Loading…

Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study

Several previous cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians have a better metabolic profile than non-vegetarians, suggesting that a vegetarian dietary pattern may help prevent chronic degenerative diseases. However, longitudinal studies on the impact of vegetarian diets on metabolic traits...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of nutrition 2015-10, Vol.114 (8), p.1313-1320
Main Authors: Chiu, Yen-Feng, Hsu, Chih-Cheng, Chiu, Tina H. T., Lee, Chun-Yi, Liu, Ting-Ting, Tsao, Chwen Keng, Chuang, Su-Chun, Hsiung, Chao A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3
container_end_page 1320
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1313
container_title British journal of nutrition
container_volume 114
creator Chiu, Yen-Feng
Hsu, Chih-Cheng
Chiu, Tina H. T.
Lee, Chun-Yi
Liu, Ting-Ting
Tsao, Chwen Keng
Chuang, Su-Chun
Hsiung, Chao A.
description Several previous cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians have a better metabolic profile than non-vegetarians, suggesting that a vegetarian dietary pattern may help prevent chronic degenerative diseases. However, longitudinal studies on the impact of vegetarian diets on metabolic traits are scarce. We studied how several sub-types of vegetarian diets affect metabolic traits, including waist circumference, BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, TAG and TC:HDL ratio, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs. The study used the MJ Health Screening database, with data collected from 1994 to 2008 in Taiwan, which included 4415 lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 1855 lacto-vegetarians and 1913 vegans; each vegetarian was matched with five non-vegetarians based on age, sex and study site. In the longitudinal follow-up, each additional year of vegan diet lowered the risk of obesity by 7 % (95 % CI 0·88, 0·99), whereas each additional year of lacto-vegetarian diet lowered the risk of elevated SBP by 8 % (95 % CI 0·85, 0·99) and elevated glucose by 7 % (95 % CI 0·87, 0·99), and each additional year of ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet increased abnormal HDL by 7 % (95 % CI 1·03, 1·12), compared with non-vegetarians. In the cross-sectional comparisons, all sub-types of vegetarians had lower likelihoods of abnormalities compared with non-vegetarians on all metabolic traits (P
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0007114515002937
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718907921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007114515002937</cupid><sourcerecordid>1718907921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhAbggS1y4hHriOLa5oRUUpEo90J4jx55svUrsxU6K-gi8NU67oAqEL5bn_-f7rRlCXgN7Dwzk2TfGmARoBAjGas3lE7KBRoqqbtv6KdmscrXqJ-RFzvvyVMD0c3JSt1wI0GxDfm5TzLnKaGcfgxmpCY6OMez8vDi_FmycDib5HEOmcaATzqaPo7f0kOLgR8y0x_kHYqC3uCti8ibcU0IM1aNSXvp9SckfqKGTme0NusK-iWmmuWTdvSTPBjNmfHW8T8n1509X2y_VxeX51-3Hi8o2qp0rgdpo5bDmarCWg2oUSu2sgJYNTggluObAWiOkUI3RDEGXI9pWyL5hjp-Sdw_c8v_vC-a5m3y2OI4mYFxyBxKUZlLXUKxv_7Lu45LKUFZXzSSHElpc8OCy6ygTDt0h-cmkuw5Yt-6p-2dPpefNkbz0E7o_Hb8XUwz8CDVTn7zb4aPs_2J_AXNgnZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1720731160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study</title><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Chiu, Yen-Feng ; Hsu, Chih-Cheng ; Chiu, Tina H. T. ; Lee, Chun-Yi ; Liu, Ting-Ting ; Tsao, Chwen Keng ; Chuang, Su-Chun ; Hsiung, Chao A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Yen-Feng ; Hsu, Chih-Cheng ; Chiu, Tina H. T. ; Lee, Chun-Yi ; Liu, Ting-Ting ; Tsao, Chwen Keng ; Chuang, Su-Chun ; Hsiung, Chao A.</creatorcontrib><description>Several previous cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians have a better metabolic profile than non-vegetarians, suggesting that a vegetarian dietary pattern may help prevent chronic degenerative diseases. However, longitudinal studies on the impact of vegetarian diets on metabolic traits are scarce. We studied how several sub-types of vegetarian diets affect metabolic traits, including waist circumference, BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, TAG and TC:HDL ratio, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs. The study used the MJ Health Screening database, with data collected from 1994 to 2008 in Taiwan, which included 4415 lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 1855 lacto-vegetarians and 1913 vegans; each vegetarian was matched with five non-vegetarians based on age, sex and study site. In the longitudinal follow-up, each additional year of vegan diet lowered the risk of obesity by 7 % (95 % CI 0·88, 0·99), whereas each additional year of lacto-vegetarian diet lowered the risk of elevated SBP by 8 % (95 % CI 0·85, 0·99) and elevated glucose by 7 % (95 % CI 0·87, 0·99), and each additional year of ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet increased abnormal HDL by 7 % (95 % CI 1·03, 1·12), compared with non-vegetarians. In the cross-sectional comparisons, all sub-types of vegetarians had lower likelihoods of abnormalities compared with non-vegetarians on all metabolic traits (P&lt;0·001 for all comparisons), except for HDL and TAG. The better metabolic profile in vegetarians is partially attributable to lower BMI. With proper management of TAG and HDL, along with caution about the intake of refined carbohydrates and fructose, a plant-based diet may benefit all aspects of the metabolic profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515002937</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26355190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Glucose - metabolism ; Blood Pressure ; Body Mass Index ; Carbohydrates ; Cholesterol, HDL - blood ; Cholesterol, LDL - blood ; Chronic Disease ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diet ; Diet, Vegan ; Diet, Vegetarian ; Dietary Surveys and Nutritional Epidemiology ; Fasting ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Metabolism ; Metabolome ; Middle Aged ; Obesity - prevention &amp; control ; Risk Factors ; Studies ; Taiwan ; Triglycerides - blood ; Veganism ; Vegetarianism ; Vegetarians ; Waist Circumference ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of nutrition, 2015-10, Vol.114 (8), p.1313-1320</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3352-4500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007114515002937/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,72703</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26355190$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Yen-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Chih-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Tina H. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chun-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ting-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Chwen Keng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Su-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiung, Chao A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study</title><title>British journal of nutrition</title><addtitle>Br J Nutr</addtitle><description>Several previous cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians have a better metabolic profile than non-vegetarians, suggesting that a vegetarian dietary pattern may help prevent chronic degenerative diseases. However, longitudinal studies on the impact of vegetarian diets on metabolic traits are scarce. We studied how several sub-types of vegetarian diets affect metabolic traits, including waist circumference, BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, TAG and TC:HDL ratio, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs. The study used the MJ Health Screening database, with data collected from 1994 to 2008 in Taiwan, which included 4415 lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 1855 lacto-vegetarians and 1913 vegans; each vegetarian was matched with five non-vegetarians based on age, sex and study site. In the longitudinal follow-up, each additional year of vegan diet lowered the risk of obesity by 7 % (95 % CI 0·88, 0·99), whereas each additional year of lacto-vegetarian diet lowered the risk of elevated SBP by 8 % (95 % CI 0·85, 0·99) and elevated glucose by 7 % (95 % CI 0·87, 0·99), and each additional year of ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet increased abnormal HDL by 7 % (95 % CI 1·03, 1·12), compared with non-vegetarians. In the cross-sectional comparisons, all sub-types of vegetarians had lower likelihoods of abnormalities compared with non-vegetarians on all metabolic traits (P&lt;0·001 for all comparisons), except for HDL and TAG. The better metabolic profile in vegetarians is partially attributable to lower BMI. With proper management of TAG and HDL, along with caution about the intake of refined carbohydrates and fructose, a plant-based diet may benefit all aspects of the metabolic profile.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - metabolism</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Cholesterol, HDL - blood</subject><subject>Cholesterol, LDL - blood</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet, Vegan</subject><subject>Diet, Vegetarian</subject><subject>Dietary Surveys and Nutritional Epidemiology</subject><subject>Fasting</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metabolome</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taiwan</subject><subject>Triglycerides - blood</subject><subject>Veganism</subject><subject>Vegetarianism</subject><subject>Vegetarians</subject><subject>Waist Circumference</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-1145</issn><issn>1475-2662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhAbggS1y4hHriOLa5oRUUpEo90J4jx55svUrsxU6K-gi8NU67oAqEL5bn_-f7rRlCXgN7Dwzk2TfGmARoBAjGas3lE7KBRoqqbtv6KdmscrXqJ-RFzvvyVMD0c3JSt1wI0GxDfm5TzLnKaGcfgxmpCY6OMez8vDi_FmycDib5HEOmcaATzqaPo7f0kOLgR8y0x_kHYqC3uCti8ibcU0IM1aNSXvp9SckfqKGTme0NusK-iWmmuWTdvSTPBjNmfHW8T8n1509X2y_VxeX51-3Hi8o2qp0rgdpo5bDmarCWg2oUSu2sgJYNTggluObAWiOkUI3RDEGXI9pWyL5hjp-Sdw_c8v_vC-a5m3y2OI4mYFxyBxKUZlLXUKxv_7Lu45LKUFZXzSSHElpc8OCy6ygTDt0h-cmkuw5Yt-6p-2dPpefNkbz0E7o_Hb8XUwz8CDVTn7zb4aPs_2J_AXNgnZA</recordid><startdate>20151028</startdate><enddate>20151028</enddate><creator>Chiu, Yen-Feng</creator><creator>Hsu, Chih-Cheng</creator><creator>Chiu, Tina H. T.</creator><creator>Lee, Chun-Yi</creator><creator>Liu, Ting-Ting</creator><creator>Tsao, Chwen Keng</creator><creator>Chuang, Su-Chun</creator><creator>Hsiung, Chao A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-4500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151028</creationdate><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study</title><author>Chiu, Yen-Feng ; Hsu, Chih-Cheng ; Chiu, Tina H. T. ; Lee, Chun-Yi ; Liu, Ting-Ting ; Tsao, Chwen Keng ; Chuang, Su-Chun ; Hsiung, Chao A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - metabolism</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Cholesterol, HDL - blood</topic><topic>Cholesterol, LDL - blood</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet, Vegan</topic><topic>Diet, Vegetarian</topic><topic>Dietary Surveys and Nutritional Epidemiology</topic><topic>Fasting</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metabolome</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taiwan</topic><topic>Triglycerides - blood</topic><topic>Veganism</topic><topic>Vegetarianism</topic><topic>Vegetarians</topic><topic>Waist Circumference</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Yen-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Chih-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Tina H. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chun-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ting-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Chwen Keng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Su-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiung, Chao A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiu, Yen-Feng</au><au>Hsu, Chih-Cheng</au><au>Chiu, Tina H. T.</au><au>Lee, Chun-Yi</au><au>Liu, Ting-Ting</au><au>Tsao, Chwen Keng</au><au>Chuang, Su-Chun</au><au>Hsiung, Chao A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study</atitle><jtitle>British journal of nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Nutr</addtitle><date>2015-10-28</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1313</spage><epage>1320</epage><pages>1313-1320</pages><issn>0007-1145</issn><eissn>1475-2662</eissn><abstract>Several previous cross-sectional studies have shown that vegetarians have a better metabolic profile than non-vegetarians, suggesting that a vegetarian dietary pattern may help prevent chronic degenerative diseases. However, longitudinal studies on the impact of vegetarian diets on metabolic traits are scarce. We studied how several sub-types of vegetarian diets affect metabolic traits, including waist circumference, BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, TAG and TC:HDL ratio, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal study designs. The study used the MJ Health Screening database, with data collected from 1994 to 2008 in Taiwan, which included 4415 lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 1855 lacto-vegetarians and 1913 vegans; each vegetarian was matched with five non-vegetarians based on age, sex and study site. In the longitudinal follow-up, each additional year of vegan diet lowered the risk of obesity by 7 % (95 % CI 0·88, 0·99), whereas each additional year of lacto-vegetarian diet lowered the risk of elevated SBP by 8 % (95 % CI 0·85, 0·99) and elevated glucose by 7 % (95 % CI 0·87, 0·99), and each additional year of ovo-lacto-vegetarian diet increased abnormal HDL by 7 % (95 % CI 1·03, 1·12), compared with non-vegetarians. In the cross-sectional comparisons, all sub-types of vegetarians had lower likelihoods of abnormalities compared with non-vegetarians on all metabolic traits (P&lt;0·001 for all comparisons), except for HDL and TAG. The better metabolic profile in vegetarians is partially attributable to lower BMI. With proper management of TAG and HDL, along with caution about the intake of refined carbohydrates and fructose, a plant-based diet may benefit all aspects of the metabolic profile.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>26355190</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0007114515002937</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-4500</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1145
ispartof British journal of nutrition, 2015-10, Vol.114 (8), p.1313-1320
issn 0007-1145
1475-2662
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718907921
source Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Cambridge University Press
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Blood Glucose - metabolism
Blood Pressure
Body Mass Index
Carbohydrates
Cholesterol, HDL - blood
Cholesterol, LDL - blood
Chronic Disease
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diet
Diet, Vegan
Diet, Vegetarian
Dietary Surveys and Nutritional Epidemiology
Fasting
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Metabolism
Metabolome
Middle Aged
Obesity - prevention & control
Risk Factors
Studies
Taiwan
Triglycerides - blood
Veganism
Vegetarianism
Vegetarians
Waist Circumference
Young Adult
title Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of metabolic profiles between vegetarian and non-vegetarian subjects: a matched cohort study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A38%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-sectional%20and%20longitudinal%20comparisons%20of%20metabolic%20profiles%20between%20vegetarian%20and%20non-vegetarian%20subjects:%20a%20matched%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20nutrition&rft.au=Chiu,%20Yen-Feng&rft.date=2015-10-28&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1313&rft.epage=1320&rft.pages=1313-1320&rft.issn=0007-1145&rft.eissn=1475-2662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007114515002937&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1718907921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-5e9a98de238fcc31848e79dc5160fd5585393106a57584a90e1999956657b40d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1720731160&rft_id=info:pmid/26355190&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007114515002937&rfr_iscdi=true