Loading…
Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Background Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2015-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1774-1781 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43 |
container_end_page | 1781 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1774 |
container_title | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS Goetz, Jessica E., PhD Anderson, Donald D., PhD |
description | Background Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, but the mechanical tradeoffs of lateralization have not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized that lateralization would decrease bony impingement but also decrease the mechanical advantage of the deltoid. Methods Finite element models were created using the same implants with different amounts of glenoid lateralization: 5 mm of medialization to replicate glenoid erosion, as well as 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm of lateralization. Tests were performed with static and dynamic scapulae for motion in either the coronal or scapular plane. The angle of impingement between the scapula and the humeral polyethylene was recorded, as was the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Results Increasing lateralization decreased impingement while increasing the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Differences were found between the static and dynamic scapulae, with the dynamic scapula model having increased humeral adduction before impinging. The impingement angle was also substantially affected by the bony prominences on the inferior scapula, showing how individual bony anatomy can affect impingement. Conclusion Lateralization is effective in increasing impingement-free range of motion but also increases the deltoid force required to perform identical tasks. In addition, impingement is determined by scapular motion, which should be included in all shoulder models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.011 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1725024460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1058274615003146</els_id><sourcerecordid>1725024460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2O1DAQhCMEYn_gAbigHLkktB3b4wgJCa2ARVrEATgbx-4QD554cCeLhqfHwywcOHDqVquqpP6qqp4waBkw9XzbbglbDky2oFpg7F51zmTHGyUB7pcdpG74Rqiz6oJoCwC9AP6wOuOKdxqgO6--vEc32Tk4G-slW49pHKm2RMkFu6Cvf4Rlqr9GnBPtJ8xYx3LONoafdglprsNcZ7zFTFjTlNboMdc2L1NO-2hpOTyqHow2Ej6-m5fV5zevP11dNzcf3r67enXTOLHRS-Ot0NIPg5WD7LWSGnvf93ojLZaD8KxXVmllRcf6jmvJUfgBtIK-d5yPorusnp1y9zl9X5EWswvkMEY7Y1rJsA2XwIVQUKTsJHU5EWUczT6Hnc0Hw8AcwZqtKWDNEawBZQrY4nl6F78OO_R_HX9IFsGLkwDLk7cBsyEXcHboQ0a3GJ_Cf-Nf_uN2Mfxu5RsekLZpzXOhZ5ghbsB8PDZ7LJaVojsmVPcL_8ue8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1725024460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH ; Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS ; Goetz, Jessica E., PhD ; Anderson, Donald D., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH ; Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS ; Goetz, Jessica E., PhD ; Anderson, Donald D., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, but the mechanical tradeoffs of lateralization have not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized that lateralization would decrease bony impingement but also decrease the mechanical advantage of the deltoid. Methods Finite element models were created using the same implants with different amounts of glenoid lateralization: 5 mm of medialization to replicate glenoid erosion, as well as 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm of lateralization. Tests were performed with static and dynamic scapulae for motion in either the coronal or scapular plane. The angle of impingement between the scapula and the humeral polyethylene was recorded, as was the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Results Increasing lateralization decreased impingement while increasing the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Differences were found between the static and dynamic scapulae, with the dynamic scapula model having increased humeral adduction before impinging. The impingement angle was also substantially affected by the bony prominences on the inferior scapula, showing how individual bony anatomy can affect impingement. Conclusion Lateralization is effective in increasing impingement-free range of motion but also increases the deltoid force required to perform identical tasks. In addition, impingement is determined by scapular motion, which should be included in all shoulder models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26238003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods ; Computer Simulation ; deltoid force ; Finite Element Analysis ; Glenospere lateralization ; Humans ; impingement ; Orthopedics ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Fitting ; Range of Motion, Articular ; reverse shoulder arthroplasty ; scapular notching ; Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2015-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1774-1781</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26238003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goetz, Jessica E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Donald D., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, but the mechanical tradeoffs of lateralization have not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized that lateralization would decrease bony impingement but also decrease the mechanical advantage of the deltoid. Methods Finite element models were created using the same implants with different amounts of glenoid lateralization: 5 mm of medialization to replicate glenoid erosion, as well as 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm of lateralization. Tests were performed with static and dynamic scapulae for motion in either the coronal or scapular plane. The angle of impingement between the scapula and the humeral polyethylene was recorded, as was the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Results Increasing lateralization decreased impingement while increasing the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Differences were found between the static and dynamic scapulae, with the dynamic scapula model having increased humeral adduction before impinging. The impingement angle was also substantially affected by the bony prominences on the inferior scapula, showing how individual bony anatomy can affect impingement. Conclusion Lateralization is effective in increasing impingement-free range of motion but also increases the deltoid force required to perform identical tasks. In addition, impingement is determined by scapular motion, which should be included in all shoulder models.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>deltoid force</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Glenospere lateralization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>impingement</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Fitting</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>reverse shoulder arthroplasty</subject><subject>scapular notching</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc2O1DAQhCMEYn_gAbigHLkktB3b4wgJCa2ARVrEATgbx-4QD554cCeLhqfHwywcOHDqVquqpP6qqp4waBkw9XzbbglbDky2oFpg7F51zmTHGyUB7pcdpG74Rqiz6oJoCwC9AP6wOuOKdxqgO6--vEc32Tk4G-slW49pHKm2RMkFu6Cvf4Rlqr9GnBPtJ8xYx3LONoafdglprsNcZ7zFTFjTlNboMdc2L1NO-2hpOTyqHow2Ej6-m5fV5zevP11dNzcf3r67enXTOLHRS-Ot0NIPg5WD7LWSGnvf93ojLZaD8KxXVmllRcf6jmvJUfgBtIK-d5yPorusnp1y9zl9X5EWswvkMEY7Y1rJsA2XwIVQUKTsJHU5EWUczT6Hnc0Hw8AcwZqtKWDNEawBZQrY4nl6F78OO_R_HX9IFsGLkwDLk7cBsyEXcHboQ0a3GJ_Cf-Nf_uN2Mfxu5RsekLZpzXOhZ5ghbsB8PDZ7LJaVojsmVPcL_8ue8g</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS</creator><creator>Goetz, Jessica E., PhD</creator><creator>Anderson, Donald D., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty</title><author>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH ; Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS ; Goetz, Jessica E., PhD ; Anderson, Donald D., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>deltoid force</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Glenospere lateralization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>impingement</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Fitting</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>reverse shoulder arthroplasty</topic><topic>scapular notching</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goetz, Jessica E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Donald D., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH</au><au>Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS</au><au>Goetz, Jessica E., PhD</au><au>Anderson, Donald D., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1774</spage><epage>1781</epage><pages>1774-1781</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, but the mechanical tradeoffs of lateralization have not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized that lateralization would decrease bony impingement but also decrease the mechanical advantage of the deltoid. Methods Finite element models were created using the same implants with different amounts of glenoid lateralization: 5 mm of medialization to replicate glenoid erosion, as well as 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm of lateralization. Tests were performed with static and dynamic scapulae for motion in either the coronal or scapular plane. The angle of impingement between the scapula and the humeral polyethylene was recorded, as was the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Results Increasing lateralization decreased impingement while increasing the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Differences were found between the static and dynamic scapulae, with the dynamic scapula model having increased humeral adduction before impinging. The impingement angle was also substantially affected by the bony prominences on the inferior scapula, showing how individual bony anatomy can affect impingement. Conclusion Lateralization is effective in increasing impingement-free range of motion but also increases the deltoid force required to perform identical tasks. In addition, impingement is determined by scapular motion, which should be included in all shoulder models.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26238003</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.011</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-2746 |
ispartof | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2015-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1774-1781 |
issn | 1058-2746 1532-6500 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1725024460 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods Computer Simulation deltoid force Finite Element Analysis Glenospere lateralization Humans impingement Orthopedics Prosthesis Design Prosthesis Fitting Range of Motion, Articular reverse shoulder arthroplasty scapular notching Shoulder Joint - surgery |
title | Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A32%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanical%20tradeoffs%20associated%20with%20glenosphere%20lateralization%20in%20reverse%20shoulder%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Hettrich,%20Carolyn%20M.,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1774&rft.epage=1781&rft.pages=1774-1781&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1725024460%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1725024460&rft_id=info:pmid/26238003&rfr_iscdi=true |