Loading…

Sustainable development: A qualitative inquiry into the current state of the UK construction industry

Purpose - Despite the surge of interest in construction sustainability and the many Government initiatives encouraging reform in the UK construction industry (CI), the prevalence of sustainable development (SD) in the industry is still largely lagging behind that of other industries. Given the amoun...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Structural survey 2014-08, Vol.32 (4), p.315-330
Main Authors: Brennan, Michelle C, Cotgrave, Alison J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-88b10ebeb895a82696a4481173f5de701dea394b99273591a1da95dab709c4d63
container_end_page 330
container_issue 4
container_start_page 315
container_title Structural survey
container_volume 32
creator Brennan, Michelle C
Cotgrave, Alison J
description Purpose - Despite the surge of interest in construction sustainability and the many Government initiatives encouraging reform in the UK construction industry (CI), the prevalence of sustainable development (SD) in the industry is still largely lagging behind that of other industries. Given the amount of focus and activity identified nationally in this area, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the reasons why this is not being translated into action and to seek counsel from industry professionals as to how they believe change can be achieved with a particular focus on how they believe higher education institutions (HEIs) can contribute. Design/methodology/approach - An explorative, qualitative study using three focus groups was of construction professionals. Findings - Despite a lack of action, many in industry support sustainability and actively attempt to engage in sustainable practices but a number of barriers preclude successful implementation. Government initiatives are having a positive impact, with participants believing that both Government and HEIs are imperative in driving the sustainability agenda forward. Research limitations/implications - Whilst limited in scale, this paper highlights the current state of the CI in relation to SD and evidences that progress is being made albeit slowly. The findings may help both Government and HEIs alongside industry in achieving how this can be overcome. Originality/value - Previous research in this area has generally adopted a quantitative approach. Adopting a qualitative approach provides a more in depth view as to why the status quo remains with regards to SD in the CI.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/SS-02-2014-0010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718928054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1718928054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-88b10ebeb895a82696a4481173f5de701dea394b99273591a1da95dab709c4d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AURQdRsFbX3Qpu3Ix9b2YyM28pxS8ouIiCu2GSvEBLmtRMIvjvbagrV67u5nC59wixQLhDBL_McwlKKkAjARBOxExp8tI4tKdiBspqCR4-zsVFSlsAsJ7MTCzyMQ1x08ai4euKv7jp9jtuh0txVscm8dVvzsX748Pb6lmuX59eVvdrWSowg_S-QOCCC09Z9MqSjcZ4RKfrrGIHWHHUZAoi5XRGGLGKlFWxcEClqayei9tj777vPkdOQ9htUslNE1vuxhTQoSflITP_QZ0hZ_zUevMH3XZj3x6OBLT2MMVpogO1PFJl36XUcx32_WYX---AECanIc8DqDA5DZNT_QNwD2YY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1662737399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainable development: A qualitative inquiry into the current state of the UK construction industry</title><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Brennan, Michelle C ; Cotgrave, Alison J</creator><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Michelle C ; Cotgrave, Alison J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - Despite the surge of interest in construction sustainability and the many Government initiatives encouraging reform in the UK construction industry (CI), the prevalence of sustainable development (SD) in the industry is still largely lagging behind that of other industries. Given the amount of focus and activity identified nationally in this area, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the reasons why this is not being translated into action and to seek counsel from industry professionals as to how they believe change can be achieved with a particular focus on how they believe higher education institutions (HEIs) can contribute. Design/methodology/approach - An explorative, qualitative study using three focus groups was of construction professionals. Findings - Despite a lack of action, many in industry support sustainability and actively attempt to engage in sustainable practices but a number of barriers preclude successful implementation. Government initiatives are having a positive impact, with participants believing that both Government and HEIs are imperative in driving the sustainability agenda forward. Research limitations/implications - Whilst limited in scale, this paper highlights the current state of the CI in relation to SD and evidences that progress is being made albeit slowly. The findings may help both Government and HEIs alongside industry in achieving how this can be overcome. Originality/value - Previous research in this area has generally adopted a quantitative approach. Adopting a qualitative approach provides a more in depth view as to why the status quo remains with regards to SD in the CI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-080X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2398-4708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-4716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/SS-02-2014-0010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Climate change ; Construction ; Construction industry ; Education ; Governments ; Higher education institutions ; Methods ; Professional ethics ; Professionals ; Qualitative research ; Structural surveys ; Studies ; Surges ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable practices</subject><ispartof>Structural survey, 2014-08, Vol.32 (4), p.315-330</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-88b10ebeb895a82696a4481173f5de701dea394b99273591a1da95dab709c4d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Michelle C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotgrave, Alison J</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainable development: A qualitative inquiry into the current state of the UK construction industry</title><title>Structural survey</title><description>Purpose - Despite the surge of interest in construction sustainability and the many Government initiatives encouraging reform in the UK construction industry (CI), the prevalence of sustainable development (SD) in the industry is still largely lagging behind that of other industries. Given the amount of focus and activity identified nationally in this area, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the reasons why this is not being translated into action and to seek counsel from industry professionals as to how they believe change can be achieved with a particular focus on how they believe higher education institutions (HEIs) can contribute. Design/methodology/approach - An explorative, qualitative study using three focus groups was of construction professionals. Findings - Despite a lack of action, many in industry support sustainability and actively attempt to engage in sustainable practices but a number of barriers preclude successful implementation. Government initiatives are having a positive impact, with participants believing that both Government and HEIs are imperative in driving the sustainability agenda forward. Research limitations/implications - Whilst limited in scale, this paper highlights the current state of the CI in relation to SD and evidences that progress is being made albeit slowly. The findings may help both Government and HEIs alongside industry in achieving how this can be overcome. Originality/value - Previous research in this area has generally adopted a quantitative approach. Adopting a qualitative approach provides a more in depth view as to why the status quo remains with regards to SD in the CI.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Governments</subject><subject>Higher education institutions</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Structural surveys</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surges</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable practices</subject><issn>0263-080X</issn><issn>2398-4708</issn><issn>2398-4716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AURQdRsFbX3Qpu3Ix9b2YyM28pxS8ouIiCu2GSvEBLmtRMIvjvbagrV67u5nC59wixQLhDBL_McwlKKkAjARBOxExp8tI4tKdiBspqCR4-zsVFSlsAsJ7MTCzyMQ1x08ai4euKv7jp9jtuh0txVscm8dVvzsX748Pb6lmuX59eVvdrWSowg_S-QOCCC09Z9MqSjcZ4RKfrrGIHWHHUZAoi5XRGGLGKlFWxcEClqayei9tj777vPkdOQ9htUslNE1vuxhTQoSflITP_QZ0hZ_zUevMH3XZj3x6OBLT2MMVpogO1PFJl36XUcx32_WYX---AECanIc8DqDA5DZNT_QNwD2YY</recordid><startdate>20140805</startdate><enddate>20140805</enddate><creator>Brennan, Michelle C</creator><creator>Cotgrave, Alison J</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140805</creationdate><title>Sustainable development</title><author>Brennan, Michelle C ; Cotgrave, Alison J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-88b10ebeb895a82696a4481173f5de701dea394b99273591a1da95dab709c4d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Governments</topic><topic>Higher education institutions</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Structural surveys</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surges</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable practices</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Michelle C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotgrave, Alison J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Structural survey</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brennan, Michelle C</au><au>Cotgrave, Alison J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainable development: A qualitative inquiry into the current state of the UK construction industry</atitle><jtitle>Structural survey</jtitle><date>2014-08-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>315-330</pages><issn>0263-080X</issn><issn>2398-4708</issn><eissn>2398-4716</eissn><abstract>Purpose - Despite the surge of interest in construction sustainability and the many Government initiatives encouraging reform in the UK construction industry (CI), the prevalence of sustainable development (SD) in the industry is still largely lagging behind that of other industries. Given the amount of focus and activity identified nationally in this area, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the reasons why this is not being translated into action and to seek counsel from industry professionals as to how they believe change can be achieved with a particular focus on how they believe higher education institutions (HEIs) can contribute. Design/methodology/approach - An explorative, qualitative study using three focus groups was of construction professionals. Findings - Despite a lack of action, many in industry support sustainability and actively attempt to engage in sustainable practices but a number of barriers preclude successful implementation. Government initiatives are having a positive impact, with participants believing that both Government and HEIs are imperative in driving the sustainability agenda forward. Research limitations/implications - Whilst limited in scale, this paper highlights the current state of the CI in relation to SD and evidences that progress is being made albeit slowly. The findings may help both Government and HEIs alongside industry in achieving how this can be overcome. Originality/value - Previous research in this area has generally adopted a quantitative approach. Adopting a qualitative approach provides a more in depth view as to why the status quo remains with regards to SD in the CI.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/SS-02-2014-0010</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-080X
ispartof Structural survey, 2014-08, Vol.32 (4), p.315-330
issn 0263-080X
2398-4708
2398-4716
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718928054
source Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Barriers
Climate change
Construction
Construction industry
Education
Governments
Higher education institutions
Methods
Professional ethics
Professionals
Qualitative research
Structural surveys
Studies
Surges
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Sustainable practices
title Sustainable development: A qualitative inquiry into the current state of the UK construction industry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A35%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainable%20development:%20A%20qualitative%20inquiry%20into%20the%20current%20state%20of%20the%20UK%20construction%20industry&rft.jtitle=Structural%20survey&rft.au=Brennan,%20Michelle%20C&rft.date=2014-08-05&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=315-330&rft.issn=0263-080X&rft.eissn=2398-4716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/SS-02-2014-0010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1718928054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c204t-88b10ebeb895a82696a4481173f5de701dea394b99273591a1da95dab709c4d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1662737399&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true