Intricacies of Social Movement Outcome Research and beyond: “How can you Tell” Social Movements Prompt Changes?

Most scholars of social movements have been drawn to research on the politically contentious behavior of collective actors because of the conviction that social movements sometimes generate significant historical progress and social change. Yet movement outcome research has been least developed in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sociological research online 2012-11, Vol.17 (4), p.1-11
Main Author: Suh, Doowon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Causality
Change agents
Irony
Political movements
Social activism
Social Change
Social Movements
Typology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Most scholars of social movements have been drawn to research on the politically contentious behavior of collective actors because of the conviction that social movements sometimes generate significant historical progress and social change. Yet movement outcome research has been least developed in the literature. This irony emanates from methodological and causal intricacies that fail to clearly explicate how social movements create change. The challenges encompass the heaped typologies, mutual inconsistencies, causal heterogeneities, and conflictive evaluation criteria of movement outcomes. To overcome these quandaries, this paper proposes that (1) any attempt to find an invariant model or general theorization of a movement outcome is inevitably futile; (2) instead, attention to the specific context of time and place in which social movements produce outcomes is necessary; and (3) a comprehensive understanding of the origins of a movement outcome becomes possible when multiple variables are considered and their combined effects are analyzed.
ISSN:1360-7804
1360-7804
DOI:10.5153/sro.2757