Loading…

Darbishire expands his vision of heredity from Mendelian genetics to inherited memory

The British biologist A.D. Darbishire (1879–1915) responded to the rediscovery in 1900 of Mendel's theory of heredity by testing it experimentally, first in Oxford, then in Manchester and London. He summarised his conclusions in a textbook ‘Breeding and the Mendelian Discovery' (1911), in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part C, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, 2015-10, Vol.53, p.16-39
Main Author: Wood, Roger J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4a4d3c62a6c0b4f25dbf4a7a9dcbee5287041819fbeccc71da4385501496eeea3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4a4d3c62a6c0b4f25dbf4a7a9dcbee5287041819fbeccc71da4385501496eeea3
container_end_page 39
container_issue
container_start_page 16
container_title Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part C, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
container_volume 53
creator Wood, Roger J.
description The British biologist A.D. Darbishire (1879–1915) responded to the rediscovery in 1900 of Mendel's theory of heredity by testing it experimentally, first in Oxford, then in Manchester and London. He summarised his conclusions in a textbook ‘Breeding and the Mendelian Discovery' (1911), in which he questioned whether Mendelism alone could explain all aspects of practical breeding experience. Already he had begun to think about an alternative theory to give greater emphasis to the widely held conviction among breeders regarding the inheritance of characteristics acquired during an individual's life. Redefining heredity in terms of a germ-plasm based biological memory, he used vocabulary drawn partly from sources outside conventional science, including the metaphysical/vitalistic writings of Samuel Butler and Henri Bergson. An evolving hereditary memory fitted well with the conception of breeding as a creative art aimed at greater economic efficiency. For evolution beyond human control he proposed a self-modifying process, claiming it to surpass in efficiency the chancy mechanism of natural selection proposed by Darwin. From his writings, including early chapters of an unfinished book entitled ‘An Introduction to a Biology’, we consider how he reached these concepts and how they relate to later advances in understanding the genome and the genetic programme.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.06.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717474121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1369848615000813</els_id><sourcerecordid>1717474121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4a4d3c62a6c0b4f25dbf4a7a9dcbee5287041819fbeccc71da4385501496eeea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwC5CQR5YEO3aceGBA5VMqYqGz5dgX6qqJg51W9N-T0sLIdDc87726B6FLSlJKqLhZpnHRRZNmhOYpESkh9AiNaVnIJONSHg87EzIpeSlG6CzGJRkIxsgpGmWClqyQYozm9zpULi5cAAxfnW5txAsX8cZF51vsa7yAANb1W1wH3-BXaC2snG7xB7TQOxNx77FrB8r1YHEDjQ_bc3RS61WEi8OcoPnjw_v0OZm9Pb1M72aJYbnsE665ZUZkWhhS8TrLbVVzXWhpTQWQZ2VBOC2prCswxhTUas7KPCeUSwEAmk3Q9f5uF_znGmKvGhcNrFa6Bb-Oiha04AWnGR1QtkdN8DEGqFUXXKPDVlGidj7VUv34VDufigi1szVBV4eCddWA_cv8ChyA2z0Aw5sbB0FF46A1g7IAplfWu38LvgHytYlD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1717474121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Darbishire expands his vision of heredity from Mendelian genetics to inherited memory</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Wood, Roger J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wood, Roger J.</creatorcontrib><description>The British biologist A.D. Darbishire (1879–1915) responded to the rediscovery in 1900 of Mendel's theory of heredity by testing it experimentally, first in Oxford, then in Manchester and London. He summarised his conclusions in a textbook ‘Breeding and the Mendelian Discovery' (1911), in which he questioned whether Mendelism alone could explain all aspects of practical breeding experience. Already he had begun to think about an alternative theory to give greater emphasis to the widely held conviction among breeders regarding the inheritance of characteristics acquired during an individual's life. Redefining heredity in terms of a germ-plasm based biological memory, he used vocabulary drawn partly from sources outside conventional science, including the metaphysical/vitalistic writings of Samuel Butler and Henri Bergson. An evolving hereditary memory fitted well with the conception of breeding as a creative art aimed at greater economic efficiency. For evolution beyond human control he proposed a self-modifying process, claiming it to surpass in efficiency the chancy mechanism of natural selection proposed by Darwin. From his writings, including early chapters of an unfinished book entitled ‘An Introduction to a Biology’, we consider how he reached these concepts and how they relate to later advances in understanding the genome and the genetic programme.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-8486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.06.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26183796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Beethoven ; Bergson ; Butler ; Darbishire ; England ; Female ; Genetics - history ; Heredity ; History, 19th Century ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Memory ; Vitalism</subject><ispartof>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part C, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, 2015-10, Vol.53, p.16-39</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4a4d3c62a6c0b4f25dbf4a7a9dcbee5287041819fbeccc71da4385501496eeea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4a4d3c62a6c0b4f25dbf4a7a9dcbee5287041819fbeccc71da4385501496eeea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26183796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wood, Roger J.</creatorcontrib><title>Darbishire expands his vision of heredity from Mendelian genetics to inherited memory</title><title>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part C, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences</title><addtitle>Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci</addtitle><description>The British biologist A.D. Darbishire (1879–1915) responded to the rediscovery in 1900 of Mendel's theory of heredity by testing it experimentally, first in Oxford, then in Manchester and London. He summarised his conclusions in a textbook ‘Breeding and the Mendelian Discovery' (1911), in which he questioned whether Mendelism alone could explain all aspects of practical breeding experience. Already he had begun to think about an alternative theory to give greater emphasis to the widely held conviction among breeders regarding the inheritance of characteristics acquired during an individual's life. Redefining heredity in terms of a germ-plasm based biological memory, he used vocabulary drawn partly from sources outside conventional science, including the metaphysical/vitalistic writings of Samuel Butler and Henri Bergson. An evolving hereditary memory fitted well with the conception of breeding as a creative art aimed at greater economic efficiency. For evolution beyond human control he proposed a self-modifying process, claiming it to surpass in efficiency the chancy mechanism of natural selection proposed by Darwin. From his writings, including early chapters of an unfinished book entitled ‘An Introduction to a Biology’, we consider how he reached these concepts and how they relate to later advances in understanding the genome and the genetic programme.</description><subject>Beethoven</subject><subject>Bergson</subject><subject>Butler</subject><subject>Darbishire</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetics - history</subject><subject>Heredity</subject><subject>History, 19th Century</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Vitalism</subject><issn>1369-8486</issn><issn>1879-2499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwC5CQR5YEO3aceGBA5VMqYqGz5dgX6qqJg51W9N-T0sLIdDc87726B6FLSlJKqLhZpnHRRZNmhOYpESkh9AiNaVnIJONSHg87EzIpeSlG6CzGJRkIxsgpGmWClqyQYozm9zpULi5cAAxfnW5txAsX8cZF51vsa7yAANb1W1wH3-BXaC2snG7xB7TQOxNx77FrB8r1YHEDjQ_bc3RS61WEi8OcoPnjw_v0OZm9Pb1M72aJYbnsE665ZUZkWhhS8TrLbVVzXWhpTQWQZ2VBOC2prCswxhTUas7KPCeUSwEAmk3Q9f5uF_znGmKvGhcNrFa6Bb-Oiha04AWnGR1QtkdN8DEGqFUXXKPDVlGidj7VUv34VDufigi1szVBV4eCddWA_cv8ChyA2z0Aw5sbB0FF46A1g7IAplfWu38LvgHytYlD</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Wood, Roger J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Darbishire expands his vision of heredity from Mendelian genetics to inherited memory</title><author>Wood, Roger J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4a4d3c62a6c0b4f25dbf4a7a9dcbee5287041819fbeccc71da4385501496eeea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Beethoven</topic><topic>Bergson</topic><topic>Butler</topic><topic>Darbishire</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetics - history</topic><topic>Heredity</topic><topic>History, 19th Century</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Vitalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wood, Roger J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part C, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wood, Roger J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Darbishire expands his vision of heredity from Mendelian genetics to inherited memory</atitle><jtitle>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part C, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>16</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>16-39</pages><issn>1369-8486</issn><eissn>1879-2499</eissn><abstract>The British biologist A.D. Darbishire (1879–1915) responded to the rediscovery in 1900 of Mendel's theory of heredity by testing it experimentally, first in Oxford, then in Manchester and London. He summarised his conclusions in a textbook ‘Breeding and the Mendelian Discovery' (1911), in which he questioned whether Mendelism alone could explain all aspects of practical breeding experience. Already he had begun to think about an alternative theory to give greater emphasis to the widely held conviction among breeders regarding the inheritance of characteristics acquired during an individual's life. Redefining heredity in terms of a germ-plasm based biological memory, he used vocabulary drawn partly from sources outside conventional science, including the metaphysical/vitalistic writings of Samuel Butler and Henri Bergson. An evolving hereditary memory fitted well with the conception of breeding as a creative art aimed at greater economic efficiency. For evolution beyond human control he proposed a self-modifying process, claiming it to surpass in efficiency the chancy mechanism of natural selection proposed by Darwin. From his writings, including early chapters of an unfinished book entitled ‘An Introduction to a Biology’, we consider how he reached these concepts and how they relate to later advances in understanding the genome and the genetic programme.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26183796</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.06.001</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1369-8486
ispartof Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part C, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, 2015-10, Vol.53, p.16-39
issn 1369-8486
1879-2499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717474121
source Elsevier
subjects Beethoven
Bergson
Butler
Darbishire
England
Female
Genetics - history
Heredity
History, 19th Century
History, 20th Century
Humans
Memory
Vitalism
title Darbishire expands his vision of heredity from Mendelian genetics to inherited memory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A37%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Darbishire%20expands%20his%20vision%20of%20heredity%20from%20Mendelian%20genetics%20to%20inherited%20memory&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20history%20and%20philosophy%20of%20science.%20Part%20C,%20Studies%20in%20history%20and%20philosophy%20of%20biological%20and%20biomedical%20sciences&rft.au=Wood,%20Roger%20J.&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=16-39&rft.issn=1369-8486&rft.eissn=1879-2499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.06.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1717474121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4a4d3c62a6c0b4f25dbf4a7a9dcbee5287041819fbeccc71da4385501496eeea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1717474121&rft_id=info:pmid/26183796&rfr_iscdi=true