. gibbiflora is limited by pollen early in the reproductive season and by resources in the middle and the end of the season.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>British Ecological Association</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00229.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 1998-08, Vol.12 (4), p.591-595 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17102614 |
source | Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Demecology Echeveria gibbiflora Ecological genetics Ecological history Fecundity Female fecundity Flowers Fruits Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human ecology hummingbird pollination México Plants Plants and fungi Pollen pollen limitation Pollination resource limitation Seed set |
title | Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Echeveria%20gibbiflora%20(Crassulaceae)%20Fecundity%20Limited%20by%20Pollen%20Availability?%20An%20Experimental%20Study&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Parra-Tabla,%20V.&rft.date=1998-08&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=595&rft.pages=591-595&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00229.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2390441%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17102614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2390441&rfr_iscdi=true |