Loading…

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is not superior to three-dimensional conformal radiation (3DCRT) for adjuvant gastric radiation: A matched pair analysis

To compare three-dimensional conformal radiation (3DCRT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IG-IMRT) for adjuvant gastric irradiation. From Jan 2010-Aug 2013, all patients undergoing 3DCRT and IG-IMRT were included. Systemic chemotherapy included 1 cycle before and 2 cycles after chemoradiat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cancer research and therapeutics 2015-07, Vol.11 (3), p.623-629
Main Authors: Chopra, Supriya, Agarwal, Aditi, Engineer, Reena, Dora, Tapas, Thomas, Biji, Sonawone, Supriya, Paul, Siji N, Kannan, Sadhna, Patil, Prachi, Mehta, Shaesta, Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To compare three-dimensional conformal radiation (3DCRT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IG-IMRT) for adjuvant gastric irradiation. From Jan 2010-Aug 2013, all patients undergoing 3DCRT and IG-IMRT were included. Systemic chemotherapy included 1 cycle before and 2 cycles after chemoradiation. Planning Target Volume (PTV) received 45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks with concurrent capcetabine 825 mg/m2 bid. Matched pair analysis was performed to evaluate imbalance in two cohorts if any. Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) vs 3.0 was used to record gastrointestinal (GI), hematological (HL), and renal toxicity during treatment and follow-up. Patterns of recurrence were documented. Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical comparison. Of the 51 patients, 26 received 3DCRT and 25 IMRT. IMRT led to decrease in dose received by right and left kidney (12.4 Gy and 7.1 Gy and 29 Gy vs 8.2 Gy; P
ISSN:0973-1482
1998-4138
DOI:10.4103/0973-1482.150438