Deliberation: Integrating Analytical Results into Environmental Decisions Involving Multiple Stakeholders

• Published in: Risk analysis 1998-10, Vol.18 (5), p.621-634
• Main Authors: Apostolakis, George E., Pickett, Susan E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: deliberation; Remediation; risk assessment; stakeholders
• ISSN: 0272-4332; 1539-6924
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00375.x

The National Research Council has recommended the use of an analytic/deliberative decision making process in environmental restoration decisions that involve multiple stakeholders. This work investigates the use of the results of risk assessment and multiattribute utility analysis (the “analysis”) in guiding the deliberation. These results include the ranking of proposed remedial action alternatives according to each stakeholder's preferences, as well as the identification of the major reasons for these rankings. The stakeholder preferences are over a number of performance measures that include the traditional risk assessment metrics, e.g., individual worker risk, as well as programmatic, cultural, and cost‐related impacts. Based on these results, a number of proposals are prepared for consideration by the stakeholders during the deliberation. These proposals are the starting point for the formulation of actual recommendations by the group. In our case study, these recommendations included new remedial action alternatives that were created by the stakeholders after an extensive discussion of the detailed analytical results.