Loading…

Genetic parsimony: a factor in the evolution of complexity, order and emergence

Two conjectures, drawn from Gregory Chaitin's Algorithmic Information Theory, are examined with respect to the relationship between an algorithm and its product; in particular his finding that, where an algorithm is minimal, its length provides a measure of the complexity of the product. Algori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological journal of the Linnean Society 2006-06, Vol.88 (2), p.295-308
Main Author: STEBBING, A.R.D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-695f32524aec5c066397ee7fd1284cfaa95d7107aec09d2e38fa982ee1ca0013
cites
container_end_page 308
container_issue 2
container_start_page 295
container_title Biological journal of the Linnean Society
container_volume 88
creator STEBBING, A.R.D
description Two conjectures, drawn from Gregory Chaitin's Algorithmic Information Theory, are examined with respect to the relationship between an algorithm and its product; in particular his finding that, where an algorithm is minimal, its length provides a measure of the complexity of the product. Algorithmic complexity is considered from the perspective of the relationship between genotype and phenotype, which Chaitin suggests is analogous to other algorithm-product systems. The first conjecture is that the genome is a minimal set of algorithms for the phenotype. Evidence is presented for a factor, here termed 'genetic parsimony', which is thought to have helped minimize the growth of genome size during evolution. Species that depend on rapid replication, such as prokaryotes which are generally r-selected are more likely to have small genomes, while the K-strategists accumulate introns and have large genomes. The second conjecture is that genome size could provide a measure of organism complexity. A surrogate index for coding DNA is in agreement with an established phenotypic index (number of cell types), in exhibiting an evolutionary trend of increasing organism complexity over time. Evidence for genetic parsimony indicates that simplicity in coding has been selected, and is responsible for phenotypic order. It is proposed that order evolved because order in the phenotype can be encoded more economically than disorder. Thus order arises due to selection for genetic parsimony, as does the evolution of other 'emergent' properties.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00652.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17200635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17200635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-695f32524aec5c066397ee7fd1284cfaa95d7107aec09d2e38fa982ee1ca0013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1v0zAYhS0EEqXwG_ANXJHMX4kTxA2rWDc0sQmK4M565bweLklc7BTaf49Dp2HJsqXznKOjQwjlrOT5nG1LztqqaCQXpWCsLvOtRHl4RBYPwmOyYEyoQrG6fkqepbRljHOlxYLcrHHEyVu6g5j8EMbjWwrUgZ1CpH6k0w-k-Dv0-8mHkQZHbRh2PR78dHxDQ-wwUhg7igPGOxwtPidPHPQJX9y_S7K5-LBZXRbXN-ur1fvrwipZi6JuKydFJRSgrWyuJVuNqF3HRaOsA2irTnOms8zaTqBsHLSNQOQWcne5JK9PsbsYfu0xTWbwyWLfw4hhnwzX8xayyuCrexCShd5FGK1PZhf9APGYOd0KmckleXfi_vgej_91ZuaVzdbMY5p5TDMnm38rm4M5v_qYP9lenOw-TXh4sEP8aWotdWW-fVqb7xe3m8-3WplV5l-eeAfBwF3Mlb5-EYwrloNZ3Sj5F4zYimE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17200635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic parsimony: a factor in the evolution of complexity, order and emergence</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>STEBBING, A.R.D</creator><creatorcontrib>STEBBING, A.R.D</creatorcontrib><description>Two conjectures, drawn from Gregory Chaitin's Algorithmic Information Theory, are examined with respect to the relationship between an algorithm and its product; in particular his finding that, where an algorithm is minimal, its length provides a measure of the complexity of the product. Algorithmic complexity is considered from the perspective of the relationship between genotype and phenotype, which Chaitin suggests is analogous to other algorithm-product systems. The first conjecture is that the genome is a minimal set of algorithms for the phenotype. Evidence is presented for a factor, here termed 'genetic parsimony', which is thought to have helped minimize the growth of genome size during evolution. Species that depend on rapid replication, such as prokaryotes which are generally r-selected are more likely to have small genomes, while the K-strategists accumulate introns and have large genomes. The second conjecture is that genome size could provide a measure of organism complexity. A surrogate index for coding DNA is in agreement with an established phenotypic index (number of cell types), in exhibiting an evolutionary trend of increasing organism complexity over time. Evidence for genetic parsimony indicates that simplicity in coding has been selected, and is responsible for phenotypic order. It is proposed that order evolved because order in the phenotype can be encoded more economically than disorder. Thus order arises due to selection for genetic parsimony, as does the evolution of other 'emergent' properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-4066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00652.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJLSBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>algorithmic complexity ; algorithms ; anagenesis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological evolution ; C-value paradox ; code compression ; DNA ; emergence ; evolution ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; genome ; genome size ; genotype ; homeodynamics ; modularity ; order ; phenotype ; r/K-selection</subject><ispartof>Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 2006-06, Vol.88 (2), p.295-308</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-695f32524aec5c066397ee7fd1284cfaa95d7107aec09d2e38fa982ee1ca0013</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17792306$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>STEBBING, A.R.D</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic parsimony: a factor in the evolution of complexity, order and emergence</title><title>Biological journal of the Linnean Society</title><description>Two conjectures, drawn from Gregory Chaitin's Algorithmic Information Theory, are examined with respect to the relationship between an algorithm and its product; in particular his finding that, where an algorithm is minimal, its length provides a measure of the complexity of the product. Algorithmic complexity is considered from the perspective of the relationship between genotype and phenotype, which Chaitin suggests is analogous to other algorithm-product systems. The first conjecture is that the genome is a minimal set of algorithms for the phenotype. Evidence is presented for a factor, here termed 'genetic parsimony', which is thought to have helped minimize the growth of genome size during evolution. Species that depend on rapid replication, such as prokaryotes which are generally r-selected are more likely to have small genomes, while the K-strategists accumulate introns and have large genomes. The second conjecture is that genome size could provide a measure of organism complexity. A surrogate index for coding DNA is in agreement with an established phenotypic index (number of cell types), in exhibiting an evolutionary trend of increasing organism complexity over time. Evidence for genetic parsimony indicates that simplicity in coding has been selected, and is responsible for phenotypic order. It is proposed that order evolved because order in the phenotype can be encoded more economically than disorder. Thus order arises due to selection for genetic parsimony, as does the evolution of other 'emergent' properties.</description><subject>algorithmic complexity</subject><subject>algorithms</subject><subject>anagenesis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>C-value paradox</subject><subject>code compression</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>emergence</subject><subject>evolution</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>genome</subject><subject>genome size</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>homeodynamics</subject><subject>modularity</subject><subject>order</subject><subject>phenotype</subject><subject>r/K-selection</subject><issn>0024-4066</issn><issn>1095-8312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkF1v0zAYhS0EEqXwG_ANXJHMX4kTxA2rWDc0sQmK4M565bweLklc7BTaf49Dp2HJsqXznKOjQwjlrOT5nG1LztqqaCQXpWCsLvOtRHl4RBYPwmOyYEyoQrG6fkqepbRljHOlxYLcrHHEyVu6g5j8EMbjWwrUgZ1CpH6k0w-k-Dv0-8mHkQZHbRh2PR78dHxDQ-wwUhg7igPGOxwtPidPHPQJX9y_S7K5-LBZXRbXN-ur1fvrwipZi6JuKydFJRSgrWyuJVuNqF3HRaOsA2irTnOms8zaTqBsHLSNQOQWcne5JK9PsbsYfu0xTWbwyWLfw4hhnwzX8xayyuCrexCShd5FGK1PZhf9APGYOd0KmckleXfi_vgej_91ZuaVzdbMY5p5TDMnm38rm4M5v_qYP9lenOw-TXh4sEP8aWotdWW-fVqb7xe3m8-3WplV5l-eeAfBwF3Mlb5-EYwrloNZ3Sj5F4zYimE</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>STEBBING, A.R.D</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Genetic parsimony: a factor in the evolution of complexity, order and emergence</title><author>STEBBING, A.R.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-695f32524aec5c066397ee7fd1284cfaa95d7107aec09d2e38fa982ee1ca0013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>algorithmic complexity</topic><topic>algorithms</topic><topic>anagenesis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>C-value paradox</topic><topic>code compression</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>emergence</topic><topic>evolution</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>genome</topic><topic>genome size</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>homeodynamics</topic><topic>modularity</topic><topic>order</topic><topic>phenotype</topic><topic>r/K-selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STEBBING, A.R.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological journal of the Linnean Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STEBBING, A.R.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic parsimony: a factor in the evolution of complexity, order and emergence</atitle><jtitle>Biological journal of the Linnean Society</jtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>295-308</pages><issn>0024-4066</issn><eissn>1095-8312</eissn><coden>BJLSBG</coden><abstract>Two conjectures, drawn from Gregory Chaitin's Algorithmic Information Theory, are examined with respect to the relationship between an algorithm and its product; in particular his finding that, where an algorithm is minimal, its length provides a measure of the complexity of the product. Algorithmic complexity is considered from the perspective of the relationship between genotype and phenotype, which Chaitin suggests is analogous to other algorithm-product systems. The first conjecture is that the genome is a minimal set of algorithms for the phenotype. Evidence is presented for a factor, here termed 'genetic parsimony', which is thought to have helped minimize the growth of genome size during evolution. Species that depend on rapid replication, such as prokaryotes which are generally r-selected are more likely to have small genomes, while the K-strategists accumulate introns and have large genomes. The second conjecture is that genome size could provide a measure of organism complexity. A surrogate index for coding DNA is in agreement with an established phenotypic index (number of cell types), in exhibiting an evolutionary trend of increasing organism complexity over time. Evidence for genetic parsimony indicates that simplicity in coding has been selected, and is responsible for phenotypic order. It is proposed that order evolved because order in the phenotype can be encoded more economically than disorder. Thus order arises due to selection for genetic parsimony, as does the evolution of other 'emergent' properties.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00652.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-4066
ispartof Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 2006-06, Vol.88 (2), p.295-308
issn 0024-4066
1095-8312
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17200635
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects algorithmic complexity
algorithms
anagenesis
Biological and medical sciences
Biological evolution
C-value paradox
code compression
DNA
emergence
evolution
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution
genome
genome size
genotype
homeodynamics
modularity
order
phenotype
r/K-selection
title Genetic parsimony: a factor in the evolution of complexity, order and emergence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A47%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20parsimony:%20a%20factor%20in%20the%20evolution%20of%20complexity,%20order%20and%20emergence&rft.jtitle=Biological%20journal%20of%20the%20Linnean%20Society&rft.au=STEBBING,%20A.R.D&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=295-308&rft.issn=0024-4066&rft.eissn=1095-8312&rft.coden=BJLSBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00652.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E17200635%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-695f32524aec5c066397ee7fd1284cfaa95d7107aec09d2e38fa982ee1ca0013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17200635&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true