Loading…
Pitch perception and frequency-following responses elicited by lexical-tone chimeras
Objective: Previous research has shown the usefulness of utilizing auditory chimeras in assessing a listener's perception of the envelope and fine structure for an acoustic stimulus. However, research comparing and contrasting behavioral and electrophysiological responses to this stimulus type...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of audiology 2016-01, Vol.55 (1), p.53-63 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-dec9fd489a94c25b6b57b9dbcc81ce5ad3ba971305f05010c45c1ef7ca47613c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-dec9fd489a94c25b6b57b9dbcc81ce5ad3ba971305f05010c45c1ef7ca47613c3 |
container_end_page | 63 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | International journal of audiology |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Jeng, Fuh-Cherng Lin, Chia-Der Sabol, John T. Hollister, Grant R. Chou, Meng-Shih Chen, Ching-Hua Kenny, Jessica E. Tsou, Yung-An |
description | Objective: Previous research has shown the usefulness of utilizing auditory chimeras in assessing a listener's perception of the envelope and fine structure for an acoustic stimulus. However, research comparing and contrasting behavioral and electrophysiological responses to this stimulus type is scarce. Design: Two sets of chimeric stimuli were constructed by interchanging the envelopes and fine-structures of the rising/yi
2
/and falling/yi
4
/Mandarin pitch contours that were filtered through 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 frequency banks. Behavioral pitch-perception tasks were administered through a two-alternative, forced-choice paradigm. Electrophysiological responses were measured through scalp-recorded frequency-following responses (FFRs) to the lexical-tone chimeras. Study sample: Twenty American and twenty Chinese adults were recruited. Results: A two-way analysis of variance showed significance (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/14992027.2015.1072774 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735908412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1735908412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-dec9fd489a94c25b6b57b9dbcc81ce5ad3ba971305f05010c45c1ef7ca47613c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtO5DAQRS00iPcngLJkk8ZO7DjezQjxkpBgAWvLqZTByLGDnRb035NWd7OcVdXiVN2rQ8g5o4uaUXXFuFIVreSiokwsGJWVlHyPHDFJ27JlbfNn3memXEOH5DjnD0qZ5KI9IIdVU1NRteqIvDy7Cd6LERPgOLkYChP6wib8XGKAVWmj9_HLhbciYR5jyJgL9A7chH3RrQqP3w6ML6cYsIB3N2Ay-ZTsW-Mznm3nCXm9vXm5vi8fn-4erv89lsDrZip7BGV73iqjOFSiazohO9V3AC0DFKavO6Mkm6taKiijwAUwtBIMlw2roT4hl5u_Y4pz3zzpwWVA703AuMyayVoo2nJWzajYoJBizgmtHpMbTFppRvVaqN4J1Wuheit0vrvYRiy7Afvfq53BGfi7AVywMQ3mKybf68msfEw2mQAur___L-MHP_qGew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735908412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pitch perception and frequency-following responses elicited by lexical-tone chimeras</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Jeng, Fuh-Cherng ; Lin, Chia-Der ; Sabol, John T. ; Hollister, Grant R. ; Chou, Meng-Shih ; Chen, Ching-Hua ; Kenny, Jessica E. ; Tsou, Yung-An</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeng, Fuh-Cherng ; Lin, Chia-Der ; Sabol, John T. ; Hollister, Grant R. ; Chou, Meng-Shih ; Chen, Ching-Hua ; Kenny, Jessica E. ; Tsou, Yung-An</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Previous research has shown the usefulness of utilizing auditory chimeras in assessing a listener's perception of the envelope and fine structure for an acoustic stimulus. However, research comparing and contrasting behavioral and electrophysiological responses to this stimulus type is scarce. Design: Two sets of chimeric stimuli were constructed by interchanging the envelopes and fine-structures of the rising/yi
2
/and falling/yi
4
/Mandarin pitch contours that were filtered through 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 frequency banks. Behavioral pitch-perception tasks were administered through a two-alternative, forced-choice paradigm. Electrophysiological responses were measured through scalp-recorded frequency-following responses (FFRs) to the lexical-tone chimeras. Study sample: Twenty American and twenty Chinese adults were recruited. Results: A two-way analysis of variance showed significance (p < 0.05) within and across the filter bank and language background factors for the behavioral measurements, while the frequency-following response demonstrated a significance only across the filter banks. Conclusions: Perceptual importance of envelope cues increases starting from 16 filter banks, while the FFR accuracy and magnitude decreases with increasing number of filter banks. These results can be useful in assessing experience-dependent neuroplasticity and in designing speech processing strategies for cochlear-implant users who speak tonal or non-tonal languages around the globe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1499-2027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1072774</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26305289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Auditory chimera ; brainstem ; Chimera ; China ; Cues ; Electroencephalography ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology ; Female ; frequency-following response ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Phonetics ; Pitch Perception - physiology ; United States ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of audiology, 2016-01, Vol.55 (1), p.53-63</ispartof><rights>British Society of Audiology; International Society of Audiology; Nordic Audiological Society 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-dec9fd489a94c25b6b57b9dbcc81ce5ad3ba971305f05010c45c1ef7ca47613c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-dec9fd489a94c25b6b57b9dbcc81ce5ad3ba971305f05010c45c1ef7ca47613c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26305289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeng, Fuh-Cherng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chia-Der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabol, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollister, Grant R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Meng-Shih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ching-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenny, Jessica E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsou, Yung-An</creatorcontrib><title>Pitch perception and frequency-following responses elicited by lexical-tone chimeras</title><title>International journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><description>Objective: Previous research has shown the usefulness of utilizing auditory chimeras in assessing a listener's perception of the envelope and fine structure for an acoustic stimulus. However, research comparing and contrasting behavioral and electrophysiological responses to this stimulus type is scarce. Design: Two sets of chimeric stimuli were constructed by interchanging the envelopes and fine-structures of the rising/yi
2
/and falling/yi
4
/Mandarin pitch contours that were filtered through 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 frequency banks. Behavioral pitch-perception tasks were administered through a two-alternative, forced-choice paradigm. Electrophysiological responses were measured through scalp-recorded frequency-following responses (FFRs) to the lexical-tone chimeras. Study sample: Twenty American and twenty Chinese adults were recruited. Results: A two-way analysis of variance showed significance (p < 0.05) within and across the filter bank and language background factors for the behavioral measurements, while the frequency-following response demonstrated a significance only across the filter banks. Conclusions: Perceptual importance of envelope cues increases starting from 16 filter banks, while the FFR accuracy and magnitude decreases with increasing number of filter banks. These results can be useful in assessing experience-dependent neuroplasticity and in designing speech processing strategies for cochlear-implant users who speak tonal or non-tonal languages around the globe.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Auditory chimera</subject><subject>brainstem</subject><subject>Chimera</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>frequency-following response</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Pitch Perception - physiology</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1499-2027</issn><issn>1708-8186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtO5DAQRS00iPcngLJkk8ZO7DjezQjxkpBgAWvLqZTByLGDnRb035NWd7OcVdXiVN2rQ8g5o4uaUXXFuFIVreSiokwsGJWVlHyPHDFJ27JlbfNn3memXEOH5DjnD0qZ5KI9IIdVU1NRteqIvDy7Cd6LERPgOLkYChP6wib8XGKAVWmj9_HLhbciYR5jyJgL9A7chH3RrQqP3w6ML6cYsIB3N2Ay-ZTsW-Mznm3nCXm9vXm5vi8fn-4erv89lsDrZip7BGV73iqjOFSiazohO9V3AC0DFKavO6Mkm6taKiijwAUwtBIMlw2roT4hl5u_Y4pz3zzpwWVA703AuMyayVoo2nJWzajYoJBizgmtHpMbTFppRvVaqN4J1Wuheit0vrvYRiy7Afvfq53BGfi7AVywMQ3mKybf68msfEw2mQAur___L-MHP_qGew</recordid><startdate>20160102</startdate><enddate>20160102</enddate><creator>Jeng, Fuh-Cherng</creator><creator>Lin, Chia-Der</creator><creator>Sabol, John T.</creator><creator>Hollister, Grant R.</creator><creator>Chou, Meng-Shih</creator><creator>Chen, Ching-Hua</creator><creator>Kenny, Jessica E.</creator><creator>Tsou, Yung-An</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160102</creationdate><title>Pitch perception and frequency-following responses elicited by lexical-tone chimeras</title><author>Jeng, Fuh-Cherng ; Lin, Chia-Der ; Sabol, John T. ; Hollister, Grant R. ; Chou, Meng-Shih ; Chen, Ching-Hua ; Kenny, Jessica E. ; Tsou, Yung-An</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-dec9fd489a94c25b6b57b9dbcc81ce5ad3ba971305f05010c45c1ef7ca47613c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Auditory chimera</topic><topic>brainstem</topic><topic>Chimera</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>frequency-following response</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Pitch Perception - physiology</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeng, Fuh-Cherng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chia-Der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabol, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollister, Grant R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Meng-Shih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ching-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenny, Jessica E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsou, Yung-An</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeng, Fuh-Cherng</au><au>Lin, Chia-Der</au><au>Sabol, John T.</au><au>Hollister, Grant R.</au><au>Chou, Meng-Shih</au><au>Chen, Ching-Hua</au><au>Kenny, Jessica E.</au><au>Tsou, Yung-An</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pitch perception and frequency-following responses elicited by lexical-tone chimeras</atitle><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><date>2016-01-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>53-63</pages><issn>1499-2027</issn><eissn>1708-8186</eissn><abstract>Objective: Previous research has shown the usefulness of utilizing auditory chimeras in assessing a listener's perception of the envelope and fine structure for an acoustic stimulus. However, research comparing and contrasting behavioral and electrophysiological responses to this stimulus type is scarce. Design: Two sets of chimeric stimuli were constructed by interchanging the envelopes and fine-structures of the rising/yi
2
/and falling/yi
4
/Mandarin pitch contours that were filtered through 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 frequency banks. Behavioral pitch-perception tasks were administered through a two-alternative, forced-choice paradigm. Electrophysiological responses were measured through scalp-recorded frequency-following responses (FFRs) to the lexical-tone chimeras. Study sample: Twenty American and twenty Chinese adults were recruited. Results: A two-way analysis of variance showed significance (p < 0.05) within and across the filter bank and language background factors for the behavioral measurements, while the frequency-following response demonstrated a significance only across the filter banks. Conclusions: Perceptual importance of envelope cues increases starting from 16 filter banks, while the FFR accuracy and magnitude decreases with increasing number of filter banks. These results can be useful in assessing experience-dependent neuroplasticity and in designing speech processing strategies for cochlear-implant users who speak tonal or non-tonal languages around the globe.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>26305289</pmid><doi>10.3109/14992027.2015.1072774</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1499-2027 |
ispartof | International journal of audiology, 2016-01, Vol.55 (1), p.53-63 |
issn | 1499-2027 1708-8186 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735908412 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation - methods Adult Analysis of Variance Auditory chimera brainstem Chimera China Cues Electroencephalography Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology Female frequency-following response Healthy Volunteers Humans Language Male Phonetics Pitch Perception - physiology United States Young Adult |
title | Pitch perception and frequency-following responses elicited by lexical-tone chimeras |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A09%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pitch%20perception%20and%20frequency-following%20responses%20elicited%20by%20lexical-tone%20chimeras&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Jeng,%20Fuh-Cherng&rft.date=2016-01-02&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=53-63&rft.issn=1499-2027&rft.eissn=1708-8186&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/14992027.2015.1072774&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1735908412%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-dec9fd489a94c25b6b57b9dbcc81ce5ad3ba971305f05010c45c1ef7ca47613c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735908412&rft_id=info:pmid/26305289&rfr_iscdi=true |