Loading…

Sapling size influences shade tolerance ranking among southern boreal tree species

1 Traditional rankings of shade tolerance of trees make little reference to individual size. However, greater respiratory loads with increasing sapling size imply that larger individuals will be less able to tolerate shade than smaller individuals of the same species and that there may be shifts amo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of ecology 2006-03, Vol.94 (2), p.471-480
Main Authors: Kneeshaw, Daniel D, Kobe, Richard K, Coates, K. David, Messier, Christian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5620-361eecc35ba0c629e69e2ae23411d6cf65765779f032949572ed0e0fbd7ff26d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5620-361eecc35ba0c629e69e2ae23411d6cf65765779f032949572ed0e0fbd7ff26d3
container_end_page 480
container_issue 2
container_start_page 471
container_title The Journal of ecology
container_volume 94
creator Kneeshaw, Daniel D
Kobe, Richard K
Coates, K. David
Messier, Christian
description 1 Traditional rankings of shade tolerance of trees make little reference to individual size. However, greater respiratory loads with increasing sapling size imply that larger individuals will be less able to tolerate shade than smaller individuals of the same species and that there may be shifts among species in shade tolerance with size. 2 We tested this hypothesis using maximum likelihood estimation to develop individual-tree-based models of the probability of mortality as a function of recent growth rate for seven species: trembling aspen, paper birch, yellow birch, mountain maple, white spruce, balsam fir and eastern white cedar. 3 Shade tolerance of small individuals, as quantified by risk of mortality at low growth, was mostly consistent with traditional shade tolerance rankings such that cedar > balsam fir > white spruce > yellow birch > mountain maple = paper birch > aspen. 4 Differences in growth-dependent mortality were greatest between species in the smallest size classes. With increasing size, a reduced tolerance to shade was observed for all species except trembling aspen and thus species tended to converge in shade tolerance with size. At a given level of radial growth larger trees, apart from aspen, had a higher probability of mortality than smaller trees. 5 Successional processes associated with shade tolerance may thus be most important in the seedling stage and decrease with ontogeny.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01070.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17158217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3599648</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3599648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5620-361eecc35ba0c629e69e2ae23411d6cf65765779f032949572ed0e0fbd7ff26d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFr1TAYxYM48Lr5HwgGQd_afUmapH3wQS5zKgPBueeQm37ZWnuba9Li5l-_1I4JezKEJOT8zuHjEEIZlCyv075kQsmC60qWHECWwEBDefuMbB6F52QDwHkBldYvyMuUegBQWsKGfL-0h6Ebr2nq_iDtRj_MODpMNN3YFukUBow2f9B8_lw4uw8LHebpBuNIdyGiHegUEWk6oOswnZAjb4eErx7uY3L16ezH9nNx8e38y_bjReGk4lAIxRCdE3JnwSneoGqQW-SiYqxVziup89aNB8GbqpGaYwsIftdq77lqxTF5v-YeYvg1Y5rMvksOh8GOGOZkmGay5kxn8O0TsA9zHPNshkPd5HyQGapXyMWQUkRvDrHb23hnGJiladObpVCzFGqWps3fps1ttr57yLfJ2cEvhXXpn19LoXPfmfuwcr-7Ae_-O998Pdsur-x_vfr7NIX46BeyaVRVZ_nNKnsbjL2OeYSrSw5M5Byp61qIe7wOo1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208903205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sapling size influences shade tolerance ranking among southern boreal tree species</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><creator>Kneeshaw, Daniel D ; Kobe, Richard K ; Coates, K. David ; Messier, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Kneeshaw, Daniel D ; Kobe, Richard K ; Coates, K. David ; Messier, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>1 Traditional rankings of shade tolerance of trees make little reference to individual size. However, greater respiratory loads with increasing sapling size imply that larger individuals will be less able to tolerate shade than smaller individuals of the same species and that there may be shifts among species in shade tolerance with size. 2 We tested this hypothesis using maximum likelihood estimation to develop individual-tree-based models of the probability of mortality as a function of recent growth rate for seven species: trembling aspen, paper birch, yellow birch, mountain maple, white spruce, balsam fir and eastern white cedar. 3 Shade tolerance of small individuals, as quantified by risk of mortality at low growth, was mostly consistent with traditional shade tolerance rankings such that cedar &gt; balsam fir &gt; white spruce &gt; yellow birch &gt; mountain maple = paper birch &gt; aspen. 4 Differences in growth-dependent mortality were greatest between species in the smallest size classes. With increasing size, a reduced tolerance to shade was observed for all species except trembling aspen and thus species tended to converge in shade tolerance with size. At a given level of radial growth larger trees, apart from aspen, had a higher probability of mortality than smaller trees. 5 Successional processes associated with shade tolerance may thus be most important in the seedling stage and decrease with ontogeny.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01070.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abies balsamea ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; boreal forest ; Boreal forests ; canopy gaps ; carbon balance ; cell respiration ; developmental stages ; Forest ecology ; forest trees ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Human ecology ; Mortality ; ontogeny ; plant development ; Plant ecology ; Plant growth ; Québec (Canada) ; radial growth ; Sample size ; Sampling ; sapling mortality ; Saplings ; seedling growth ; seedlings ; Shade tolerance ; Shade Tolerance and Trees ; Species ; succession ; tree growth ; tree mortality ; Trees ; understory</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2006-03, Vol.94 (2), p.471-480</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Mar 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5620-361eecc35ba0c629e69e2ae23411d6cf65765779f032949572ed0e0fbd7ff26d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5620-361eecc35ba0c629e69e2ae23411d6cf65765779f032949572ed0e0fbd7ff26d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3599648$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3599648$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17537006$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kneeshaw, Daniel D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobe, Richard K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, K. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messier, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Sapling size influences shade tolerance ranking among southern boreal tree species</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>1 Traditional rankings of shade tolerance of trees make little reference to individual size. However, greater respiratory loads with increasing sapling size imply that larger individuals will be less able to tolerate shade than smaller individuals of the same species and that there may be shifts among species in shade tolerance with size. 2 We tested this hypothesis using maximum likelihood estimation to develop individual-tree-based models of the probability of mortality as a function of recent growth rate for seven species: trembling aspen, paper birch, yellow birch, mountain maple, white spruce, balsam fir and eastern white cedar. 3 Shade tolerance of small individuals, as quantified by risk of mortality at low growth, was mostly consistent with traditional shade tolerance rankings such that cedar &gt; balsam fir &gt; white spruce &gt; yellow birch &gt; mountain maple = paper birch &gt; aspen. 4 Differences in growth-dependent mortality were greatest between species in the smallest size classes. With increasing size, a reduced tolerance to shade was observed for all species except trembling aspen and thus species tended to converge in shade tolerance with size. At a given level of radial growth larger trees, apart from aspen, had a higher probability of mortality than smaller trees. 5 Successional processes associated with shade tolerance may thus be most important in the seedling stage and decrease with ontogeny.</description><subject>Abies balsamea</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>boreal forest</subject><subject>Boreal forests</subject><subject>canopy gaps</subject><subject>carbon balance</subject><subject>cell respiration</subject><subject>developmental stages</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>ontogeny</subject><subject>plant development</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Québec (Canada)</subject><subject>radial growth</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>sapling mortality</subject><subject>Saplings</subject><subject>seedling growth</subject><subject>seedlings</subject><subject>Shade tolerance</subject><subject>Shade Tolerance and Trees</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>succession</subject><subject>tree growth</subject><subject>tree mortality</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>understory</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkNFr1TAYxYM48Lr5HwgGQd_afUmapH3wQS5zKgPBueeQm37ZWnuba9Li5l-_1I4JezKEJOT8zuHjEEIZlCyv075kQsmC60qWHECWwEBDefuMbB6F52QDwHkBldYvyMuUegBQWsKGfL-0h6Ebr2nq_iDtRj_MODpMNN3YFukUBow2f9B8_lw4uw8LHebpBuNIdyGiHegUEWk6oOswnZAjb4eErx7uY3L16ezH9nNx8e38y_bjReGk4lAIxRCdE3JnwSneoGqQW-SiYqxVziup89aNB8GbqpGaYwsIftdq77lqxTF5v-YeYvg1Y5rMvksOh8GOGOZkmGay5kxn8O0TsA9zHPNshkPd5HyQGapXyMWQUkRvDrHb23hnGJiladObpVCzFGqWps3fps1ttr57yLfJ2cEvhXXpn19LoXPfmfuwcr-7Ae_-O998Pdsur-x_vfr7NIX46BeyaVRVZ_nNKnsbjL2OeYSrSw5M5Byp61qIe7wOo1o</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Kneeshaw, Daniel D</creator><creator>Kobe, Richard K</creator><creator>Coates, K. David</creator><creator>Messier, Christian</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Ecological Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>Sapling size influences shade tolerance ranking among southern boreal tree species</title><author>Kneeshaw, Daniel D ; Kobe, Richard K ; Coates, K. David ; Messier, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5620-361eecc35ba0c629e69e2ae23411d6cf65765779f032949572ed0e0fbd7ff26d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Abies balsamea</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>boreal forest</topic><topic>Boreal forests</topic><topic>canopy gaps</topic><topic>carbon balance</topic><topic>cell respiration</topic><topic>developmental stages</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>ontogeny</topic><topic>plant development</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Québec (Canada)</topic><topic>radial growth</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>sapling mortality</topic><topic>Saplings</topic><topic>seedling growth</topic><topic>seedlings</topic><topic>Shade tolerance</topic><topic>Shade Tolerance and Trees</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>succession</topic><topic>tree growth</topic><topic>tree mortality</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>understory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kneeshaw, Daniel D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobe, Richard K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coates, K. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messier, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kneeshaw, Daniel D</au><au>Kobe, Richard K</au><au>Coates, K. David</au><au>Messier, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sapling size influences shade tolerance ranking among southern boreal tree species</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>471-480</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><coden>JECOAB</coden><abstract>1 Traditional rankings of shade tolerance of trees make little reference to individual size. However, greater respiratory loads with increasing sapling size imply that larger individuals will be less able to tolerate shade than smaller individuals of the same species and that there may be shifts among species in shade tolerance with size. 2 We tested this hypothesis using maximum likelihood estimation to develop individual-tree-based models of the probability of mortality as a function of recent growth rate for seven species: trembling aspen, paper birch, yellow birch, mountain maple, white spruce, balsam fir and eastern white cedar. 3 Shade tolerance of small individuals, as quantified by risk of mortality at low growth, was mostly consistent with traditional shade tolerance rankings such that cedar &gt; balsam fir &gt; white spruce &gt; yellow birch &gt; mountain maple = paper birch &gt; aspen. 4 Differences in growth-dependent mortality were greatest between species in the smallest size classes. With increasing size, a reduced tolerance to shade was observed for all species except trembling aspen and thus species tended to converge in shade tolerance with size. At a given level of radial growth larger trees, apart from aspen, had a higher probability of mortality than smaller trees. 5 Successional processes associated with shade tolerance may thus be most important in the seedling stage and decrease with ontogeny.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01070.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0477
ispartof The Journal of ecology, 2006-03, Vol.94 (2), p.471-480
issn 0022-0477
1365-2745
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17158217
source Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】
subjects Abies balsamea
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
boreal forest
Boreal forests
canopy gaps
carbon balance
cell respiration
developmental stages
Forest ecology
forest trees
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Human ecology
Mortality
ontogeny
plant development
Plant ecology
Plant growth
Québec (Canada)
radial growth
Sample size
Sampling
sapling mortality
Saplings
seedling growth
seedlings
Shade tolerance
Shade Tolerance and Trees
Species
succession
tree growth
tree mortality
Trees
understory
title Sapling size influences shade tolerance ranking among southern boreal tree species
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A03%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sapling%20size%20influences%20shade%20tolerance%20ranking%20among%20southern%20boreal%20tree%20species&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Kneeshaw,%20Daniel%20D&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=471-480&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft.coden=JECOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01070.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3599648%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5620-361eecc35ba0c629e69e2ae23411d6cf65765779f032949572ed0e0fbd7ff26d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208903205&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3599648&rfr_iscdi=true