Loading…

Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Background Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2015-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1774-1781
Main Authors: Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH, Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS, Goetz, Jessica E., PhD, Anderson, Donald D., PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43
container_end_page 1781
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1774
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 24
creator Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH
Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS
Goetz, Jessica E., PhD
Anderson, Donald D., PhD
description Background Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, but the mechanical tradeoffs of lateralization have not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized that lateralization would decrease bony impingement but also decrease the mechanical advantage of the deltoid. Methods Finite element models were created using the same implants with different amounts of glenoid lateralization: 5 mm of medialization to replicate glenoid erosion, as well as 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm of lateralization. Tests were performed with static and dynamic scapulae for motion in either the coronal or scapular plane. The angle of impingement between the scapula and the humeral polyethylene was recorded, as was the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Results Increasing lateralization decreased impingement while increasing the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Differences were found between the static and dynamic scapulae, with the dynamic scapula model having increased humeral adduction before impinging. The impingement angle was also substantially affected by the bony prominences on the inferior scapula, showing how individual bony anatomy can affect impingement. Conclusion Lateralization is effective in increasing impingement-free range of motion but also increases the deltoid force required to perform identical tasks. In addition, impingement is determined by scapular motion, which should be included in all shoulder models.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1725024460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1058274615003146</els_id><sourcerecordid>1725024460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2O1DAQhCMEYn_gAbigHLkktB3b4wgJCa2ARVrEATgbx-4QD554cCeLhqfHwywcOHDqVquqpP6qqp4waBkw9XzbbglbDky2oFpg7F51zmTHGyUB7pcdpG74Rqiz6oJoCwC9AP6wOuOKdxqgO6--vEc32Tk4G-slW49pHKm2RMkFu6Cvf4Rlqr9GnBPtJ8xYx3LONoafdglprsNcZ7zFTFjTlNboMdc2L1NO-2hpOTyqHow2Ej6-m5fV5zevP11dNzcf3r67enXTOLHRS-Ot0NIPg5WD7LWSGnvf93ojLZaD8KxXVmllRcf6jmvJUfgBtIK-d5yPorusnp1y9zl9X5EWswvkMEY7Y1rJsA2XwIVQUKTsJHU5EWUczT6Hnc0Hw8AcwZqtKWDNEawBZQrY4nl6F78OO_R_HX9IFsGLkwDLk7cBsyEXcHboQ0a3GJ_Cf-Nf_uN2Mfxu5RsekLZpzXOhZ5ghbsB8PDZ7LJaVojsmVPcL_8ue8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1725024460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH ; Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS ; Goetz, Jessica E., PhD ; Anderson, Donald D., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH ; Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS ; Goetz, Jessica E., PhD ; Anderson, Donald D., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, but the mechanical tradeoffs of lateralization have not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized that lateralization would decrease bony impingement but also decrease the mechanical advantage of the deltoid. Methods Finite element models were created using the same implants with different amounts of glenoid lateralization: 5 mm of medialization to replicate glenoid erosion, as well as 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm of lateralization. Tests were performed with static and dynamic scapulae for motion in either the coronal or scapular plane. The angle of impingement between the scapula and the humeral polyethylene was recorded, as was the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Results Increasing lateralization decreased impingement while increasing the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Differences were found between the static and dynamic scapulae, with the dynamic scapula model having increased humeral adduction before impinging. The impingement angle was also substantially affected by the bony prominences on the inferior scapula, showing how individual bony anatomy can affect impingement. Conclusion Lateralization is effective in increasing impingement-free range of motion but also increases the deltoid force required to perform identical tasks. In addition, impingement is determined by scapular motion, which should be included in all shoulder models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26238003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods ; Computer Simulation ; deltoid force ; Finite Element Analysis ; Glenospere lateralization ; Humans ; impingement ; Orthopedics ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Fitting ; Range of Motion, Articular ; reverse shoulder arthroplasty ; scapular notching ; Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2015-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1774-1781</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26238003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goetz, Jessica E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Donald D., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, but the mechanical tradeoffs of lateralization have not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized that lateralization would decrease bony impingement but also decrease the mechanical advantage of the deltoid. Methods Finite element models were created using the same implants with different amounts of glenoid lateralization: 5 mm of medialization to replicate glenoid erosion, as well as 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm of lateralization. Tests were performed with static and dynamic scapulae for motion in either the coronal or scapular plane. The angle of impingement between the scapula and the humeral polyethylene was recorded, as was the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Results Increasing lateralization decreased impingement while increasing the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Differences were found between the static and dynamic scapulae, with the dynamic scapula model having increased humeral adduction before impinging. The impingement angle was also substantially affected by the bony prominences on the inferior scapula, showing how individual bony anatomy can affect impingement. Conclusion Lateralization is effective in increasing impingement-free range of motion but also increases the deltoid force required to perform identical tasks. In addition, impingement is determined by scapular motion, which should be included in all shoulder models.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>deltoid force</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Glenospere lateralization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>impingement</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Fitting</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>reverse shoulder arthroplasty</subject><subject>scapular notching</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc2O1DAQhCMEYn_gAbigHLkktB3b4wgJCa2ARVrEATgbx-4QD554cCeLhqfHwywcOHDqVquqpP6qqp4waBkw9XzbbglbDky2oFpg7F51zmTHGyUB7pcdpG74Rqiz6oJoCwC9AP6wOuOKdxqgO6--vEc32Tk4G-slW49pHKm2RMkFu6Cvf4Rlqr9GnBPtJ8xYx3LONoafdglprsNcZ7zFTFjTlNboMdc2L1NO-2hpOTyqHow2Ej6-m5fV5zevP11dNzcf3r67enXTOLHRS-Ot0NIPg5WD7LWSGnvf93ojLZaD8KxXVmllRcf6jmvJUfgBtIK-d5yPorusnp1y9zl9X5EWswvkMEY7Y1rJsA2XwIVQUKTsJHU5EWUczT6Hnc0Hw8AcwZqtKWDNEawBZQrY4nl6F78OO_R_HX9IFsGLkwDLk7cBsyEXcHboQ0a3GJ_Cf-Nf_uN2Mfxu5RsekLZpzXOhZ5ghbsB8PDZ7LJaVojsmVPcL_8ue8g</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS</creator><creator>Goetz, Jessica E., PhD</creator><creator>Anderson, Donald D., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty</title><author>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH ; Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS ; Goetz, Jessica E., PhD ; Anderson, Donald D., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>deltoid force</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Glenospere lateralization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>impingement</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Fitting</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>reverse shoulder arthroplasty</topic><topic>scapular notching</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goetz, Jessica E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Donald D., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hettrich, Carolyn M., MD, MPH</au><au>Permeswaran, Vijay N., MS</au><au>Goetz, Jessica E., PhD</au><au>Anderson, Donald D., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1774</spage><epage>1781</epage><pages>1774-1781</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty occurs in up to 97% of patients. Notching is associated with decreased strength and reduced motion and may lead to long-term failure due to polyethylene wear. Many implant systems lateralize the glenosphere to address scapular notching, but the mechanical tradeoffs of lateralization have not been rigorously evaluated. We hypothesized that lateralization would decrease bony impingement but also decrease the mechanical advantage of the deltoid. Methods Finite element models were created using the same implants with different amounts of glenoid lateralization: 5 mm of medialization to replicate glenoid erosion, as well as 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mm of lateralization. Tests were performed with static and dynamic scapulae for motion in either the coronal or scapular plane. The angle of impingement between the scapula and the humeral polyethylene was recorded, as was the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Results Increasing lateralization decreased impingement while increasing the deltoid force required to elevate the arm. Differences were found between the static and dynamic scapulae, with the dynamic scapula model having increased humeral adduction before impinging. The impingement angle was also substantially affected by the bony prominences on the inferior scapula, showing how individual bony anatomy can affect impingement. Conclusion Lateralization is effective in increasing impingement-free range of motion but also increases the deltoid force required to perform identical tasks. In addition, impingement is determined by scapular motion, which should be included in all shoulder models.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26238003</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.011</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2015-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1774-1781
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1725024460
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation
Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods
Computer Simulation
deltoid force
Finite Element Analysis
Glenospere lateralization
Humans
impingement
Orthopedics
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Fitting
Range of Motion, Articular
reverse shoulder arthroplasty
scapular notching
Shoulder Joint - surgery
title Mechanical tradeoffs associated with glenosphere lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A32%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanical%20tradeoffs%20associated%20with%20glenosphere%20lateralization%20in%20reverse%20shoulder%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Hettrich,%20Carolyn%20M.,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1774&rft.epage=1781&rft.pages=1774-1781&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1725024460%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-da485dbba5b598658e9d99875aeb594d196a686a431932852e4db086099c22f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1725024460&rft_id=info:pmid/26238003&rfr_iscdi=true