Loading…
Physical and chemical properties of biochars co-composted with biowastes and incubated with a chicken litter compost
[Display omitted] •Generally, amended biochar gained elements when compost had higher level of elements than biochar.•Some biochars showed strong affinity for B, C, N and S.•Biochars sorbed N during co-composting and incubation with compost.•Biochar C showed recalcitrance during co-composting and in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2016-01, Vol.142, p.14-23 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-9b13856c536efbec346935458939c615be3169ee2ce09ee7fc4bbd3c4192f9473 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-9b13856c536efbec346935458939c615be3169ee2ce09ee7fc4bbd3c4192f9473 |
container_end_page | 23 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 14 |
container_title | Chemosphere (Oxford) |
container_volume | 142 |
creator | Khan, Naser Clark, Ian Sánchez-Monedero, Miguel A. Shea, Syd Meier, Sebastian Qi, Fangjie Kookana, Rai S. Bolan, Nanthi |
description | [Display omitted]
•Generally, amended biochar gained elements when compost had higher level of elements than biochar.•Some biochars showed strong affinity for B, C, N and S.•Biochars sorbed N during co-composting and incubation with compost.•Biochar C showed recalcitrance during co-composting and incubation with compost.•The cation exchange capacity of co-composted biochars increased, but not of incubated biochars.
Two experiments were conducted where three biochars, made from macadamia nutshell (MS), hardwood shaving (WS) and chicken litter (CL), were co-composted with chicken manure and sawdust, and also incubated with a chicken litter based commercial compost. Biochars were added at the rates of 5% and 10% in the co-composting and 10% and 20% in the incubation experiment. The rates of biochar had no consistent effect on the change in element contents of composted- or incubated-biochars. The biochar C demonstrated recalcitrance in both composting and incubation systems. Composting increased the CEC of biochars probably due to thermophilic oxidation. The increases in CEC of WS and CL were 6.5 and 2.2 times, respectively, for composting. Translocation of elements, between biochar and compost medium, occurred in both directions. In most cases, biochars gained elements under the influence of positive difference of concentrations (i.e., when compost medium had higher concentration of elements than biochar), while in some cases they lost elements despite a positive difference. Biochar lost some elements (WS: B; CL: B, Mg and S) under the influence of negative difference of concentrations. Some biochars showed strong affinity for B, C, N and S: the concentration of these elements gained by biochars surpassed the concentration in the respective composting medium. The material difference in the biochars did not have influence on N retention: all three netbag-biochars increased their N content. The cost of production of biochar-compost will be lower in co-composting than incubation, which involves two separate processes, i.e., composting and subsequent incubation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.065 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732307379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653515005287</els_id><sourcerecordid>1732307379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-9b13856c536efbec346935458939c615be3169ee2ce09ee7fc4bbd3c4192f9473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1r3DAQhkVpaLab_IXi3nLxRrI-bB3Lko9CoD00ZyGPx1hb23IlbUP-fbTZTeixMDAM877vMA8hXxndMMrU9W4DA04-LgMG3FSUyQ3NpeQHsmJNrUtW6eYjWVEqZKkkl-fkc4w7SrNZ6k_kvFJUCN7oFUk_h-fowI6FnbviEPs6LMEvGJLDWPi-aJ2HwYZYgC_BT4uPCbviyaXhsHqyeYyvfjfDvrXvS5sDHfzGuRhdShiKk_mCnPV2jHh56mvyeHvza3tfPvy4-7799lCCEHUqdct4IxVIrrBvEbhQmkshG801KCZb5ExpxAqQ5lb3INq24yCYrnotar4mV8fc_M6fPcZkJhcBx9HO6PfRsJpXnNa81lmqj1IIPsaAvVmCm2x4NoyaA3SzM_9ANwfohubKeNfky-nMvp2we3e-Uc6C7VGA-dm_DoOJ4HAG7FxASKbz7j_OvABiM5t1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732307379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical and chemical properties of biochars co-composted with biowastes and incubated with a chicken litter compost</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Khan, Naser ; Clark, Ian ; Sánchez-Monedero, Miguel A. ; Shea, Syd ; Meier, Sebastian ; Qi, Fangjie ; Kookana, Rai S. ; Bolan, Nanthi</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Naser ; Clark, Ian ; Sánchez-Monedero, Miguel A. ; Shea, Syd ; Meier, Sebastian ; Qi, Fangjie ; Kookana, Rai S. ; Bolan, Nanthi</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Generally, amended biochar gained elements when compost had higher level of elements than biochar.•Some biochars showed strong affinity for B, C, N and S.•Biochars sorbed N during co-composting and incubation with compost.•Biochar C showed recalcitrance during co-composting and incubation with compost.•The cation exchange capacity of co-composted biochars increased, but not of incubated biochars.
Two experiments were conducted where three biochars, made from macadamia nutshell (MS), hardwood shaving (WS) and chicken litter (CL), were co-composted with chicken manure and sawdust, and also incubated with a chicken litter based commercial compost. Biochars were added at the rates of 5% and 10% in the co-composting and 10% and 20% in the incubation experiment. The rates of biochar had no consistent effect on the change in element contents of composted- or incubated-biochars. The biochar C demonstrated recalcitrance in both composting and incubation systems. Composting increased the CEC of biochars probably due to thermophilic oxidation. The increases in CEC of WS and CL were 6.5 and 2.2 times, respectively, for composting. Translocation of elements, between biochar and compost medium, occurred in both directions. In most cases, biochars gained elements under the influence of positive difference of concentrations (i.e., when compost medium had higher concentration of elements than biochar), while in some cases they lost elements despite a positive difference. Biochar lost some elements (WS: B; CL: B, Mg and S) under the influence of negative difference of concentrations. Some biochars showed strong affinity for B, C, N and S: the concentration of these elements gained by biochars surpassed the concentration in the respective composting medium. The material difference in the biochars did not have influence on N retention: all three netbag-biochars increased their N content. The cost of production of biochar-compost will be lower in co-composting than incubation, which involves two separate processes, i.e., composting and subsequent incubation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.065</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26044389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biochar ; Carbon ; Charcoal - chemistry ; Chickens ; Compost ; Manure - analysis ; Nutrient ; Organic Chemicals - chemistry ; Organic Chemicals - metabolism ; Soil - chemistry ; Sorption ; Trace element ; Waste Products ; Wood - chemistry ; Wood - metabolism ; Wood - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2016-01, Vol.142, p.14-23</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-9b13856c536efbec346935458939c615be3169ee2ce09ee7fc4bbd3c4192f9473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-9b13856c536efbec346935458939c615be3169ee2ce09ee7fc4bbd3c4192f9473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26044389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Naser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Monedero, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Syd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Fangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kookana, Rai S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolan, Nanthi</creatorcontrib><title>Physical and chemical properties of biochars co-composted with biowastes and incubated with a chicken litter compost</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>[Display omitted]
•Generally, amended biochar gained elements when compost had higher level of elements than biochar.•Some biochars showed strong affinity for B, C, N and S.•Biochars sorbed N during co-composting and incubation with compost.•Biochar C showed recalcitrance during co-composting and incubation with compost.•The cation exchange capacity of co-composted biochars increased, but not of incubated biochars.
Two experiments were conducted where three biochars, made from macadamia nutshell (MS), hardwood shaving (WS) and chicken litter (CL), were co-composted with chicken manure and sawdust, and also incubated with a chicken litter based commercial compost. Biochars were added at the rates of 5% and 10% in the co-composting and 10% and 20% in the incubation experiment. The rates of biochar had no consistent effect on the change in element contents of composted- or incubated-biochars. The biochar C demonstrated recalcitrance in both composting and incubation systems. Composting increased the CEC of biochars probably due to thermophilic oxidation. The increases in CEC of WS and CL were 6.5 and 2.2 times, respectively, for composting. Translocation of elements, between biochar and compost medium, occurred in both directions. In most cases, biochars gained elements under the influence of positive difference of concentrations (i.e., when compost medium had higher concentration of elements than biochar), while in some cases they lost elements despite a positive difference. Biochar lost some elements (WS: B; CL: B, Mg and S) under the influence of negative difference of concentrations. Some biochars showed strong affinity for B, C, N and S: the concentration of these elements gained by biochars surpassed the concentration in the respective composting medium. The material difference in the biochars did not have influence on N retention: all three netbag-biochars increased their N content. The cost of production of biochar-compost will be lower in co-composting than incubation, which involves two separate processes, i.e., composting and subsequent incubation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biochar</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Charcoal - chemistry</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Compost</subject><subject>Manure - analysis</subject><subject>Nutrient</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - chemistry</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - metabolism</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Sorption</subject><subject>Trace element</subject><subject>Waste Products</subject><subject>Wood - chemistry</subject><subject>Wood - metabolism</subject><subject>Wood - microbiology</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1r3DAQhkVpaLab_IXi3nLxRrI-bB3Lko9CoD00ZyGPx1hb23IlbUP-fbTZTeixMDAM877vMA8hXxndMMrU9W4DA04-LgMG3FSUyQ3NpeQHsmJNrUtW6eYjWVEqZKkkl-fkc4w7SrNZ6k_kvFJUCN7oFUk_h-fowI6FnbviEPs6LMEvGJLDWPi-aJ2HwYZYgC_BT4uPCbviyaXhsHqyeYyvfjfDvrXvS5sDHfzGuRhdShiKk_mCnPV2jHh56mvyeHvza3tfPvy4-7799lCCEHUqdct4IxVIrrBvEbhQmkshG801KCZb5ExpxAqQ5lb3INq24yCYrnotar4mV8fc_M6fPcZkJhcBx9HO6PfRsJpXnNa81lmqj1IIPsaAvVmCm2x4NoyaA3SzM_9ANwfohubKeNfky-nMvp2we3e-Uc6C7VGA-dm_DoOJ4HAG7FxASKbz7j_OvABiM5t1</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Khan, Naser</creator><creator>Clark, Ian</creator><creator>Sánchez-Monedero, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Shea, Syd</creator><creator>Meier, Sebastian</creator><creator>Qi, Fangjie</creator><creator>Kookana, Rai S.</creator><creator>Bolan, Nanthi</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Physical and chemical properties of biochars co-composted with biowastes and incubated with a chicken litter compost</title><author>Khan, Naser ; Clark, Ian ; Sánchez-Monedero, Miguel A. ; Shea, Syd ; Meier, Sebastian ; Qi, Fangjie ; Kookana, Rai S. ; Bolan, Nanthi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-9b13856c536efbec346935458939c615be3169ee2ce09ee7fc4bbd3c4192f9473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biochar</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Charcoal - chemistry</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Compost</topic><topic>Manure - analysis</topic><topic>Nutrient</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - chemistry</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - metabolism</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Sorption</topic><topic>Trace element</topic><topic>Waste Products</topic><topic>Wood - chemistry</topic><topic>Wood - metabolism</topic><topic>Wood - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Naser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Monedero, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Syd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Fangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kookana, Rai S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolan, Nanthi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Naser</au><au>Clark, Ian</au><au>Sánchez-Monedero, Miguel A.</au><au>Shea, Syd</au><au>Meier, Sebastian</au><au>Qi, Fangjie</au><au>Kookana, Rai S.</au><au>Bolan, Nanthi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical and chemical properties of biochars co-composted with biowastes and incubated with a chicken litter compost</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>142</volume><spage>14</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>14-23</pages><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Generally, amended biochar gained elements when compost had higher level of elements than biochar.•Some biochars showed strong affinity for B, C, N and S.•Biochars sorbed N during co-composting and incubation with compost.•Biochar C showed recalcitrance during co-composting and incubation with compost.•The cation exchange capacity of co-composted biochars increased, but not of incubated biochars.
Two experiments were conducted where three biochars, made from macadamia nutshell (MS), hardwood shaving (WS) and chicken litter (CL), were co-composted with chicken manure and sawdust, and also incubated with a chicken litter based commercial compost. Biochars were added at the rates of 5% and 10% in the co-composting and 10% and 20% in the incubation experiment. The rates of biochar had no consistent effect on the change in element contents of composted- or incubated-biochars. The biochar C demonstrated recalcitrance in both composting and incubation systems. Composting increased the CEC of biochars probably due to thermophilic oxidation. The increases in CEC of WS and CL were 6.5 and 2.2 times, respectively, for composting. Translocation of elements, between biochar and compost medium, occurred in both directions. In most cases, biochars gained elements under the influence of positive difference of concentrations (i.e., when compost medium had higher concentration of elements than biochar), while in some cases they lost elements despite a positive difference. Biochar lost some elements (WS: B; CL: B, Mg and S) under the influence of negative difference of concentrations. Some biochars showed strong affinity for B, C, N and S: the concentration of these elements gained by biochars surpassed the concentration in the respective composting medium. The material difference in the biochars did not have influence on N retention: all three netbag-biochars increased their N content. The cost of production of biochar-compost will be lower in co-composting than incubation, which involves two separate processes, i.e., composting and subsequent incubation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26044389</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.065</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-6535 |
ispartof | Chemosphere (Oxford), 2016-01, Vol.142, p.14-23 |
issn | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732307379 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Animals Biochar Carbon Charcoal - chemistry Chickens Compost Manure - analysis Nutrient Organic Chemicals - chemistry Organic Chemicals - metabolism Soil - chemistry Sorption Trace element Waste Products Wood - chemistry Wood - metabolism Wood - microbiology |
title | Physical and chemical properties of biochars co-composted with biowastes and incubated with a chicken litter compost |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A57%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20and%20chemical%20properties%20of%20biochars%20co-composted%20with%20biowastes%20and%20incubated%20with%20a%20chicken%20litter%20compost&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Khan,%20Naser&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=142&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=14-23&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.065&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1732307379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-9b13856c536efbec346935458939c615be3169ee2ce09ee7fc4bbd3c4192f9473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732307379&rft_id=info:pmid/26044389&rfr_iscdi=true |