Impact of bushfire and climate variability on streamflow from forested catchments in southeast Australia

• Published in: Hydrological sciences journal 2015-08, Vol.60 (7-8), p.1340-1360
• Main Authors: Zhou, Yanchun, Zhang, Yongqiang, Vaze, Jai, Lane, Patrick, Xu, Shiguo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: bushfires; climate; climate variability; climatique; débits; evapotranspiration; feux de brousse; fires; forest management; forested watersheds; forests; forêts; hydrologic models; hydrological models; infiltration rate; logging; managers; modèles hydrologiques; runoff; soil; stream flow; variabilité; évapotranspiration
• ISSN: 2150-3435; 0262-6667; 2150-3435
• DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2014.961923

This paper quantifies the impacts of bushfire and climate variability on streamflow from three southeast Australian catchments where bushfires occurred in February 1983. Three hydrological models (AWRA-L, Xinanjiang and GR4J) were first calibrated against streamflow data from the pre-bushfire period and then used to simulate runoff for the post-bushfire period with the calibrated parameters. The difference in simulated streamflow between pre- and post-bushfire periods provides an estimate of the impact of climate variability on streamflow. The impact of bushfire on streamflow is quantified by removing the climate variability impact from the difference in mean annual observed streamflow between post- and pre-bushfire periods. For the first 15 years after the 1983 bushfires, the results from hydrological models for the three catchments indicate that there is a substantial increase in streamflow; this is attributed to initial decreases in evapotranspiration and soil infiltration rates resulting from the fires, followed by logging activity. After 15 years, streamflow dynamics are more heavily influenced by climate effects, although some impact from fire and logging regeneration may still occur. The results show that hydrological models provide reasonably consistent estimates of bushfire and climate impacts on streamflow for the three catchments. The models can be used to quantify relative contributions of forest disturbance (bushfire, logging and other forest management) and climate variability. The results presented can also help forest managers understand the relationship between bushfire and climate variability impacts on water yield in the context of climate variability.