Loading…
Ad hoc Rules, Rights, and Rituals: The Politics of Mass Death
In spite of the growing incidence of mass death incidents due to factors such as climate change, technology, terrorism and globalization there are relatively few rules and procedures in place to deal with the dead and where rules do exist they are often ignored or broken. Furthermore, because of the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of contingencies and crisis management 2014-12, Vol.22 (4), p.223-237 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-bc995e0096b0a1f2fb8ec408fabf6f02c61ace2ae4b5c6a94eb3135cfd0a1c793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-bc995e0096b0a1f2fb8ec408fabf6f02c61ace2ae4b5c6a94eb3135cfd0a1c793 |
container_end_page | 237 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Journal of contingencies and crisis management |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Scanlon, Joseph Stoney, Christopher |
description | In spite of the growing incidence of mass death incidents due to factors such as climate change, technology, terrorism and globalization there are relatively few rules and procedures in place to deal with the dead and where rules do exist they are often ignored or broken. Furthermore, because of the very different cultural, legal, financial, and religious nature of states and victims international agreements, conventions and best practices are difficult to establish. This paper highlights the often political and ad hoc nature of the decisions that have to be made by responders and the challenges this presents for policy‐makers as well as the families of the victims. While accepting the need for flexibility in emergency situations, the paper identifies some of the areas where public policy reforms and frameworks are most needed in order to establish clearer rules and procedures for dealing with the dead. Finally, the paper calls for the policies and procedures that do exist to be informed by and subject to the same principles of public administration, such as accountability and transparency, that govern other areas public policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1468-5973.12059 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735655182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1680154829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-bc995e0096b0a1f2fb8ec408fabf6f02c61ace2ae4b5c6a94eb3135cfd0a1c793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9PwjAYhhujiYievS7x4sFBu65da-LBTMUfgIRg8NZ0pXXDwXDdovz3dqIcvNDL1zTP8-brC8Apgh3kTheFlPmER7iDAkj4HmhtX_ZBC3JKfcgifgiOrJ1DCAljrAWurmdeWihvXOfaXnjj7C2t3JTLmbtXtcztpTdJtTcq8qzKlPUK4w2ktd6NllV6DA6MQ_TJ72yDl7vbSXzv9597D_F131chwdxPFOdEQ7dDAiUygUmYViFkRiaGGhgoiqTSgdRhQhSVPNQJRpgoM3O4ijhug_NN7qosPmptK7HIrNJ5Lpe6qK1AESaUEMSC3ShlEJGQBU3q2T90XtTl0n3EUYgHUYB5E9jdUKosrC21EasyW8hyLRAUTfOi6Vk0PYuf5p1BN8Znluv1Llw8xvHgT_Q3YmYr_bUVZfkuaIQjIqbDngjp03Q46r0Kgr8BYN6Rsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1619272392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ad hoc Rules, Rights, and Rituals: The Politics of Mass Death</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Scanlon, Joseph ; Stoney, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Scanlon, Joseph ; Stoney, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>In spite of the growing incidence of mass death incidents due to factors such as climate change, technology, terrorism and globalization there are relatively few rules and procedures in place to deal with the dead and where rules do exist they are often ignored or broken. Furthermore, because of the very different cultural, legal, financial, and religious nature of states and victims international agreements, conventions and best practices are difficult to establish. This paper highlights the often political and ad hoc nature of the decisions that have to be made by responders and the challenges this presents for policy‐makers as well as the families of the victims. While accepting the need for flexibility in emergency situations, the paper identifies some of the areas where public policy reforms and frameworks are most needed in order to establish clearer rules and procedures for dealing with the dead. Finally, the paper calls for the policies and procedures that do exist to be informed by and subject to the same principles of public administration, such as accountability and transparency, that govern other areas public policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0879</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12059</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCCMET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Contracts ; Conventions ; Culture ; Death ; Death Rituals ; Deaths ; Decision making ; Family ; Global warming ; Globalization ; International agreements ; Management of crises ; Politics ; Public policy ; Reform ; Regulation ; Rights ; Rituals ; Studies ; Terrorism ; Victims</subject><ispartof>Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 2014-12, Vol.22 (4), p.223-237</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-bc995e0096b0a1f2fb8ec408fabf6f02c61ace2ae4b5c6a94eb3135cfd0a1c793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-bc995e0096b0a1f2fb8ec408fabf6f02c61ace2ae4b5c6a94eb3135cfd0a1c793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27866,27924,27925,33223,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scanlon, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoney, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Ad hoc Rules, Rights, and Rituals: The Politics of Mass Death</title><title>Journal of contingencies and crisis management</title><addtitle>J Contingencies & Crisis Man</addtitle><description>In spite of the growing incidence of mass death incidents due to factors such as climate change, technology, terrorism and globalization there are relatively few rules and procedures in place to deal with the dead and where rules do exist they are often ignored or broken. Furthermore, because of the very different cultural, legal, financial, and religious nature of states and victims international agreements, conventions and best practices are difficult to establish. This paper highlights the often political and ad hoc nature of the decisions that have to be made by responders and the challenges this presents for policy‐makers as well as the families of the victims. While accepting the need for flexibility in emergency situations, the paper identifies some of the areas where public policy reforms and frameworks are most needed in order to establish clearer rules and procedures for dealing with the dead. Finally, the paper calls for the policies and procedures that do exist to be informed by and subject to the same principles of public administration, such as accountability and transparency, that govern other areas public policy.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Conventions</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Death Rituals</subject><subject>Deaths</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>Management of crises</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Victims</subject><issn>0966-0879</issn><issn>1468-5973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9PwjAYhhujiYievS7x4sFBu65da-LBTMUfgIRg8NZ0pXXDwXDdovz3dqIcvNDL1zTP8-brC8Apgh3kTheFlPmER7iDAkj4HmhtX_ZBC3JKfcgifgiOrJ1DCAljrAWurmdeWihvXOfaXnjj7C2t3JTLmbtXtcztpTdJtTcq8qzKlPUK4w2ktd6NllV6DA6MQ_TJ72yDl7vbSXzv9597D_F131chwdxPFOdEQ7dDAiUygUmYViFkRiaGGhgoiqTSgdRhQhSVPNQJRpgoM3O4ijhug_NN7qosPmptK7HIrNJ5Lpe6qK1AESaUEMSC3ShlEJGQBU3q2T90XtTl0n3EUYgHUYB5E9jdUKosrC21EasyW8hyLRAUTfOi6Vk0PYuf5p1BN8Znluv1Llw8xvHgT_Q3YmYr_bUVZfkuaIQjIqbDngjp03Q46r0Kgr8BYN6Rsg</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Scanlon, Joseph</creator><creator>Stoney, Christopher</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Ad hoc Rules, Rights, and Rituals: The Politics of Mass Death</title><author>Scanlon, Joseph ; Stoney, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-bc995e0096b0a1f2fb8ec408fabf6f02c61ace2ae4b5c6a94eb3135cfd0a1c793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Conventions</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Death Rituals</topic><topic>Deaths</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>Management of crises</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Victims</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scanlon, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoney, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of contingencies and crisis management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scanlon, Joseph</au><au>Stoney, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ad hoc Rules, Rights, and Rituals: The Politics of Mass Death</atitle><jtitle>Journal of contingencies and crisis management</jtitle><addtitle>J Contingencies & Crisis Man</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>223-237</pages><issn>0966-0879</issn><eissn>1468-5973</eissn><coden>JCCMET</coden><abstract>In spite of the growing incidence of mass death incidents due to factors such as climate change, technology, terrorism and globalization there are relatively few rules and procedures in place to deal with the dead and where rules do exist they are often ignored or broken. Furthermore, because of the very different cultural, legal, financial, and religious nature of states and victims international agreements, conventions and best practices are difficult to establish. This paper highlights the often political and ad hoc nature of the decisions that have to be made by responders and the challenges this presents for policy‐makers as well as the families of the victims. While accepting the need for flexibility in emergency situations, the paper identifies some of the areas where public policy reforms and frameworks are most needed in order to establish clearer rules and procedures for dealing with the dead. Finally, the paper calls for the policies and procedures that do exist to be informed by and subject to the same principles of public administration, such as accountability and transparency, that govern other areas public policy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1468-5973.12059</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0966-0879 |
ispartof | Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 2014-12, Vol.22 (4), p.223-237 |
issn | 0966-0879 1468-5973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735655182 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Analysis Contracts Conventions Culture Death Death Rituals Deaths Decision making Family Global warming Globalization International agreements Management of crises Politics Public policy Reform Regulation Rights Rituals Studies Terrorism Victims |
title | Ad hoc Rules, Rights, and Rituals: The Politics of Mass Death |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A15%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ad%20hoc%20Rules,%20Rights,%20and%20Rituals:%20The%20Politics%20of%20Mass%20Death&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20contingencies%20and%20crisis%20management&rft.au=Scanlon,%20Joseph&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=223-237&rft.issn=0966-0879&rft.eissn=1468-5973&rft.coden=JCCMET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1468-5973.12059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1680154829%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4539-bc995e0096b0a1f2fb8ec408fabf6f02c61ace2ae4b5c6a94eb3135cfd0a1c793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1619272392&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |