Loading…
Bone-anchored hearing aids and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: why do patients reject them?
This study aimed to report the bone-anchored hearing aid uptake and the reasons for their rejection by unilateral sensorineural deafness patients. A retrospective review of 90 consecutive unilateral sensorineural deafness patients referred to the Greater Manchester Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Programm...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of laryngology and otology 2015-04, Vol.129 (4), p.321-325 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-1aae85297b059cd38a0a2ad029f3a89a8c08de072e2d042d293ca79af54588593 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-1aae85297b059cd38a0a2ad029f3a89a8c08de072e2d042d293ca79af54588593 |
| container_end_page | 325 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 321 |
| container_title | Journal of laryngology and otology |
| container_volume | 129 |
| creator | Siau, D Dhillon, B Andrews, R Green, K M J |
| description | This study aimed to report the bone-anchored hearing aid uptake and the reasons for their rejection by unilateral sensorineural deafness patients.
A retrospective review of 90 consecutive unilateral sensorineural deafness patients referred to the Greater Manchester Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Programme between September 2008 and August 2011 was performed.
In all, 79 (87.8 per cent) were deemed audiologically suitable: 24 (30.3 per cent) eventually had a bone-anchored hearing aid implanted and 55 (69.6 per cent) patients declined. Of those who declined, 26 (47.3 per cent) cited perceived limited benefits, 18 (32.7 per cent) cited reservations regarding surgery, 13 (23.6 per cent) preferred a wireless contralateral routing of sound device and 12 (21.8 per cent) cited cosmetic reasons. In all, 32 (40.5 per cent) suitable patients eventually chose the wireless contralateral routing of sound device.
The uptake rate was 30 per cent for audiologically suitable patients. Almost half of suitable patients did not perceive a sufficient benefit to proceed to device implantation and a significant proportion rejected it. It is therefore important that clinicians do not to rush to implant all unilateral sensorineural hearing loss patients with a bone-anchored hearing aid. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022215115000602 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1727698514</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022215115000602</cupid><sourcerecordid>1727698514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-1aae85297b059cd38a0a2ad029f3a89a8c08de072e2d042d293ca79af54588593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1L5EAQhhtx0fHjB3iRBi97iVvdSae7vYiKHwvCHtRzqEnXOBmSztidIP77TZwZEWXZU1G8T71F1cvYkYBTAUL_egCQUgolhAKAHOQWmwidmURlOWyzySgno77L9mJcDIzQIHfYrlRa5yaHCZtetp4S9OW8DeT4nDBU_plj5SJH73jvqxo7CljzSD62g0r92G3Iuo3xjL_O37hr-RK7inwXeaAFlR3v5tScH7AfM6wjHa7rPnu6uX68ukvu_9z-vrq4T8pM510iEMkoafUUlC1dahBQogNpZykai6YE4wi0JOkgk07atERtcaYyZYyy6T77ufJdhvalp9gVTRVLqmv01PaxEFrq3Bolsv-juVZGG7AjevIFXbR98MMh75QY_i9goMSKKsPwj0CzYhmqBsNbIaAYsyq-ZTXMHK-d-2lD7mNiE84ApGtTbKahcs_0afc_bf8CYAychg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1675122110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bone-anchored hearing aids and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: why do patients reject them?</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Siau, D ; Dhillon, B ; Andrews, R ; Green, K M J</creator><creatorcontrib>Siau, D ; Dhillon, B ; Andrews, R ; Green, K M J</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to report the bone-anchored hearing aid uptake and the reasons for their rejection by unilateral sensorineural deafness patients.
A retrospective review of 90 consecutive unilateral sensorineural deafness patients referred to the Greater Manchester Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Programme between September 2008 and August 2011 was performed.
In all, 79 (87.8 per cent) were deemed audiologically suitable: 24 (30.3 per cent) eventually had a bone-anchored hearing aid implanted and 55 (69.6 per cent) patients declined. Of those who declined, 26 (47.3 per cent) cited perceived limited benefits, 18 (32.7 per cent) cited reservations regarding surgery, 13 (23.6 per cent) preferred a wireless contralateral routing of sound device and 12 (21.8 per cent) cited cosmetic reasons. In all, 32 (40.5 per cent) suitable patients eventually chose the wireless contralateral routing of sound device.
The uptake rate was 30 per cent for audiologically suitable patients. Almost half of suitable patients did not perceive a sufficient benefit to proceed to device implantation and a significant proportion rejected it. It is therefore important that clinicians do not to rush to implant all unilateral sensorineural hearing loss patients with a bone-anchored hearing aid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022215115000602</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25776860</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLOTAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia ; Audiology ; Bone Conduction ; Correction of Hearing Impairment - methods ; Correction of Hearing Impairment - psychology ; Ears & hearing ; Etiology ; Female ; Hearing aids ; Hearing Aids - psychology ; Hearing loss ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation ; Hearing Loss, Unilateral - psychology ; Hearing Loss, Unilateral - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Main Articles ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Preference ; Patients ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Prosthesis Implantation - psychology ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Titanium ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of laryngology and otology, 2015-04, Vol.129 (4), p.321-325</ispartof><rights>Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-1aae85297b059cd38a0a2ad029f3a89a8c08de072e2d042d293ca79af54588593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-1aae85297b059cd38a0a2ad029f3a89a8c08de072e2d042d293ca79af54588593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022215115000602/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25776860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siau, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, K M J</creatorcontrib><title>Bone-anchored hearing aids and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: why do patients reject them?</title><title>Journal of laryngology and otology</title><addtitle>J. Laryngol. Otol</addtitle><description>This study aimed to report the bone-anchored hearing aid uptake and the reasons for their rejection by unilateral sensorineural deafness patients.
A retrospective review of 90 consecutive unilateral sensorineural deafness patients referred to the Greater Manchester Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Programme between September 2008 and August 2011 was performed.
In all, 79 (87.8 per cent) were deemed audiologically suitable: 24 (30.3 per cent) eventually had a bone-anchored hearing aid implanted and 55 (69.6 per cent) patients declined. Of those who declined, 26 (47.3 per cent) cited perceived limited benefits, 18 (32.7 per cent) cited reservations regarding surgery, 13 (23.6 per cent) preferred a wireless contralateral routing of sound device and 12 (21.8 per cent) cited cosmetic reasons. In all, 32 (40.5 per cent) suitable patients eventually chose the wireless contralateral routing of sound device.
The uptake rate was 30 per cent for audiologically suitable patients. Almost half of suitable patients did not perceive a sufficient benefit to proceed to device implantation and a significant proportion rejected it. It is therefore important that clinicians do not to rush to implant all unilateral sensorineural hearing loss patients with a bone-anchored hearing aid.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Audiology</subject><subject>Bone Conduction</subject><subject>Correction of Hearing Impairment - methods</subject><subject>Correction of Hearing Impairment - psychology</subject><subject>Ears & hearing</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing aids</subject><subject>Hearing Aids - psychology</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Unilateral - psychology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Unilateral - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Main Articles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - psychology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-2151</issn><issn>1748-5460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1L5EAQhhtx0fHjB3iRBi97iVvdSae7vYiKHwvCHtRzqEnXOBmSztidIP77TZwZEWXZU1G8T71F1cvYkYBTAUL_egCQUgolhAKAHOQWmwidmURlOWyzySgno77L9mJcDIzQIHfYrlRa5yaHCZtetp4S9OW8DeT4nDBU_plj5SJH73jvqxo7CljzSD62g0r92G3Iuo3xjL_O37hr-RK7inwXeaAFlR3v5tScH7AfM6wjHa7rPnu6uX68ukvu_9z-vrq4T8pM510iEMkoafUUlC1dahBQogNpZykai6YE4wi0JOkgk07atERtcaYyZYyy6T77ufJdhvalp9gVTRVLqmv01PaxEFrq3Bolsv-juVZGG7AjevIFXbR98MMh75QY_i9goMSKKsPwj0CzYhmqBsNbIaAYsyq-ZTXMHK-d-2lD7mNiE84ApGtTbKahcs_0afc_bf8CYAychg</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Siau, D</creator><creator>Dhillon, B</creator><creator>Andrews, R</creator><creator>Green, K M J</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Bone-anchored hearing aids and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: why do patients reject them?</title><author>Siau, D ; Dhillon, B ; Andrews, R ; Green, K M J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-1aae85297b059cd38a0a2ad029f3a89a8c08de072e2d042d293ca79af54588593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Audiology</topic><topic>Bone Conduction</topic><topic>Correction of Hearing Impairment - methods</topic><topic>Correction of Hearing Impairment - psychology</topic><topic>Ears & hearing</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing aids</topic><topic>Hearing Aids - psychology</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Unilateral - psychology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Unilateral - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Main Articles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - psychology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siau, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, K M J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of laryngology and otology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siau, D</au><au>Dhillon, B</au><au>Andrews, R</au><au>Green, K M J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bone-anchored hearing aids and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: why do patients reject them?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of laryngology and otology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Laryngol. Otol</addtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>321-325</pages><issn>0022-2151</issn><eissn>1748-5460</eissn><coden>JLOTAX</coden><abstract>This study aimed to report the bone-anchored hearing aid uptake and the reasons for their rejection by unilateral sensorineural deafness patients.
A retrospective review of 90 consecutive unilateral sensorineural deafness patients referred to the Greater Manchester Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Programme between September 2008 and August 2011 was performed.
In all, 79 (87.8 per cent) were deemed audiologically suitable: 24 (30.3 per cent) eventually had a bone-anchored hearing aid implanted and 55 (69.6 per cent) patients declined. Of those who declined, 26 (47.3 per cent) cited perceived limited benefits, 18 (32.7 per cent) cited reservations regarding surgery, 13 (23.6 per cent) preferred a wireless contralateral routing of sound device and 12 (21.8 per cent) cited cosmetic reasons. In all, 32 (40.5 per cent) suitable patients eventually chose the wireless contralateral routing of sound device.
The uptake rate was 30 per cent for audiologically suitable patients. Almost half of suitable patients did not perceive a sufficient benefit to proceed to device implantation and a significant proportion rejected it. It is therefore important that clinicians do not to rush to implant all unilateral sensorineural hearing loss patients with a bone-anchored hearing aid.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>25776860</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0022215115000602</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-2151 |
| ispartof | Journal of laryngology and otology, 2015-04, Vol.129 (4), p.321-325 |
| issn | 0022-2151 1748-5460 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1727698514 |
| source | Cambridge Journals Online |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthesia Audiology Bone Conduction Correction of Hearing Impairment - methods Correction of Hearing Impairment - psychology Ears & hearing Etiology Female Hearing aids Hearing Aids - psychology Hearing loss Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation Hearing Loss, Unilateral - psychology Hearing Loss, Unilateral - rehabilitation Humans Main Articles Male Middle Aged Patient Preference Patients Prosthesis Implantation - methods Prosthesis Implantation - psychology Retrospective Studies Surgery Titanium Young Adult |
| title | Bone-anchored hearing aids and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: why do patients reject them? |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A36%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bone-anchored%20hearing%20aids%20and%20unilateral%20sensorineural%20hearing%20loss:%20why%20do%20patients%20reject%20them?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20laryngology%20and%20otology&rft.au=Siau,%20D&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=321-325&rft.issn=0022-2151&rft.eissn=1748-5460&rft.coden=JLOTAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022215115000602&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1727698514%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-1aae85297b059cd38a0a2ad029f3a89a8c08de072e2d042d293ca79af54588593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1675122110&rft_id=info:pmid/25776860&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022215115000602&rfr_iscdi=true |