Dynamic memory searches: Selective output interference for the memory of facts

The benefits of testing on later memory performance are well documented; however, the manner in which testing harms memory performance is less well understood. This research is concerned with the finding that accuracy decreases over the course of testing, a phenomena termed “output interference” (OI...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2015-12, Vol.22 (6), p.1798-1806
Main Authors: Aue, William R., Criss, Amy H., Prince, Melissa A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Amnesia
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Brief Report
Cognitive Psychology
Feedback
Feedback, Psychological
Gender
Humans
Knowledge
Memory, Episodic
Mental Recall - physiology
Psychology
Semantics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The benefits of testing on later memory performance are well documented; however, the manner in which testing harms memory performance is less well understood. This research is concerned with the finding that accuracy decreases over the course of testing, a phenomena termed “output interference” (OI). OI has primarily been investigated with episodic memory, but there is limited research investigating OI in measures of semantic memory (i.e., knowledge). In the current study, participants were twice tested for their knowledge of factual questions; they received corrective feedback during the first test. No OI was observed during the first test, when participants presumably searched semantic memory to answer the general-knowledge questions. During the second test, OI was observed. Conditional analyses of Test 2 performance revealed that OI was largely isolated to questions answered incorrectly during Test 1. These were questions for which participants needed to rely on recent experience (i.e., the feedback in episodic memory) to respond correctly. One possible explanation is that episodic memory is more susceptible to the sort of interference generated during testing (e.g., gradual changes in context, encoding/updating of items) relative to semantic memory. Alternative explanations are considered.
ISSN:1069-9384
1531-5320
DOI:10.3758/s13423-015-0840-5