Loading…
Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis
The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several met...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water research (Oxford) 2004, Vol.38 (2), p.355-364 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53 |
container_end_page | 364 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 355 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Bednar, A.J Garbarino, J.R Burkhardt, M.R Ranville, J.F Wildeman, T.R |
description | The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several methods for the speciation of arsenic in groundwater, surface-water, and acid mine drainage sample matrices using field and laboratory techniques are presented. The methods provide quantitative determination of arsenite [As(III)], arsenate [As(V)], monomethylarsonate (MMA), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and roxarsone in 2–8
min at detection limits of less than 1
μg arsenic per liter (μg As
L
−1). All the methods use anion exchange chromatography to separate the arsenic species and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry as an arsenic-specific detector. Different methods were needed because some sample matrices did not have all arsenic species present or were incompatible with particular high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phases. The bias and variability of the methods were evaluated using total arsenic, As(III), As(V), DMA, and MMA results from more than 100 surface-water, groundwater, and acid mine drainage samples, and reference materials. Concentrations in test samples were as much as 13,000
μg As
L
−1 for As(III) and 3700
μg As
L
−1 for As(V). Methylated arsenic species were less than 100
μg As
L
−1 and were found only in certain surface-water samples, and roxarsone was not detected in any of the water samples tested. The distribution of inorganic arsenic species in the test samples ranged from 0% to 90% As(III). Laboratory-speciation method variability for As(III), As(V), MMA, and DMA in reagent water at 0.5
μg As
L
−1 was 8–13% (
n=7). Field-speciation method variability for As(III) and As(V) at 1
μg As
L
−1 in reagent water was 3–4% (
n=3). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.034 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17244995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135403005608</els_id><sourcerecordid>17244995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAURUVISSZp_0Ep3jQ7u5IlW6NNoIR8QSCbdi2epSeiQWM5kqZl_n088UB2Wb3FPffyOIR8Z7RhlPW_Ns1_KAlz01LKG6oaysUJWbG1VHUrxPqUrCgVvGa8E-fkIucNpbRtuToj50z0suuFXBF95zHYCkZbBRhighLTvoKUcfSmyhMaD8XHsdpieYk2v5PlBX2qYJqCN0taYjVC2SUI9fwVzuEIYZ99_kq-OAgZvx3vJfl7d_vn5qF-er5_vPn9VBvBVKmHnhvTq3UvKbcOBumMlGipbHtqmLAORcs4t1IZB3zgpoNuAOs63jox2I5fkqtld0rxdYe56K3PBkOAEeMuayZnJ0odQLGAJsWcEzo9Jb-FtNeM6oNYvdGLWH0Qq6nSs9i59uO4vxu2aD9KR5Mz8PMIQDYQXILR-PzBdVwywdjMXS8czjb-eUw6G4-jQesTmqJt9J9_8gawlZr_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17244995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Bednar, A.J ; Garbarino, J.R ; Burkhardt, M.R ; Ranville, J.F ; Wildeman, T.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bednar, A.J ; Garbarino, J.R ; Burkhardt, M.R ; Ranville, J.F ; Wildeman, T.R</creatorcontrib><description>The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several methods for the speciation of arsenic in groundwater, surface-water, and acid mine drainage sample matrices using field and laboratory techniques are presented. The methods provide quantitative determination of arsenite [As(III)], arsenate [As(V)], monomethylarsonate (MMA), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and roxarsone in 2–8
min at detection limits of less than 1
μg arsenic per liter (μg As
L
−1). All the methods use anion exchange chromatography to separate the arsenic species and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry as an arsenic-specific detector. Different methods were needed because some sample matrices did not have all arsenic species present or were incompatible with particular high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phases. The bias and variability of the methods were evaluated using total arsenic, As(III), As(V), DMA, and MMA results from more than 100 surface-water, groundwater, and acid mine drainage samples, and reference materials. Concentrations in test samples were as much as 13,000
μg As
L
−1 for As(III) and 3700
μg As
L
−1 for As(V). Methylated arsenic species were less than 100
μg As
L
−1 and were found only in certain surface-water samples, and roxarsone was not detected in any of the water samples tested. The distribution of inorganic arsenic species in the test samples ranged from 0% to 90% As(III). Laboratory-speciation method variability for As(III), As(V), MMA, and DMA in reagent water at 0.5
μg As
L
−1 was 8–13% (
n=7). Field-speciation method variability for As(III) and As(V) at 1
μg As
L
−1 in reagent water was 3–4% (
n=3).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14675647</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Analytical chemistry ; Applied sciences ; Arsenic ; Arsenic - analysis ; Arsenic - chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Methods ; Natural water pollution ; Other chromatographic methods ; Pollution ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; SPE ; Speciation ; Water ; Water - chemistry ; Water Pollutants - analysis ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2004, Vol.38 (2), p.355-364</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15371411$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14675647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bednar, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbarino, J.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkhardt, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranville, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wildeman, T.R</creatorcontrib><title>Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several methods for the speciation of arsenic in groundwater, surface-water, and acid mine drainage sample matrices using field and laboratory techniques are presented. The methods provide quantitative determination of arsenite [As(III)], arsenate [As(V)], monomethylarsonate (MMA), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and roxarsone in 2–8
min at detection limits of less than 1
μg arsenic per liter (μg As
L
−1). All the methods use anion exchange chromatography to separate the arsenic species and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry as an arsenic-specific detector. Different methods were needed because some sample matrices did not have all arsenic species present or were incompatible with particular high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phases. The bias and variability of the methods were evaluated using total arsenic, As(III), As(V), DMA, and MMA results from more than 100 surface-water, groundwater, and acid mine drainage samples, and reference materials. Concentrations in test samples were as much as 13,000
μg As
L
−1 for As(III) and 3700
μg As
L
−1 for As(V). Methylated arsenic species were less than 100
μg As
L
−1 and were found only in certain surface-water samples, and roxarsone was not detected in any of the water samples tested. The distribution of inorganic arsenic species in the test samples ranged from 0% to 90% As(III). Laboratory-speciation method variability for As(III), As(V), MMA, and DMA in reagent water at 0.5
μg As
L
−1 was 8–13% (
n=7). Field-speciation method variability for As(III) and As(V) at 1
μg As
L
−1 in reagent water was 3–4% (
n=3).</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Arsenic - analysis</subject><subject>Arsenic - chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Other chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>SPE</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAURUVISSZp_0Ep3jQ7u5IlW6NNoIR8QSCbdi2epSeiQWM5kqZl_n088UB2Wb3FPffyOIR8Z7RhlPW_Ns1_KAlz01LKG6oaysUJWbG1VHUrxPqUrCgVvGa8E-fkIucNpbRtuToj50z0suuFXBF95zHYCkZbBRhighLTvoKUcfSmyhMaD8XHsdpieYk2v5PlBX2qYJqCN0taYjVC2SUI9fwVzuEIYZ99_kq-OAgZvx3vJfl7d_vn5qF-er5_vPn9VBvBVKmHnhvTq3UvKbcOBumMlGipbHtqmLAORcs4t1IZB3zgpoNuAOs63jox2I5fkqtld0rxdYe56K3PBkOAEeMuayZnJ0odQLGAJsWcEzo9Jb-FtNeM6oNYvdGLWH0Qq6nSs9i59uO4vxu2aD9KR5Mz8PMIQDYQXILR-PzBdVwywdjMXS8czjb-eUw6G4-jQesTmqJt9J9_8gawlZr_</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Bednar, A.J</creator><creator>Garbarino, J.R</creator><creator>Burkhardt, M.R</creator><creator>Ranville, J.F</creator><creator>Wildeman, T.R</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis</title><author>Bednar, A.J ; Garbarino, J.R ; Burkhardt, M.R ; Ranville, J.F ; Wildeman, T.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Arsenic - analysis</topic><topic>Arsenic - chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Other chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>SPE</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bednar, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbarino, J.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkhardt, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranville, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wildeman, T.R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bednar, A.J</au><au>Garbarino, J.R</au><au>Burkhardt, M.R</au><au>Ranville, J.F</au><au>Wildeman, T.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>355-364</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several methods for the speciation of arsenic in groundwater, surface-water, and acid mine drainage sample matrices using field and laboratory techniques are presented. The methods provide quantitative determination of arsenite [As(III)], arsenate [As(V)], monomethylarsonate (MMA), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and roxarsone in 2–8
min at detection limits of less than 1
μg arsenic per liter (μg As
L
−1). All the methods use anion exchange chromatography to separate the arsenic species and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry as an arsenic-specific detector. Different methods were needed because some sample matrices did not have all arsenic species present or were incompatible with particular high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phases. The bias and variability of the methods were evaluated using total arsenic, As(III), As(V), DMA, and MMA results from more than 100 surface-water, groundwater, and acid mine drainage samples, and reference materials. Concentrations in test samples were as much as 13,000
μg As
L
−1 for As(III) and 3700
μg As
L
−1 for As(V). Methylated arsenic species were less than 100
μg As
L
−1 and were found only in certain surface-water samples, and roxarsone was not detected in any of the water samples tested. The distribution of inorganic arsenic species in the test samples ranged from 0% to 90% As(III). Laboratory-speciation method variability for As(III), As(V), MMA, and DMA in reagent water at 0.5
μg As
L
−1 was 8–13% (
n=7). Field-speciation method variability for As(III) and As(V) at 1
μg As
L
−1 in reagent water was 3–4% (
n=3).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>14675647</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.034</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2004, Vol.38 (2), p.355-364 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17244995 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Analysis methods Analytical chemistry Applied sciences Arsenic Arsenic - analysis Arsenic - chemistry Chemistry Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography Environmental Monitoring - methods Exact sciences and technology Methods Natural water pollution Other chromatographic methods Pollution Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Soil Pollutants - analysis SPE Speciation Water Water - chemistry Water Pollutants - analysis Water treatment and pollution |
title | Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A14%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20and%20laboratory%20arsenic%20speciation%20methods%20and%20their%20application%20to%20natural-water%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Bednar,%20A.J&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=355-364&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17244995%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17244995&rft_id=info:pmid/14675647&rfr_iscdi=true |