Expert Versus Novice Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle During a Single-Leg Squat

The high rate of ACL injury has led to the need for large-scale injury risk screening to aid in prevention. Cost and time alternatives to three-dimensional assessments of knee injury risk factors are necessary for largescale, clinical use. The purpose of this study was to determine the expert versus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of athletic therapy & training 2015-07, Vol.20 (4), p.23-27
Main Authors: Tate, Jeremiah, True, Hanna, Dale, Barry, Baker, Carrie
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-2ad2b53bf8a739ba67a72f4a2db1eac01d09da086d020dd17376cc3604a503a53
cites
container_end_page 27
container_issue 4
container_start_page 23
container_title International journal of athletic therapy & training
container_volume 20
creator Tate, Jeremiah
True, Hanna
Dale, Barry
Baker, Carrie
description The high rate of ACL injury has led to the need for large-scale injury risk screening to aid in prevention. Cost and time alternatives to three-dimensional assessments of knee injury risk factors are necessary for largescale, clinical use. The purpose of this study was to determine the expert versus novice interrater reliability and test-retest reliability of the frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) during the single-leg squat (SLS) test. Excellent interrater reliability was demonstrated for session 1 and session 2. Excellent intrarater (i.e., test-retest) reliability was demonstrated for both the novice and expert. The minimal training requirements and excellent reliability of the FPPA during the SLS test make it a key screening tool for large-scale assessment of injury risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1123/ijatt.2014-0116
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1727675479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1727675479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-2ad2b53bf8a739ba67a72f4a2db1eac01d09da086d020dd17376cc3604a503a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PAjEQhhujiQQ5e-3Ry0I_t3AkCEpClIh63cy2XSxZdqHtGvHXuyvGOczMk7yZTB6EbikZUsr4yO0gxiEjVCSE0vQC9RiVKlFsLC__d6Wu0SCEHWlLSCGp6KHv-dfB-ojfrQ9NwE_1p9MWL6tovYe2YahMhx7O-GJLB7krXTzhusDxw-KFr6sIJV6XUFm89vXO6ujqCk-rbWnxfeNdtcWAN67jZGW3eHNsIN6gqwLKYAd_s4_eFvPX2WOyen5YzqarRDMlYsLAsFzyvBiD4pMcUgWKFQKYyakFTaghEwNknBrCiDFUcZVqzVMiQBIOkvfR3fnuwdfHxoaY7V3QtuzerZuQ0dZMqqRQkzY6Oke1r0PwtsgO3u3BnzJKsk509is660RnnWj-A9lkcxM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1727675479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expert Versus Novice Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle During a Single-Leg Squat</title><source>Human Kinetics</source><creator>Tate, Jeremiah ; True, Hanna ; Dale, Barry ; Baker, Carrie</creator><creatorcontrib>Tate, Jeremiah ; True, Hanna ; Dale, Barry ; Baker, Carrie</creatorcontrib><description>The high rate of ACL injury has led to the need for large-scale injury risk screening to aid in prevention. Cost and time alternatives to three-dimensional assessments of knee injury risk factors are necessary for largescale, clinical use. The purpose of this study was to determine the expert versus novice interrater reliability and test-retest reliability of the frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) during the single-leg squat (SLS) test. Excellent interrater reliability was demonstrated for session 1 and session 2. Excellent intrarater (i.e., test-retest) reliability was demonstrated for both the novice and expert. The minimal training requirements and excellent reliability of the FPPA during the SLS test make it a key screening tool for large-scale assessment of injury risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2157-7277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2157-7285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1123/ijatt.2014-0116</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of athletic therapy &amp; training, 2015-07, Vol.20 (4), p.23-27</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-2ad2b53bf8a739ba67a72f4a2db1eac01d09da086d020dd17376cc3604a503a53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tate, Jeremiah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>True, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dale, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Carrie</creatorcontrib><title>Expert Versus Novice Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle During a Single-Leg Squat</title><title>International journal of athletic therapy &amp; training</title><description>The high rate of ACL injury has led to the need for large-scale injury risk screening to aid in prevention. Cost and time alternatives to three-dimensional assessments of knee injury risk factors are necessary for largescale, clinical use. The purpose of this study was to determine the expert versus novice interrater reliability and test-retest reliability of the frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) during the single-leg squat (SLS) test. Excellent interrater reliability was demonstrated for session 1 and session 2. Excellent intrarater (i.e., test-retest) reliability was demonstrated for both the novice and expert. The minimal training requirements and excellent reliability of the FPPA during the SLS test make it a key screening tool for large-scale assessment of injury risk.</description><issn>2157-7277</issn><issn>2157-7285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1PAjEQhhujiQQ5e-3Ry0I_t3AkCEpClIh63cy2XSxZdqHtGvHXuyvGOczMk7yZTB6EbikZUsr4yO0gxiEjVCSE0vQC9RiVKlFsLC__d6Wu0SCEHWlLSCGp6KHv-dfB-ojfrQ9NwE_1p9MWL6tovYe2YahMhx7O-GJLB7krXTzhusDxw-KFr6sIJV6XUFm89vXO6ujqCk-rbWnxfeNdtcWAN67jZGW3eHNsIN6gqwLKYAd_s4_eFvPX2WOyen5YzqarRDMlYsLAsFzyvBiD4pMcUgWKFQKYyakFTaghEwNknBrCiDFUcZVqzVMiQBIOkvfR3fnuwdfHxoaY7V3QtuzerZuQ0dZMqqRQkzY6Oke1r0PwtsgO3u3BnzJKsk509is660RnnWj-A9lkcxM</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Tate, Jeremiah</creator><creator>True, Hanna</creator><creator>Dale, Barry</creator><creator>Baker, Carrie</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Expert Versus Novice Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle During a Single-Leg Squat</title><author>Tate, Jeremiah ; True, Hanna ; Dale, Barry ; Baker, Carrie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-2ad2b53bf8a739ba67a72f4a2db1eac01d09da086d020dd17376cc3604a503a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tate, Jeremiah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>True, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dale, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Carrie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>International journal of athletic therapy &amp; training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tate, Jeremiah</au><au>True, Hanna</au><au>Dale, Barry</au><au>Baker, Carrie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expert Versus Novice Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle During a Single-Leg Squat</atitle><jtitle>International journal of athletic therapy &amp; training</jtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>23-27</pages><issn>2157-7277</issn><eissn>2157-7285</eissn><abstract>The high rate of ACL injury has led to the need for large-scale injury risk screening to aid in prevention. Cost and time alternatives to three-dimensional assessments of knee injury risk factors are necessary for largescale, clinical use. The purpose of this study was to determine the expert versus novice interrater reliability and test-retest reliability of the frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) during the single-leg squat (SLS) test. Excellent interrater reliability was demonstrated for session 1 and session 2. Excellent intrarater (i.e., test-retest) reliability was demonstrated for both the novice and expert. The minimal training requirements and excellent reliability of the FPPA during the SLS test make it a key screening tool for large-scale assessment of injury risk.</abstract><doi>10.1123/ijatt.2014-0116</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2157-7277
ispartof International journal of athletic therapy & training, 2015-07, Vol.20 (4), p.23-27
issn 2157-7277
2157-7285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1727675479
source Human Kinetics
title Expert Versus Novice Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle During a Single-Leg Squat
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A38%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expert%20Versus%20Novice%20Interrater%20and%20Intrarater%20Reliability%20of%20the%20Frontal%20Plane%20Projection%20Angle%20During%20a%20Single-Leg%20Squat&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20athletic%20therapy%20&%20training&rft.au=Tate,%20Jeremiah&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=23-27&rft.issn=2157-7277&rft.eissn=2157-7285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1123/ijatt.2014-0116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1727675479%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-2ad2b53bf8a739ba67a72f4a2db1eac01d09da086d020dd17376cc3604a503a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1727675479&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true