Loading…

Comparison of clinically suspected injuries with injuries detected at whole-body CT in suspected multi-trauma victims

Aim To assess the accuracy of the trauma team leader's clinical suspicion of injury in patients who have undergone whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for suspected polytrauma, and to assess the frequency of unsuspected injuries and specific patterns of injury at WBCT. Materials and methods R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical radiology 2015-11, Vol.70 (11), p.1205-1211
Main Authors: Shannon, L, Peachey, T, Skipper, N, Adiotomre, E, Chopra, A, Marappan, B, Kotnis, N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7a1c97103597bffb0db73177e9b442ccd40c622612547c62d62fcda1abdc44d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7a1c97103597bffb0db73177e9b442ccd40c622612547c62d62fcda1abdc44d93
container_end_page 1211
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1205
container_title Clinical radiology
container_volume 70
creator Shannon, L
Peachey, T
Skipper, N
Adiotomre, E
Chopra, A
Marappan, B
Kotnis, N
description Aim To assess the accuracy of the trauma team leader's clinical suspicion of injury in patients who have undergone whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for suspected polytrauma, and to assess the frequency of unsuspected injuries and specific patterns of injury at WBCT. Materials and methods Requests for patients who underwent WBCT for suspected polytrauma from April 2011 to March 2014 were reviewed and each body area that was clinically suspected to be injured was recorded. Body areas were divided into the following groups based on anatomical regions covered in each segment of the WBCT examination: head (including facial bones); neck (including cervical spine); chest (including thoracic spine); and abdomen/pelvis (including lumbar spine). The formal radiology report for each study was reviewed and injuries found at CT were grouped into the same body areas. For each patient, the number of clinically suspected injured areas was compared to the number of confirmed injured areas at WBCT. Results Five hundred and eighty-eight patients were included in the study. Thirty-two percent (186/588) had a normal scan. Ninety-three percent (546/588) had fewer injured body areas at WBCT than suspected. Four percent (27/588) had the equivalent number of injured areas at WBCT as suspected. Three percent (15/588) had more injured areas at WBCT than suspected. Fifty percent (263/527) with clinically suspected chest injuries were confirmed to have chest injuries at WBCT. This was lower for other areas: abdomen/pelvis 31% (165/535); head 29% (155/533); neck 13% (66/513). Four percent of (24/588) patients had unsuspected injuries found at WBCT. Seventy-five percent (18/24) of unsuspected injuries were considered as serious, where failure to treat would have the potential for significant morbidity. Most of these patients had severe injuries to other body areas that were correctly suspected. Of the 165 with abdominal/pelvic region injuries, there were associated injuries in the thoracic region in 62% (103/165) cases. Of the 278 thoracic injuries, there were abdominal/pelvic region injuries in 37% (103/278) and injuries to the neck in 19% (52/278) cases. Of the 158 head injuries, there were neck injuries in 22% (34/158) cases. Conclusion Clinical suspicion of injury correlates poorly with findings at WBCT, with a high proportion of uninjured body areas. The number of unsuspected injuries found at WBCT was low, but the majority of these were serious injuries, possibly masked by di
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.084
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718909875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0009926015002779</els_id><sourcerecordid>1718909875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7a1c97103597bffb0db73177e9b442ccd40c622612547c62d62fcda1abdc44d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxYMo9rX6BVzILN3M9CaTSV5ABHlUWyh0YQV3IZNkaMaZyTN_Wt63b4bXqrhwde8l5xzI7yD0DkODAbPzsdFBmYYA7hpgDWzpC7TBLetqQsSPl2gDAKIWhMEJOo1xXE9K6Gt0QhiBrRB4g_LOz3sVXPRL5YdKT25xWk3ToYo57q1O1lRuGXNwNlYPLt39uYxNx3eVqoc7P9m69-ZQ7W6L5C_3nKfk6hRUnlV173Ryc3yDXg1qivbt0zxD379c3O4u6-ubr1e7z9e1phinmiusBcfQdoL3w9CD6XmLObeip5RobShoRgjDpKO8bIaRQRuFVW80pUa0Z-jDMXcf_K9sY5Kzi9pOk1qsz1FijrcCxJZ3RUqOUh18jMEOch_crMJBYpArbjnKFbdccUtgsuAupvdP-bmfrflteeZbBB-PAlt-ee9skFE7u2hrXCh4pPHu__mf_rE_F_TTHmwcfQ5L4SexjESC_LY2vPaNOwDCuWgfAZC-qBk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718909875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of clinically suspected injuries with injuries detected at whole-body CT in suspected multi-trauma victims</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Shannon, L ; Peachey, T ; Skipper, N ; Adiotomre, E ; Chopra, A ; Marappan, B ; Kotnis, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Shannon, L ; Peachey, T ; Skipper, N ; Adiotomre, E ; Chopra, A ; Marappan, B ; Kotnis, N</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To assess the accuracy of the trauma team leader's clinical suspicion of injury in patients who have undergone whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for suspected polytrauma, and to assess the frequency of unsuspected injuries and specific patterns of injury at WBCT. Materials and methods Requests for patients who underwent WBCT for suspected polytrauma from April 2011 to March 2014 were reviewed and each body area that was clinically suspected to be injured was recorded. Body areas were divided into the following groups based on anatomical regions covered in each segment of the WBCT examination: head (including facial bones); neck (including cervical spine); chest (including thoracic spine); and abdomen/pelvis (including lumbar spine). The formal radiology report for each study was reviewed and injuries found at CT were grouped into the same body areas. For each patient, the number of clinically suspected injured areas was compared to the number of confirmed injured areas at WBCT. Results Five hundred and eighty-eight patients were included in the study. Thirty-two percent (186/588) had a normal scan. Ninety-three percent (546/588) had fewer injured body areas at WBCT than suspected. Four percent (27/588) had the equivalent number of injured areas at WBCT as suspected. Three percent (15/588) had more injured areas at WBCT than suspected. Fifty percent (263/527) with clinically suspected chest injuries were confirmed to have chest injuries at WBCT. This was lower for other areas: abdomen/pelvis 31% (165/535); head 29% (155/533); neck 13% (66/513). Four percent of (24/588) patients had unsuspected injuries found at WBCT. Seventy-five percent (18/24) of unsuspected injuries were considered as serious, where failure to treat would have the potential for significant morbidity. Most of these patients had severe injuries to other body areas that were correctly suspected. Of the 165 with abdominal/pelvic region injuries, there were associated injuries in the thoracic region in 62% (103/165) cases. Of the 278 thoracic injuries, there were abdominal/pelvic region injuries in 37% (103/278) and injuries to the neck in 19% (52/278) cases. Of the 158 head injuries, there were neck injuries in 22% (34/158) cases. Conclusion Clinical suspicion of injury correlates poorly with findings at WBCT, with a high proportion of uninjured body areas. The number of unsuspected injuries found at WBCT was low, but the majority of these were serious injuries, possibly masked by distracting injury to other body areas. The use of a WBCT protocol is recommended for suspected polytrauma, but regular monitoring of WBCT findings and regular feedback of the results to emergency physicians is suggested to help inform their selection of patients for trauma WBCT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-229X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26208991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Distribution ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Trauma - diagnostic imaging ; Patient Care Team - standards ; Radiology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Traumatology - standards ; Whole Body Imaging - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical radiology, 2015-11, Vol.70 (11), p.1205-1211</ispartof><rights>The Royal College of Radiologists</rights><rights>2015 The Royal College of Radiologists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7a1c97103597bffb0db73177e9b442ccd40c622612547c62d62fcda1abdc44d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7a1c97103597bffb0db73177e9b442ccd40c622612547c62d62fcda1abdc44d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26208991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shannon, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peachey, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skipper, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adiotomre, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopra, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marappan, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotnis, N</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of clinically suspected injuries with injuries detected at whole-body CT in suspected multi-trauma victims</title><title>Clinical radiology</title><addtitle>Clin Radiol</addtitle><description>Aim To assess the accuracy of the trauma team leader's clinical suspicion of injury in patients who have undergone whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for suspected polytrauma, and to assess the frequency of unsuspected injuries and specific patterns of injury at WBCT. Materials and methods Requests for patients who underwent WBCT for suspected polytrauma from April 2011 to March 2014 were reviewed and each body area that was clinically suspected to be injured was recorded. Body areas were divided into the following groups based on anatomical regions covered in each segment of the WBCT examination: head (including facial bones); neck (including cervical spine); chest (including thoracic spine); and abdomen/pelvis (including lumbar spine). The formal radiology report for each study was reviewed and injuries found at CT were grouped into the same body areas. For each patient, the number of clinically suspected injured areas was compared to the number of confirmed injured areas at WBCT. Results Five hundred and eighty-eight patients were included in the study. Thirty-two percent (186/588) had a normal scan. Ninety-three percent (546/588) had fewer injured body areas at WBCT than suspected. Four percent (27/588) had the equivalent number of injured areas at WBCT as suspected. Three percent (15/588) had more injured areas at WBCT than suspected. Fifty percent (263/527) with clinically suspected chest injuries were confirmed to have chest injuries at WBCT. This was lower for other areas: abdomen/pelvis 31% (165/535); head 29% (155/533); neck 13% (66/513). Four percent of (24/588) patients had unsuspected injuries found at WBCT. Seventy-five percent (18/24) of unsuspected injuries were considered as serious, where failure to treat would have the potential for significant morbidity. Most of these patients had severe injuries to other body areas that were correctly suspected. Of the 165 with abdominal/pelvic region injuries, there were associated injuries in the thoracic region in 62% (103/165) cases. Of the 278 thoracic injuries, there were abdominal/pelvic region injuries in 37% (103/278) and injuries to the neck in 19% (52/278) cases. Of the 158 head injuries, there were neck injuries in 22% (34/158) cases. Conclusion Clinical suspicion of injury correlates poorly with findings at WBCT, with a high proportion of uninjured body areas. The number of unsuspected injuries found at WBCT was low, but the majority of these were serious injuries, possibly masked by distracting injury to other body areas. The use of a WBCT protocol is recommended for suspected polytrauma, but regular monitoring of WBCT findings and regular feedback of the results to emergency physicians is suggested to help inform their selection of patients for trauma WBCT.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple Trauma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Patient Care Team - standards</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Traumatology - standards</subject><subject>Whole Body Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0009-9260</issn><issn>1365-229X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxYMo9rX6BVzILN3M9CaTSV5ABHlUWyh0YQV3IZNkaMaZyTN_Wt63b4bXqrhwde8l5xzI7yD0DkODAbPzsdFBmYYA7hpgDWzpC7TBLetqQsSPl2gDAKIWhMEJOo1xXE9K6Gt0QhiBrRB4g_LOz3sVXPRL5YdKT25xWk3ToYo57q1O1lRuGXNwNlYPLt39uYxNx3eVqoc7P9m69-ZQ7W6L5C_3nKfk6hRUnlV173Ryc3yDXg1qivbt0zxD379c3O4u6-ubr1e7z9e1phinmiusBcfQdoL3w9CD6XmLObeip5RobShoRgjDpKO8bIaRQRuFVW80pUa0Z-jDMXcf_K9sY5Kzi9pOk1qsz1FijrcCxJZ3RUqOUh18jMEOch_crMJBYpArbjnKFbdccUtgsuAupvdP-bmfrflteeZbBB-PAlt-ee9skFE7u2hrXCh4pPHu__mf_rE_F_TTHmwcfQ5L4SexjESC_LY2vPaNOwDCuWgfAZC-qBk</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Shannon, L</creator><creator>Peachey, T</creator><creator>Skipper, N</creator><creator>Adiotomre, E</creator><creator>Chopra, A</creator><creator>Marappan, B</creator><creator>Kotnis, N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Comparison of clinically suspected injuries with injuries detected at whole-body CT in suspected multi-trauma victims</title><author>Shannon, L ; Peachey, T ; Skipper, N ; Adiotomre, E ; Chopra, A ; Marappan, B ; Kotnis, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7a1c97103597bffb0db73177e9b442ccd40c622612547c62d62fcda1abdc44d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple Trauma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Patient Care Team - standards</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Traumatology - standards</topic><topic>Whole Body Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shannon, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peachey, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skipper, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adiotomre, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopra, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marappan, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotnis, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shannon, L</au><au>Peachey, T</au><au>Skipper, N</au><au>Adiotomre, E</au><au>Chopra, A</au><au>Marappan, B</au><au>Kotnis, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of clinically suspected injuries with injuries detected at whole-body CT in suspected multi-trauma victims</atitle><jtitle>Clinical radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Radiol</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1205</spage><epage>1211</epage><pages>1205-1211</pages><issn>0009-9260</issn><eissn>1365-229X</eissn><abstract>Aim To assess the accuracy of the trauma team leader's clinical suspicion of injury in patients who have undergone whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for suspected polytrauma, and to assess the frequency of unsuspected injuries and specific patterns of injury at WBCT. Materials and methods Requests for patients who underwent WBCT for suspected polytrauma from April 2011 to March 2014 were reviewed and each body area that was clinically suspected to be injured was recorded. Body areas were divided into the following groups based on anatomical regions covered in each segment of the WBCT examination: head (including facial bones); neck (including cervical spine); chest (including thoracic spine); and abdomen/pelvis (including lumbar spine). The formal radiology report for each study was reviewed and injuries found at CT were grouped into the same body areas. For each patient, the number of clinically suspected injured areas was compared to the number of confirmed injured areas at WBCT. Results Five hundred and eighty-eight patients were included in the study. Thirty-two percent (186/588) had a normal scan. Ninety-three percent (546/588) had fewer injured body areas at WBCT than suspected. Four percent (27/588) had the equivalent number of injured areas at WBCT as suspected. Three percent (15/588) had more injured areas at WBCT than suspected. Fifty percent (263/527) with clinically suspected chest injuries were confirmed to have chest injuries at WBCT. This was lower for other areas: abdomen/pelvis 31% (165/535); head 29% (155/533); neck 13% (66/513). Four percent of (24/588) patients had unsuspected injuries found at WBCT. Seventy-five percent (18/24) of unsuspected injuries were considered as serious, where failure to treat would have the potential for significant morbidity. Most of these patients had severe injuries to other body areas that were correctly suspected. Of the 165 with abdominal/pelvic region injuries, there were associated injuries in the thoracic region in 62% (103/165) cases. Of the 278 thoracic injuries, there were abdominal/pelvic region injuries in 37% (103/278) and injuries to the neck in 19% (52/278) cases. Of the 158 head injuries, there were neck injuries in 22% (34/158) cases. Conclusion Clinical suspicion of injury correlates poorly with findings at WBCT, with a high proportion of uninjured body areas. The number of unsuspected injuries found at WBCT was low, but the majority of these were serious injuries, possibly masked by distracting injury to other body areas. The use of a WBCT protocol is recommended for suspected polytrauma, but regular monitoring of WBCT findings and regular feedback of the results to emergency physicians is suggested to help inform their selection of patients for trauma WBCT.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26208991</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.084</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9260
ispartof Clinical radiology, 2015-11, Vol.70 (11), p.1205-1211
issn 0009-9260
1365-229X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718909875
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age Distribution
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Clinical Competence - standards
Humans
Middle Aged
Multiple Trauma - diagnostic imaging
Patient Care Team - standards
Radiology
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Traumatology - standards
Whole Body Imaging - methods
Young Adult
title Comparison of clinically suspected injuries with injuries detected at whole-body CT in suspected multi-trauma victims
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A26%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20clinically%20suspected%20injuries%20with%20injuries%20detected%20at%20whole-body%20CT%20in%20suspected%20multi-trauma%20victims&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20radiology&rft.au=Shannon,%20L&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1205&rft.epage=1211&rft.pages=1205-1211&rft.issn=0009-9260&rft.eissn=1365-229X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1718909875%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7a1c97103597bffb0db73177e9b442ccd40c622612547c62d62fcda1abdc44d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718909875&rft_id=info:pmid/26208991&rfr_iscdi=true