Loading…

Effects of a Higher-bioavailability Buprenorphine/Naloxone Sublingual Tablet Versus Buprenorphine/Naloxone Film for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence During Induction and Stabilization: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial

Abstract Purpose Sublingual buprenorphine and combination buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) are effective options for the treatment of opioid dependence. A BNX sublingual tablet approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the induction and maintenance treatment of opioid-dependence in adults was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical therapeutics 2015-10, Vol.37 (10), p.2244-2255
Main Authors: Gunderson, Erik W., MD, Hjelmström, Peter, MD, Sumner, Michael, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3f9d737a498689c83ac5267c4b587902a4f1182e433e511739b07e56c5618f8a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3f9d737a498689c83ac5267c4b587902a4f1182e433e511739b07e56c5618f8a3
container_end_page 2255
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2244
container_title Clinical therapeutics
container_volume 37
creator Gunderson, Erik W., MD
Hjelmström, Peter, MD
Sumner, Michael, MD
description Abstract Purpose Sublingual buprenorphine and combination buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) are effective options for the treatment of opioid dependence. A BNX sublingual tablet approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the induction and maintenance treatment of opioid-dependence in adults was developed as a higher-bioavailability formulation, allowing for a 30% lesser dose of buprenorphine with bioequivalent systemic exposure compared with another BNX sublingual tablet formulation. No data were previously available comparing the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet to generic buprenorphine or BNX sublingual film; we therefore evaluated treatment retention during induction and stabilization with the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet versus generic buprenorphine or BNX sublingual film. Methods This multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-group noninferiority trial was conducted at 43 centers in the United States. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 to 65 years who met the criteria for opioid dependence and had at least mild withdrawal symptoms. On days 1 and 2, patients received blinded, fixed-dose induction with the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet or generic buprenorphine. On days 3 to 14, patients induced with BNX received open-label, titrated doses of the BNX tablet for stabilization; patients induced with buprenorphine received sublingual BNX film. Co-primary end points were treatment retention on days 3 and 15; noninferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI of the between-group difference in treatment retention was ≥−10%. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study period. Findings A total of 758 opioid-dependent patients were included in the study (BNX sublingual tablet, 383 patients; generic buprenorphine, 375). Day-3 retention rates were 93.9% (309/329) and 92.6% (302/326) with the BNX tablet and buprenorphine, respectively (between-group difference 95% CI, −2.6 to 5.1). Day-15 retention rates were 83.0% (273/329) and 82.5% (269/326) with the BNX tablet and BNX film, respectively (between-group difference 95% CI, –5.3 to 6.3). No unexpected tolerability issues were identified; the safety profile of the BNX sublingual tablet was similar to those of generic buprenorphine and BNX film. Implications Based on the findings from this study in patients with opioid dependence , the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet formulation was noninferior to both generic buprenorphine (induction)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.08.025
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732838882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014929181501098X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1727992774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3f9d737a498689c83ac5267c4b587902a4f1182e433e511739b07e56c5618f8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkttu1DAQhiMEotvCK4Albrhotj7k4HCBtPRAKxUqsQvqneU4k9aLYwc7qdg-Kk-Dw5YiVULqlSXrm98z4y9JXhM8J5gUB-u5MtoO1-DlnGKSzzGfY5o_SWaEl1VKSHb5NJlhklUprQjfSXZDWGOMWZXT58kOLTJCOSaz5Ndx24IaAnItkuhUX8XItNZO3khtZK2NHjbow9h7sM7319rCwWdp3E9nAS3HOjZxNUqDVrI2MKBv4MMY_sefaNOh1nkU-0YrD3LowA7Tyxe9drpBR9CDbcAqQEejj9HozDajGrSzSNoGLYc_Hd3K6eYdWqBPoxm0iiHg99GXiLhO30ITw7U0L5JnrTQBXt6de8nXk-PV4Wl6fvHx7HBxnqqcFUPK2qopWSmzihe8UpxJldOiVFmdx1ViKrOWEE4hYwxyQkpW1biEvFB5QXjLJdtL3m5ze-9-jBAG0emgwBhpwY1BxBLKGeecPgKlZVXRsswi-uYBunajt3GQicoLzkiOI1VuKeVdCB5a0XvdSb8RBIvJFLEW96aIyRSBuYimxMpXd_lj3UFzX_dXjQgstgDE3d1o8CIoPf1No300RjROP-KR9w8yJk4rab7DBsK_iUSgAovlJOzkaxyN4Ipfst-PIOu_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1725683150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of a Higher-bioavailability Buprenorphine/Naloxone Sublingual Tablet Versus Buprenorphine/Naloxone Film for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence During Induction and Stabilization: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Gunderson, Erik W., MD ; Hjelmström, Peter, MD ; Sumner, Michael, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Gunderson, Erik W., MD ; Hjelmström, Peter, MD ; Sumner, Michael, MD ; on behalf of the 006 Study Investigators ; 006 Study Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose Sublingual buprenorphine and combination buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) are effective options for the treatment of opioid dependence. A BNX sublingual tablet approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the induction and maintenance treatment of opioid-dependence in adults was developed as a higher-bioavailability formulation, allowing for a 30% lesser dose of buprenorphine with bioequivalent systemic exposure compared with another BNX sublingual tablet formulation. No data were previously available comparing the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet to generic buprenorphine or BNX sublingual film; we therefore evaluated treatment retention during induction and stabilization with the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet versus generic buprenorphine or BNX sublingual film. Methods This multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-group noninferiority trial was conducted at 43 centers in the United States. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 to 65 years who met the criteria for opioid dependence and had at least mild withdrawal symptoms. On days 1 and 2, patients received blinded, fixed-dose induction with the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet or generic buprenorphine. On days 3 to 14, patients induced with BNX received open-label, titrated doses of the BNX tablet for stabilization; patients induced with buprenorphine received sublingual BNX film. Co-primary end points were treatment retention on days 3 and 15; noninferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI of the between-group difference in treatment retention was ≥−10%. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study period. Findings A total of 758 opioid-dependent patients were included in the study (BNX sublingual tablet, 383 patients; generic buprenorphine, 375). Day-3 retention rates were 93.9% (309/329) and 92.6% (302/326) with the BNX tablet and buprenorphine, respectively (between-group difference 95% CI, −2.6 to 5.1). Day-15 retention rates were 83.0% (273/329) and 82.5% (269/326) with the BNX tablet and BNX film, respectively (between-group difference 95% CI, –5.3 to 6.3). No unexpected tolerability issues were identified; the safety profile of the BNX sublingual tablet was similar to those of generic buprenorphine and BNX film. Implications Based on the findings from this study in patients with opioid dependence , the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet formulation was noninferior to both generic buprenorphine (induction) and BNX film (stabilization). These findings suggest that BNX sublingual tablets are an efficacious and well-tolerated option for induction and early stabilization treatment of opioid dependence. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01908842.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.08.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26412801</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Sublingual ; Adult ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage ; Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacokinetics ; Biological Availability ; buprenorphine ; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination - administration &amp; dosage ; Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination - pharmacokinetics ; buprenorphine/naloxone combination ; FDA approval ; Female ; Heroin ; Humans ; induction therapy ; Internal Medicine ; maintenance therapy ; Male ; Medical Education ; Methadone ; Middle Aged ; Narcotic Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage ; Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacokinetics ; Narcotics ; Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy ; Opioid-Related Disorders - metabolism ; Prospective Studies ; Substance abuse treatment ; Tablets ; treatment retention ; United States</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2015-10, Vol.37 (10), p.2244-2255</ispartof><rights>The Authors</rights><rights>2015 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3f9d737a498689c83ac5267c4b587902a4f1182e433e511739b07e56c5618f8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3f9d737a498689c83ac5267c4b587902a4f1182e433e511739b07e56c5618f8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26412801$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gunderson, Erik W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjelmström, Peter, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumner, Michael, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the 006 Study Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>006 Study Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of a Higher-bioavailability Buprenorphine/Naloxone Sublingual Tablet Versus Buprenorphine/Naloxone Film for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence During Induction and Stabilization: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose Sublingual buprenorphine and combination buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) are effective options for the treatment of opioid dependence. A BNX sublingual tablet approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the induction and maintenance treatment of opioid-dependence in adults was developed as a higher-bioavailability formulation, allowing for a 30% lesser dose of buprenorphine with bioequivalent systemic exposure compared with another BNX sublingual tablet formulation. No data were previously available comparing the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet to generic buprenorphine or BNX sublingual film; we therefore evaluated treatment retention during induction and stabilization with the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet versus generic buprenorphine or BNX sublingual film. Methods This multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-group noninferiority trial was conducted at 43 centers in the United States. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 to 65 years who met the criteria for opioid dependence and had at least mild withdrawal symptoms. On days 1 and 2, patients received blinded, fixed-dose induction with the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet or generic buprenorphine. On days 3 to 14, patients induced with BNX received open-label, titrated doses of the BNX tablet for stabilization; patients induced with buprenorphine received sublingual BNX film. Co-primary end points were treatment retention on days 3 and 15; noninferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI of the between-group difference in treatment retention was ≥−10%. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study period. Findings A total of 758 opioid-dependent patients were included in the study (BNX sublingual tablet, 383 patients; generic buprenorphine, 375). Day-3 retention rates were 93.9% (309/329) and 92.6% (302/326) with the BNX tablet and buprenorphine, respectively (between-group difference 95% CI, −2.6 to 5.1). Day-15 retention rates were 83.0% (273/329) and 82.5% (269/326) with the BNX tablet and BNX film, respectively (between-group difference 95% CI, –5.3 to 6.3). No unexpected tolerability issues were identified; the safety profile of the BNX sublingual tablet was similar to those of generic buprenorphine and BNX film. Implications Based on the findings from this study in patients with opioid dependence , the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet formulation was noninferior to both generic buprenorphine (induction) and BNX film (stabilization). These findings suggest that BNX sublingual tablets are an efficacious and well-tolerated option for induction and early stabilization treatment of opioid dependence. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01908842.</description><subject>Administration, Sublingual</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Biological Availability</subject><subject>buprenorphine</subject><subject>Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>buprenorphine/naloxone combination</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heroin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>induction therapy</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>maintenance therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Methadone</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Narcotic Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy</subject><subject>Opioid-Related Disorders - metabolism</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Tablets</subject><subject>treatment retention</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkttu1DAQhiMEotvCK4Albrhotj7k4HCBtPRAKxUqsQvqneU4k9aLYwc7qdg-Kk-Dw5YiVULqlSXrm98z4y9JXhM8J5gUB-u5MtoO1-DlnGKSzzGfY5o_SWaEl1VKSHb5NJlhklUprQjfSXZDWGOMWZXT58kOLTJCOSaz5Ndx24IaAnItkuhUX8XItNZO3khtZK2NHjbow9h7sM7319rCwWdp3E9nAS3HOjZxNUqDVrI2MKBv4MMY_sefaNOh1nkU-0YrD3LowA7Tyxe9drpBR9CDbcAqQEejj9HozDajGrSzSNoGLYc_Hd3K6eYdWqBPoxm0iiHg99GXiLhO30ITw7U0L5JnrTQBXt6de8nXk-PV4Wl6fvHx7HBxnqqcFUPK2qopWSmzihe8UpxJldOiVFmdx1ViKrOWEE4hYwxyQkpW1biEvFB5QXjLJdtL3m5ze-9-jBAG0emgwBhpwY1BxBLKGeecPgKlZVXRsswi-uYBunajt3GQicoLzkiOI1VuKeVdCB5a0XvdSb8RBIvJFLEW96aIyRSBuYimxMpXd_lj3UFzX_dXjQgstgDE3d1o8CIoPf1No300RjROP-KR9w8yJk4rab7DBsK_iUSgAovlJOzkaxyN4Ipfst-PIOu_</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Gunderson, Erik W., MD</creator><creator>Hjelmström, Peter, MD</creator><creator>Sumner, Michael, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Effects of a Higher-bioavailability Buprenorphine/Naloxone Sublingual Tablet Versus Buprenorphine/Naloxone Film for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence During Induction and Stabilization: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial</title><author>Gunderson, Erik W., MD ; Hjelmström, Peter, MD ; Sumner, Michael, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3f9d737a498689c83ac5267c4b587902a4f1182e433e511739b07e56c5618f8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Administration, Sublingual</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Biological Availability</topic><topic>buprenorphine</topic><topic>Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>buprenorphine/naloxone combination</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heroin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>induction therapy</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>maintenance therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Methadone</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Narcotic Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy</topic><topic>Opioid-Related Disorders - metabolism</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Tablets</topic><topic>treatment retention</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gunderson, Erik W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hjelmström, Peter, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumner, Michael, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the 006 Study Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>006 Study Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gunderson, Erik W., MD</au><au>Hjelmström, Peter, MD</au><au>Sumner, Michael, MD</au><aucorp>on behalf of the 006 Study Investigators</aucorp><aucorp>006 Study Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of a Higher-bioavailability Buprenorphine/Naloxone Sublingual Tablet Versus Buprenorphine/Naloxone Film for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence During Induction and Stabilization: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2244</spage><epage>2255</epage><pages>2244-2255</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose Sublingual buprenorphine and combination buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) are effective options for the treatment of opioid dependence. A BNX sublingual tablet approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the induction and maintenance treatment of opioid-dependence in adults was developed as a higher-bioavailability formulation, allowing for a 30% lesser dose of buprenorphine with bioequivalent systemic exposure compared with another BNX sublingual tablet formulation. No data were previously available comparing the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet to generic buprenorphine or BNX sublingual film; we therefore evaluated treatment retention during induction and stabilization with the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet versus generic buprenorphine or BNX sublingual film. Methods This multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-group noninferiority trial was conducted at 43 centers in the United States. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 to 65 years who met the criteria for opioid dependence and had at least mild withdrawal symptoms. On days 1 and 2, patients received blinded, fixed-dose induction with the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet or generic buprenorphine. On days 3 to 14, patients induced with BNX received open-label, titrated doses of the BNX tablet for stabilization; patients induced with buprenorphine received sublingual BNX film. Co-primary end points were treatment retention on days 3 and 15; noninferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI of the between-group difference in treatment retention was ≥−10%. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study period. Findings A total of 758 opioid-dependent patients were included in the study (BNX sublingual tablet, 383 patients; generic buprenorphine, 375). Day-3 retention rates were 93.9% (309/329) and 92.6% (302/326) with the BNX tablet and buprenorphine, respectively (between-group difference 95% CI, −2.6 to 5.1). Day-15 retention rates were 83.0% (273/329) and 82.5% (269/326) with the BNX tablet and BNX film, respectively (between-group difference 95% CI, –5.3 to 6.3). No unexpected tolerability issues were identified; the safety profile of the BNX sublingual tablet was similar to those of generic buprenorphine and BNX film. Implications Based on the findings from this study in patients with opioid dependence , the higher-bioavailability BNX sublingual tablet formulation was noninferior to both generic buprenorphine (induction) and BNX film (stabilization). These findings suggest that BNX sublingual tablets are an efficacious and well-tolerated option for induction and early stabilization treatment of opioid dependence. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01908842.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26412801</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.08.025</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-2918
ispartof Clinical therapeutics, 2015-10, Vol.37 (10), p.2244-2255
issn 0149-2918
1879-114X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732838882
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Administration, Sublingual
Adult
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacokinetics
Biological Availability
buprenorphine
Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination - administration & dosage
Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination - pharmacokinetics
buprenorphine/naloxone combination
FDA approval
Female
Heroin
Humans
induction therapy
Internal Medicine
maintenance therapy
Male
Medical Education
Methadone
Middle Aged
Narcotic Antagonists - administration & dosage
Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacokinetics
Narcotics
Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy
Opioid-Related Disorders - metabolism
Prospective Studies
Substance abuse treatment
Tablets
treatment retention
United States
title Effects of a Higher-bioavailability Buprenorphine/Naloxone Sublingual Tablet Versus Buprenorphine/Naloxone Film for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence During Induction and Stabilization: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T15%3A54%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20a%20Higher-bioavailability%20Buprenorphine/Naloxone%20Sublingual%20Tablet%20Versus%20Buprenorphine/Naloxone%20Film%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Opioid%20Dependence%20During%20Induction%20and%20Stabilization:%20A%20Multicenter,%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Gunderson,%20Erik%20W.,%20MD&rft.aucorp=on%20behalf%20of%20the%20006%20Study%20Investigators&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2244&rft.epage=2255&rft.pages=2244-2255&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.08.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1727992774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3f9d737a498689c83ac5267c4b587902a4f1182e433e511739b07e56c5618f8a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1725683150&rft_id=info:pmid/26412801&rfr_iscdi=true