Loading…

Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan

We studied the effects of habitat mosaics on butterfly assemblage on multiple spatial scales: landscape, landscape element, local habitat, and microhabitat, based on the transect counts conducted along a 3.84 km route. The transect route, including 21 local habitats, passed through two distinct area...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological research 1999-06, Vol.14 (2), p.105-118
Main Authors: Natuhara, Yosihiro, Imai, Chobei, Takahashi, Mitsuko
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4597-9cd899916223ecf42b2367162325b69a36e547eecffa3c20711272397a1b91fe3
cites
container_end_page 118
container_issue 2
container_start_page 105
container_title Ecological research
container_volume 14
creator Natuhara, Yosihiro
Imai, Chobei
Takahashi, Mitsuko
description We studied the effects of habitat mosaics on butterfly assemblage on multiple spatial scales: landscape, landscape element, local habitat, and microhabitat, based on the transect counts conducted along a 3.84 km route. The transect route, including 21 local habitats, passed through two distinct areas: 1.65 km of a secondary deciduous Quercus forest and the grove of a shrine in Hiraoka, and 2.19 km of a mosaic of secondary deciduous Quercus forest, grassland, and farmland in Narukawa. The diversity of the landscape elements and species richness were higher in Narukawa than in Hiraoka; the landscape mosaic enhanced the species richness in Narukawa. However, the diversity indices and specialist species (univoltine tree feeder) were decreased in this mosaic landscape. The species richness at local habitats was also increased by the mosaic of microhabitats, such as the herbaceous layer, glade, and mantle in the local habitats, whereas it was decreased by an abundant shrub layer. The ratios of species richness to abundance in the local habitats were lower than expected based on random sampling from the total of Hiraoka and Narukawa. This means that local assemblages were non‐random samples from an assemblage on the landscape or regional scale, and were made up by the process of habitat selection of butterfly species in the assemblages on the landscape or regional scale. For conservation of butterfly assemblages, we recommend that woodlands should be kept without fragmentation, but with glades or small grasslands, and with clearance of the shrub layer along the path.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1440-1703.1999.00287.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17270783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2603811031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4597-9cd899916223ecf42b2367162325b69a36e547eecffa3c20711272397a1b91fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDxYLViT4lTiW2CBUoKioFYK1NXHtKm0eJU5E-_c4FLFgxWo8mnNH44MQpiSmRKQ365gKQSIqCY-pUiomhGUy3h2h0e_gGI2IoiziGRWn6Mz7NSGUKUlGaLGArrNtjRuHS6iXuGo8FMZjcM6arqhXOO8HwpV7DN7bKi9hZTF0-KXD001TwTWee9iE8gxbqM_RiYPS24ufOkbvD5O3-6doNn-c3t_NIiMSJSNlllm4lqaMcWucYDnjqQwtZ0meKuCpTYS0YeSAG0YkpUwyriTQXFFn-RhdHfZu2-ajt77TVeGNLcMnbNN7TSWTRGY8gJd_wHXTt3W4TSuWJoJLIgKUHSDTNt631ultW1TQ7jUlevCs13rQqQedevCsvz3rXYjeHqKfRWn3_87pyeskPPgXP4iBaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>926543704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Natuhara, Yosihiro ; Imai, Chobei ; Takahashi, Mitsuko</creator><creatorcontrib>Natuhara, Yosihiro ; Imai, Chobei ; Takahashi, Mitsuko</creatorcontrib><description>We studied the effects of habitat mosaics on butterfly assemblage on multiple spatial scales: landscape, landscape element, local habitat, and microhabitat, based on the transect counts conducted along a 3.84 km route. The transect route, including 21 local habitats, passed through two distinct areas: 1.65 km of a secondary deciduous Quercus forest and the grove of a shrine in Hiraoka, and 2.19 km of a mosaic of secondary deciduous Quercus forest, grassland, and farmland in Narukawa. The diversity of the landscape elements and species richness were higher in Narukawa than in Hiraoka; the landscape mosaic enhanced the species richness in Narukawa. However, the diversity indices and specialist species (univoltine tree feeder) were decreased in this mosaic landscape. The species richness at local habitats was also increased by the mosaic of microhabitats, such as the herbaceous layer, glade, and mantle in the local habitats, whereas it was decreased by an abundant shrub layer. The ratios of species richness to abundance in the local habitats were lower than expected based on random sampling from the total of Hiraoka and Narukawa. This means that local assemblages were non‐random samples from an assemblage on the landscape or regional scale, and were made up by the process of habitat selection of butterfly species in the assemblages on the landscape or regional scale. For conservation of butterfly assemblages, we recommend that woodlands should be kept without fragmentation, but with glades or small grasslands, and with clearance of the shrub layer along the path.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0912-3814</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.1999.00287.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; biodiversity; butterfly; conservation; landscape ecology; Quercus forests ; Diversity indices ; Grasslands ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Landscape ; Microhabitats ; Quercus ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Ecological research, 1999-06, Vol.14 (2), p.105-118</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Science Asia Pty. Ltd. 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4597-9cd899916223ecf42b2367162325b69a36e547eecffa3c20711272397a1b91fe3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Natuhara, Yosihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imai, Chobei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Mitsuko</creatorcontrib><title>Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan</title><title>Ecological research</title><description>We studied the effects of habitat mosaics on butterfly assemblage on multiple spatial scales: landscape, landscape element, local habitat, and microhabitat, based on the transect counts conducted along a 3.84 km route. The transect route, including 21 local habitats, passed through two distinct areas: 1.65 km of a secondary deciduous Quercus forest and the grove of a shrine in Hiraoka, and 2.19 km of a mosaic of secondary deciduous Quercus forest, grassland, and farmland in Narukawa. The diversity of the landscape elements and species richness were higher in Narukawa than in Hiraoka; the landscape mosaic enhanced the species richness in Narukawa. However, the diversity indices and specialist species (univoltine tree feeder) were decreased in this mosaic landscape. The species richness at local habitats was also increased by the mosaic of microhabitats, such as the herbaceous layer, glade, and mantle in the local habitats, whereas it was decreased by an abundant shrub layer. The ratios of species richness to abundance in the local habitats were lower than expected based on random sampling from the total of Hiraoka and Narukawa. This means that local assemblages were non‐random samples from an assemblage on the landscape or regional scale, and were made up by the process of habitat selection of butterfly species in the assemblages on the landscape or regional scale. For conservation of butterfly assemblages, we recommend that woodlands should be kept without fragmentation, but with glades or small grasslands, and with clearance of the shrub layer along the path.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>biodiversity; butterfly; conservation; landscape ecology; Quercus forests</subject><subject>Diversity indices</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Quercus</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0912-3814</issn><issn>1440-1703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDxYLViT4lTiW2CBUoKioFYK1NXHtKm0eJU5E-_c4FLFgxWo8mnNH44MQpiSmRKQ365gKQSIqCY-pUiomhGUy3h2h0e_gGI2IoiziGRWn6Mz7NSGUKUlGaLGArrNtjRuHS6iXuGo8FMZjcM6arqhXOO8HwpV7DN7bKi9hZTF0-KXD001TwTWee9iE8gxbqM_RiYPS24ufOkbvD5O3-6doNn-c3t_NIiMSJSNlllm4lqaMcWucYDnjqQwtZ0meKuCpTYS0YeSAG0YkpUwyriTQXFFn-RhdHfZu2-ajt77TVeGNLcMnbNN7TSWTRGY8gJd_wHXTt3W4TSuWJoJLIgKUHSDTNt631ultW1TQ7jUlevCs13rQqQedevCsvz3rXYjeHqKfRWn3_87pyeskPPgXP4iBaQ</recordid><startdate>199906</startdate><enddate>199906</enddate><creator>Natuhara, Yosihiro</creator><creator>Imai, Chobei</creator><creator>Takahashi, Mitsuko</creator><general>Blackwell Science Pty</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199906</creationdate><title>Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan</title><author>Natuhara, Yosihiro ; Imai, Chobei ; Takahashi, Mitsuko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4597-9cd899916223ecf42b2367162325b69a36e547eecffa3c20711272397a1b91fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>biodiversity; butterfly; conservation; landscape ecology; Quercus forests</topic><topic>Diversity indices</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Quercus</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Natuhara, Yosihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imai, Chobei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Mitsuko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Natuhara, Yosihiro</au><au>Imai, Chobei</au><au>Takahashi, Mitsuko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan</atitle><jtitle>Ecological research</jtitle><date>1999-06</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>105-118</pages><issn>0912-3814</issn><eissn>1440-1703</eissn><abstract>We studied the effects of habitat mosaics on butterfly assemblage on multiple spatial scales: landscape, landscape element, local habitat, and microhabitat, based on the transect counts conducted along a 3.84 km route. The transect route, including 21 local habitats, passed through two distinct areas: 1.65 km of a secondary deciduous Quercus forest and the grove of a shrine in Hiraoka, and 2.19 km of a mosaic of secondary deciduous Quercus forest, grassland, and farmland in Narukawa. The diversity of the landscape elements and species richness were higher in Narukawa than in Hiraoka; the landscape mosaic enhanced the species richness in Narukawa. However, the diversity indices and specialist species (univoltine tree feeder) were decreased in this mosaic landscape. The species richness at local habitats was also increased by the mosaic of microhabitats, such as the herbaceous layer, glade, and mantle in the local habitats, whereas it was decreased by an abundant shrub layer. The ratios of species richness to abundance in the local habitats were lower than expected based on random sampling from the total of Hiraoka and Narukawa. This means that local assemblages were non‐random samples from an assemblage on the landscape or regional scale, and were made up by the process of habitat selection of butterfly species in the assemblages on the landscape or regional scale. For conservation of butterfly assemblages, we recommend that woodlands should be kept without fragmentation, but with glades or small grasslands, and with clearance of the shrub layer along the path.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Pty</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1440-1703.1999.00287.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0912-3814
ispartof Ecological research, 1999-06, Vol.14 (2), p.105-118
issn 0912-3814
1440-1703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17270783
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Agricultural land
biodiversity
butterfly
conservation
landscape ecology
Quercus forests
Diversity indices
Grasslands
Habitat selection
Habitats
Landscape
Microhabitats
Quercus
Species diversity
Species richness
Woodlands
title Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A29%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pattern%20of%20land%20mosaics%20affecting%20butterfly%20assemblage%20at%20Mt%20Ikoma,%20Osaka,%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20research&rft.au=Natuhara,%20Yosihiro&rft.date=1999-06&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=105-118&rft.issn=0912-3814&rft.eissn=1440-1703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1440-1703.1999.00287.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2603811031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4597-9cd899916223ecf42b2367162325b69a36e547eecffa3c20711272397a1b91fe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=926543704&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true