Loading…

Is surface patch binding between proteins symmetric about isoelectric pH?

Surface selective patch binding (SPB) interaction occurring between two protein molecules, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and gelatin B (GB), both having same isoelectric pH (pI approximately 5) and identical pH-zeta potential profile, was systematically examined. BSA : GB mixing ratio r was varied in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:RSC advances 2014-01, Vol.4 (47), p.24710-24718
Main Authors: Pathak, Jyotsana, Rawat, Kamla, Bohidar, H. B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-1763d04634c8d57563a1558e5d3cd686a72c5d382c8274322727b154210672b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-1763d04634c8d57563a1558e5d3cd686a72c5d382c8274322727b154210672b63
container_end_page 24718
container_issue 47
container_start_page 24710
container_title RSC advances
container_volume 4
creator Pathak, Jyotsana
Rawat, Kamla
Bohidar, H. B.
description Surface selective patch binding (SPB) interaction occurring between two protein molecules, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and gelatin B (GB), both having same isoelectric pH (pI approximately 5) and identical pH-zeta potential profile, was systematically examined. BSA : GB mixing ratio r was varied in the range 0.16-2.00 and ionic strength was varied in the range 0-10 mM, which yielded optimum binding ratio r= 1. The binding profiles produced asymmetric bell-like curves with clearly identifiable pairs of transition pHs: onset of intermolecular interaction, formation of soluble complexes and coalescence of the soluble complexes occurring at pH sub(c1,2), pH sub( phi 1,2) and pH sub(m) respectively. Since pH sub(m) could be approached from either lower or higher side of pI, these profiles yielded pairs of pH sub(c) and pH sub( phi ) values. In fact, we found (pH sub(c2) - pI) > (pH sub(c1) - pI), which clearly indicated that initiation of intermolecular associative interaction was not symmetric about pI (pI = pH sub(m) for r less than or equal to 1, an observation not reported hitherto. Secondly, (pH sub( phi 2) - pI) approximately (pH sub( phi 1) - pI) implied that the pH at which soluble complexes formed (pH sub( phi )) was always located symmetrically about pH sub(m), irrespective of the binding ratio. Higher binding affinity determined from higher value of pH sub(c2) was confirmed from size measurement results. The change in the turbidity maximum Delta tau could be correlated as Delta tau similar to I super(1/2) implying electrostatic screening of SPB with increase in ionic strength (I). This interaction was modelled using a linear combination of attractive and repulsive electrostatic forces which revealed considerable screening of the interaction potential U, consistent with aforesaid experimental data; Delta U similar to I super(1/2). Further, it is concluded that intermolecular binding in protein-polyampholyte systems is qualitatively different from that in protein-polyelectrolyte class.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/c4ra02372b
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730043310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1730043310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-1763d04634c8d57563a1558e5d3cd686a72c5d382c8274322727b154210672b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1LAzEQxYMoWGov_gU5irCaTL62J5GibaHgRc9LNjvVyH6ZZJH-90Yr6FzmMTyG936EXHJ2w5lY3joZLANhoD4hM2BSF8D08vSfPieLGN9ZHq04aD4j222kcQp765CONrk3Wvu-8f0rrTF9IvZ0DENC32fboeswBe-orYcpUR8HbNH9XMbN3QU529s24uJ3z8nL48PzalPsntbb1f2ucKBlKrjRosl5hHRlo4zSwnKlSlSNcI0utTXgsi7BlWCkADBgaq4kcKZzMy3m5Or4Nwf7mDCmqvPRYdvaHocpVtwIxqQQGcmcXB-tLgwxBtxXY_CdDYeKs-obWfWHTHwBZPFcqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1730043310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is surface patch binding between proteins symmetric about isoelectric pH?</title><source>Royal Society of Chemistry:Jisc Collections:Royal Society of Chemistry Read and Publish 2022-2024 (reading list)</source><creator>Pathak, Jyotsana ; Rawat, Kamla ; Bohidar, H. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Jyotsana ; Rawat, Kamla ; Bohidar, H. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Surface selective patch binding (SPB) interaction occurring between two protein molecules, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and gelatin B (GB), both having same isoelectric pH (pI approximately 5) and identical pH-zeta potential profile, was systematically examined. BSA : GB mixing ratio r was varied in the range 0.16-2.00 and ionic strength was varied in the range 0-10 mM, which yielded optimum binding ratio r= 1. The binding profiles produced asymmetric bell-like curves with clearly identifiable pairs of transition pHs: onset of intermolecular interaction, formation of soluble complexes and coalescence of the soluble complexes occurring at pH sub(c1,2), pH sub( phi 1,2) and pH sub(m) respectively. Since pH sub(m) could be approached from either lower or higher side of pI, these profiles yielded pairs of pH sub(c) and pH sub( phi ) values. In fact, we found (pH sub(c2) - pI) &gt; (pH sub(c1) - pI), which clearly indicated that initiation of intermolecular associative interaction was not symmetric about pI (pI = pH sub(m) for r less than or equal to 1, an observation not reported hitherto. Secondly, (pH sub( phi 2) - pI) approximately (pH sub( phi 1) - pI) implied that the pH at which soluble complexes formed (pH sub( phi )) was always located symmetrically about pH sub(m), irrespective of the binding ratio. Higher binding affinity determined from higher value of pH sub(c2) was confirmed from size measurement results. The change in the turbidity maximum Delta tau could be correlated as Delta tau similar to I super(1/2) implying electrostatic screening of SPB with increase in ionic strength (I). This interaction was modelled using a linear combination of attractive and repulsive electrostatic forces which revealed considerable screening of the interaction potential U, consistent with aforesaid experimental data; Delta U similar to I super(1/2). Further, it is concluded that intermolecular binding in protein-polyampholyte systems is qualitatively different from that in protein-polyelectrolyte class.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-2069</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-2069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c4ra02372b</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Binding ; Electrostatics ; Proteins ; Screening ; Strength ; Symmetry ; Turbidity</subject><ispartof>RSC advances, 2014-01, Vol.4 (47), p.24710-24718</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-1763d04634c8d57563a1558e5d3cd686a72c5d382c8274322727b154210672b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-1763d04634c8d57563a1558e5d3cd686a72c5d382c8274322727b154210672b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Jyotsana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawat, Kamla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohidar, H. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Is surface patch binding between proteins symmetric about isoelectric pH?</title><title>RSC advances</title><description>Surface selective patch binding (SPB) interaction occurring between two protein molecules, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and gelatin B (GB), both having same isoelectric pH (pI approximately 5) and identical pH-zeta potential profile, was systematically examined. BSA : GB mixing ratio r was varied in the range 0.16-2.00 and ionic strength was varied in the range 0-10 mM, which yielded optimum binding ratio r= 1. The binding profiles produced asymmetric bell-like curves with clearly identifiable pairs of transition pHs: onset of intermolecular interaction, formation of soluble complexes and coalescence of the soluble complexes occurring at pH sub(c1,2), pH sub( phi 1,2) and pH sub(m) respectively. Since pH sub(m) could be approached from either lower or higher side of pI, these profiles yielded pairs of pH sub(c) and pH sub( phi ) values. In fact, we found (pH sub(c2) - pI) &gt; (pH sub(c1) - pI), which clearly indicated that initiation of intermolecular associative interaction was not symmetric about pI (pI = pH sub(m) for r less than or equal to 1, an observation not reported hitherto. Secondly, (pH sub( phi 2) - pI) approximately (pH sub( phi 1) - pI) implied that the pH at which soluble complexes formed (pH sub( phi )) was always located symmetrically about pH sub(m), irrespective of the binding ratio. Higher binding affinity determined from higher value of pH sub(c2) was confirmed from size measurement results. The change in the turbidity maximum Delta tau could be correlated as Delta tau similar to I super(1/2) implying electrostatic screening of SPB with increase in ionic strength (I). This interaction was modelled using a linear combination of attractive and repulsive electrostatic forces which revealed considerable screening of the interaction potential U, consistent with aforesaid experimental data; Delta U similar to I super(1/2). Further, it is concluded that intermolecular binding in protein-polyampholyte systems is qualitatively different from that in protein-polyelectrolyte class.</description><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Electrostatics</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><subject>Turbidity</subject><issn>2046-2069</issn><issn>2046-2069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM1LAzEQxYMoWGov_gU5irCaTL62J5GibaHgRc9LNjvVyH6ZZJH-90Yr6FzmMTyG936EXHJ2w5lY3joZLANhoD4hM2BSF8D08vSfPieLGN9ZHq04aD4j222kcQp765CONrk3Wvu-8f0rrTF9IvZ0DENC32fboeswBe-orYcpUR8HbNH9XMbN3QU529s24uJ3z8nL48PzalPsntbb1f2ucKBlKrjRosl5hHRlo4zSwnKlSlSNcI0utTXgsi7BlWCkADBgaq4kcKZzMy3m5Or4Nwf7mDCmqvPRYdvaHocpVtwIxqQQGcmcXB-tLgwxBtxXY_CdDYeKs-obWfWHTHwBZPFcqw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Pathak, Jyotsana</creator><creator>Rawat, Kamla</creator><creator>Bohidar, H. B.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Is surface patch binding between proteins symmetric about isoelectric pH?</title><author>Pathak, Jyotsana ; Rawat, Kamla ; Bohidar, H. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-1763d04634c8d57563a1558e5d3cd686a72c5d382c8274322727b154210672b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Electrostatics</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><topic>Turbidity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Jyotsana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawat, Kamla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohidar, H. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>RSC advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pathak, Jyotsana</au><au>Rawat, Kamla</au><au>Bohidar, H. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is surface patch binding between proteins symmetric about isoelectric pH?</atitle><jtitle>RSC advances</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>47</issue><spage>24710</spage><epage>24718</epage><pages>24710-24718</pages><issn>2046-2069</issn><eissn>2046-2069</eissn><abstract>Surface selective patch binding (SPB) interaction occurring between two protein molecules, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and gelatin B (GB), both having same isoelectric pH (pI approximately 5) and identical pH-zeta potential profile, was systematically examined. BSA : GB mixing ratio r was varied in the range 0.16-2.00 and ionic strength was varied in the range 0-10 mM, which yielded optimum binding ratio r= 1. The binding profiles produced asymmetric bell-like curves with clearly identifiable pairs of transition pHs: onset of intermolecular interaction, formation of soluble complexes and coalescence of the soluble complexes occurring at pH sub(c1,2), pH sub( phi 1,2) and pH sub(m) respectively. Since pH sub(m) could be approached from either lower or higher side of pI, these profiles yielded pairs of pH sub(c) and pH sub( phi ) values. In fact, we found (pH sub(c2) - pI) &gt; (pH sub(c1) - pI), which clearly indicated that initiation of intermolecular associative interaction was not symmetric about pI (pI = pH sub(m) for r less than or equal to 1, an observation not reported hitherto. Secondly, (pH sub( phi 2) - pI) approximately (pH sub( phi 1) - pI) implied that the pH at which soluble complexes formed (pH sub( phi )) was always located symmetrically about pH sub(m), irrespective of the binding ratio. Higher binding affinity determined from higher value of pH sub(c2) was confirmed from size measurement results. The change in the turbidity maximum Delta tau could be correlated as Delta tau similar to I super(1/2) implying electrostatic screening of SPB with increase in ionic strength (I). This interaction was modelled using a linear combination of attractive and repulsive electrostatic forces which revealed considerable screening of the interaction potential U, consistent with aforesaid experimental data; Delta U similar to I super(1/2). Further, it is concluded that intermolecular binding in protein-polyampholyte systems is qualitatively different from that in protein-polyelectrolyte class.</abstract><doi>10.1039/c4ra02372b</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-2069
ispartof RSC advances, 2014-01, Vol.4 (47), p.24710-24718
issn 2046-2069
2046-2069
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730043310
source Royal Society of Chemistry:Jisc Collections:Royal Society of Chemistry Read and Publish 2022-2024 (reading list)
subjects Binding
Electrostatics
Proteins
Screening
Strength
Symmetry
Turbidity
title Is surface patch binding between proteins symmetric about isoelectric pH?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T02%3A51%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20surface%20patch%20binding%20between%20proteins%20symmetric%20about%20isoelectric%20pH?&rft.jtitle=RSC%20advances&rft.au=Pathak,%20Jyotsana&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=47&rft.spage=24710&rft.epage=24718&rft.pages=24710-24718&rft.issn=2046-2069&rft.eissn=2046-2069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c4ra02372b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1730043310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-1763d04634c8d57563a1558e5d3cd686a72c5d382c8274322727b154210672b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1730043310&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true