Loading…

Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks

Although popularly perceived as a positive force important for objectives such as economic development and democracy, social capital may also be linked to less desirable outcomes. This article highlights a dark side to social capital by pointing to its role in a particularly pernicious phenomenon: g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of conflict resolution 2014-08, Vol.58 (5), p.865-893
Main Author: McDoom, Omar Shahabudin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9231552b9ae682eacb36909d11ef778b3f1548adbf48f61f985b8d3bdaca16c43
container_end_page 893
container_issue 5
container_start_page 865
container_title The Journal of conflict resolution
container_volume 58
creator McDoom, Omar Shahabudin
description Although popularly perceived as a positive force important for objectives such as economic development and democracy, social capital may also be linked to less desirable outcomes. This article highlights a dark side to social capital by pointing to its role in a particularly pernicious phenomenon: genocidal violence. Drawing on a survey of residents from one community that experienced violence during Rwanda's 1994 genocide, I show that individual participation in the violence was partly determined by the features of residents' social networks. Perpetrators possessed larger networks in general and more connections to other perpetrators in particular. The quality as well as quantity of connections also mattered. Strong ties generally, and kinship and neighborly ties specifically, were strong predictors of participation. In contrast, possession of countervailing ties to nonparticipants did not reduce a resident's likelihood of participation. Drawing on in-depth interviews to explore the possible mechanisms behind these findings, I suggest participants' networks fulfilled functions of information diffusion, social influence, and behavioral regulation. More broadly, the findings suggest the importance of social structure and social interaction for participation in collective violence. Relational data should complement individual attribute data in predicting participation. The findings also suggest, contrary to the neo-Malthusian interpretation, that the role played by Rwanda's extraordinarily high population density in the violence may have been more sociological than ecological in origin. The diffusion, influence, and regulatory effects of social connections are likely to be amplified in communities where individuals live in close spatial proximity to each other.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0022002713484282
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718062202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24545592</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0022002713484282</sage_id><sourcerecordid>24545592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9231552b9ae682eacb36909d11ef778b3f1548adbf48f61f985b8d3bdaca16c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1LwzAUxYMoOKfvvggBH_Slmu-mvo2hUxhu-PFc0jaRzq6pScbwvzelIjIQH8IN3N853HsuAKcYXWGcptcIERJfiimTjEiyB0aYc5LIVIh9MOrbSd8_BEferxDq_2gEFpM21N6WtWrgVHV1UM0NnMCls6ZuNLQGPm1VW6kWznQbsUrDpXadDk4F6_wFfB60jzpsrXv3x-DAqMbrk-86Bq93ty_T-2S-mD1MJ_OkpByFJCO0n67IlBaSaFUWVGQoqzDWJk1lQQ3mTKqqMEwagU0meSErWlSqVFiUjI7B5eDbOfux0T7k69qXumlUq-3G5zjFEokYCfkfFZhmHAlJI3q-g67sxrVxkTzOw6QgnPcUGqjSWe-dNnnn6rVynzlGeX-MfPcYUZIMEq_e9C_Tv_mzgV_5GPOPP2GccR7D-wLy9JBb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1544862553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</creator><creatorcontrib>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</creatorcontrib><description>Although popularly perceived as a positive force important for objectives such as economic development and democracy, social capital may also be linked to less desirable outcomes. This article highlights a dark side to social capital by pointing to its role in a particularly pernicious phenomenon: genocidal violence. Drawing on a survey of residents from one community that experienced violence during Rwanda's 1994 genocide, I show that individual participation in the violence was partly determined by the features of residents' social networks. Perpetrators possessed larger networks in general and more connections to other perpetrators in particular. The quality as well as quantity of connections also mattered. Strong ties generally, and kinship and neighborly ties specifically, were strong predictors of participation. In contrast, possession of countervailing ties to nonparticipants did not reduce a resident's likelihood of participation. Drawing on in-depth interviews to explore the possible mechanisms behind these findings, I suggest participants' networks fulfilled functions of information diffusion, social influence, and behavioral regulation. More broadly, the findings suggest the importance of social structure and social interaction for participation in collective violence. Relational data should complement individual attribute data in predicting participation. The findings also suggest, contrary to the neo-Malthusian interpretation, that the role played by Rwanda's extraordinarily high population density in the violence may have been more sociological than ecological in origin. The diffusion, influence, and regulatory effects of social connections are likely to be amplified in communities where individuals live in close spatial proximity to each other.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8766</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022002713484282</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCFRAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Collective violence ; Communities ; Community structure ; Conflict resolution ; Death ; Democracy ; Genocide ; Individual Characteristics ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Kinship ; Online communities ; Participation ; Population Distribution ; Residents ; Rwanda ; Social Capital ; Social Influences ; Social interaction ; Social Networks ; Social Participation ; Social sciences ; Social structure ; Studies ; Violence</subject><ispartof>The Journal of conflict resolution, 2014-08, Vol.58 (5), p.865-893</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Aug 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9231552b9ae682eacb36909d11ef778b3f1548adbf48f61f985b8d3bdaca16c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24545592$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24545592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33204,33205,58219,58452,79113</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</creatorcontrib><title>Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks</title><title>The Journal of conflict resolution</title><description>Although popularly perceived as a positive force important for objectives such as economic development and democracy, social capital may also be linked to less desirable outcomes. This article highlights a dark side to social capital by pointing to its role in a particularly pernicious phenomenon: genocidal violence. Drawing on a survey of residents from one community that experienced violence during Rwanda's 1994 genocide, I show that individual participation in the violence was partly determined by the features of residents' social networks. Perpetrators possessed larger networks in general and more connections to other perpetrators in particular. The quality as well as quantity of connections also mattered. Strong ties generally, and kinship and neighborly ties specifically, were strong predictors of participation. In contrast, possession of countervailing ties to nonparticipants did not reduce a resident's likelihood of participation. Drawing on in-depth interviews to explore the possible mechanisms behind these findings, I suggest participants' networks fulfilled functions of information diffusion, social influence, and behavioral regulation. More broadly, the findings suggest the importance of social structure and social interaction for participation in collective violence. Relational data should complement individual attribute data in predicting participation. The findings also suggest, contrary to the neo-Malthusian interpretation, that the role played by Rwanda's extraordinarily high population density in the violence may have been more sociological than ecological in origin. The diffusion, influence, and regulatory effects of social connections are likely to be amplified in communities where individuals live in close spatial proximity to each other.</description><subject>Collective violence</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Genocide</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Online communities</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Population Distribution</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Rwanda</subject><subject>Social Capital</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><subject>Social Participation</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0022-0027</issn><issn>1552-8766</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd1LwzAUxYMoOKfvvggBH_Slmu-mvo2hUxhu-PFc0jaRzq6pScbwvzelIjIQH8IN3N853HsuAKcYXWGcptcIERJfiimTjEiyB0aYc5LIVIh9MOrbSd8_BEferxDq_2gEFpM21N6WtWrgVHV1UM0NnMCls6ZuNLQGPm1VW6kWznQbsUrDpXadDk4F6_wFfB60jzpsrXv3x-DAqMbrk-86Bq93ty_T-2S-mD1MJ_OkpByFJCO0n67IlBaSaFUWVGQoqzDWJk1lQQ3mTKqqMEwagU0meSErWlSqVFiUjI7B5eDbOfux0T7k69qXumlUq-3G5zjFEokYCfkfFZhmHAlJI3q-g67sxrVxkTzOw6QgnPcUGqjSWe-dNnnn6rVynzlGeX-MfPcYUZIMEq_e9C_Tv_mzgV_5GPOPP2GccR7D-wLy9JBb</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks</title><author>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9231552b9ae682eacb36909d11ef778b3f1548adbf48f61f985b8d3bdaca16c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Collective violence</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Genocide</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Online communities</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Population Distribution</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Rwanda</topic><topic>Social Capital</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><topic>Social Participation</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of conflict resolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDoom, Omar Shahabudin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of conflict resolution</jtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>865</spage><epage>893</epage><pages>865-893</pages><issn>0022-0027</issn><eissn>1552-8766</eissn><coden>JCFRAL</coden><abstract>Although popularly perceived as a positive force important for objectives such as economic development and democracy, social capital may also be linked to less desirable outcomes. This article highlights a dark side to social capital by pointing to its role in a particularly pernicious phenomenon: genocidal violence. Drawing on a survey of residents from one community that experienced violence during Rwanda's 1994 genocide, I show that individual participation in the violence was partly determined by the features of residents' social networks. Perpetrators possessed larger networks in general and more connections to other perpetrators in particular. The quality as well as quantity of connections also mattered. Strong ties generally, and kinship and neighborly ties specifically, were strong predictors of participation. In contrast, possession of countervailing ties to nonparticipants did not reduce a resident's likelihood of participation. Drawing on in-depth interviews to explore the possible mechanisms behind these findings, I suggest participants' networks fulfilled functions of information diffusion, social influence, and behavioral regulation. More broadly, the findings suggest the importance of social structure and social interaction for participation in collective violence. Relational data should complement individual attribute data in predicting participation. The findings also suggest, contrary to the neo-Malthusian interpretation, that the role played by Rwanda's extraordinarily high population density in the violence may have been more sociological than ecological in origin. The diffusion, influence, and regulatory effects of social connections are likely to be amplified in communities where individuals live in close spatial proximity to each other.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022002713484282</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0027
ispartof The Journal of conflict resolution, 2014-08, Vol.58 (5), p.865-893
issn 0022-0027
1552-8766
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718062202
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR; SAGE
subjects Collective violence
Communities
Community structure
Conflict resolution
Death
Democracy
Genocide
Individual Characteristics
Interpersonal Relationship
Kinship
Online communities
Participation
Population Distribution
Residents
Rwanda
Social Capital
Social Influences
Social interaction
Social Networks
Social Participation
Social sciences
Social structure
Studies
Violence
title Antisocial Capital: A Profile of Rwandan Genocide Perpetrators' Social Networks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antisocial%20Capital:%20A%20Profile%20of%20Rwandan%20Genocide%20Perpetrators'%20Social%20Networks&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20conflict%20resolution&rft.au=McDoom,%20Omar%20Shahabudin&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=865&rft.epage=893&rft.pages=865-893&rft.issn=0022-0027&rft.eissn=1552-8766&rft.coden=JCFRAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022002713484282&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24545592%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9231552b9ae682eacb36909d11ef778b3f1548adbf48f61f985b8d3bdaca16c43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1544862553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24545592&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022002713484282&rfr_iscdi=true