Loading…

Effects of inbreeding on growth and yield of oil palm

The effects of inbreeding were studied in three oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) trials in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Congo). In selfings, marked inbreeding depression was observed for yield of fruit bunches, mean bunch weight and bunch number, but there was little effect on bunch compositi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Euphytica 2005, Vol.143 (1-2), p.9-17
Main Authors: Luyindula, N, Mantantu, N, Dumortier, F, Corley, R.H.V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1030-dd85e6056bf086d76c6d6ec4814f35bf01493a8b8b91788612d3670917c9716d3
cites
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 9
container_title Euphytica
container_volume 143
creator Luyindula, N
Mantantu, N
Dumortier, F
Corley, R.H.V
description The effects of inbreeding were studied in three oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) trials in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Congo). In selfings, marked inbreeding depression was observed for yield of fruit bunches, mean bunch weight and bunch number, but there was little effect on bunch composition. Most vegetative measurements were significantly affected by selfing, but leaf production rate and leaf area ratio were unaffected. Sib-crossing had less depressive effect than selfing, and in some families sib-crosses were superior to outcrosses. Where selection needs to be done within inbred families, our study suggests that leaf area ratio and bunch composition would be useful criteria.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10681-005-6735-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17109980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17109980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1030-dd85e6056bf086d76c6d6ec4814f35bf01493a8b8b91788612d3670917c9716d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk1LxDAURYMoOI7-AFdm5S76XtO8JEsZxg8YcKGzLmmT1EqnGZsO4r-3Mq4u53K4XMauEe4QQN9nBDIoAJQgLZXAE7ZApaVQQHDKFgBYikJKOmcXOX8CgNUKFkytYwzNlHmKvBvqMQTfDS1PA2_H9D19cDd4_tOF3v8Zqev53vW7S3YWXZ_D1X8u2fZx_b56FpvXp5fVw0Y0CBKE90YFAkV1BENeU0OeQlMaLKNUc4mllc7UpraojSEsvCQNMzRWI3m5ZLfH3f2Yvg4hT9Wuy03oezeEdMgVagRrDczizVGMLlWuHbtcbd8KQAnzEbRYyF-fPVAR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17109980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of inbreeding on growth and yield of oil palm</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Luyindula, N ; Mantantu, N ; Dumortier, F ; Corley, R.H.V</creator><creatorcontrib>Luyindula, N ; Mantantu, N ; Dumortier, F ; Corley, R.H.V</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of inbreeding were studied in three oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) trials in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Congo). In selfings, marked inbreeding depression was observed for yield of fruit bunches, mean bunch weight and bunch number, but there was little effect on bunch composition. Most vegetative measurements were significantly affected by selfing, but leaf production rate and leaf area ratio were unaffected. Sib-crossing had less depressive effect than selfing, and in some families sib-crosses were superior to outcrosses. Where selection needs to be done within inbred families, our study suggests that leaf area ratio and bunch composition would be useful criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2336</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10681-005-6735-1</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>agronomic traits ; crop yield ; Elaeis guineensis ; fruiting ; fruits (plant anatomy) ; inbreeding ; inbreeding depression ; leaf area ; leaf development ; plant breeding ; plant development ; plant growth</subject><ispartof>Euphytica, 2005, Vol.143 (1-2), p.9-17</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1030-dd85e6056bf086d76c6d6ec4814f35bf01493a8b8b91788612d3670917c9716d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luyindula, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantantu, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumortier, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corley, R.H.V</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of inbreeding on growth and yield of oil palm</title><title>Euphytica</title><description>The effects of inbreeding were studied in three oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) trials in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Congo). In selfings, marked inbreeding depression was observed for yield of fruit bunches, mean bunch weight and bunch number, but there was little effect on bunch composition. Most vegetative measurements were significantly affected by selfing, but leaf production rate and leaf area ratio were unaffected. Sib-crossing had less depressive effect than selfing, and in some families sib-crosses were superior to outcrosses. Where selection needs to be done within inbred families, our study suggests that leaf area ratio and bunch composition would be useful criteria.</description><subject>agronomic traits</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>Elaeis guineensis</subject><subject>fruiting</subject><subject>fruits (plant anatomy)</subject><subject>inbreeding</subject><subject>inbreeding depression</subject><subject>leaf area</subject><subject>leaf development</subject><subject>plant breeding</subject><subject>plant development</subject><subject>plant growth</subject><issn>0014-2336</issn><issn>1573-5060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjk1LxDAURYMoOI7-AFdm5S76XtO8JEsZxg8YcKGzLmmT1EqnGZsO4r-3Mq4u53K4XMauEe4QQN9nBDIoAJQgLZXAE7ZApaVQQHDKFgBYikJKOmcXOX8CgNUKFkytYwzNlHmKvBvqMQTfDS1PA2_H9D19cDd4_tOF3v8Zqev53vW7S3YWXZ_D1X8u2fZx_b56FpvXp5fVw0Y0CBKE90YFAkV1BENeU0OeQlMaLKNUc4mllc7UpraojSEsvCQNMzRWI3m5ZLfH3f2Yvg4hT9Wuy03oezeEdMgVagRrDczizVGMLlWuHbtcbd8KQAnzEbRYyF-fPVAR</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Luyindula, N</creator><creator>Mantantu, N</creator><creator>Dumortier, F</creator><creator>Corley, R.H.V</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Effects of inbreeding on growth and yield of oil palm</title><author>Luyindula, N ; Mantantu, N ; Dumortier, F ; Corley, R.H.V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1030-dd85e6056bf086d76c6d6ec4814f35bf01493a8b8b91788612d3670917c9716d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>agronomic traits</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>Elaeis guineensis</topic><topic>fruiting</topic><topic>fruits (plant anatomy)</topic><topic>inbreeding</topic><topic>inbreeding depression</topic><topic>leaf area</topic><topic>leaf development</topic><topic>plant breeding</topic><topic>plant development</topic><topic>plant growth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luyindula, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantantu, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumortier, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corley, R.H.V</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Euphytica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luyindula, N</au><au>Mantantu, N</au><au>Dumortier, F</au><au>Corley, R.H.V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of inbreeding on growth and yield of oil palm</atitle><jtitle>Euphytica</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>9-17</pages><issn>0014-2336</issn><eissn>1573-5060</eissn><abstract>The effects of inbreeding were studied in three oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) trials in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Congo). In selfings, marked inbreeding depression was observed for yield of fruit bunches, mean bunch weight and bunch number, but there was little effect on bunch composition. Most vegetative measurements were significantly affected by selfing, but leaf production rate and leaf area ratio were unaffected. Sib-crossing had less depressive effect than selfing, and in some families sib-crosses were superior to outcrosses. Where selection needs to be done within inbred families, our study suggests that leaf area ratio and bunch composition would be useful criteria.</abstract><doi>10.1007/s10681-005-6735-1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-2336
ispartof Euphytica, 2005, Vol.143 (1-2), p.9-17
issn 0014-2336
1573-5060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17109980
source Springer Link
subjects agronomic traits
crop yield
Elaeis guineensis
fruiting
fruits (plant anatomy)
inbreeding
inbreeding depression
leaf area
leaf development
plant breeding
plant development
plant growth
title Effects of inbreeding on growth and yield of oil palm
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A17%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20inbreeding%20on%20growth%20and%20yield%20of%20oil%20palm&rft.jtitle=Euphytica&rft.au=Luyindula,%20N&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=9-17&rft.issn=0014-2336&rft.eissn=1573-5060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10681-005-6735-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_fao_a%3E17109980%3C/proquest_fao_a%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1030-dd85e6056bf086d76c6d6ec4814f35bf01493a8b8b91788612d3670917c9716d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17109980&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true