Loading…
Detrital Controls on Soil Solution N and Dissolved Organic Matter in Soils: A Field Experiment
We established a long-term field study in an old growth coniferous forest at the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, OR, USA, to address how detrital quality and quantity control soil organic matter accumulation and stabilization. The Detritus Input and Removal Treatments (DIRT) plots consist of trea...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biogeochemistry 2005-11, Vol.76 (2), p.261-281 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-d5439f2219b850c5879b877b5d5789224c520a1ed9d377afab5cb62aa9ca9b453 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-d5439f2219b850c5879b877b5d5789224c520a1ed9d377afab5cb62aa9ca9b453 |
container_end_page | 281 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 261 |
container_title | Biogeochemistry |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Lajtha, K Crow, S.E Yano, Y Kaushal, S.S Sulzman, E Sollins, P Spears, J.D.H |
description | We established a long-term field study in an old growth coniferous forest at the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, OR, USA, to address how detrital quality and quantity control soil organic matter accumulation and stabilization. The Detritus Input and Removal Treatments (DIRT) plots consist of treatments that double leaf litter, double woody debris inputs, exclude litter inputs, or remove root inputs via trenching. We measured changes in soil solution chemistry with depth, and conducted long-term incubations of bulk soils from different treatments in order to elucidate effects of detrital inputs on the relative amounts and lability of different soil C pools. In the field, the addition of woody debris increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in O-horizon leachate and at 30 cm, but not at 100 cm, compared to control plots, suggesting increased rates of DOC retention with added woody debris. DOC concentrations decreased through the soil profile in all plots to a greater degree than did dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), most likely due to preferential sorption of high C:N hydrophobic dissolved organic matter (DOM) in upper horizons; percent hydrophobic DOM decreased significantly with depth, and hydrophilic DOM had a much lower and less variable C:N ratio. Although laboratory extracts of different litter types showed differences in DOM chemistry, percent hydrophobic DOM did not differ among soil solutions from different detrital treatments in the field, suggesting that microbial processing of DOM leachate in the field consumed easily degradable components, thus equalizing leachate chemistry among treatments. Total dissolved N leaching from plots with intact roots was very low (0.17 g$\text{m}^{-2}$
$\text{year}^{-1}$), slightly less than measured deposition to this very unpolluted forest (∼0.2 g$\text{m}^{-2}$
$\text{year}^{-1}$). Total dissolved N losses showed significant increases in the two treatments without roots whereas concentrations of DOC decreased. In these plots, N losses were less than half of estimated plant uptake, suggesting that other mechanisms, such as increased microbial immobilization of N, accounted for retention of N in deep soils. In long-term laboratory incubations, soils from plots that had both above- and below-ground litter inputs excluded for 5 years showed a trend towards lower DOC loss rates, but not lower respiration rates. Soils from plots with added wood had similar respiration and DOC loss rates as control soi |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10533-005-5071-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17201901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20055302</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20055302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-d5439f2219b850c5879b877b5d5789224c520a1ed9d377afab5cb62aa9ca9b453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFvFSEQx0mjSV-rH8CDkTSpt9UBluXhrXlt1aTaQ23iSTLLsg0vdHkFntFvL5tt2sQLA5nf_Gf4DyFvGHxgAOpjZiCFaABkI0GxRh-QFZNKNJLJny_ICli3brjsxCE5ynkLAFqBWJFf564kXzDQTZxKiiHTONGb6EM9wr74-vpOcRrouc85ht9uoNfpDidv6TcsxSXqFz5_omf00rsw0Is_O5f8vZvKK_JyxJDd68d4TG4vL35svjRX15-_bs6uGiuULs0gW6FHzpnu1xKsXKt6UaqXg1RrzXlrJQdkbtCDUApH7KXtO46oLeq-leKYvF90dyk-7F0u5t5n60LAycV9NkxxYBpYBU_-A7dxn6Y6m1FtdRJaxSvEFsimmHNyo9nV72D6axiY2W6z2G2q3Wa22-hac_oojNliGBNO1ufnQiUk67qZe7tw21xiesrzKiUFzL3fLfkRo8G7VDVub-rwAhioeYviH1dTkM0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>741000472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detrital Controls on Soil Solution N and Dissolved Organic Matter in Soils: A Field Experiment</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Lajtha, K ; Crow, S.E ; Yano, Y ; Kaushal, S.S ; Sulzman, E ; Sollins, P ; Spears, J.D.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Lajtha, K ; Crow, S.E ; Yano, Y ; Kaushal, S.S ; Sulzman, E ; Sollins, P ; Spears, J.D.H</creatorcontrib><description>We established a long-term field study in an old growth coniferous forest at the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, OR, USA, to address how detrital quality and quantity control soil organic matter accumulation and stabilization. The Detritus Input and Removal Treatments (DIRT) plots consist of treatments that double leaf litter, double woody debris inputs, exclude litter inputs, or remove root inputs via trenching. We measured changes in soil solution chemistry with depth, and conducted long-term incubations of bulk soils from different treatments in order to elucidate effects of detrital inputs on the relative amounts and lability of different soil C pools. In the field, the addition of woody debris increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in O-horizon leachate and at 30 cm, but not at 100 cm, compared to control plots, suggesting increased rates of DOC retention with added woody debris. DOC concentrations decreased through the soil profile in all plots to a greater degree than did dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), most likely due to preferential sorption of high C:N hydrophobic dissolved organic matter (DOM) in upper horizons; percent hydrophobic DOM decreased significantly with depth, and hydrophilic DOM had a much lower and less variable C:N ratio. Although laboratory extracts of different litter types showed differences in DOM chemistry, percent hydrophobic DOM did not differ among soil solutions from different detrital treatments in the field, suggesting that microbial processing of DOM leachate in the field consumed easily degradable components, thus equalizing leachate chemistry among treatments. Total dissolved N leaching from plots with intact roots was very low (0.17 g$\text{m}^{-2}$
$\text{year}^{-1}$), slightly less than measured deposition to this very unpolluted forest (∼0.2 g$\text{m}^{-2}$
$\text{year}^{-1}$). Total dissolved N losses showed significant increases in the two treatments without roots whereas concentrations of DOC decreased. In these plots, N losses were less than half of estimated plant uptake, suggesting that other mechanisms, such as increased microbial immobilization of N, accounted for retention of N in deep soils. In long-term laboratory incubations, soils from plots that had both above- and below-ground litter inputs excluded for 5 years showed a trend towards lower DOC loss rates, but not lower respiration rates. Soils from plots with added wood had similar respiration and DOC loss rates as control soils, suggesting that the additional DOC sorption observed in the field in these soils was stabilized in the soil and not readily lost upon incubation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-2563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-515X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10533-005-5071-9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; biodegradation ; Biological and medical sciences ; coarse wood debris ; Coniferous forests ; Detritus ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Dissolved organic matter ; dissolved organic nitrogen ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; forest litter ; Forest soils ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; immobilization in soil ; Leachates ; Leaching ; Leaf litter ; mineralization ; nitrates ; Nitrogen ; Old growth ; Old growth forests ; organic horizons ; Organic nitrogen ; organic nitrogen compounds ; Organic soils ; Respiration ; Retention ; Roots ; Soil chemistry ; Soil ecology ; soil microorganisms ; Soil organic matter ; Soil profiles ; Soil respiration ; Soil solution ; Soil water ; Soils ; Solution chemistry ; Sorption ; Surficial geology ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Biogeochemistry, 2005-11, Vol.76 (2), p.261-281</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Springer</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-d5439f2219b850c5879b877b5d5789224c520a1ed9d377afab5cb62aa9ca9b453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-d5439f2219b850c5879b877b5d5789224c520a1ed9d377afab5cb62aa9ca9b453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20055302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20055302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17351669$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lajtha, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crow, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yano, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushal, S.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulzman, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sollins, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spears, J.D.H</creatorcontrib><title>Detrital Controls on Soil Solution N and Dissolved Organic Matter in Soils: A Field Experiment</title><title>Biogeochemistry</title><description>We established a long-term field study in an old growth coniferous forest at the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, OR, USA, to address how detrital quality and quantity control soil organic matter accumulation and stabilization. The Detritus Input and Removal Treatments (DIRT) plots consist of treatments that double leaf litter, double woody debris inputs, exclude litter inputs, or remove root inputs via trenching. We measured changes in soil solution chemistry with depth, and conducted long-term incubations of bulk soils from different treatments in order to elucidate effects of detrital inputs on the relative amounts and lability of different soil C pools. In the field, the addition of woody debris increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in O-horizon leachate and at 30 cm, but not at 100 cm, compared to control plots, suggesting increased rates of DOC retention with added woody debris. DOC concentrations decreased through the soil profile in all plots to a greater degree than did dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), most likely due to preferential sorption of high C:N hydrophobic dissolved organic matter (DOM) in upper horizons; percent hydrophobic DOM decreased significantly with depth, and hydrophilic DOM had a much lower and less variable C:N ratio. Although laboratory extracts of different litter types showed differences in DOM chemistry, percent hydrophobic DOM did not differ among soil solutions from different detrital treatments in the field, suggesting that microbial processing of DOM leachate in the field consumed easily degradable components, thus equalizing leachate chemistry among treatments. Total dissolved N leaching from plots with intact roots was very low (0.17 g$\text{m}^{-2}$
$\text{year}^{-1}$), slightly less than measured deposition to this very unpolluted forest (∼0.2 g$\text{m}^{-2}$
$\text{year}^{-1}$). Total dissolved N losses showed significant increases in the two treatments without roots whereas concentrations of DOC decreased. In these plots, N losses were less than half of estimated plant uptake, suggesting that other mechanisms, such as increased microbial immobilization of N, accounted for retention of N in deep soils. In long-term laboratory incubations, soils from plots that had both above- and below-ground litter inputs excluded for 5 years showed a trend towards lower DOC loss rates, but not lower respiration rates. Soils from plots with added wood had similar respiration and DOC loss rates as control soils, suggesting that the additional DOC sorption observed in the field in these soils was stabilized in the soil and not readily lost upon incubation.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>biodegradation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>coarse wood debris</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Dissolved organic matter</subject><subject>dissolved organic nitrogen</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>forest litter</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>immobilization in soil</subject><subject>Leachates</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Leaf litter</subject><subject>mineralization</subject><subject>nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Old growth</subject><subject>Old growth forests</subject><subject>organic horizons</subject><subject>Organic nitrogen</subject><subject>organic nitrogen compounds</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil ecology</subject><subject>soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil profiles</subject><subject>Soil respiration</subject><subject>Soil solution</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Solution chemistry</subject><subject>Sorption</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>0168-2563</issn><issn>1573-515X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUFvFSEQx0mjSV-rH8CDkTSpt9UBluXhrXlt1aTaQ23iSTLLsg0vdHkFntFvL5tt2sQLA5nf_Gf4DyFvGHxgAOpjZiCFaABkI0GxRh-QFZNKNJLJny_ICli3brjsxCE5ynkLAFqBWJFf564kXzDQTZxKiiHTONGb6EM9wr74-vpOcRrouc85ht9uoNfpDidv6TcsxSXqFz5_omf00rsw0Is_O5f8vZvKK_JyxJDd68d4TG4vL35svjRX15-_bs6uGiuULs0gW6FHzpnu1xKsXKt6UaqXg1RrzXlrJQdkbtCDUApH7KXtO46oLeq-leKYvF90dyk-7F0u5t5n60LAycV9NkxxYBpYBU_-A7dxn6Y6m1FtdRJaxSvEFsimmHNyo9nV72D6axiY2W6z2G2q3Wa22-hac_oojNliGBNO1ufnQiUk67qZe7tw21xiesrzKiUFzL3fLfkRo8G7VDVub-rwAhioeYviH1dTkM0</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Lajtha, K</creator><creator>Crow, S.E</creator><creator>Yano, Y</creator><creator>Kaushal, S.S</creator><creator>Sulzman, E</creator><creator>Sollins, P</creator><creator>Spears, J.D.H</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Detrital Controls on Soil Solution N and Dissolved Organic Matter in Soils: A Field Experiment</title><author>Lajtha, K ; Crow, S.E ; Yano, Y ; Kaushal, S.S ; Sulzman, E ; Sollins, P ; Spears, J.D.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-d5439f2219b850c5879b877b5d5789224c520a1ed9d377afab5cb62aa9ca9b453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>biodegradation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>coarse wood debris</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Dissolved organic matter</topic><topic>dissolved organic nitrogen</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>forest litter</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>immobilization in soil</topic><topic>Leachates</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Leaf litter</topic><topic>mineralization</topic><topic>nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Old growth</topic><topic>Old growth forests</topic><topic>organic horizons</topic><topic>Organic nitrogen</topic><topic>organic nitrogen compounds</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil ecology</topic><topic>soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil profiles</topic><topic>Soil respiration</topic><topic>Soil solution</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Solution chemistry</topic><topic>Sorption</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lajtha, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crow, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yano, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushal, S.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulzman, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sollins, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spears, J.D.H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lajtha, K</au><au>Crow, S.E</au><au>Yano, Y</au><au>Kaushal, S.S</au><au>Sulzman, E</au><au>Sollins, P</au><au>Spears, J.D.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detrital Controls on Soil Solution N and Dissolved Organic Matter in Soils: A Field Experiment</atitle><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>281</epage><pages>261-281</pages><issn>0168-2563</issn><eissn>1573-515X</eissn><coden>BIOGEP</coden><abstract>We established a long-term field study in an old growth coniferous forest at the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, OR, USA, to address how detrital quality and quantity control soil organic matter accumulation and stabilization. The Detritus Input and Removal Treatments (DIRT) plots consist of treatments that double leaf litter, double woody debris inputs, exclude litter inputs, or remove root inputs via trenching. We measured changes in soil solution chemistry with depth, and conducted long-term incubations of bulk soils from different treatments in order to elucidate effects of detrital inputs on the relative amounts and lability of different soil C pools. In the field, the addition of woody debris increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in O-horizon leachate and at 30 cm, but not at 100 cm, compared to control plots, suggesting increased rates of DOC retention with added woody debris. DOC concentrations decreased through the soil profile in all plots to a greater degree than did dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), most likely due to preferential sorption of high C:N hydrophobic dissolved organic matter (DOM) in upper horizons; percent hydrophobic DOM decreased significantly with depth, and hydrophilic DOM had a much lower and less variable C:N ratio. Although laboratory extracts of different litter types showed differences in DOM chemistry, percent hydrophobic DOM did not differ among soil solutions from different detrital treatments in the field, suggesting that microbial processing of DOM leachate in the field consumed easily degradable components, thus equalizing leachate chemistry among treatments. Total dissolved N leaching from plots with intact roots was very low (0.17 g$\text{m}^{-2}$
$\text{year}^{-1}$), slightly less than measured deposition to this very unpolluted forest (∼0.2 g$\text{m}^{-2}$
$\text{year}^{-1}$). Total dissolved N losses showed significant increases in the two treatments without roots whereas concentrations of DOC decreased. In these plots, N losses were less than half of estimated plant uptake, suggesting that other mechanisms, such as increased microbial immobilization of N, accounted for retention of N in deep soils. In long-term laboratory incubations, soils from plots that had both above- and below-ground litter inputs excluded for 5 years showed a trend towards lower DOC loss rates, but not lower respiration rates. Soils from plots with added wood had similar respiration and DOC loss rates as control soils, suggesting that the additional DOC sorption observed in the field in these soils was stabilized in the soil and not readily lost upon incubation.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10533-005-5071-9</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-2563 |
ispartof | Biogeochemistry, 2005-11, Vol.76 (2), p.261-281 |
issn | 0168-2563 1573-515X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17201901 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Link |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology biodegradation Biological and medical sciences coarse wood debris Coniferous forests Detritus Dissolved organic carbon Dissolved organic matter dissolved organic nitrogen Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology forest litter Forest soils Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology immobilization in soil Leachates Leaching Leaf litter mineralization nitrates Nitrogen Old growth Old growth forests organic horizons Organic nitrogen organic nitrogen compounds Organic soils Respiration Retention Roots Soil chemistry Soil ecology soil microorganisms Soil organic matter Soil profiles Soil respiration Soil solution Soil water Soils Solution chemistry Sorption Surficial geology Synecology Terrestrial ecosystems |
title | Detrital Controls on Soil Solution N and Dissolved Organic Matter in Soils: A Field Experiment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A35%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detrital%20Controls%20on%20Soil%20Solution%20N%20and%20Dissolved%20Organic%20Matter%20in%20Soils:%20A%20Field%20Experiment&rft.jtitle=Biogeochemistry&rft.au=Lajtha,%20K&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=281&rft.pages=261-281&rft.issn=0168-2563&rft.eissn=1573-515X&rft.coden=BIOGEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10533-005-5071-9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20055302%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-d5439f2219b850c5879b877b5d5789224c520a1ed9d377afab5cb62aa9ca9b453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=741000472&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20055302&rfr_iscdi=true |