Seabirds mated for life migrate separately to the same places: behavioural coordination or shared proximate causes?

• Published in: Animal behaviour 2015-04, Vol.102, p.267-276
• Main Authors: Müller, Martina S., Massa, Bruno, Phillips, Richard A., Dell'Omo, Giacomo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Animal reproduction; behavioural strategy; Bird migration; Birds; Calonectris diomedea; carryover effects; Genetics; global location sensor; GLS logger; inbreeding; mate fidelity; movement ecology; Ornithology; partner coordination; Taxonomy
• ISSN: 0003-3472; 1095-8282
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.02.005

Long-term pair bonds occur in diverse animal taxa, but they are most common in birds, and can last from a few years to a lifetime. In many of these species, after the reproductive season, birds migrate to distant nonbreeding grounds where they remain for several months, and until recently, little was known about whether partners maintain contact during migration. This gap in knowledge was primarily due to past methodological difficulties in tracking long-term, large-scale movements of individuals. However, the development of new animal-borne geolocation devices has enabled researchers to track movements of individuals for a year or more. We tracked the annual migrations of both members of breeding pairs of Scopoli's shearwaters, Calonectris diomedea, breeding on Linosa Island (Italy) and found that although they did not migrate together, they did spend a similar number of days travelling to and from similar terminal nonbreeding areas. Although migration destinations were alike, they were not identical. That partners did not appear to travel or spend time together in the nonbreeding season suggests that similarities were not due to behavioural coordination. We performed additional analyses to uncover alternative, potential proximate mechanisms. First, we found that body mass of breeding adults during the chick-rearing period correlated positively with the decision to migrate further south, so conceivably pair members may migrate to similar areas because of shared reproductive costs; however, partners were not of similar body mass. Distances between nonbreeding areas for individuals that nested closer together were smaller than for individuals that nested far apart. As neighbours tend to be more closely related due to high natal philopatry, this suggests that similarities within pairs in migration behaviour may reflect the influence of shared genes on migration strategy. •In shearwaters, members of the same pair migrate to similar nonbreeding areas.•Pair members migrate at different times and do not spend time together.•Heavier birds migrate further, but pair members are not similar in mass.•Migrations of neighbours are more similar than for birds from distant nests.•As high philopatry causes inbreeding, pair members may share migration genes.