Loading…

Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study

1. An experimental approach, manually pollinating all the flowers of individual plants, was used to measure the effect of pollen limitation on female fecundity of the hummingbird-pollinated perennial shrub Echeveria gibbiflora in the ecological preserve of Pedregal de San Angel around Mexico City, M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Functional ecology 1998-08, Vol.12 (4), p.591-595
Main Authors: Parra-Tabla, V., Vargas, C. F., Eguiarte, L. E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13
container_end_page 595
container_issue 4
container_start_page 591
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 12
creator Parra-Tabla, V.
Vargas, C. F.
Eguiarte, L. E.
description 1. An experimental approach, manually pollinating all the flowers of individual plants, was used to measure the effect of pollen limitation on female fecundity of the hummingbird-pollinated perennial shrub Echeveria gibbiflora in the ecological preserve of Pedregal de San Angel around Mexico City, Mexico. Eleven randomly selected plants were manually over-pollinated in all their flowers and another 11 were left to be freely visited by natural pollinators. 2. Manually pollinated plants produced significantly more fruit and seeds than control plants (1.38 and 1.74 times, respectively). There was no change in average mass of fruits. 3. Considering individual fruit production per plant sampled three times in one season, decreases in fruit mass and average seeds per fruit were observed within the same reproductive season for both treatments. For the manually pollinated plants, from the start to the end of the reproductive season, seed set decreased 55.9%; while in control plants seed set decreased 33.4% in the same period. For both treatments, average fruit mass decreased 26%. 4. Vegetative growth was not significantly different between control and experimental plants but hand-pollinated plants showed a smaller reproduction probability for the following year. 5. It is concluded that female fecundity in E. gibbiflora is limited by pollen early in the reproductive season and by resources in the middle and the end of the season.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00229.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17102614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2390441</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2390441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF2L1DAUhoMoOK7-Ay9yIaIX7earaQKCDMOMLgzsgnod0vREM2TaMWnX6b-3dZb1dq8SOO_znsODEKakpETI60NJuawKJnhVUq1VSQhjujw_Q6vHwXO0IkzqQgnJX6JXOR8IIbpibIX8TcZb9wvuIQWLf4amCT72yeIPm2RzHqN1YOEj3oEbuzYME96HYxigxc2E7_oYocPrexuibUKcx5_xusPb82muO0I32Ii_DWM7vUYvvI0Z3jy8V-jHbvt987XY33652az3hROM6KJVAqqae127mte2Ac9AeMIUSFkJq7RTjZCKQ8PaWksnaltVzNat14rqlvIr9P7Se0r97xHyYI4hO4jRdtCP2dCaziaomIPqEnSpzzmBN6f5YpsmQ4lZxJqDWfyZxZ9ZxJp_Ys15Rt897LDZ2eiT7VzI_3lJuBTLhk-X2J8QYXpyvdltN_Nnxt9e8EMe-vSIM66JEJT_BZxPlN8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17102614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Parra-Tabla, V. ; Vargas, C. F. ; Eguiarte, L. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parra-Tabla, V. ; Vargas, C. F. ; Eguiarte, L. E.</creatorcontrib><description>1. An experimental approach, manually pollinating all the flowers of individual plants, was used to measure the effect of pollen limitation on female fecundity of the hummingbird-pollinated perennial shrub Echeveria gibbiflora in the ecological preserve of Pedregal de San Angel around Mexico City, Mexico. Eleven randomly selected plants were manually over-pollinated in all their flowers and another 11 were left to be freely visited by natural pollinators. 2. Manually pollinated plants produced significantly more fruit and seeds than control plants (1.38 and 1.74 times, respectively). There was no change in average mass of fruits. 3. Considering individual fruit production per plant sampled three times in one season, decreases in fruit mass and average seeds per fruit were observed within the same reproductive season for both treatments. For the manually pollinated plants, from the start to the end of the reproductive season, seed set decreased 55.9%; while in control plants seed set decreased 33.4% in the same period. For both treatments, average fruit mass decreased 26%. 4. Vegetative growth was not significantly different between control and experimental plants but hand-pollinated plants showed a smaller reproduction probability for the following year. 5. It is concluded that female fecundity in E. gibbiflora is limited by pollen early in the reproductive season and by resources in the middle and the end of the season.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00229.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: British Ecological Association</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Demecology ; Echeveria gibbiflora ; Ecological genetics ; Ecological history ; Fecundity ; Female fecundity ; Flowers ; Fruits ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ecology ; hummingbird pollination ; México ; Plants ; Plants and fungi ; Pollen ; pollen limitation ; Pollination ; resource limitation ; Seed set</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 1998-08, Vol.12 (4), p.591-595</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>1998 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2390441$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2390441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1603644$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parra-Tabla, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguiarte, L. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>1. An experimental approach, manually pollinating all the flowers of individual plants, was used to measure the effect of pollen limitation on female fecundity of the hummingbird-pollinated perennial shrub Echeveria gibbiflora in the ecological preserve of Pedregal de San Angel around Mexico City, Mexico. Eleven randomly selected plants were manually over-pollinated in all their flowers and another 11 were left to be freely visited by natural pollinators. 2. Manually pollinated plants produced significantly more fruit and seeds than control plants (1.38 and 1.74 times, respectively). There was no change in average mass of fruits. 3. Considering individual fruit production per plant sampled three times in one season, decreases in fruit mass and average seeds per fruit were observed within the same reproductive season for both treatments. For the manually pollinated plants, from the start to the end of the reproductive season, seed set decreased 55.9%; while in control plants seed set decreased 33.4% in the same period. For both treatments, average fruit mass decreased 26%. 4. Vegetative growth was not significantly different between control and experimental plants but hand-pollinated plants showed a smaller reproduction probability for the following year. 5. It is concluded that female fecundity in E. gibbiflora is limited by pollen early in the reproductive season and by resources in the middle and the end of the season.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Echeveria gibbiflora</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Ecological history</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Female fecundity</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>hummingbird pollination</subject><subject>México</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and fungi</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>pollen limitation</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>resource limitation</subject><subject>Seed set</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF2L1DAUhoMoOK7-Ay9yIaIX7earaQKCDMOMLgzsgnod0vREM2TaMWnX6b-3dZb1dq8SOO_znsODEKakpETI60NJuawKJnhVUq1VSQhjujw_Q6vHwXO0IkzqQgnJX6JXOR8IIbpibIX8TcZb9wvuIQWLf4amCT72yeIPm2RzHqN1YOEj3oEbuzYME96HYxigxc2E7_oYocPrexuibUKcx5_xusPb82muO0I32Ii_DWM7vUYvvI0Z3jy8V-jHbvt987XY33652az3hROM6KJVAqqae127mte2Ac9AeMIUSFkJq7RTjZCKQ8PaWksnaltVzNat14rqlvIr9P7Se0r97xHyYI4hO4jRdtCP2dCaziaomIPqEnSpzzmBN6f5YpsmQ4lZxJqDWfyZxZ9ZxJp_Ys15Rt897LDZ2eiT7VzI_3lJuBTLhk-X2J8QYXpyvdltN_Nnxt9e8EMe-vSIM66JEJT_BZxPlN8</recordid><startdate>199808</startdate><enddate>199808</enddate><creator>Parra-Tabla, V.</creator><creator>Vargas, C. F.</creator><creator>Eguiarte, L. E.</creator><general>British Ecological Association</general><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199808</creationdate><title>Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study</title><author>Parra-Tabla, V. ; Vargas, C. F. ; Eguiarte, L. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Echeveria gibbiflora</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Ecological history</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Female fecundity</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>hummingbird pollination</topic><topic>México</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and fungi</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>pollen limitation</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>resource limitation</topic><topic>Seed set</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parra-Tabla, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, C. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguiarte, L. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parra-Tabla, V.</au><au>Vargas, C. F.</au><au>Eguiarte, L. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>1998-08</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>595</epage><pages>591-595</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>1. An experimental approach, manually pollinating all the flowers of individual plants, was used to measure the effect of pollen limitation on female fecundity of the hummingbird-pollinated perennial shrub Echeveria gibbiflora in the ecological preserve of Pedregal de San Angel around Mexico City, Mexico. Eleven randomly selected plants were manually over-pollinated in all their flowers and another 11 were left to be freely visited by natural pollinators. 2. Manually pollinated plants produced significantly more fruit and seeds than control plants (1.38 and 1.74 times, respectively). There was no change in average mass of fruits. 3. Considering individual fruit production per plant sampled three times in one season, decreases in fruit mass and average seeds per fruit were observed within the same reproductive season for both treatments. For the manually pollinated plants, from the start to the end of the reproductive season, seed set decreased 55.9%; while in control plants seed set decreased 33.4% in the same period. For both treatments, average fruit mass decreased 26%. 4. Vegetative growth was not significantly different between control and experimental plants but hand-pollinated plants showed a smaller reproduction probability for the following year. 5. It is concluded that female fecundity in E. gibbiflora is limited by pollen early in the reproductive season and by resources in the middle and the end of the season.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>British Ecological Association</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00229.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 1998-08, Vol.12 (4), p.591-595
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17102614
source Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Demecology
Echeveria gibbiflora
Ecological genetics
Ecological history
Fecundity
Female fecundity
Flowers
Fruits
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human ecology
hummingbird pollination
México
Plants
Plants and fungi
Pollen
pollen limitation
Pollination
resource limitation
Seed set
title Is Echeveria gibbiflora (Crassulaceae) Fecundity Limited by Pollen Availability? An Experimental Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Echeveria%20gibbiflora%20(Crassulaceae)%20Fecundity%20Limited%20by%20Pollen%20Availability?%20An%20Experimental%20Study&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Parra-Tabla,%20V.&rft.date=1998-08&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=595&rft.pages=591-595&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00229.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2390441%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-d84e573f97c737abef2e4f028e6654a89c8b4683eb2d796c47a552a7df9819d13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17102614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2390441&rfr_iscdi=true