Loading…

Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception

Recent research has suggested that the extrinsic cognitive load generated by performing a nonlinguistic visual task while perceiving speech increases listeners’ reliance on lexical knowledge and decreases their capacity to perceive phonetic detail. In the present study, we asked whether this effect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2014-06, Vol.21 (3), p.748-754
Main Authors: Mattys, Sven L., Barden, Katharine, Samuel, Arthur G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-2c69d2bb3608150f96babf34e70718b6750a1d1aad03888480cb2727408ab8953
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-2c69d2bb3608150f96babf34e70718b6750a1d1aad03888480cb2727408ab8953
container_end_page 754
container_issue 3
container_start_page 748
container_title Psychonomic bulletin & review
container_volume 21
creator Mattys, Sven L.
Barden, Katharine
Samuel, Arthur G.
description Recent research has suggested that the extrinsic cognitive load generated by performing a nonlinguistic visual task while perceiving speech increases listeners’ reliance on lexical knowledge and decreases their capacity to perceive phonetic detail. In the present study, we asked whether this effect is accounted for better at a lexical or a sublexical level. The former would imply that cognitive load directly affects lexical activation but not perceptual sensitivity; the latter would imply that increased lexical reliance under cognitive load is only a secondary consequence of imprecise or incomplete phonetic encoding. Using the phoneme restoration paradigm, we showed that perceptual sensitivity decreases (i.e., phoneme restoration increases) almost linearly with the effort involved in the concurrent visual task. However, cognitive load had only a minimal effect on the contribution of lexical information to phoneme restoration. We concluded that the locus of extrinsic cognitive load on the speech system is perceptual rather than lexical. Mechanisms by which cognitive load increases tolerance to acoustic imprecision and broadens phonemic categories were discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13423-013-0544-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1738473161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1735915074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-2c69d2bb3608150f96babf34e70718b6750a1d1aad03888480cb2727408ab8953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoPkZ_gBspiOCmevNqEnAjgy8Q3Og6pGmqGTptTTqj_nszzPhAEF2E5JLv3nMuB6F9DCdUcHkaMWWE5oDT4YzlYg1tY05xzimB9fSGQuWKSraFdmKcAAAvVLGJtgjDUilFttHZxesQfBu9zWz32PrBz13WdKbK_LQ3PsRUvOSNm7smi71z9inrXbCuH3zX7qKN2jTR7a3uEXq4vLgfX-e3d1c34_Pb3HIhhpzYQlWkLGkBEnOoVVGasqbMCRBYloXgYHCFjamASimZBFsSQQQDaUqpOB2h4-XcPnTPMxcHPfXRuqYxretmUWORdhQUF_g_KFfJhGB_o5xIyoCxhYHDH-ikm4U27ZwoCiwpk4U2XlI2dDEGV-s--KkJbxqDXgSml4HpFJheBKZF6jlYTZ6VU1d9dnwklICjFWCiNU0dTGt9_OIkVzzFnDiy5GL6ah9d-GbxV_V3k0GqMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1530416121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Mattys, Sven L. ; Barden, Katharine ; Samuel, Arthur G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mattys, Sven L. ; Barden, Katharine ; Samuel, Arthur G.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research has suggested that the extrinsic cognitive load generated by performing a nonlinguistic visual task while perceiving speech increases listeners’ reliance on lexical knowledge and decreases their capacity to perceive phonetic detail. In the present study, we asked whether this effect is accounted for better at a lexical or a sublexical level. The former would imply that cognitive load directly affects lexical activation but not perceptual sensitivity; the latter would imply that increased lexical reliance under cognitive load is only a secondary consequence of imprecise or incomplete phonetic encoding. Using the phoneme restoration paradigm, we showed that perceptual sensitivity decreases (i.e., phoneme restoration increases) almost linearly with the effort involved in the concurrent visual task. However, cognitive load had only a minimal effect on the contribution of lexical information to phoneme restoration. We concluded that the locus of extrinsic cognitive load on the speech system is perceptual rather than lexical. Mechanisms by which cognitive load increases tolerance to acoustic imprecision and broadens phonemic categories were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0544-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24189992</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBUREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Automobile industry ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brief Report ; Cognitive Psychology ; Computer industry ; Experiments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Influence ; Language ; Male ; Memory ; Noise ; Phonetics ; Production and perception of spoken language ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Speech Perception - physiology ; Studies ; Vigilance. Attention. Sleep ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Voice response technology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review, 2014-06, Vol.21 (3), p.748-754</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Jun 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-2c69d2bb3608150f96babf34e70718b6750a1d1aad03888480cb2727408ab8953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-2c69d2bb3608150f96babf34e70718b6750a1d1aad03888480cb2727408ab8953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28595069$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24189992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mattys, Sven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barden, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Arthur G.</creatorcontrib><title>Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Recent research has suggested that the extrinsic cognitive load generated by performing a nonlinguistic visual task while perceiving speech increases listeners’ reliance on lexical knowledge and decreases their capacity to perceive phonetic detail. In the present study, we asked whether this effect is accounted for better at a lexical or a sublexical level. The former would imply that cognitive load directly affects lexical activation but not perceptual sensitivity; the latter would imply that increased lexical reliance under cognitive load is only a secondary consequence of imprecise or incomplete phonetic encoding. Using the phoneme restoration paradigm, we showed that perceptual sensitivity decreases (i.e., phoneme restoration increases) almost linearly with the effort involved in the concurrent visual task. However, cognitive load had only a minimal effect on the contribution of lexical information to phoneme restoration. We concluded that the locus of extrinsic cognitive load on the speech system is perceptual rather than lexical. Mechanisms by which cognitive load increases tolerance to acoustic imprecision and broadens phonemic categories were discussed.</description><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Automobile industry</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Computer industry</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Production and perception of spoken language</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Voice response technology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoPkZ_gBspiOCmevNqEnAjgy8Q3Og6pGmqGTptTTqj_nszzPhAEF2E5JLv3nMuB6F9DCdUcHkaMWWE5oDT4YzlYg1tY05xzimB9fSGQuWKSraFdmKcAAAvVLGJtgjDUilFttHZxesQfBu9zWz32PrBz13WdKbK_LQ3PsRUvOSNm7smi71z9inrXbCuH3zX7qKN2jTR7a3uEXq4vLgfX-e3d1c34_Pb3HIhhpzYQlWkLGkBEnOoVVGasqbMCRBYloXgYHCFjamASimZBFsSQQQDaUqpOB2h4-XcPnTPMxcHPfXRuqYxretmUWORdhQUF_g_KFfJhGB_o5xIyoCxhYHDH-ikm4U27ZwoCiwpk4U2XlI2dDEGV-s--KkJbxqDXgSml4HpFJheBKZF6jlYTZ6VU1d9dnwklICjFWCiNU0dTGt9_OIkVzzFnDiy5GL6ah9d-GbxV_V3k0GqMg</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Mattys, Sven L.</creator><creator>Barden, Katharine</creator><creator>Samuel, Arthur G.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception</title><author>Mattys, Sven L. ; Barden, Katharine ; Samuel, Arthur G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-2c69d2bb3608150f96babf34e70718b6750a1d1aad03888480cb2727408ab8953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Automobile industry</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Computer industry</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Production and perception of spoken language</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Voice response technology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mattys, Sven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barden, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Arthur G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mattys, Sven L.</au><au>Barden, Katharine</au><au>Samuel, Arthur G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle><stitle>Psychon Bull Rev</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>748</spage><epage>754</epage><pages>748-754</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><coden>PBUREN</coden><abstract>Recent research has suggested that the extrinsic cognitive load generated by performing a nonlinguistic visual task while perceiving speech increases listeners’ reliance on lexical knowledge and decreases their capacity to perceive phonetic detail. In the present study, we asked whether this effect is accounted for better at a lexical or a sublexical level. The former would imply that cognitive load directly affects lexical activation but not perceptual sensitivity; the latter would imply that increased lexical reliance under cognitive load is only a secondary consequence of imprecise or incomplete phonetic encoding. Using the phoneme restoration paradigm, we showed that perceptual sensitivity decreases (i.e., phoneme restoration increases) almost linearly with the effort involved in the concurrent visual task. However, cognitive load had only a minimal effect on the contribution of lexical information to phoneme restoration. We concluded that the locus of extrinsic cognitive load on the speech system is perceptual rather than lexical. Mechanisms by which cognitive load increases tolerance to acoustic imprecision and broadens phonemic categories were discussed.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>24189992</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13423-013-0544-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-9384
ispartof Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2014-06, Vol.21 (3), p.748-754
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1738473161
source Springer Nature; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Activity levels. Psychomotricity
Adolescent
Adult
Attention - physiology
Automobile industry
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Brief Report
Cognitive Psychology
Computer industry
Experiments
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Influence
Language
Male
Memory
Noise
Phonetics
Production and perception of spoken language
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Speech Perception - physiology
Studies
Vigilance. Attention. Sleep
Visual Perception - physiology
Voice response technology
Young Adult
title Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T12%3A19%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extrinsic%20cognitive%20load%20impairs%20low-level%20speech%20perception&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Mattys,%20Sven%20L.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=748&rft.epage=754&rft.pages=748-754&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft.coden=PBUREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13423-013-0544-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1735915074%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-2c69d2bb3608150f96babf34e70718b6750a1d1aad03888480cb2727408ab8953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1530416121&rft_id=info:pmid/24189992&rfr_iscdi=true