Loading…

A randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate solution vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol solution as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy

Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and acceptability of an evening-before regimens of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) as bowel cleansers and to explore the results of a same-day regimen of SPMC. Methods Multicenter, randomized, obse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of colorectal disease 2015-10, Vol.30 (10), p.1407-1416
Main Authors: Muñoz-Navas, Miguel, Calleja, José Luis, Payeras, Guillermo, Hervás, Antonio José, Abreu, Luis Esteban, Orive, Víctor, Menchén, Pedro L., Bordas, José María, Armengol, José Ramón, Carretero, Cristina, Beltrán, Vicente Pons, Alonso-Abreu, Inmaculada, Manteca, Román, Parra-Blanco, Adolfo, Carballo, Fernando, Herrerías, Juan Manuel, Badiola, Carlos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and acceptability of an evening-before regimens of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) as bowel cleansers and to explore the results of a same-day regimen of SPMC. Methods Multicenter, randomized, observer-blinded, parallel study carried out in subjects who were 18–80 years old and were undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy for the first time. The primary outcome was treatment success, which was a composite outcome defined by (1) the evaluation of the overall preparation quality as “excellent” or “good” by two blinded independent evaluators with the Fleet® Grading Scale for Bowel Cleansing and (2) a subject’s acceptability rating of “easy to take” or “tolerable.” The primary outcome was analyzed using a logistic regression with site, gender, and age group (age ≥65 years and
ISSN:0179-1958
1432-1262
DOI:10.1007/s00384-015-2307-6