Loading…
Implementing a Calibration Sy
A calibration system implementation is only about 20%-30% technology; the rest is culture and process. Calibration system implementation is also very time- and resource-consuming -- the risk of failure is high. Typically, it involves many different functions and departments within an organization an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Quality (Wheaton) 2015-07, Vol.54 (7), p.28-32 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 32 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 28 |
container_title | Quality (Wheaton) |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Koskinen, Sami |
description | A calibration system implementation is only about 20%-30% technology; the rest is culture and process. Calibration system implementation is also very time- and resource-consuming -- the risk of failure is high. Typically, it involves many different functions and departments within an organization and takes time to complete. To ensure a high quality, sustainable calibration system, there are some important aspects to consider and common pitfalls to avoid during implementation. The most common pitfalls include: 1. features, functions, price arms race, 2. unclear goal and purpose, 3. modelling an old legacy system into a new system, 4. failing to gain early user and stakeholder adoption, 5. the "Big Bang" implementation, and 6. under-resourcing and lack of project organization. Overall, avoiding the common pitfalls to execute a successful calibration system implementation will take a significant amount of combined efforts from both the vendor and the company. It will take due diligence from both parties to define the implementation processes needed. |
format | magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718968889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3740194141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p619-7da29296b9223a491f790181aa1a97aa500dc670357b06557098aab5f4aac4243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjstKxEAQAAdRMK5-ghDw4iXQPT2vPsriY2HBg3sPnexEsuRlJjn49y7oyVNdiqIuVIZMvjAG4VJlQA4KZnLX6ialEwBqtJSp-10_dbGPw9IOn7nkW-naapalHYf84_tWXTXSpXj3x406vDwftm_F_v11t33aF5NDLvxRNGt2FWtNYhgbz4ABRVDYi1iAY-08kPUVOGs9cBCpbGNEaqMNbdTjb3aax681pqXs21THrpMhjmsq0WNgF0Lgs_rwTz2N6zyc50p0bMkReKIfQ-VFdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1695363073</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Implementing a Calibration Sy</title><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><creator>Koskinen, Sami</creator><creatorcontrib>Koskinen, Sami</creatorcontrib><description>A calibration system implementation is only about 20%-30% technology; the rest is culture and process. Calibration system implementation is also very time- and resource-consuming -- the risk of failure is high. Typically, it involves many different functions and departments within an organization and takes time to complete. To ensure a high quality, sustainable calibration system, there are some important aspects to consider and common pitfalls to avoid during implementation. The most common pitfalls include: 1. features, functions, price arms race, 2. unclear goal and purpose, 3. modelling an old legacy system into a new system, 4. failing to gain early user and stakeholder adoption, 5. the "Big Bang" implementation, and 6. under-resourcing and lack of project organization. Overall, avoiding the common pitfalls to execute a successful calibration system implementation will take a significant amount of combined efforts from both the vendor and the company. It will take due diligence from both parties to define the implementation processes needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-9936</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-4410</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QULTDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Troy: BNP Media</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Culture ; Due diligence ; Gain ; Guidelines ; Legacy ; Mathematical models ; Organizations ; Quality control</subject><ispartof>Quality (Wheaton), 2015-07, Vol.54 (7), p.28-32</ispartof><rights>Copyright BNP Media Jul 2015</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koskinen, Sami</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing a Calibration Sy</title><title>Quality (Wheaton)</title><description>A calibration system implementation is only about 20%-30% technology; the rest is culture and process. Calibration system implementation is also very time- and resource-consuming -- the risk of failure is high. Typically, it involves many different functions and departments within an organization and takes time to complete. To ensure a high quality, sustainable calibration system, there are some important aspects to consider and common pitfalls to avoid during implementation. The most common pitfalls include: 1. features, functions, price arms race, 2. unclear goal and purpose, 3. modelling an old legacy system into a new system, 4. failing to gain early user and stakeholder adoption, 5. the "Big Bang" implementation, and 6. under-resourcing and lack of project organization. Overall, avoiding the common pitfalls to execute a successful calibration system implementation will take a significant amount of combined efforts from both the vendor and the company. It will take due diligence from both parties to define the implementation processes needed.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Due diligence</subject><subject>Gain</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Legacy</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><issn>0360-9936</issn><issn>1937-4410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjstKxEAQAAdRMK5-ghDw4iXQPT2vPsriY2HBg3sPnexEsuRlJjn49y7oyVNdiqIuVIZMvjAG4VJlQA4KZnLX6ialEwBqtJSp-10_dbGPw9IOn7nkW-naapalHYf84_tWXTXSpXj3x406vDwftm_F_v11t33aF5NDLvxRNGt2FWtNYhgbz4ABRVDYi1iAY-08kPUVOGs9cBCpbGNEaqMNbdTjb3aax681pqXs21THrpMhjmsq0WNgF0Lgs_rwTz2N6zyc50p0bMkReKIfQ-VFdQ</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Koskinen, Sami</creator><general>BNP Media</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88K</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2T</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Implementing a Calibration Sy</title><author>Koskinen, Sami</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p619-7da29296b9223a491f790181aa1a97aa500dc670357b06557098aab5f4aac4243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Due diligence</topic><topic>Gain</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Legacy</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koskinen, Sami</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Proquest Entrepreneurship</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Telecommunications (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM trade & industry</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Telecommunications Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Quality (Wheaton)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koskinen, Sami</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementing a Calibration Sy</atitle><jtitle>Quality (Wheaton)</jtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>28-32</pages><issn>0360-9936</issn><eissn>1937-4410</eissn><coden>QULTDP</coden><abstract>A calibration system implementation is only about 20%-30% technology; the rest is culture and process. Calibration system implementation is also very time- and resource-consuming -- the risk of failure is high. Typically, it involves many different functions and departments within an organization and takes time to complete. To ensure a high quality, sustainable calibration system, there are some important aspects to consider and common pitfalls to avoid during implementation. The most common pitfalls include: 1. features, functions, price arms race, 2. unclear goal and purpose, 3. modelling an old legacy system into a new system, 4. failing to gain early user and stakeholder adoption, 5. the "Big Bang" implementation, and 6. under-resourcing and lack of project organization. Overall, avoiding the common pitfalls to execute a successful calibration system implementation will take a significant amount of combined efforts from both the vendor and the company. It will take due diligence from both parties to define the implementation processes needed.</abstract><cop>Troy</cop><pub>BNP Media</pub><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-9936 |
ispartof | Quality (Wheaton), 2015-07, Vol.54 (7), p.28-32 |
issn | 0360-9936 1937-4410 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718968889 |
source | Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】 |
subjects | Calibration Culture Due diligence Gain Guidelines Legacy Mathematical models Organizations Quality control |
title | Implementing a Calibration Sy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A45%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20a%20Calibration%20Sy&rft.jtitle=Quality%20(Wheaton)&rft.au=Koskinen,%20Sami&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=28-32&rft.issn=0360-9936&rft.eissn=1937-4410&rft.coden=QULTDP&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3740194141%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p619-7da29296b9223a491f790181aa1a97aa500dc670357b06557098aab5f4aac4243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1695363073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |