Loading…
The Baroreflex Mechanism Revisited
We state that the autonomic part of the brain controls the blood pressure (BP) and the heart rate (HR) via the baroreflex mechanism in all situations of human activity (at sleep, at rest, during exercise, fright etc.), in a way which is not, as was hitherto assumed, a mere homeostatic tool or even a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bulletin of mathematical biology 2015-08, Vol.77 (8), p.1521-1538 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We state that the autonomic part of the brain controls the blood pressure (BP) and the heart rate (HR) via the baroreflex mechanism in all situations of human activity (at sleep, at rest, during exercise, fright etc.), in a way which is not, as was hitherto assumed, a mere homeostatic tool or even a resetting device, designed to bring these variables on the road to
preset
values. The baroreflex is rather a
continuous
feedback mechanism commanded by the autonomic part of the brain, leading to values appropriate to the situation at hand. Feasibility of this assertion is demonstrated here by using the Seidel–Herzel feedback system outside of its regular practice. Results show indeed that the brain can, and we claim that it does, control the HR and BP throughout life. New responses are demonstrated, e.g., to a sudden fear or apnea. In this event, large BP and HR overshoots are expected before the variables can relax to a new level. Response to abrupt downward change in the controlling parameter shows an undershoot in HR and just a gradual resetting in the BP. The relaxation from sudden
external
changes to various expected states are calculated and discussed and properties of the Rheos test are explained. Experimental findings for orthostatic tests and for babies under translations and rotations reveal
complete qualitative agreement
with our model and show no need to invoke the operation of additional body systems. Our method should be the preferred one by the Occam Razor approach. The outcomes may lead to beneficial clinical implication. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0092-8240 1522-9602 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11538-015-0094-4 |