Loading…
Validation of a short odour discrimination test for working dogs
•A short odour discrimination test was designed for use with working dogs (
Saved in:
| Published in: | Applied animal behaviour science 2015-04, Vol.165, p.133-142 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a50c121555ab7da503a22a90a459c360f51f65cce56341bf4c85ea222968f54f3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a50c121555ab7da503a22a90a459c360f51f65cce56341bf4c85ea222968f54f3 |
| container_end_page | 142 |
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 133 |
| container_title | Applied animal behaviour science |
| container_volume | 165 |
| creator | Porritt, Fay Mansson, Ralph Berry, Alison Cook, Natalie Sibbald, Nicola Nicklin, Steve |
| description | •A short odour discrimination test was designed for use with working dogs ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.021 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732820937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168159114003086</els_id><sourcerecordid>1732820937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a50c121555ab7da503a22a90a459c360f51f65cce56341bf4c85ea222968f54f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwF5CPXBK8dpzEt6KKl1SJC3C1XD-KSxoHOwXx73EVOHNarfab0c4gdAmkBAL19bZUw9Cp3u9KSqAqAUpC4QjNoG1oIUjFj9Esg20BXMApOktpSwjhDMgMLV5V540afehxcFjh9BbiiIMJ-4iNTzr6ne-n-2jTiF2I-CvEd99vsAmbdI5OnOqSvfidc_Ryd_u8fChWT_ePy5tVoZlgY6E40UCBc67WjckbU5QqQVTFhWY1cRxczbW2vGYVrF2lW24zQkXdOl45NkdXk-8Qw8c-fyJ3-Tvb5eA27JOEhtGWEsGajNYTqmNIKVonh5xCxW8JRB4qk1v5V5k8VCYBZK4sCxeT0OYgn95GmbS3vbbGR6tHaYL_z-IH-rx34A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732820937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a short odour discrimination test for working dogs</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Porritt, Fay ; Mansson, Ralph ; Berry, Alison ; Cook, Natalie ; Sibbald, Nicola ; Nicklin, Steve</creator><creatorcontrib>Porritt, Fay ; Mansson, Ralph ; Berry, Alison ; Cook, Natalie ; Sibbald, Nicola ; Nicklin, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>•A short odour discrimination test was designed for use with working dogs (<6min/target).•Accompanying Excel™ programme gives the test low logistic burden and full standardisation.•Internal repeatability was good for dogs with “poor” (<3/5) and “good” (≥4/5) outcomes.•External repeatability was good for “poor” dogs and moderate for “good” dogs.
A short odour discrimination test has been designed to allow rapid quality assurance of odour recognition by detection dogs. The test comprises five repeats per target and a minimum of 20 associated non-target odours. The mean time taken to conduct the test is 5.6min per target type. A pass criterion of “a detection rate at least 70% greater than false alarm (FA) rate, with a 15% cap on total allowable false alarms” is used which equates to 4/5 correct indications and 2 FAs, or 5/5 correct indications and 3 FAs; the probability of passing this test by chance is <1%. A Microsoft Excel™ programme has been written to rapidly generate balanced running orders that allow search runs to be truncated following correct indications; this speeds up testing whilst maintaining standardisation; the programme is available free-to-use. The test's internal validity has been measured by conducting test re-test analysis on a range of target types on 19 operational search dogs, and external validity has been measured by completing the test and an equivalent operationally relevant building search on 26 operational search dogs. In both cases there is good overall reliability (kappa≥0.80). The test is thus deemed suitable for complementary assessment of detection dog ability during detailed accreditation procedures or as a standalone quality assurance test in between accreditation or licensing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Detection ; Discrimination ; Dog ; Explosive ; Odour ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Applied animal behaviour science, 2015-04, Vol.165, p.133-142</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a50c121555ab7da503a22a90a459c360f51f65cce56341bf4c85ea222968f54f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a50c121555ab7da503a22a90a459c360f51f65cce56341bf4c85ea222968f54f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5165-2330</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Porritt, Fay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansson, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibbald, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicklin, Steve</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a short odour discrimination test for working dogs</title><title>Applied animal behaviour science</title><description>•A short odour discrimination test was designed for use with working dogs (<6min/target).•Accompanying Excel™ programme gives the test low logistic burden and full standardisation.•Internal repeatability was good for dogs with “poor” (<3/5) and “good” (≥4/5) outcomes.•External repeatability was good for “poor” dogs and moderate for “good” dogs.
A short odour discrimination test has been designed to allow rapid quality assurance of odour recognition by detection dogs. The test comprises five repeats per target and a minimum of 20 associated non-target odours. The mean time taken to conduct the test is 5.6min per target type. A pass criterion of “a detection rate at least 70% greater than false alarm (FA) rate, with a 15% cap on total allowable false alarms” is used which equates to 4/5 correct indications and 2 FAs, or 5/5 correct indications and 3 FAs; the probability of passing this test by chance is <1%. A Microsoft Excel™ programme has been written to rapidly generate balanced running orders that allow search runs to be truncated following correct indications; this speeds up testing whilst maintaining standardisation; the programme is available free-to-use. The test's internal validity has been measured by conducting test re-test analysis on a range of target types on 19 operational search dogs, and external validity has been measured by completing the test and an equivalent operationally relevant building search on 26 operational search dogs. In both cases there is good overall reliability (kappa≥0.80). The test is thus deemed suitable for complementary assessment of detection dog ability during detailed accreditation procedures or as a standalone quality assurance test in between accreditation or licensing.</description><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Dog</subject><subject>Explosive</subject><subject>Odour</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>0168-1591</issn><issn>1872-9045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwF5CPXBK8dpzEt6KKl1SJC3C1XD-KSxoHOwXx73EVOHNarfab0c4gdAmkBAL19bZUw9Cp3u9KSqAqAUpC4QjNoG1oIUjFj9Esg20BXMApOktpSwjhDMgMLV5V540afehxcFjh9BbiiIMJ-4iNTzr6ne-n-2jTiF2I-CvEd99vsAmbdI5OnOqSvfidc_Ryd_u8fChWT_ePy5tVoZlgY6E40UCBc67WjckbU5QqQVTFhWY1cRxczbW2vGYVrF2lW24zQkXdOl45NkdXk-8Qw8c-fyJ3-Tvb5eA27JOEhtGWEsGajNYTqmNIKVonh5xCxW8JRB4qk1v5V5k8VCYBZK4sCxeT0OYgn95GmbS3vbbGR6tHaYL_z-IH-rx34A</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Porritt, Fay</creator><creator>Mansson, Ralph</creator><creator>Berry, Alison</creator><creator>Cook, Natalie</creator><creator>Sibbald, Nicola</creator><creator>Nicklin, Steve</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5165-2330</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Validation of a short odour discrimination test for working dogs</title><author>Porritt, Fay ; Mansson, Ralph ; Berry, Alison ; Cook, Natalie ; Sibbald, Nicola ; Nicklin, Steve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a50c121555ab7da503a22a90a459c360f51f65cce56341bf4c85ea222968f54f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Dog</topic><topic>Explosive</topic><topic>Odour</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porritt, Fay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansson, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibbald, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicklin, Steve</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied animal behaviour science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porritt, Fay</au><au>Mansson, Ralph</au><au>Berry, Alison</au><au>Cook, Natalie</au><au>Sibbald, Nicola</au><au>Nicklin, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a short odour discrimination test for working dogs</atitle><jtitle>Applied animal behaviour science</jtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>165</volume><spage>133</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>133-142</pages><issn>0168-1591</issn><eissn>1872-9045</eissn><abstract>•A short odour discrimination test was designed for use with working dogs (<6min/target).•Accompanying Excel™ programme gives the test low logistic burden and full standardisation.•Internal repeatability was good for dogs with “poor” (<3/5) and “good” (≥4/5) outcomes.•External repeatability was good for “poor” dogs and moderate for “good” dogs.
A short odour discrimination test has been designed to allow rapid quality assurance of odour recognition by detection dogs. The test comprises five repeats per target and a minimum of 20 associated non-target odours. The mean time taken to conduct the test is 5.6min per target type. A pass criterion of “a detection rate at least 70% greater than false alarm (FA) rate, with a 15% cap on total allowable false alarms” is used which equates to 4/5 correct indications and 2 FAs, or 5/5 correct indications and 3 FAs; the probability of passing this test by chance is <1%. A Microsoft Excel™ programme has been written to rapidly generate balanced running orders that allow search runs to be truncated following correct indications; this speeds up testing whilst maintaining standardisation; the programme is available free-to-use. The test's internal validity has been measured by conducting test re-test analysis on a range of target types on 19 operational search dogs, and external validity has been measured by completing the test and an equivalent operationally relevant building search on 26 operational search dogs. In both cases there is good overall reliability (kappa≥0.80). The test is thus deemed suitable for complementary assessment of detection dog ability during detailed accreditation procedures or as a standalone quality assurance test in between accreditation or licensing.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.021</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5165-2330</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0168-1591 |
| ispartof | Applied animal behaviour science, 2015-04, Vol.165, p.133-142 |
| issn | 0168-1591 1872-9045 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732820937 |
| source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
| subjects | Detection Discrimination Dog Explosive Odour Validation |
| title | Validation of a short odour discrimination test for working dogs |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A59%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20short%20odour%20discrimination%20test%20for%20working%20dogs&rft.jtitle=Applied%20animal%20behaviour%20science&rft.au=Porritt,%20Fay&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=165&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=133-142&rft.issn=0168-1591&rft.eissn=1872-9045&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1732820937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a50c121555ab7da503a22a90a459c360f51f65cce56341bf4c85ea222968f54f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732820937&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |