Loading…

Evaluation of Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy, Shuffled Complex Evolution and Firefly Algorithms for phase stability, phase equilibrium and chemical equilibrium problems

► FA, CMA-ES and SCE algorithms were tested in phase equilibrium calculations. ► Their strengths for phase equilibrium and phase stability problems were identified. ► FA was found to be the most reliable among the three techniques. ► CMA-ES can find the global minimum reliably and accurately with fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemical engineering research & design 2012-12, Vol.90 (12), p.2051-2071
Main Authors: Fateen, Seif-Eddeen K., Bonilla-Petriciolet, Adrián, Rangaiah, Gade Pandu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:► FA, CMA-ES and SCE algorithms were tested in phase equilibrium calculations. ► Their strengths for phase equilibrium and phase stability problems were identified. ► FA was found to be the most reliable among the three techniques. ► CMA-ES can find the global minimum reliably and accurately with fewer iterations. Phase equilibrium calculations and phase stability analysis of reactive and non-reactive systems play a significant role in the simulation, design and optimization of reaction and separation processes in chemical engineering. These challenging problems, which are often multivariable and non-convex, require global optimization methods for solving them. Stochastic global optimization algorithms have shown promise in providing reliable and efficient solutions for these thermodynamic problems. In this study, we evaluate three alternative global optimization algorithms for phase and chemical equilibrium calculations, namely, Covariant Matrix Adaptation-Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES), Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE) and Firefly Algorithm (FA). The performance of these three stochastic algorithms was tested and compared to identify their relative strengths for phase equilibrium and phase stability problems. The phase equilibrium problems include both multi-component systems with and without chemical reactions. FA was found to be the most reliable among the three techniques, whereas CMA-ES can find the global minimum reliably and accurately even with a smaller number of iterations.
ISSN:0263-8762
DOI:10.1016/j.cherd.2012.04.011