Loading…

Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model

An empirical equation for annual evaporation (E) of the form, E = P/(1 + (P/Rn)alpha) 1/alpha, where P is the annual precipitation, Rn the water equivalent of annual net radiation, and alpha an adjustable parameter, is evaluated using field observations (water balance, and micrometeorologic measurem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 1999-03, Vol.216 (1/2), p.99-110
Main Author: Choudhury, B.J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-963ccc87d6c0ac382e4a5720c02d01557a313cbce18cf6cb5f0525c6d2d233363
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-963ccc87d6c0ac382e4a5720c02d01557a313cbce18cf6cb5f0525c6d2d233363
container_end_page 110
container_issue 1/2
container_start_page 99
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 216
creator Choudhury, B.J
description An empirical equation for annual evaporation (E) of the form, E = P/(1 + (P/Rn)alpha) 1/alpha, where P is the annual precipitation, Rn the water equivalent of annual net radiation, and alpha an adjustable parameter, is evaluated using field observations (water balance, and micrometeorologic measurements for areas ca. 1 km2) at eight locations having different types of vegetation, and results from a biophysical process-based model for four years (1987-1990) for ten river basins (areas larger than 10(6) km2). For the field observations, minimum value of the mean absolute error (MAE) was 33 mm (4% of the mean observed evaporation) obtained for alpha = 2.6, and the empirical equation was able to explain 99% of the variance under linear least square regression, with a slope of 0.99, intercept of 16 mm, and standard error of estimate (SEE) of 46 mm. For evaporation from the river basins, minimum value of the MAE was 36 mm (5% of the mean evaporation) obtained for alpha = 1.8, and the empirical equation was able to explain 97% of the variance, with linear regression slope of 1.01, intercept of -11 mm, and SEE of 45 mm. The effect of spatial variations in P and Rn in determining evaporation from the empirical equation is analyzed to develop an understanding of the differences in the value of alpha for the field observations and the river basins.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/s0022-1694(98)00293-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17198548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>13666299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-963ccc87d6c0ac382e4a5720c02d01557a313cbce18cf6cb5f0525c6d2d233363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUlvFDEQhS0EEkPgJyB8QAgOnXgZb0cUhUWKlEOSs1XjtoNRd7vjmh4l_x7PIjhSF6teffUsvSLkPWfnnHF9gYwJ0XHt1p-d_dIaJzv1gqy4Na4ThpmXZPUXeU3eIP5mraRcr8jT1Q6GBba5TLQkChON45xrDjDQ-HgapFLbZFr22g7mUo_ygnl6oCnHoadlg7HuDjo2tqc14jJskaZaRgp0k8v86xkPvmPp4_CWvEowYHx3es_I_beru8sf3fXN95-XX687UMxsO6dlCMGaXgcGQVoR16CMYIGJnnGlDEguwyZEbkPSYaMSU0IF3YteSCm1PCOfjr5zLY9LxK0fM4Y4DDDFsqDnhjur1vb_oNRaC-caqI5gqAWxxuTnmkeoz54zvz-Iv92n7fdpe2f94SBetb2Ppw8AWwypwhQy_ls2wkgrG_bhiCUoHh5qQ-5vBeOy2XCtjJN_AG0gloE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13666299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Choudhury, B.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Choudhury, B.J</creatorcontrib><description>An empirical equation for annual evaporation (E) of the form, E = P/(1 + (P/Rn)alpha) 1/alpha, where P is the annual precipitation, Rn the water equivalent of annual net radiation, and alpha an adjustable parameter, is evaluated using field observations (water balance, and micrometeorologic measurements for areas ca. 1 km2) at eight locations having different types of vegetation, and results from a biophysical process-based model for four years (1987-1990) for ten river basins (areas larger than 10(6) km2). For the field observations, minimum value of the mean absolute error (MAE) was 33 mm (4% of the mean observed evaporation) obtained for alpha = 2.6, and the empirical equation was able to explain 99% of the variance under linear least square regression, with a slope of 0.99, intercept of 16 mm, and standard error of estimate (SEE) of 46 mm. For evaporation from the river basins, minimum value of the MAE was 36 mm (5% of the mean evaporation) obtained for alpha = 1.8, and the empirical equation was able to explain 97% of the variance, with linear regression slope of 1.01, intercept of -11 mm, and SEE of 45 mm. The effect of spatial variations in P and Rn in determining evaporation from the empirical equation is analyzed to develop an understanding of the differences in the value of alpha for the field observations and the river basins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(98)00293-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Science</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; mathematical models ; rain ; simulation models ; solar radiation</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 1999-03, Vol.216 (1/2), p.99-110</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-963ccc87d6c0ac382e4a5720c02d01557a313cbce18cf6cb5f0525c6d2d233363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-963ccc87d6c0ac382e4a5720c02d01557a313cbce18cf6cb5f0525c6d2d233363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1727383$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choudhury, B.J</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>An empirical equation for annual evaporation (E) of the form, E = P/(1 + (P/Rn)alpha) 1/alpha, where P is the annual precipitation, Rn the water equivalent of annual net radiation, and alpha an adjustable parameter, is evaluated using field observations (water balance, and micrometeorologic measurements for areas ca. 1 km2) at eight locations having different types of vegetation, and results from a biophysical process-based model for four years (1987-1990) for ten river basins (areas larger than 10(6) km2). For the field observations, minimum value of the mean absolute error (MAE) was 33 mm (4% of the mean observed evaporation) obtained for alpha = 2.6, and the empirical equation was able to explain 99% of the variance under linear least square regression, with a slope of 0.99, intercept of 16 mm, and standard error of estimate (SEE) of 46 mm. For evaporation from the river basins, minimum value of the MAE was 36 mm (5% of the mean evaporation) obtained for alpha = 1.8, and the empirical equation was able to explain 97% of the variance, with linear regression slope of 1.01, intercept of -11 mm, and SEE of 45 mm. The effect of spatial variations in P and Rn in determining evaporation from the empirical equation is analyzed to develop an understanding of the differences in the value of alpha for the field observations and the river basins.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>mathematical models</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>solar radiation</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUlvFDEQhS0EEkPgJyB8QAgOnXgZb0cUhUWKlEOSs1XjtoNRd7vjmh4l_x7PIjhSF6teffUsvSLkPWfnnHF9gYwJ0XHt1p-d_dIaJzv1gqy4Na4ThpmXZPUXeU3eIP5mraRcr8jT1Q6GBba5TLQkChON45xrDjDQ-HgapFLbZFr22g7mUo_ygnl6oCnHoadlg7HuDjo2tqc14jJskaZaRgp0k8v86xkPvmPp4_CWvEowYHx3es_I_beru8sf3fXN95-XX687UMxsO6dlCMGaXgcGQVoR16CMYIGJnnGlDEguwyZEbkPSYaMSU0IF3YteSCm1PCOfjr5zLY9LxK0fM4Y4DDDFsqDnhjur1vb_oNRaC-caqI5gqAWxxuTnmkeoz54zvz-Iv92n7fdpe2f94SBetb2Ppw8AWwypwhQy_ls2wkgrG_bhiCUoHh5qQ-5vBeOy2XCtjJN_AG0gloE</recordid><startdate>19990308</startdate><enddate>19990308</enddate><creator>Choudhury, B.J</creator><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990308</creationdate><title>Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model</title><author>Choudhury, B.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-963ccc87d6c0ac382e4a5720c02d01557a313cbce18cf6cb5f0525c6d2d233363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>mathematical models</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>solar radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choudhury, B.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choudhury, B.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>1999-03-08</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>216</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>99-110</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>An empirical equation for annual evaporation (E) of the form, E = P/(1 + (P/Rn)alpha) 1/alpha, where P is the annual precipitation, Rn the water equivalent of annual net radiation, and alpha an adjustable parameter, is evaluated using field observations (water balance, and micrometeorologic measurements for areas ca. 1 km2) at eight locations having different types of vegetation, and results from a biophysical process-based model for four years (1987-1990) for ten river basins (areas larger than 10(6) km2). For the field observations, minimum value of the mean absolute error (MAE) was 33 mm (4% of the mean observed evaporation) obtained for alpha = 2.6, and the empirical equation was able to explain 99% of the variance under linear least square regression, with a slope of 0.99, intercept of 16 mm, and standard error of estimate (SEE) of 46 mm. For evaporation from the river basins, minimum value of the MAE was 36 mm (5% of the mean evaporation) obtained for alpha = 1.8, and the empirical equation was able to explain 97% of the variance, with linear regression slope of 1.01, intercept of -11 mm, and SEE of 45 mm. The effect of spatial variations in P and Rn in determining evaporation from the empirical equation is analyzed to develop an understanding of the differences in the value of alpha for the field observations and the river basins.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Science</pub><doi>10.1016/s0022-1694(98)00293-5</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 1999-03, Vol.216 (1/2), p.99-110
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17198548
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
mathematical models
rain
simulation models
solar radiation
title Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A37%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20an%20empirical%20equation%20for%20annual%20evaporation%20using%20field%20observations%20and%20results%20from%20a%20biophysical%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Choudhury,%20B.J&rft.date=1999-03-08&rft.volume=216&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=99-110&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/s0022-1694(98)00293-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E13666299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-963ccc87d6c0ac382e4a5720c02d01557a313cbce18cf6cb5f0525c6d2d233363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13666299&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true