Estimation and effects of tag-misread rates in capture-recapture studies

Virtually all capture-recapture studies assume that tags are read properly when an animal is captured. However, the animals in resighting studies are often not handled, tags are read at a distance, and misreads can occur. In this paper, we develop a simple model to account for misreads, assess the i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences 1999-04, Vol.56 (4), p.551-559
Main Authors: Schwarz, C J, Stobo, W T
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Virtually all capture-recapture studies assume that tags are read properly when an animal is captured. However, the animals in resighting studies are often not handled, tags are read at a distance, and misreads can occur. In this paper, we develop a simple model to account for misreads, assess the impact of misreads upon estimates of survival and catchability, and analyze a set of data from resightings of previously branded seals. In general, unless survival, capture, and misread rates are relatively high, most studies have poor power to detect misreads and estimates of survival are not severely biased. Estimates of capture rates will be biased downwards and will tend to estimate the product of the original capture rate and the complement of the misread rate.
ISSN:0706-652X
1205-7533
DOI:10.1139/cjfas-56-4-551