Loading…
Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators
This paper aims at contributing to the on-going discussion about building and applying bibliometric indicators. It sheds light on their properties and requirements concerning six different aspects: deterministic versus probabilistic approach, application-related properties, the time dependence, norm...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scientometrics 2013-07, Vol.96 (1), p.381-394 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-bbb64321b5d08fd9451b84aac0b898a974e9b10eb0e77e1344790cd94aa13063 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-bbb64321b5d08fd9451b84aac0b898a974e9b10eb0e77e1344790cd94aa13063 |
container_end_page | 394 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 381 |
container_title | Scientometrics |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Glänzel, Wolfgang Moed, Henk F. |
description | This paper aims at contributing to the on-going discussion about building and applying bibliometric indicators. It sheds light on their properties and requirements concerning six different aspects: deterministic versus probabilistic approach, application-related properties, the time dependence, normalization issues, size dependence and network indicators. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11192-012-0898-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718055572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1718055572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-bbb64321b5d08fd9451b84aac0b898a974e9b10eb0e77e1344790cd94aa13063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNteBC_RzO6mScSLFP9BoZfeQ5LNtinbZE12D_bTG9ni0cMwA_N7j5mH0C2QByCEPSYAECUmkIsLjo9naAaUc1zyBZyjGYGKYwEVuURXKe1J1lSEz9DzunfeBV_0qrfxqRh2YdzuhlQo3xStMnnKS-1058LBDtGZwvnGGTWEmK7RRau6ZG9OfY42b6-b5Qderd8_ly8rbCoKA9ZaL-qqBE0bwttG1BQ0r5UyROdTlWC1FRqI1cQyZqGqayaIyZxS-eBFNUf3k20fw9do0yAPLhnbdcrbMCYJDDihlLIyozChJoaUom1lH91BxW8JRP4GJaegZA5K_gYlj1lzd7JXyaiujcobl_6EJasZ41Rkrpy4lFd-a6PchzH6_Pg_5j8gknhD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718055572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Glänzel, Wolfgang ; Moed, Henk F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Glänzel, Wolfgang ; Moed, Henk F.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper aims at contributing to the on-going discussion about building and applying bibliometric indicators. It sheds light on their properties and requirements concerning six different aspects: deterministic versus probabilistic approach, application-related properties, the time dependence, normalization issues, size dependence and network indicators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0138-9130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0898-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCNTDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Bibliometrics. Scientometrics ; Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation ; Computer Science ; Exact sciences and technology ; Information and communication sciences ; Information science. Documentation ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Library and information science. General aspects ; Library Science ; Sciences and techniques of general use ; Statistical methods</subject><ispartof>Scientometrics, 2013-07, Vol.96 (1), p.381-394</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-bbb64321b5d08fd9451b84aac0b898a974e9b10eb0e77e1344790cd94aa13063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-bbb64321b5d08fd9451b84aac0b898a974e9b10eb0e77e1344790cd94aa13063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34136</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27477859$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glänzel, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moed, Henk F.</creatorcontrib><title>Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators</title><title>Scientometrics</title><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><description>This paper aims at contributing to the on-going discussion about building and applying bibliometric indicators. It sheds light on their properties and requirements concerning six different aspects: deterministic versus probabilistic approach, application-related properties, the time dependence, normalization issues, size dependence and network indicators.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics</subject><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Library and information science. General aspects</subject><subject>Library Science</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><issn>0138-9130</issn><issn>1588-2861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNteBC_RzO6mScSLFP9BoZfeQ5LNtinbZE12D_bTG9ni0cMwA_N7j5mH0C2QByCEPSYAECUmkIsLjo9naAaUc1zyBZyjGYGKYwEVuURXKe1J1lSEz9DzunfeBV_0qrfxqRh2YdzuhlQo3xStMnnKS-1058LBDtGZwvnGGTWEmK7RRau6ZG9OfY42b6-b5Qderd8_ly8rbCoKA9ZaL-qqBE0bwttG1BQ0r5UyROdTlWC1FRqI1cQyZqGqayaIyZxS-eBFNUf3k20fw9do0yAPLhnbdcrbMCYJDDihlLIyozChJoaUom1lH91BxW8JRP4GJaegZA5K_gYlj1lzd7JXyaiujcobl_6EJasZ41Rkrpy4lFd-a6PchzH6_Pg_5j8gknhD</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Glänzel, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Moed, Henk F.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BP</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators</title><author>Glänzel, Wolfgang ; Moed, Henk F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-bbb64321b5d08fd9451b84aac0b898a974e9b10eb0e77e1344790cd94aa13063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics</topic><topic>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Library and information science. General aspects</topic><topic>Library Science</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glänzel, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moed, Henk F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glänzel, Wolfgang</au><au>Moed, Henk F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators</atitle><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle><stitle>Scientometrics</stitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>381-394</pages><issn>0138-9130</issn><eissn>1588-2861</eissn><coden>SCNTDX</coden><abstract>This paper aims at contributing to the on-going discussion about building and applying bibliometric indicators. It sheds light on their properties and requirements concerning six different aspects: deterministic versus probabilistic approach, application-related properties, the time dependence, normalization issues, size dependence and network indicators.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11192-012-0898-z</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0138-9130 |
ispartof | Scientometrics, 2013-07, Vol.96 (1), p.381-394 |
issn | 0138-9130 1588-2861 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718055572 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Springer Nature |
subjects | Bibliometrics Bibliometrics. Scientometrics Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation Computer Science Exact sciences and technology Information and communication sciences Information science. Documentation Information Storage and Retrieval Library and information science. General aspects Library Science Sciences and techniques of general use Statistical methods |
title | Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A00%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opinion%20paper:%20thoughts%20and%20facts%20on%20bibliometric%20indicators&rft.jtitle=Scientometrics&rft.au=Gl%C3%A4nzel,%20Wolfgang&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=381-394&rft.issn=0138-9130&rft.eissn=1588-2861&rft.coden=SCNTDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11192-012-0898-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1718055572%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-bbb64321b5d08fd9451b84aac0b898a974e9b10eb0e77e1344790cd94aa13063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718055572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |