Loading…
Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan
We studied the effects of habitat mosaics on butterfly assemblage on multiple spatial scales: landscape, landscape element, local habitat, and microhabitat, based on the transect counts conducted along a 3.84 km route. The transect route, including 21 local habitats, passed through two distinct area...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological research 1999-06, Vol.14 (2), p.105-118 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4597-9cd899916223ecf42b2367162325b69a36e547eecffa3c20711272397a1b91fe3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 118 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Ecological research |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Natuhara, Yosihiro Imai, Chobei Takahashi, Mitsuko |
description | We studied the effects of habitat mosaics on butterfly assemblage on multiple spatial scales: landscape, landscape element, local habitat, and microhabitat, based on the transect counts conducted along a 3.84 km route. The transect route, including 21 local habitats, passed through two distinct areas: 1.65 km of a secondary deciduous Quercus forest and the grove of a shrine in Hiraoka, and 2.19 km of a mosaic of secondary deciduous Quercus forest, grassland, and farmland in Narukawa. The diversity of the landscape elements and species richness were higher in Narukawa than in Hiraoka; the landscape mosaic enhanced the species richness in Narukawa. However, the diversity indices and specialist species (univoltine tree feeder) were decreased in this mosaic landscape. The species richness at local habitats was also increased by the mosaic of microhabitats, such as the herbaceous layer, glade, and mantle in the local habitats, whereas it was decreased by an abundant shrub layer. The ratios of species richness to abundance in the local habitats were lower than expected based on random sampling from the total of Hiraoka and Narukawa. This means that local assemblages were non‐random samples from an assemblage on the landscape or regional scale, and were made up by the process of habitat selection of butterfly species in the assemblages on the landscape or regional scale. For conservation of butterfly assemblages, we recommend that woodlands should be kept without fragmentation, but with glades or small grasslands, and with clearance of the shrub layer along the path. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1440-1703.1999.00287.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17270783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2603811031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4597-9cd899916223ecf42b2367162325b69a36e547eecffa3c20711272397a1b91fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDxYLViT4lTiW2CBUoKioFYK1NXHtKm0eJU5E-_c4FLFgxWo8mnNH44MQpiSmRKQ365gKQSIqCY-pUiomhGUy3h2h0e_gGI2IoiziGRWn6Mz7NSGUKUlGaLGArrNtjRuHS6iXuGo8FMZjcM6arqhXOO8HwpV7DN7bKi9hZTF0-KXD001TwTWee9iE8gxbqM_RiYPS24ufOkbvD5O3-6doNn-c3t_NIiMSJSNlllm4lqaMcWucYDnjqQwtZ0meKuCpTYS0YeSAG0YkpUwyriTQXFFn-RhdHfZu2-ajt77TVeGNLcMnbNN7TSWTRGY8gJd_wHXTt3W4TSuWJoJLIgKUHSDTNt631ultW1TQ7jUlevCs13rQqQedevCsvz3rXYjeHqKfRWn3_87pyeskPPgXP4iBaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>926543704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Natuhara, Yosihiro ; Imai, Chobei ; Takahashi, Mitsuko</creator><creatorcontrib>Natuhara, Yosihiro ; Imai, Chobei ; Takahashi, Mitsuko</creatorcontrib><description>We studied the effects of habitat mosaics on butterfly assemblage on multiple spatial scales: landscape, landscape element, local habitat, and microhabitat, based on the transect counts conducted along a 3.84 km route. The transect route, including 21 local habitats, passed through two distinct areas: 1.65 km of a secondary deciduous Quercus forest and the grove of a shrine in Hiraoka, and 2.19 km of a mosaic of secondary deciduous Quercus forest, grassland, and farmland in Narukawa. The diversity of the landscape elements and species richness were higher in Narukawa than in Hiraoka; the landscape mosaic enhanced the species richness in Narukawa. However, the diversity indices and specialist species (univoltine tree feeder) were decreased in this mosaic landscape. The species richness at local habitats was also increased by the mosaic of microhabitats, such as the herbaceous layer, glade, and mantle in the local habitats, whereas it was decreased by an abundant shrub layer. The ratios of species richness to abundance in the local habitats were lower than expected based on random sampling from the total of Hiraoka and Narukawa. This means that local assemblages were non‐random samples from an assemblage on the landscape or regional scale, and were made up by the process of habitat selection of butterfly species in the assemblages on the landscape or regional scale. For conservation of butterfly assemblages, we recommend that woodlands should be kept without fragmentation, but with glades or small grasslands, and with clearance of the shrub layer along the path.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0912-3814</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.1999.00287.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; biodiversity; butterfly; conservation; landscape ecology; Quercus forests ; Diversity indices ; Grasslands ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Landscape ; Microhabitats ; Quercus ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Ecological research, 1999-06, Vol.14 (2), p.105-118</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Science Asia Pty. Ltd. 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4597-9cd899916223ecf42b2367162325b69a36e547eecffa3c20711272397a1b91fe3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Natuhara, Yosihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imai, Chobei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Mitsuko</creatorcontrib><title>Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan</title><title>Ecological research</title><description>We studied the effects of habitat mosaics on butterfly assemblage on multiple spatial scales: landscape, landscape element, local habitat, and microhabitat, based on the transect counts conducted along a 3.84 km route. The transect route, including 21 local habitats, passed through two distinct areas: 1.65 km of a secondary deciduous Quercus forest and the grove of a shrine in Hiraoka, and 2.19 km of a mosaic of secondary deciduous Quercus forest, grassland, and farmland in Narukawa. The diversity of the landscape elements and species richness were higher in Narukawa than in Hiraoka; the landscape mosaic enhanced the species richness in Narukawa. However, the diversity indices and specialist species (univoltine tree feeder) were decreased in this mosaic landscape. The species richness at local habitats was also increased by the mosaic of microhabitats, such as the herbaceous layer, glade, and mantle in the local habitats, whereas it was decreased by an abundant shrub layer. The ratios of species richness to abundance in the local habitats were lower than expected based on random sampling from the total of Hiraoka and Narukawa. This means that local assemblages were non‐random samples from an assemblage on the landscape or regional scale, and were made up by the process of habitat selection of butterfly species in the assemblages on the landscape or regional scale. For conservation of butterfly assemblages, we recommend that woodlands should be kept without fragmentation, but with glades or small grasslands, and with clearance of the shrub layer along the path.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>biodiversity; butterfly; conservation; landscape ecology; Quercus forests</subject><subject>Diversity indices</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Quercus</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0912-3814</issn><issn>1440-1703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDxYLViT4lTiW2CBUoKioFYK1NXHtKm0eJU5E-_c4FLFgxWo8mnNH44MQpiSmRKQ365gKQSIqCY-pUiomhGUy3h2h0e_gGI2IoiziGRWn6Mz7NSGUKUlGaLGArrNtjRuHS6iXuGo8FMZjcM6arqhXOO8HwpV7DN7bKi9hZTF0-KXD001TwTWee9iE8gxbqM_RiYPS24ufOkbvD5O3-6doNn-c3t_NIiMSJSNlllm4lqaMcWucYDnjqQwtZ0meKuCpTYS0YeSAG0YkpUwyriTQXFFn-RhdHfZu2-ajt77TVeGNLcMnbNN7TSWTRGY8gJd_wHXTt3W4TSuWJoJLIgKUHSDTNt631ultW1TQ7jUlevCs13rQqQedevCsvz3rXYjeHqKfRWn3_87pyeskPPgXP4iBaQ</recordid><startdate>199906</startdate><enddate>199906</enddate><creator>Natuhara, Yosihiro</creator><creator>Imai, Chobei</creator><creator>Takahashi, Mitsuko</creator><general>Blackwell Science Pty</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199906</creationdate><title>Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan</title><author>Natuhara, Yosihiro ; Imai, Chobei ; Takahashi, Mitsuko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4597-9cd899916223ecf42b2367162325b69a36e547eecffa3c20711272397a1b91fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>biodiversity; butterfly; conservation; landscape ecology; Quercus forests</topic><topic>Diversity indices</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Quercus</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Natuhara, Yosihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imai, Chobei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Mitsuko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Natuhara, Yosihiro</au><au>Imai, Chobei</au><au>Takahashi, Mitsuko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan</atitle><jtitle>Ecological research</jtitle><date>1999-06</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>105-118</pages><issn>0912-3814</issn><eissn>1440-1703</eissn><abstract>We studied the effects of habitat mosaics on butterfly assemblage on multiple spatial scales: landscape, landscape element, local habitat, and microhabitat, based on the transect counts conducted along a 3.84 km route. The transect route, including 21 local habitats, passed through two distinct areas: 1.65 km of a secondary deciduous Quercus forest and the grove of a shrine in Hiraoka, and 2.19 km of a mosaic of secondary deciduous Quercus forest, grassland, and farmland in Narukawa. The diversity of the landscape elements and species richness were higher in Narukawa than in Hiraoka; the landscape mosaic enhanced the species richness in Narukawa. However, the diversity indices and specialist species (univoltine tree feeder) were decreased in this mosaic landscape. The species richness at local habitats was also increased by the mosaic of microhabitats, such as the herbaceous layer, glade, and mantle in the local habitats, whereas it was decreased by an abundant shrub layer. The ratios of species richness to abundance in the local habitats were lower than expected based on random sampling from the total of Hiraoka and Narukawa. This means that local assemblages were non‐random samples from an assemblage on the landscape or regional scale, and were made up by the process of habitat selection of butterfly species in the assemblages on the landscape or regional scale. For conservation of butterfly assemblages, we recommend that woodlands should be kept without fragmentation, but with glades or small grasslands, and with clearance of the shrub layer along the path.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Pty</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1440-1703.1999.00287.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0912-3814 |
ispartof | Ecological research, 1999-06, Vol.14 (2), p.105-118 |
issn | 0912-3814 1440-1703 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17270783 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agricultural land biodiversity butterfly conservation landscape ecology Quercus forests Diversity indices Grasslands Habitat selection Habitats Landscape Microhabitats Quercus Species diversity Species richness Woodlands |
title | Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A29%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pattern%20of%20land%20mosaics%20affecting%20butterfly%20assemblage%20at%20Mt%20Ikoma,%20Osaka,%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20research&rft.au=Natuhara,%20Yosihiro&rft.date=1999-06&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=105-118&rft.issn=0912-3814&rft.eissn=1440-1703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1440-1703.1999.00287.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2603811031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4597-9cd899916223ecf42b2367162325b69a36e547eecffa3c20711272397a1b91fe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=926543704&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |