Loading…
Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks
Although popularly perceived as a positive force important for objectives such as economic development and democracy, social capital may also be linked to less desirable outcomes. This article highlights a dark side to social capital by pointing to its role in a particularly pernicious phenomenon: g...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of conflict resolution 2014-08, Vol.58 (5), p.865-893 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9231552b9ae682eacb36909d11ef778b3f1548adbf48f61f985b8d3bdaca16c43 |
container_end_page | 893 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 865 |
container_title | The Journal of conflict resolution |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | McDoom, Omar Shahabudin |
description | Although popularly perceived as a positive force important for objectives such as economic development and democracy, social capital may also be linked to less desirable outcomes. This article highlights a dark side to social capital by pointing to its role in a particularly pernicious phenomenon: genocidal violence. Drawing on a survey of residents from one community that experienced violence during Rwanda's 1994 genocide, I show that individual participation in the violence was partly determined by the features of residents' social networks. Perpetrators possessed larger networks in general and more connections to other perpetrators in particular. The quality as well as quantity of connections also mattered. Strong ties generally, and kinship and neighborly ties specifically, were strong predictors of participation. In contrast, possession of countervailing ties to nonparticipants did not reduce a resident's likelihood of participation. Drawing on in-depth interviews to explore the possible mechanisms behind these findings, I suggest participants' networks fulfilled functions of information diffusion, social influence, and behavioral regulation. More broadly, the findings suggest the importance of social structure and social interaction for participation in collective violence. Relational data should complement individual attribute data in predicting participation. The findings also suggest, contrary to the neo-Malthusian interpretation, that the role played by Rwanda's extraordinarily high population density in the violence may have been more sociological than ecological in origin. The diffusion, influence, and regulatory effects of social connections are likely to be amplified in communities where individuals live in close spatial proximity to each other. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0022002713484282 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718062202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24545592</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0022002713484282</sage_id><sourcerecordid>24545592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9231552b9ae682eacb36909d11ef778b3f1548adbf48f61f985b8d3bdaca16c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1LwzAUxYMoOKfvvggBH_Slmu-mvo2hUxhu-PFc0jaRzq6pScbwvzelIjIQH8IN3N853HsuAKcYXWGcptcIERJfiimTjEiyB0aYc5LIVIh9MOrbSd8_BEferxDq_2gEFpM21N6WtWrgVHV1UM0NnMCls6ZuNLQGPm1VW6kWznQbsUrDpXadDk4F6_wFfB60jzpsrXv3x-DAqMbrk-86Bq93ty_T-2S-mD1MJ_OkpByFJCO0n67IlBaSaFUWVGQoqzDWJk1lQQ3mTKqqMEwagU0meSErWlSqVFiUjI7B5eDbOfux0T7k69qXumlUq-3G5zjFEokYCfkfFZhmHAlJI3q-g67sxrVxkTzOw6QgnPcUGqjSWe-dNnnn6rVynzlGeX-MfPcYUZIMEq_e9C_Tv_mzgV_5GPOPP2GccR7D-wLy9JBb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1544862553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</creator><creatorcontrib>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</creatorcontrib><description>Although popularly perceived as a positive force important for objectives such as economic development and democracy, social capital may also be linked to less desirable outcomes. This article highlights a dark side to social capital by pointing to its role in a particularly pernicious phenomenon: genocidal violence. Drawing on a survey of residents from one community that experienced violence during Rwanda's 1994 genocide, I show that individual participation in the violence was partly determined by the features of residents' social networks. Perpetrators possessed larger networks in general and more connections to other perpetrators in particular. The quality as well as quantity of connections also mattered. Strong ties generally, and kinship and neighborly ties specifically, were strong predictors of participation. In contrast, possession of countervailing ties to nonparticipants did not reduce a resident's likelihood of participation. Drawing on in-depth interviews to explore the possible mechanisms behind these findings, I suggest participants' networks fulfilled functions of information diffusion, social influence, and behavioral regulation. More broadly, the findings suggest the importance of social structure and social interaction for participation in collective violence. Relational data should complement individual attribute data in predicting participation. The findings also suggest, contrary to the neo-Malthusian interpretation, that the role played by Rwanda's extraordinarily high population density in the violence may have been more sociological than ecological in origin. The diffusion, influence, and regulatory effects of social connections are likely to be amplified in communities where individuals live in close spatial proximity to each other.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8766</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022002713484282</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCFRAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Collective violence ; Communities ; Community structure ; Conflict resolution ; Death ; Democracy ; Genocide ; Individual Characteristics ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Kinship ; Online communities ; Participation ; Population Distribution ; Residents ; Rwanda ; Social Capital ; Social Influences ; Social interaction ; Social Networks ; Social Participation ; Social sciences ; Social structure ; Studies ; Violence</subject><ispartof>The Journal of conflict resolution, 2014-08, Vol.58 (5), p.865-893</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Aug 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9231552b9ae682eacb36909d11ef778b3f1548adbf48f61f985b8d3bdaca16c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24545592$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24545592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33204,33205,58219,58452,79113</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</creatorcontrib><title>Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks</title><title>The Journal of conflict resolution</title><description>Although popularly perceived as a positive force important for objectives such as economic development and democracy, social capital may also be linked to less desirable outcomes. This article highlights a dark side to social capital by pointing to its role in a particularly pernicious phenomenon: genocidal violence. Drawing on a survey of residents from one community that experienced violence during Rwanda's 1994 genocide, I show that individual participation in the violence was partly determined by the features of residents' social networks. Perpetrators possessed larger networks in general and more connections to other perpetrators in particular. The quality as well as quantity of connections also mattered. Strong ties generally, and kinship and neighborly ties specifically, were strong predictors of participation. In contrast, possession of countervailing ties to nonparticipants did not reduce a resident's likelihood of participation. Drawing on in-depth interviews to explore the possible mechanisms behind these findings, I suggest participants' networks fulfilled functions of information diffusion, social influence, and behavioral regulation. More broadly, the findings suggest the importance of social structure and social interaction for participation in collective violence. Relational data should complement individual attribute data in predicting participation. The findings also suggest, contrary to the neo-Malthusian interpretation, that the role played by Rwanda's extraordinarily high population density in the violence may have been more sociological than ecological in origin. The diffusion, influence, and regulatory effects of social connections are likely to be amplified in communities where individuals live in close spatial proximity to each other.</description><subject>Collective violence</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Genocide</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Online communities</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Population Distribution</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Rwanda</subject><subject>Social Capital</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><subject>Social Participation</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0022-0027</issn><issn>1552-8766</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd1LwzAUxYMoOKfvvggBH_Slmu-mvo2hUxhu-PFc0jaRzq6pScbwvzelIjIQH8IN3N853HsuAKcYXWGcptcIERJfiimTjEiyB0aYc5LIVIh9MOrbSd8_BEferxDq_2gEFpM21N6WtWrgVHV1UM0NnMCls6ZuNLQGPm1VW6kWznQbsUrDpXadDk4F6_wFfB60jzpsrXv3x-DAqMbrk-86Bq93ty_T-2S-mD1MJ_OkpByFJCO0n67IlBaSaFUWVGQoqzDWJk1lQQ3mTKqqMEwagU0meSErWlSqVFiUjI7B5eDbOfux0T7k69qXumlUq-3G5zjFEokYCfkfFZhmHAlJI3q-g67sxrVxkTzOw6QgnPcUGqjSWe-dNnnn6rVynzlGeX-MfPcYUZIMEq_e9C_Tv_mzgV_5GPOPP2GccR7D-wLy9JBb</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks</title><author>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9231552b9ae682eacb36909d11ef778b3f1548adbf48f61f985b8d3bdaca16c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Collective violence</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Genocide</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Online communities</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Population Distribution</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Rwanda</topic><topic>Social Capital</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><topic>Social Participation</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of conflict resolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of conflict resolution</jtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>865</spage><epage>893</epage><pages>865-893</pages><issn>0022-0027</issn><eissn>1552-8766</eissn><coden>JCFRAL</coden><abstract>Although popularly perceived as a positive force important for objectives such as economic development and democracy, social capital may also be linked to less desirable outcomes. This article highlights a dark side to social capital by pointing to its role in a particularly pernicious phenomenon: genocidal violence. Drawing on a survey of residents from one community that experienced violence during Rwanda's 1994 genocide, I show that individual participation in the violence was partly determined by the features of residents' social networks. Perpetrators possessed larger networks in general and more connections to other perpetrators in particular. The quality as well as quantity of connections also mattered. Strong ties generally, and kinship and neighborly ties specifically, were strong predictors of participation. In contrast, possession of countervailing ties to nonparticipants did not reduce a resident's likelihood of participation. Drawing on in-depth interviews to explore the possible mechanisms behind these findings, I suggest participants' networks fulfilled functions of information diffusion, social influence, and behavioral regulation. More broadly, the findings suggest the importance of social structure and social interaction for participation in collective violence. Relational data should complement individual attribute data in predicting participation. The findings also suggest, contrary to the neo-Malthusian interpretation, that the role played by Rwanda's extraordinarily high population density in the violence may have been more sociological than ecological in origin. The diffusion, influence, and regulatory effects of social connections are likely to be amplified in communities where individuals live in close spatial proximity to each other.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022002713484282</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0027 |
ispartof | The Journal of conflict resolution, 2014-08, Vol.58 (5), p.865-893 |
issn | 0022-0027 1552-8766 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718062202 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR; SAGE |
subjects | Collective violence Communities Community structure Conflict resolution Death Democracy Genocide Individual Characteristics Interpersonal Relationship Kinship Online communities Participation Population Distribution Residents Rwanda Social Capital Social Influences Social interaction Social Networks Social Participation Social sciences Social structure Studies Violence |
title | Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antisocial%20Capital:%20A%20Profile%20of%20Rwandan%20Genocide%20Perpetrators'%20Social%20Networks&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20conflict%20resolution&rft.au=McDoom,%20Omar%20Shahabudin&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=865&rft.epage=893&rft.pages=865-893&rft.issn=0022-0027&rft.eissn=1552-8766&rft.coden=JCFRAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022002713484282&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24545592%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9231552b9ae682eacb36909d11ef778b3f1548adbf48f61f985b8d3bdaca16c43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1544862553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24545592&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022002713484282&rfr_iscdi=true |