Loading…
Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study
Several previous cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians have a better metabolic profile than non-vegetarians, suggesting that a vegetarian dietary pattern may help prevent chronic degenerative diseases. However, longitudinal studies on the impact of vegetarian diets on metabolic traits...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of nutrition 2015-10, Vol.114 (8), p.1313-1320 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3 |
container_end_page | 1320 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1313 |
container_title | British journal of nutrition |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Chiu, Yen-Feng Hsu, Chih-Cheng Chiu, Tina H. T. Lee, Chun-Yi Liu, Ting-Ting Tsao, Chwen Keng Chuang, Su-Chun Hsiung, Chao A. |
description | Several previous cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians have a better metabolic profile than non-vegetarians, suggesting that a vegetarian dietary pattern may help prevent chronic degenerative diseases. However, longitudinal studies on the impact of vegetarian diets on metabolic traits are scarce. We studied how several sub-types of vegetarian diets affect metabolic traits, including waist circumference, BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, TAG and TC:HDL ratio, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs. The study used the MJ Health Screening database, with data collected from 1994 to 2008 in Taiwan, which included 4415 lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 1855 lacto-vegetarians and 1913 vegans; each vegetarian was matched with five non-vegetarians based on age, sex and study site. In the longitudinal follow-up, each additional year of vegan diet lowered the risk of obesity by 7 % (95 % CI 0·88, 0·99), whereas each additional year of lacto-vegetarian diet lowered the risk of elevated SBP by 8 % (95 % CI 0·85, 0·99) and elevated glucose by 7 % (95 % CI 0·87, 0·99), and each additional year of ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet increased abnormal HDL by 7 % (95 % CI 1·03, 1·12), compared with non-vegetarians. In the cross-sectional comparisons, all sub-types of vegetarians had lower likelihoods of abnormalities compared with non-vegetarians on all metabolic traits (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0007114515002937 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718907921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007114515002937</cupid><sourcerecordid>1718907921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhAbggS1y4hHriOLa5oRUUpEo90J4jx55svUrsxU6K-gi8NU67oAqEL5bn_-f7rRlCXgN7Dwzk2TfGmARoBAjGas3lE7KBRoqqbtv6KdmscrXqJ-RFzvvyVMD0c3JSt1wI0GxDfm5TzLnKaGcfgxmpCY6OMez8vDi_FmycDib5HEOmcaATzqaPo7f0kOLgR8y0x_kHYqC3uCti8ibcU0IM1aNSXvp9SckfqKGTme0NusK-iWmmuWTdvSTPBjNmfHW8T8n1509X2y_VxeX51-3Hi8o2qp0rgdpo5bDmarCWg2oUSu2sgJYNTggluObAWiOkUI3RDEGXI9pWyL5hjp-Sdw_c8v_vC-a5m3y2OI4mYFxyBxKUZlLXUKxv_7Lu45LKUFZXzSSHElpc8OCy6ygTDt0h-cmkuw5Yt-6p-2dPpefNkbz0E7o_Hb8XUwz8CDVTn7zb4aPs_2J_AXNgnZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1720731160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study</title><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Chiu, Yen-Feng ; Hsu, Chih-Cheng ; Chiu, Tina H. T. ; Lee, Chun-Yi ; Liu, Ting-Ting ; Tsao, Chwen Keng ; Chuang, Su-Chun ; Hsiung, Chao A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Yen-Feng ; Hsu, Chih-Cheng ; Chiu, Tina H. T. ; Lee, Chun-Yi ; Liu, Ting-Ting ; Tsao, Chwen Keng ; Chuang, Su-Chun ; Hsiung, Chao A.</creatorcontrib><description>Several previous cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians have a better metabolic profile than non-vegetarians, suggesting that a vegetarian dietary pattern may help prevent chronic degenerative diseases. However, longitudinal studies on the impact of vegetarian diets on metabolic traits are scarce. We studied how several sub-types of vegetarian diets affect metabolic traits, including waist circumference, BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, TAG and TC:HDL ratio, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs. The study used the MJ Health Screening database, with data collected from 1994 to 2008 in Taiwan, which included 4415 lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 1855 lacto-vegetarians and 1913 vegans; each vegetarian was matched with five non-vegetarians based on age, sex and study site. In the longitudinal follow-up, each additional year of vegan diet lowered the risk of obesity by 7 % (95 % CI 0·88, 0·99), whereas each additional year of lacto-vegetarian diet lowered the risk of elevated SBP by 8 % (95 % CI 0·85, 0·99) and elevated glucose by 7 % (95 % CI 0·87, 0·99), and each additional year of ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet increased abnormal HDL by 7 % (95 % CI 1·03, 1·12), compared with non-vegetarians. In the cross-sectional comparisons, all sub-types of vegetarians had lower likelihoods of abnormalities compared with non-vegetarians on all metabolic traits (P<0·001 for all comparisons), except for HDL and TAG. The better metabolic profile in vegetarians is partially attributable to lower BMI. With proper management of TAG and HDL, along with caution about the intake of refined carbohydrates and fructose, a plant-based diet may benefit all aspects of the metabolic profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515002937</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26355190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Glucose - metabolism ; Blood Pressure ; Body Mass Index ; Carbohydrates ; Cholesterol, HDL - blood ; Cholesterol, LDL - blood ; Chronic Disease ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diet ; Diet, Vegan ; Diet, Vegetarian ; Dietary Surveys and Nutritional Epidemiology ; Fasting ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Metabolism ; Metabolome ; Middle Aged ; Obesity - prevention & control ; Risk Factors ; Studies ; Taiwan ; Triglycerides - blood ; Veganism ; Vegetarianism ; Vegetarians ; Waist Circumference ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of nutrition, 2015-10, Vol.114 (8), p.1313-1320</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3352-4500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007114515002937/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,72703</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26355190$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Yen-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Chih-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Tina H. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chun-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ting-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Chwen Keng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Su-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiung, Chao A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study</title><title>British journal of nutrition</title><addtitle>Br J Nutr</addtitle><description>Several previous cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians have a better metabolic profile than non-vegetarians, suggesting that a vegetarian dietary pattern may help prevent chronic degenerative diseases. However, longitudinal studies on the impact of vegetarian diets on metabolic traits are scarce. We studied how several sub-types of vegetarian diets affect metabolic traits, including waist circumference, BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, TAG and TC:HDL ratio, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs. The study used the MJ Health Screening database, with data collected from 1994 to 2008 in Taiwan, which included 4415 lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 1855 lacto-vegetarians and 1913 vegans; each vegetarian was matched with five non-vegetarians based on age, sex and study site. In the longitudinal follow-up, each additional year of vegan diet lowered the risk of obesity by 7 % (95 % CI 0·88, 0·99), whereas each additional year of lacto-vegetarian diet lowered the risk of elevated SBP by 8 % (95 % CI 0·85, 0·99) and elevated glucose by 7 % (95 % CI 0·87, 0·99), and each additional year of ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet increased abnormal HDL by 7 % (95 % CI 1·03, 1·12), compared with non-vegetarians. In the cross-sectional comparisons, all sub-types of vegetarians had lower likelihoods of abnormalities compared with non-vegetarians on all metabolic traits (P<0·001 for all comparisons), except for HDL and TAG. The better metabolic profile in vegetarians is partially attributable to lower BMI. With proper management of TAG and HDL, along with caution about the intake of refined carbohydrates and fructose, a plant-based diet may benefit all aspects of the metabolic profile.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - metabolism</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Cholesterol, HDL - blood</subject><subject>Cholesterol, LDL - blood</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet, Vegan</subject><subject>Diet, Vegetarian</subject><subject>Dietary Surveys and Nutritional Epidemiology</subject><subject>Fasting</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metabolome</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity - prevention & control</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Triglycerides - blood</subject><subject>Veganism</subject><subject>Vegetarianism</subject><subject>Vegetarians</subject><subject>Waist Circumference</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-1145</issn><issn>1475-2662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhAbggS1y4hHriOLa5oRUUpEo90J4jx55svUrsxU6K-gi8NU67oAqEL5bn_-f7rRlCXgN7Dwzk2TfGmARoBAjGas3lE7KBRoqqbtv6KdmscrXqJ-RFzvvyVMD0c3JSt1wI0GxDfm5TzLnKaGcfgxmpCY6OMez8vDi_FmycDib5HEOmcaATzqaPo7f0kOLgR8y0x_kHYqC3uCti8ibcU0IM1aNSXvp9SckfqKGTme0NusK-iWmmuWTdvSTPBjNmfHW8T8n1509X2y_VxeX51-3Hi8o2qp0rgdpo5bDmarCWg2oUSu2sgJYNTggluObAWiOkUI3RDEGXI9pWyL5hjp-Sdw_c8v_vC-a5m3y2OI4mYFxyBxKUZlLXUKxv_7Lu45LKUFZXzSSHElpc8OCy6ygTDt0h-cmkuw5Yt-6p-2dPpefNkbz0E7o_Hb8XUwz8CDVTn7zb4aPs_2J_AXNgnZA</recordid><startdate>20151028</startdate><enddate>20151028</enddate><creator>Chiu, Yen-Feng</creator><creator>Hsu, Chih-Cheng</creator><creator>Chiu, Tina H. T.</creator><creator>Lee, Chun-Yi</creator><creator>Liu, Ting-Ting</creator><creator>Tsao, Chwen Keng</creator><creator>Chuang, Su-Chun</creator><creator>Hsiung, Chao A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-4500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151028</creationdate><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study</title><author>Chiu, Yen-Feng ; Hsu, Chih-Cheng ; Chiu, Tina H. T. ; Lee, Chun-Yi ; Liu, Ting-Ting ; Tsao, Chwen Keng ; Chuang, Su-Chun ; Hsiung, Chao A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - metabolism</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Cholesterol, HDL - blood</topic><topic>Cholesterol, LDL - blood</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet, Vegan</topic><topic>Diet, Vegetarian</topic><topic>Dietary Surveys and Nutritional Epidemiology</topic><topic>Fasting</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metabolome</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity - prevention & control</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Triglycerides - blood</topic><topic>Veganism</topic><topic>Vegetarianism</topic><topic>Vegetarians</topic><topic>Waist Circumference</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Yen-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Chih-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Tina H. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chun-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ting-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Chwen Keng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Su-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiung, Chao A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiu, Yen-Feng</au><au>Hsu, Chih-Cheng</au><au>Chiu, Tina H. T.</au><au>Lee, Chun-Yi</au><au>Liu, Ting-Ting</au><au>Tsao, Chwen Keng</au><au>Chuang, Su-Chun</au><au>Hsiung, Chao A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study</atitle><jtitle>British journal of nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Nutr</addtitle><date>2015-10-28</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1313</spage><epage>1320</epage><pages>1313-1320</pages><issn>0007-1145</issn><eissn>1475-2662</eissn><abstract>Several previous cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians have a better metabolic profile than non-vegetarians, suggesting that a vegetarian dietary pattern may help prevent chronic degenerative diseases. However, longitudinal studies on the impact of vegetarian diets on metabolic traits are scarce. We studied how several sub-types of vegetarian diets affect metabolic traits, including waist circumference, BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, TAG and TC:HDL ratio, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs. The study used the MJ Health Screening database, with data collected from 1994 to 2008 in Taiwan, which included 4415 lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 1855 lacto-vegetarians and 1913 vegans; each vegetarian was matched with five non-vegetarians based on age, sex and study site. In the longitudinal follow-up, each additional year of vegan diet lowered the risk of obesity by 7 % (95 % CI 0·88, 0·99), whereas each additional year of lacto-vegetarian diet lowered the risk of elevated SBP by 8 % (95 % CI 0·85, 0·99) and elevated glucose by 7 % (95 % CI 0·87, 0·99), and each additional year of ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet increased abnormal HDL by 7 % (95 % CI 1·03, 1·12), compared with non-vegetarians. In the cross-sectional comparisons, all sub-types of vegetarians had lower likelihoods of abnormalities compared with non-vegetarians on all metabolic traits (P<0·001 for all comparisons), except for HDL and TAG. The better metabolic profile in vegetarians is partially attributable to lower BMI. With proper management of TAG and HDL, along with caution about the intake of refined carbohydrates and fructose, a plant-based diet may benefit all aspects of the metabolic profile.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>26355190</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0007114515002937</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-4500</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1145 |
ispartof | British journal of nutrition, 2015-10, Vol.114 (8), p.1313-1320 |
issn | 0007-1145 1475-2662 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718907921 |
source | Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Blood Glucose - metabolism Blood Pressure Body Mass Index Carbohydrates Cholesterol, HDL - blood Cholesterol, LDL - blood Chronic Disease Cross-Sectional Studies Diet Diet, Vegan Diet, Vegetarian Dietary Surveys and Nutritional Epidemiology Fasting Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Longitudinal Studies Male Metabolism Metabolome Middle Aged Obesity - prevention & control Risk Factors Studies Taiwan Triglycerides - blood Veganism Vegetarianism Vegetarians Waist Circumference Young Adult |
title | Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A38%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-sectional%20and%20longitudinal%20comparisons%20of%20metabolic%20profiles%20between%20vegetarian%20and%20non-vegetarian%20subjects:%20a%20matched%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20nutrition&rft.au=Chiu,%20Yen-Feng&rft.date=2015-10-28&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1313&rft.epage=1320&rft.pages=1313-1320&rft.issn=0007-1145&rft.eissn=1475-2662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007114515002937&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1718907921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1720731160&rft_id=info:pmid/26355190&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007114515002937&rfr_iscdi=true |