Pseudo-nitzschia in New Zealand and the role of DNA probes and immunoassays in refining marine biotoxin monitoring programmes

• Published in: Natural toxins 1998, Vol.6 (3/4), p.105-111
• Main Authors: Rhodes, L, Scholin, C, Garthwaite, I
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; biotoxin monitoring; DNA Probes; domoic acid; Environmental Monitoring - methods; Eutrophication; foodborne illness; Immunoassay - methods; immunoassays; Kainic Acid - analogs & derivatives; Kainic Acid - analysis; Marine Toxins - analysis; neurotoxic shellfish poisoning; neurotoxins; New Zealand; Pseudo-nitzschia; Pseudo-nitzschia delicatissima; Pseudo-nitzschia heimii; Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries; Pseudo-nitzschia pseudodelicatissima; Pseudo-nitzschia pungens; Pseudo-nitzschia turgidula; Shellfish
• ISSN: 1056-9014; 1522-7189
• DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7189(199805/08)6:3/4<105::AID-NT13>3.0.CO;2-9

Domoic acid (DA) was first detected in shellfish in New Zealand after the implementation of a comprehensive biotoxin monitoring programme for amnesic, paralytic, diarrhetic and neurotoxic shellfish toxins, following a suspected neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NSP) event in early 1993. Both phytoplankton monitoring and shellfish flesh testing programmes have led to an extensive database which has helped link species of Pseudo‐nitzschia to specific DA outbreaks. In 1994, P. pungens and P. turgidula were associated with DA contamination of shellfish, and cultured isolates of these species proved to be toxin producers. During 1996 the use of species‐specific ribosomal RNA (rRNA)‐targeted oligonucleotide probes and DA immunoassays led to the discovery of toxin production by P. fraudulenta, and showed the nontoxic P. heimii to be a major bloom former. Pseudo‐nitzschia delicatissima, P. pseudodelicatissima and P. multiseries, also identified using rRNA‐targeted probes, have been linked to DA contamination of New Zealand shellfish; P. australis is the main cause of DA in scallops. The relative amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP) risk associated with different species, largely determined by DA immunoassays of cultured isolates, is now used by some regulators to refine risk assessments. Species identification is therefore vital so that shellfish growers, and health and industry officials, can make safe and economically sound harvesting decisions. The development and field trialling of DNA probes is proving invaluable in this context. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.