Loading…

Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis

The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water research (Oxford) 2004, Vol.38 (2), p.355-364
Main Authors: Bednar, A.J, Garbarino, J.R, Burkhardt, M.R, Ranville, J.F, Wildeman, T.R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53
container_end_page 364
container_issue 2
container_start_page 355
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 38
creator Bednar, A.J
Garbarino, J.R
Burkhardt, M.R
Ranville, J.F
Wildeman, T.R
description The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several methods for the speciation of arsenic in groundwater, surface-water, and acid mine drainage sample matrices using field and laboratory techniques are presented. The methods provide quantitative determination of arsenite [As(III)], arsenate [As(V)], monomethylarsonate (MMA), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and roxarsone in 2–8 min at detection limits of less than 1 μg arsenic per liter (μg As L −1). All the methods use anion exchange chromatography to separate the arsenic species and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry as an arsenic-specific detector. Different methods were needed because some sample matrices did not have all arsenic species present or were incompatible with particular high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phases. The bias and variability of the methods were evaluated using total arsenic, As(III), As(V), DMA, and MMA results from more than 100 surface-water, groundwater, and acid mine drainage samples, and reference materials. Concentrations in test samples were as much as 13,000 μg As L −1 for As(III) and 3700 μg As L −1 for As(V). Methylated arsenic species were less than 100 μg As L −1 and were found only in certain surface-water samples, and roxarsone was not detected in any of the water samples tested. The distribution of inorganic arsenic species in the test samples ranged from 0% to 90% As(III). Laboratory-speciation method variability for As(III), As(V), MMA, and DMA in reagent water at 0.5 μg As L −1 was 8–13% ( n=7). Field-speciation method variability for As(III) and As(V) at 1 μg As L −1 in reagent water was 3–4% ( n=3).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.034
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17244995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135403005608</els_id><sourcerecordid>17244995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAURUVISSZp_0Ep3jQ7u5IlW6NNoIR8QSCbdi2epSeiQWM5kqZl_n088UB2Wb3FPffyOIR8Z7RhlPW_Ns1_KAlz01LKG6oaysUJWbG1VHUrxPqUrCgVvGa8E-fkIucNpbRtuToj50z0suuFXBF95zHYCkZbBRhighLTvoKUcfSmyhMaD8XHsdpieYk2v5PlBX2qYJqCN0taYjVC2SUI9fwVzuEIYZ99_kq-OAgZvx3vJfl7d_vn5qF-er5_vPn9VBvBVKmHnhvTq3UvKbcOBumMlGipbHtqmLAORcs4t1IZB3zgpoNuAOs63jox2I5fkqtld0rxdYe56K3PBkOAEeMuayZnJ0odQLGAJsWcEzo9Jb-FtNeM6oNYvdGLWH0Qq6nSs9i59uO4vxu2aD9KR5Mz8PMIQDYQXILR-PzBdVwywdjMXS8czjb-eUw6G4-jQesTmqJt9J9_8gawlZr_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17244995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Bednar, A.J ; Garbarino, J.R ; Burkhardt, M.R ; Ranville, J.F ; Wildeman, T.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bednar, A.J ; Garbarino, J.R ; Burkhardt, M.R ; Ranville, J.F ; Wildeman, T.R</creatorcontrib><description>The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several methods for the speciation of arsenic in groundwater, surface-water, and acid mine drainage sample matrices using field and laboratory techniques are presented. The methods provide quantitative determination of arsenite [As(III)], arsenate [As(V)], monomethylarsonate (MMA), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and roxarsone in 2–8 min at detection limits of less than 1 μg arsenic per liter (μg As L −1). All the methods use anion exchange chromatography to separate the arsenic species and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry as an arsenic-specific detector. Different methods were needed because some sample matrices did not have all arsenic species present or were incompatible with particular high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phases. The bias and variability of the methods were evaluated using total arsenic, As(III), As(V), DMA, and MMA results from more than 100 surface-water, groundwater, and acid mine drainage samples, and reference materials. Concentrations in test samples were as much as 13,000 μg As L −1 for As(III) and 3700 μg As L −1 for As(V). Methylated arsenic species were less than 100 μg As L −1 and were found only in certain surface-water samples, and roxarsone was not detected in any of the water samples tested. The distribution of inorganic arsenic species in the test samples ranged from 0% to 90% As(III). Laboratory-speciation method variability for As(III), As(V), MMA, and DMA in reagent water at 0.5 μg As L −1 was 8–13% ( n=7). Field-speciation method variability for As(III) and As(V) at 1 μg As L −1 in reagent water was 3–4% ( n=3).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14675647</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Analytical chemistry ; Applied sciences ; Arsenic ; Arsenic - analysis ; Arsenic - chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Methods ; Natural water pollution ; Other chromatographic methods ; Pollution ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; SPE ; Speciation ; Water ; Water - chemistry ; Water Pollutants - analysis ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2004, Vol.38 (2), p.355-364</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15371411$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14675647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bednar, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbarino, J.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkhardt, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranville, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wildeman, T.R</creatorcontrib><title>Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several methods for the speciation of arsenic in groundwater, surface-water, and acid mine drainage sample matrices using field and laboratory techniques are presented. The methods provide quantitative determination of arsenite [As(III)], arsenate [As(V)], monomethylarsonate (MMA), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and roxarsone in 2–8 min at detection limits of less than 1 μg arsenic per liter (μg As L −1). All the methods use anion exchange chromatography to separate the arsenic species and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry as an arsenic-specific detector. Different methods were needed because some sample matrices did not have all arsenic species present or were incompatible with particular high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phases. The bias and variability of the methods were evaluated using total arsenic, As(III), As(V), DMA, and MMA results from more than 100 surface-water, groundwater, and acid mine drainage samples, and reference materials. Concentrations in test samples were as much as 13,000 μg As L −1 for As(III) and 3700 μg As L −1 for As(V). Methylated arsenic species were less than 100 μg As L −1 and were found only in certain surface-water samples, and roxarsone was not detected in any of the water samples tested. The distribution of inorganic arsenic species in the test samples ranged from 0% to 90% As(III). Laboratory-speciation method variability for As(III), As(V), MMA, and DMA in reagent water at 0.5 μg As L −1 was 8–13% ( n=7). Field-speciation method variability for As(III) and As(V) at 1 μg As L −1 in reagent water was 3–4% ( n=3).</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Arsenic - analysis</subject><subject>Arsenic - chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Other chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>SPE</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAURUVISSZp_0Ep3jQ7u5IlW6NNoIR8QSCbdi2epSeiQWM5kqZl_n088UB2Wb3FPffyOIR8Z7RhlPW_Ns1_KAlz01LKG6oaysUJWbG1VHUrxPqUrCgVvGa8E-fkIucNpbRtuToj50z0suuFXBF95zHYCkZbBRhighLTvoKUcfSmyhMaD8XHsdpieYk2v5PlBX2qYJqCN0taYjVC2SUI9fwVzuEIYZ99_kq-OAgZvx3vJfl7d_vn5qF-er5_vPn9VBvBVKmHnhvTq3UvKbcOBumMlGipbHtqmLAORcs4t1IZB3zgpoNuAOs63jox2I5fkqtld0rxdYe56K3PBkOAEeMuayZnJ0odQLGAJsWcEzo9Jb-FtNeM6oNYvdGLWH0Qq6nSs9i59uO4vxu2aD9KR5Mz8PMIQDYQXILR-PzBdVwywdjMXS8czjb-eUw6G4-jQesTmqJt9J9_8gawlZr_</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Bednar, A.J</creator><creator>Garbarino, J.R</creator><creator>Burkhardt, M.R</creator><creator>Ranville, J.F</creator><creator>Wildeman, T.R</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis</title><author>Bednar, A.J ; Garbarino, J.R ; Burkhardt, M.R ; Ranville, J.F ; Wildeman, T.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Arsenic - analysis</topic><topic>Arsenic - chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Other chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>SPE</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bednar, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbarino, J.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkhardt, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranville, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wildeman, T.R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bednar, A.J</au><au>Garbarino, J.R</au><au>Burkhardt, M.R</au><au>Ranville, J.F</au><au>Wildeman, T.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>355-364</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several methods for the speciation of arsenic in groundwater, surface-water, and acid mine drainage sample matrices using field and laboratory techniques are presented. The methods provide quantitative determination of arsenite [As(III)], arsenate [As(V)], monomethylarsonate (MMA), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and roxarsone in 2–8 min at detection limits of less than 1 μg arsenic per liter (μg As L −1). All the methods use anion exchange chromatography to separate the arsenic species and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry as an arsenic-specific detector. Different methods were needed because some sample matrices did not have all arsenic species present or were incompatible with particular high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phases. The bias and variability of the methods were evaluated using total arsenic, As(III), As(V), DMA, and MMA results from more than 100 surface-water, groundwater, and acid mine drainage samples, and reference materials. Concentrations in test samples were as much as 13,000 μg As L −1 for As(III) and 3700 μg As L −1 for As(V). Methylated arsenic species were less than 100 μg As L −1 and were found only in certain surface-water samples, and roxarsone was not detected in any of the water samples tested. The distribution of inorganic arsenic species in the test samples ranged from 0% to 90% As(III). Laboratory-speciation method variability for As(III), As(V), MMA, and DMA in reagent water at 0.5 μg As L −1 was 8–13% ( n=7). Field-speciation method variability for As(III) and As(V) at 1 μg As L −1 in reagent water was 3–4% ( n=3).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>14675647</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.034</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2004, Vol.38 (2), p.355-364
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17244995
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Analysis methods
Analytical chemistry
Applied sciences
Arsenic
Arsenic - analysis
Arsenic - chemistry
Chemistry
Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Exact sciences and technology
Methods
Natural water pollution
Other chromatographic methods
Pollution
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Soil Pollutants - analysis
SPE
Speciation
Water
Water - chemistry
Water Pollutants - analysis
Water treatment and pollution
title Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A14%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20and%20laboratory%20arsenic%20speciation%20methods%20and%20their%20application%20to%20natural-water%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Bednar,%20A.J&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=355-364&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17244995%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b63cc6986703dfab7fc77ed07260c14dfe42133d79cfa3b3c5a5badf532f4bd53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17244995&rft_id=info:pmid/14675647&rfr_iscdi=true