Loading…
Sustainable development: A qualitative inquiry into the current state of the UK construction industry
Purpose - Despite the surge of interest in construction sustainability and the many Government initiatives encouraging reform in the UK construction industry (CI), the prevalence of sustainable development (SD) in the industry is still largely lagging behind that of other industries. Given the amoun...
Saved in:
Published in: | Structural survey 2014-08, Vol.32 (4), p.315-330 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-88b10ebeb895a82696a4481173f5de701dea394b99273591a1da95dab709c4d63 |
container_end_page | 330 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 315 |
container_title | Structural survey |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Brennan, Michelle C Cotgrave, Alison J |
description | Purpose - Despite the surge of interest in construction sustainability and the many Government initiatives encouraging reform in the UK construction industry (CI), the prevalence of sustainable development (SD) in the industry is still largely lagging behind that of other industries. Given the amount of focus and activity identified nationally in this area, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the reasons why this is not being translated into action and to seek counsel from industry professionals as to how they believe change can be achieved with a particular focus on how they believe higher education institutions (HEIs) can contribute. Design/methodology/approach - An explorative, qualitative study using three focus groups was of construction professionals. Findings - Despite a lack of action, many in industry support sustainability and actively attempt to engage in sustainable practices but a number of barriers preclude successful implementation. Government initiatives are having a positive impact, with participants believing that both Government and HEIs are imperative in driving the sustainability agenda forward. Research limitations/implications - Whilst limited in scale, this paper highlights the current state of the CI in relation to SD and evidences that progress is being made albeit slowly. The findings may help both Government and HEIs alongside industry in achieving how this can be overcome. Originality/value - Previous research in this area has generally adopted a quantitative approach. Adopting a qualitative approach provides a more in depth view as to why the status quo remains with regards to SD in the CI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/SS-02-2014-0010 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718928054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1718928054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-88b10ebeb895a82696a4481173f5de701dea394b99273591a1da95dab709c4d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AURQdRsFbX3Qpu3Ix9b2YyM28pxS8ouIiCu2GSvEBLmtRMIvjvbagrV67u5nC59wixQLhDBL_McwlKKkAjARBOxExp8tI4tKdiBspqCR4-zsVFSlsAsJ7MTCzyMQ1x08ai4euKv7jp9jtuh0txVscm8dVvzsX748Pb6lmuX59eVvdrWSowg_S-QOCCC09Z9MqSjcZ4RKfrrGIHWHHUZAoi5XRGGLGKlFWxcEClqayei9tj777vPkdOQ9htUslNE1vuxhTQoSflITP_QZ0hZ_zUevMH3XZj3x6OBLT2MMVpogO1PFJl36XUcx32_WYX---AECanIc8DqDA5DZNT_QNwD2YY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1662737399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainable development: A qualitative inquiry into the current state of the UK construction industry</title><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Brennan, Michelle C ; Cotgrave, Alison J</creator><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Michelle C ; Cotgrave, Alison J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - Despite the surge of interest in construction sustainability and the many Government initiatives encouraging reform in the UK construction industry (CI), the prevalence of sustainable development (SD) in the industry is still largely lagging behind that of other industries. Given the amount of focus and activity identified nationally in this area, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the reasons why this is not being translated into action and to seek counsel from industry professionals as to how they believe change can be achieved with a particular focus on how they believe higher education institutions (HEIs) can contribute. Design/methodology/approach - An explorative, qualitative study using three focus groups was of construction professionals. Findings - Despite a lack of action, many in industry support sustainability and actively attempt to engage in sustainable practices but a number of barriers preclude successful implementation. Government initiatives are having a positive impact, with participants believing that both Government and HEIs are imperative in driving the sustainability agenda forward. Research limitations/implications - Whilst limited in scale, this paper highlights the current state of the CI in relation to SD and evidences that progress is being made albeit slowly. The findings may help both Government and HEIs alongside industry in achieving how this can be overcome. Originality/value - Previous research in this area has generally adopted a quantitative approach. Adopting a qualitative approach provides a more in depth view as to why the status quo remains with regards to SD in the CI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-080X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2398-4708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-4716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/SS-02-2014-0010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Climate change ; Construction ; Construction industry ; Education ; Governments ; Higher education institutions ; Methods ; Professional ethics ; Professionals ; Qualitative research ; Structural surveys ; Studies ; Surges ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable practices</subject><ispartof>Structural survey, 2014-08, Vol.32 (4), p.315-330</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-88b10ebeb895a82696a4481173f5de701dea394b99273591a1da95dab709c4d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Michelle C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotgrave, Alison J</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainable development: A qualitative inquiry into the current state of the UK construction industry</title><title>Structural survey</title><description>Purpose - Despite the surge of interest in construction sustainability and the many Government initiatives encouraging reform in the UK construction industry (CI), the prevalence of sustainable development (SD) in the industry is still largely lagging behind that of other industries. Given the amount of focus and activity identified nationally in this area, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the reasons why this is not being translated into action and to seek counsel from industry professionals as to how they believe change can be achieved with a particular focus on how they believe higher education institutions (HEIs) can contribute. Design/methodology/approach - An explorative, qualitative study using three focus groups was of construction professionals. Findings - Despite a lack of action, many in industry support sustainability and actively attempt to engage in sustainable practices but a number of barriers preclude successful implementation. Government initiatives are having a positive impact, with participants believing that both Government and HEIs are imperative in driving the sustainability agenda forward. Research limitations/implications - Whilst limited in scale, this paper highlights the current state of the CI in relation to SD and evidences that progress is being made albeit slowly. The findings may help both Government and HEIs alongside industry in achieving how this can be overcome. Originality/value - Previous research in this area has generally adopted a quantitative approach. Adopting a qualitative approach provides a more in depth view as to why the status quo remains with regards to SD in the CI.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Governments</subject><subject>Higher education institutions</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Structural surveys</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surges</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable practices</subject><issn>0263-080X</issn><issn>2398-4708</issn><issn>2398-4716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AURQdRsFbX3Qpu3Ix9b2YyM28pxS8ouIiCu2GSvEBLmtRMIvjvbagrV67u5nC59wixQLhDBL_McwlKKkAjARBOxExp8tI4tKdiBspqCR4-zsVFSlsAsJ7MTCzyMQ1x08ai4euKv7jp9jtuh0txVscm8dVvzsX748Pb6lmuX59eVvdrWSowg_S-QOCCC09Z9MqSjcZ4RKfrrGIHWHHUZAoi5XRGGLGKlFWxcEClqayei9tj777vPkdOQ9htUslNE1vuxhTQoSflITP_QZ0hZ_zUevMH3XZj3x6OBLT2MMVpogO1PFJl36XUcx32_WYX---AECanIc8DqDA5DZNT_QNwD2YY</recordid><startdate>20140805</startdate><enddate>20140805</enddate><creator>Brennan, Michelle C</creator><creator>Cotgrave, Alison J</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140805</creationdate><title>Sustainable development</title><author>Brennan, Michelle C ; Cotgrave, Alison J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-88b10ebeb895a82696a4481173f5de701dea394b99273591a1da95dab709c4d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Governments</topic><topic>Higher education institutions</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Structural surveys</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surges</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable practices</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Michelle C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotgrave, Alison J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Structural survey</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brennan, Michelle C</au><au>Cotgrave, Alison J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainable development: A qualitative inquiry into the current state of the UK construction industry</atitle><jtitle>Structural survey</jtitle><date>2014-08-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>315-330</pages><issn>0263-080X</issn><issn>2398-4708</issn><eissn>2398-4716</eissn><abstract>Purpose - Despite the surge of interest in construction sustainability and the many Government initiatives encouraging reform in the UK construction industry (CI), the prevalence of sustainable development (SD) in the industry is still largely lagging behind that of other industries. Given the amount of focus and activity identified nationally in this area, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the reasons why this is not being translated into action and to seek counsel from industry professionals as to how they believe change can be achieved with a particular focus on how they believe higher education institutions (HEIs) can contribute. Design/methodology/approach - An explorative, qualitative study using three focus groups was of construction professionals. Findings - Despite a lack of action, many in industry support sustainability and actively attempt to engage in sustainable practices but a number of barriers preclude successful implementation. Government initiatives are having a positive impact, with participants believing that both Government and HEIs are imperative in driving the sustainability agenda forward. Research limitations/implications - Whilst limited in scale, this paper highlights the current state of the CI in relation to SD and evidences that progress is being made albeit slowly. The findings may help both Government and HEIs alongside industry in achieving how this can be overcome. Originality/value - Previous research in this area has generally adopted a quantitative approach. Adopting a qualitative approach provides a more in depth view as to why the status quo remains with regards to SD in the CI.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/SS-02-2014-0010</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0263-080X |
ispartof | Structural survey, 2014-08, Vol.32 (4), p.315-330 |
issn | 0263-080X 2398-4708 2398-4716 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718928054 |
source | Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Barriers Climate change Construction Construction industry Education Governments Higher education institutions Methods Professional ethics Professionals Qualitative research Structural surveys Studies Surges Sustainability Sustainable development Sustainable practices |
title | Sustainable development: A qualitative inquiry into the current state of the UK construction industry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A35%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainable%20development:%20A%20qualitative%20inquiry%20into%20the%20current%20state%20of%20the%20UK%20construction%20industry&rft.jtitle=Structural%20survey&rft.au=Brennan,%20Michelle%20C&rft.date=2014-08-05&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=315-330&rft.issn=0263-080X&rft.eissn=2398-4716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/SS-02-2014-0010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1718928054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-88b10ebeb895a82696a4481173f5de701dea394b99273591a1da95dab709c4d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1662737399&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |