Loading…

The Painful Shoulder: Ultrasonographic Measurements of Supraspinatus Thickness, Pain Scores and Treatment

We hypothesize that a positive correlation exists and that this could aid clinical development of targeted treatment strategies and earlier identification of those who require a more aggressive therapeutic approach. A retrospective analysis of supraspinatus thickness was performed by analyzing ultra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2012-05, Vol.44 (5S), p.714-714
Main Authors: Hillinger, Marni, Visco, Christopher
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 714
container_issue 5S
container_start_page 714
container_title Medicine and science in sports and exercise
container_volume 44
creator Hillinger, Marni
Visco, Christopher
description We hypothesize that a positive correlation exists and that this could aid clinical development of targeted treatment strategies and earlier identification of those who require a more aggressive therapeutic approach. A retrospective analysis of supraspinatus thickness was performed by analyzing ultrasonographic shoulder examinations of patients who presented to the Columbia University musculoskeletal clinic with a primary complaint of shoulder pain. This included 58 separate shoulder studies among 52 different patients. An average thickness was obtained by utilizing the DICOM ultrasonographic software ruler tool. Outpatient records were reviewed including pertinent follow-up visits. Pain scores and treatment at the time of presentation and follow-up were recorded. There was no correlation (Pearson correlation =-0.008) found between supraspinatus tendinous thickness and pain scores at the time of presentation. Average supraspinatus thickness was found to be 0.506cm + or - 0.113 among women and 0.556cm + or -0.157 among men. Average pain score was found to be 5.4+ or -2.2 among women and 5.7+ or -2.28 among men on initial evaluation.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717499296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1717499296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17174992963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVzL0KwjAUhuEMCv7ewxkdLDRWLXEVxUUQWmc51FMbjUnNSe7fKt6A07c839sTw1SqVaJkJgdixHxP0zTPMjkUumwITqhtHQ0UjYvmSn4DZxM8srPu5rFtdAVHQo6enmQDg6uhiG0HWm0xRIayIw9LzPNvC4rKeWJAe4XSE4bPbSL6NRqm6W_HYrbfldtD0nr3isTh8tRckTFoyUW-yFzmS6UWap39Qd99LkxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1717499296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Painful Shoulder: Ultrasonographic Measurements of Supraspinatus Thickness, Pain Scores and Treatment</title><source>LWW Online</source><creator>Hillinger, Marni ; Visco, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Hillinger, Marni ; Visco, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>We hypothesize that a positive correlation exists and that this could aid clinical development of targeted treatment strategies and earlier identification of those who require a more aggressive therapeutic approach. A retrospective analysis of supraspinatus thickness was performed by analyzing ultrasonographic shoulder examinations of patients who presented to the Columbia University musculoskeletal clinic with a primary complaint of shoulder pain. This included 58 separate shoulder studies among 52 different patients. An average thickness was obtained by utilizing the DICOM ultrasonographic software ruler tool. Outpatient records were reviewed including pertinent follow-up visits. Pain scores and treatment at the time of presentation and follow-up were recorded. There was no correlation (Pearson correlation =-0.008) found between supraspinatus tendinous thickness and pain scores at the time of presentation. Average supraspinatus thickness was found to be 0.506cm + or - 0.113 among women and 0.556cm + or -0.157 among men. Average pain score was found to be 5.4+ or -2.2 among women and 5.7+ or -2.28 among men on initial evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2012-05, Vol.44 (5S), p.714-714</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hillinger, Marni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visco, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>The Painful Shoulder: Ultrasonographic Measurements of Supraspinatus Thickness, Pain Scores and Treatment</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><description>We hypothesize that a positive correlation exists and that this could aid clinical development of targeted treatment strategies and earlier identification of those who require a more aggressive therapeutic approach. A retrospective analysis of supraspinatus thickness was performed by analyzing ultrasonographic shoulder examinations of patients who presented to the Columbia University musculoskeletal clinic with a primary complaint of shoulder pain. This included 58 separate shoulder studies among 52 different patients. An average thickness was obtained by utilizing the DICOM ultrasonographic software ruler tool. Outpatient records were reviewed including pertinent follow-up visits. Pain scores and treatment at the time of presentation and follow-up were recorded. There was no correlation (Pearson correlation =-0.008) found between supraspinatus tendinous thickness and pain scores at the time of presentation. Average supraspinatus thickness was found to be 0.506cm + or - 0.113 among women and 0.556cm + or -0.157 among men. Average pain score was found to be 5.4+ or -2.2 among women and 5.7+ or -2.28 among men on initial evaluation.</description><issn>0195-9131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVzL0KwjAUhuEMCv7ewxkdLDRWLXEVxUUQWmc51FMbjUnNSe7fKt6A07c839sTw1SqVaJkJgdixHxP0zTPMjkUumwITqhtHQ0UjYvmSn4DZxM8srPu5rFtdAVHQo6enmQDg6uhiG0HWm0xRIayIw9LzPNvC4rKeWJAe4XSE4bPbSL6NRqm6W_HYrbfldtD0nr3isTh8tRckTFoyUW-yFzmS6UWap39Qd99LkxQ</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Hillinger, Marni</creator><creator>Visco, Christopher</creator><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>The Painful Shoulder: Ultrasonographic Measurements of Supraspinatus Thickness, Pain Scores and Treatment</title><author>Hillinger, Marni ; Visco, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17174992963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hillinger, Marni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visco, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hillinger, Marni</au><au>Visco, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Painful Shoulder: Ultrasonographic Measurements of Supraspinatus Thickness, Pain Scores and Treatment</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5S</issue><spage>714</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>714-714</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><abstract>We hypothesize that a positive correlation exists and that this could aid clinical development of targeted treatment strategies and earlier identification of those who require a more aggressive therapeutic approach. A retrospective analysis of supraspinatus thickness was performed by analyzing ultrasonographic shoulder examinations of patients who presented to the Columbia University musculoskeletal clinic with a primary complaint of shoulder pain. This included 58 separate shoulder studies among 52 different patients. An average thickness was obtained by utilizing the DICOM ultrasonographic software ruler tool. Outpatient records were reviewed including pertinent follow-up visits. Pain scores and treatment at the time of presentation and follow-up were recorded. There was no correlation (Pearson correlation =-0.008) found between supraspinatus tendinous thickness and pain scores at the time of presentation. Average supraspinatus thickness was found to be 0.506cm + or - 0.113 among women and 0.556cm + or -0.157 among men. Average pain score was found to be 5.4+ or -2.2 among women and 5.7+ or -2.28 among men on initial evaluation.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-9131
ispartof Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2012-05, Vol.44 (5S), p.714-714
issn 0195-9131
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717499296
source LWW Online
title The Painful Shoulder: Ultrasonographic Measurements of Supraspinatus Thickness, Pain Scores and Treatment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A11%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Painful%20Shoulder:%20Ultrasonographic%20Measurements%20of%20Supraspinatus%20Thickness,%20Pain%20Scores%20and%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=Hillinger,%20Marni&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5S&rft.spage=714&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=714-714&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1717499296%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17174992963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1717499296&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true