Loading…
MRSA colonization and the nasal microbiome in adults at high risk of colonization and infection
Summary Objective The objective of this study was to define the nasal microbiome of hospital inpatients who are persistently colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with matched, non-colonized controls. Methods Twenty-six persistently MRSA-colonized subjects and 26...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of infection 2015-12, Vol.71 (6), p.649-657 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-aabc1bc0bb990dce43aec5e001c83feb54c2d6f5e6e3f8e58822445fefefff053 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-aabc1bc0bb990dce43aec5e001c83feb54c2d6f5e6e3f8e58822445fefefff053 |
container_end_page | 657 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 649 |
container_title | The Journal of infection |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Bessesen, Mary T Kotter, Cassandra Vogel Wagner, Brandie D Adams, Jill C Kingery, Shannon Benoit, Jeanne B Robertson, Charles E Janoff, Edward N Frank, Daniel N |
description | Summary Objective The objective of this study was to define the nasal microbiome of hospital inpatients who are persistently colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with matched, non-colonized controls. Methods Twenty-six persistently MRSA-colonized subjects and 26 matched non-colonized controls were selected from the screening records of the infection control program at the Department of the Veteran Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System (VA-ECHCS). The nasal microbiotas were analyzed with PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. Comparison of all variables across the groups was performed using stratified logistic regression to account for the one-to-one matching. Canonical discriminant analysis was performed to assess differences in bacterial community across the two groups. Competing organisms were cocultured with MRSA in vitro. Results There was a negative association between MRSA colonization and colonization with Streptococcus spp. At the species level, multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant negative association between colonization with Streptococcus mitis or Lactobacillus gasseri and MRSA. Coculture experiments revealed in vitro competition between S. mitis and all of the 22 MRSA strains isolated from subjects. Competition was blocked by addition of catalase to the media. Persistently colonized subjects had lesser microbial diversity than the non-colonized controls. Conclusion In a high-risk inpatient setting, bacterial competition in the nasal niche protects some patients from MRSA colonization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.08.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735905659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0163445315002613</els_id><sourcerecordid>1735905659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-aabc1bc0bb990dce43aec5e001c83feb54c2d6f5e6e3f8e58822445fefefff053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhUVpaW7SvkAWRctu7Iwky9eGUgghf5BSaNq1kOVRrxxbSiU7kD59ZG7SRQtFCyF0zmHON4QcMygZsPpkKAfnbcmByRKaEqB5RTZMCl7wbcVfk00WiaKqpDgghykNANCKtn5LDngthNxCsyHqy7fbU2rCGLz7rWcXPNW-p_MOqddJj3RyJobOhQmpy3_9Ms6J6pnu3M8djS7d0WD_9ee50Kyvd-SN1WPC98_3Eflxcf797Kq4-Xp5fXZ6UxjJ2Vxo3RnWGei6toXeYCU0GokAzDTCYicrw_vaSqxR2AZl03Cei1nMx1qQ4oh83Ofex_BrwTSrySWD46g9hiUpthWyBVnLNkv5XpqLpRTRqvvoJh0fFQO1glWDWsGqFayCRmWw2fThOX_pJuz_WF5IZsGnvQBzyweHUSXj0BvsXcwoVB_c__M__2U3o_PO6PEOHzENYYk-81NMJa5A3a6rXTfLJACvmRBPBaagOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735905659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MRSA colonization and the nasal microbiome in adults at high risk of colonization and infection</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Bessesen, Mary T ; Kotter, Cassandra Vogel ; Wagner, Brandie D ; Adams, Jill C ; Kingery, Shannon ; Benoit, Jeanne B ; Robertson, Charles E ; Janoff, Edward N ; Frank, Daniel N</creator><creatorcontrib>Bessesen, Mary T ; Kotter, Cassandra Vogel ; Wagner, Brandie D ; Adams, Jill C ; Kingery, Shannon ; Benoit, Jeanne B ; Robertson, Charles E ; Janoff, Edward N ; Frank, Daniel N</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Objective The objective of this study was to define the nasal microbiome of hospital inpatients who are persistently colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with matched, non-colonized controls. Methods Twenty-six persistently MRSA-colonized subjects and 26 matched non-colonized controls were selected from the screening records of the infection control program at the Department of the Veteran Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System (VA-ECHCS). The nasal microbiotas were analyzed with PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. Comparison of all variables across the groups was performed using stratified logistic regression to account for the one-to-one matching. Canonical discriminant analysis was performed to assess differences in bacterial community across the two groups. Competing organisms were cocultured with MRSA in vitro. Results There was a negative association between MRSA colonization and colonization with Streptococcus spp. At the species level, multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant negative association between colonization with Streptococcus mitis or Lactobacillus gasseri and MRSA. Coculture experiments revealed in vitro competition between S. mitis and all of the 22 MRSA strains isolated from subjects. Competition was blocked by addition of catalase to the media. Persistently colonized subjects had lesser microbial diversity than the non-colonized controls. Conclusion In a high-risk inpatient setting, bacterial competition in the nasal niche protects some patients from MRSA colonization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-4453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26335708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibiosis ; Bacterial interference ; Carrier State ; Catalase - metabolism ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Infectious Disease ; Lactobacillus - drug effects ; Lactobacillus - isolation & purification ; Lactobacillus - physiology ; Lactobacillus gasseri ; Male ; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - physiology ; Microbiome ; Microbiota ; Nose - microbiology ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Risk Factors ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology ; Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification ; Staphylococcus aureus - physiology ; Streptococcus mitis ; Streptococcus mitis - isolation & purification ; Streptococcus mitis - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of infection, 2015-12, Vol.71 (6), p.649-657</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-aabc1bc0bb990dce43aec5e001c83feb54c2d6f5e6e3f8e58822445fefefff053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-aabc1bc0bb990dce43aec5e001c83feb54c2d6f5e6e3f8e58822445fefefff053</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9305-1293</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26335708$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bessesen, Mary T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotter, Cassandra Vogel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Brandie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Jill C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingery, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoit, Jeanne B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Charles E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janoff, Edward N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Daniel N</creatorcontrib><title>MRSA colonization and the nasal microbiome in adults at high risk of colonization and infection</title><title>The Journal of infection</title><addtitle>J Infect</addtitle><description>Summary Objective The objective of this study was to define the nasal microbiome of hospital inpatients who are persistently colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with matched, non-colonized controls. Methods Twenty-six persistently MRSA-colonized subjects and 26 matched non-colonized controls were selected from the screening records of the infection control program at the Department of the Veteran Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System (VA-ECHCS). The nasal microbiotas were analyzed with PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. Comparison of all variables across the groups was performed using stratified logistic regression to account for the one-to-one matching. Canonical discriminant analysis was performed to assess differences in bacterial community across the two groups. Competing organisms were cocultured with MRSA in vitro. Results There was a negative association between MRSA colonization and colonization with Streptococcus spp. At the species level, multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant negative association between colonization with Streptococcus mitis or Lactobacillus gasseri and MRSA. Coculture experiments revealed in vitro competition between S. mitis and all of the 22 MRSA strains isolated from subjects. Competition was blocked by addition of catalase to the media. Persistently colonized subjects had lesser microbial diversity than the non-colonized controls. Conclusion In a high-risk inpatient setting, bacterial competition in the nasal niche protects some patients from MRSA colonization.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibiosis</subject><subject>Bacterial interference</subject><subject>Carrier State</subject><subject>Catalase - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - drug effects</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - physiology</subject><subject>Lactobacillus gasseri</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - physiology</subject><subject>Microbiome</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Nose - microbiology</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - physiology</subject><subject>Streptococcus mitis</subject><subject>Streptococcus mitis - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Streptococcus mitis - physiology</subject><issn>0163-4453</issn><issn>1532-2742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhUVpaW7SvkAWRctu7Iwky9eGUgghf5BSaNq1kOVRrxxbSiU7kD59ZG7SRQtFCyF0zmHON4QcMygZsPpkKAfnbcmByRKaEqB5RTZMCl7wbcVfk00WiaKqpDgghykNANCKtn5LDngthNxCsyHqy7fbU2rCGLz7rWcXPNW-p_MOqddJj3RyJobOhQmpy3_9Ms6J6pnu3M8djS7d0WD_9ee50Kyvd-SN1WPC98_3Eflxcf797Kq4-Xp5fXZ6UxjJ2Vxo3RnWGei6toXeYCU0GokAzDTCYicrw_vaSqxR2AZl03Cei1nMx1qQ4oh83Ofex_BrwTSrySWD46g9hiUpthWyBVnLNkv5XpqLpRTRqvvoJh0fFQO1glWDWsGqFayCRmWw2fThOX_pJuz_WF5IZsGnvQBzyweHUSXj0BvsXcwoVB_c__M__2U3o_PO6PEOHzENYYk-81NMJa5A3a6rXTfLJACvmRBPBaagOw</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Bessesen, Mary T</creator><creator>Kotter, Cassandra Vogel</creator><creator>Wagner, Brandie D</creator><creator>Adams, Jill C</creator><creator>Kingery, Shannon</creator><creator>Benoit, Jeanne B</creator><creator>Robertson, Charles E</creator><creator>Janoff, Edward N</creator><creator>Frank, Daniel N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9305-1293</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>MRSA colonization and the nasal microbiome in adults at high risk of colonization and infection</title><author>Bessesen, Mary T ; Kotter, Cassandra Vogel ; Wagner, Brandie D ; Adams, Jill C ; Kingery, Shannon ; Benoit, Jeanne B ; Robertson, Charles E ; Janoff, Edward N ; Frank, Daniel N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-aabc1bc0bb990dce43aec5e001c83feb54c2d6f5e6e3f8e58822445fefefff053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibiosis</topic><topic>Bacterial interference</topic><topic>Carrier State</topic><topic>Catalase - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - drug effects</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - physiology</topic><topic>Lactobacillus gasseri</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - physiology</topic><topic>Microbiome</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Nose - microbiology</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - physiology</topic><topic>Streptococcus mitis</topic><topic>Streptococcus mitis - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Streptococcus mitis - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bessesen, Mary T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotter, Cassandra Vogel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Brandie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Jill C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingery, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoit, Jeanne B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Charles E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janoff, Edward N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Daniel N</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bessesen, Mary T</au><au>Kotter, Cassandra Vogel</au><au>Wagner, Brandie D</au><au>Adams, Jill C</au><au>Kingery, Shannon</au><au>Benoit, Jeanne B</au><au>Robertson, Charles E</au><au>Janoff, Edward N</au><au>Frank, Daniel N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MRSA colonization and the nasal microbiome in adults at high risk of colonization and infection</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Infect</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>657</epage><pages>649-657</pages><issn>0163-4453</issn><eissn>1532-2742</eissn><abstract>Summary Objective The objective of this study was to define the nasal microbiome of hospital inpatients who are persistently colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with matched, non-colonized controls. Methods Twenty-six persistently MRSA-colonized subjects and 26 matched non-colonized controls were selected from the screening records of the infection control program at the Department of the Veteran Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System (VA-ECHCS). The nasal microbiotas were analyzed with PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. Comparison of all variables across the groups was performed using stratified logistic regression to account for the one-to-one matching. Canonical discriminant analysis was performed to assess differences in bacterial community across the two groups. Competing organisms were cocultured with MRSA in vitro. Results There was a negative association between MRSA colonization and colonization with Streptococcus spp. At the species level, multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant negative association between colonization with Streptococcus mitis or Lactobacillus gasseri and MRSA. Coculture experiments revealed in vitro competition between S. mitis and all of the 22 MRSA strains isolated from subjects. Competition was blocked by addition of catalase to the media. Persistently colonized subjects had lesser microbial diversity than the non-colonized controls. Conclusion In a high-risk inpatient setting, bacterial competition in the nasal niche protects some patients from MRSA colonization.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26335708</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jinf.2015.08.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9305-1293</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-4453 |
ispartof | The Journal of infection, 2015-12, Vol.71 (6), p.649-657 |
issn | 0163-4453 1532-2742 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735905659 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Adult Antibiosis Bacterial interference Carrier State Catalase - metabolism Female Hospitalization Humans Infectious Disease Lactobacillus - drug effects Lactobacillus - isolation & purification Lactobacillus - physiology Lactobacillus gasseri Male Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - physiology Microbiome Microbiota Nose - microbiology Polymerase Chain Reaction Risk Factors RNA, Ribosomal, 16S Sequence Analysis, DNA Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification Staphylococcus aureus - physiology Streptococcus mitis Streptococcus mitis - isolation & purification Streptococcus mitis - physiology |
title | MRSA colonization and the nasal microbiome in adults at high risk of colonization and infection |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A51%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MRSA%20colonization%20and%20the%20nasal%20microbiome%20in%20adults%20at%20high%20risk%20of%20colonization%20and%20infection&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20infection&rft.au=Bessesen,%20Mary%20T&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=657&rft.pages=649-657&rft.issn=0163-4453&rft.eissn=1532-2742&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jinf.2015.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1735905659%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-aabc1bc0bb990dce43aec5e001c83feb54c2d6f5e6e3f8e58822445fefefff053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735905659&rft_id=info:pmid/26335708&rfr_iscdi=true |