Loading…

How Much Should the Hutchinson Ratio Be and Why?

While addressing the question "Why are there so many kinds of animals?" Hutchinson suggested a process of how species competing for a common resource spectrum could co-exist (Hutchinson 1959). He proposed that a certain extent of morphological displacement in the harvesting organ (characte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oikos 1999-10, Vol.87 (1), p.201-203
Main Authors: Ganeshaiah, K. N., Kumar, A. R. V., Chandrashekara, K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-6ccaa737e6d5ae1b97bbb160e5449ff344fe78802a0d82ade80925d55a5dea2b3
cites
container_end_page 203
container_issue 1
container_start_page 201
container_title Oikos
container_volume 87
creator Ganeshaiah, K. N.
Kumar, A. R. V.
Chandrashekara, K.
description While addressing the question "Why are there so many kinds of animals?" Hutchinson suggested a process of how species competing for a common resource spectrum could co-exist (Hutchinson 1959). He proposed that a certain extent of morphological displacement in the harvesting organ (character displacement) of two closely competing species leads to a relatively, non-competitive sharing of their common resource pool facilitating their coexistence. Such a process obviously sets limits on the similarity among the characters of the closely competing species. Expressing these limits of similarity as the ratio of body size or of the trophic organs of the larger to that of the smaller of the competing species, he suggested that typically this ratio (HR for Hutchinson ratio, henceforth) could be 1:1.3. Although the flurry of literature that followed confirmed that these ratios occur within a certain range, they were not consistent across guilds and were not always 1:1.3 (Simberloff and Boecklen 1981). Several workers have developed arguments to show the dependence of HR on guild size and variance of resource use organs (reviewed by Schoener 1986, Yom-Tov 1993, Dayan and Simberloff 1994). In this paper, based on minimal assumptions, we show that HR is a function of a) the number of competing species in a community and b) the variances of their traits or characters involved in harvesting. We provide evidence in support of our argument.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3547014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17399861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3547014</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3547014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-6ccaa737e6d5ae1b97bbb160e5449ff344fe78802a0d82ade80925d55a5dea2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLw0AUhuFBFKxV_AuzEF1Fz9yTlWhRI1QEL7gMJzMTkpJmaiZB-u-ttNCVq7N5eDl8hJwzuOYCzI1Q0gCTB2TCNEACBvQhmQAISBjPsmNyEuMCAIwxckIgDz_0ZbQ1fa_D2Do61J7m42Drpouho284NIHee4qdo1_1-vaUHFXYRn-2u1Py-fjwMcuT-evT8-xunljB-JBoaxGNMF47hZ6VmSnLcvOQV1JmVSWkrLxJU-AILuXofAoZV04pVM4jL8WUXG67qz58jz4OxbKJ1rctdj6MsWBGZFmq2QZebaHtQ4y9r4pV3yyxXxcMir9Fit0iG3mxS2K02FY9draJe865ZFrv2SIOof-39gt8T2h4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17399861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Much Should the Hutchinson Ratio Be and Why?</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Ganeshaiah, K. N. ; Kumar, A. R. V. ; Chandrashekara, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ganeshaiah, K. N. ; Kumar, A. R. V. ; Chandrashekara, K.</creatorcontrib><description>While addressing the question "Why are there so many kinds of animals?" Hutchinson suggested a process of how species competing for a common resource spectrum could co-exist (Hutchinson 1959). He proposed that a certain extent of morphological displacement in the harvesting organ (character displacement) of two closely competing species leads to a relatively, non-competitive sharing of their common resource pool facilitating their coexistence. Such a process obviously sets limits on the similarity among the characters of the closely competing species. Expressing these limits of similarity as the ratio of body size or of the trophic organs of the larger to that of the smaller of the competing species, he suggested that typically this ratio (HR for Hutchinson ratio, henceforth) could be 1:1.3. Although the flurry of literature that followed confirmed that these ratios occur within a certain range, they were not consistent across guilds and were not always 1:1.3 (Simberloff and Boecklen 1981). Several workers have developed arguments to show the dependence of HR on guild size and variance of resource use organs (reviewed by Schoener 1986, Yom-Tov 1993, Dayan and Simberloff 1994). In this paper, based on minimal assumptions, we show that HR is a function of a) the number of competing species in a community and b) the variances of their traits or characters involved in harvesting. We provide evidence in support of our argument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3547014</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OIKSAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Bats ; Biological and medical sciences ; Correlations ; Ecological competition ; Forum ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Hawks ; Insect morphology ; Population ecology ; Population growth ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 1999-10, Vol.87 (1), p.201-203</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Oikos</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-6ccaa737e6d5ae1b97bbb160e5449ff344fe78802a0d82ade80925d55a5dea2b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3547014$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3547014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1224166$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ganeshaiah, K. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, A. R. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrashekara, K.</creatorcontrib><title>How Much Should the Hutchinson Ratio Be and Why?</title><title>Oikos</title><description>While addressing the question "Why are there so many kinds of animals?" Hutchinson suggested a process of how species competing for a common resource spectrum could co-exist (Hutchinson 1959). He proposed that a certain extent of morphological displacement in the harvesting organ (character displacement) of two closely competing species leads to a relatively, non-competitive sharing of their common resource pool facilitating their coexistence. Such a process obviously sets limits on the similarity among the characters of the closely competing species. Expressing these limits of similarity as the ratio of body size or of the trophic organs of the larger to that of the smaller of the competing species, he suggested that typically this ratio (HR for Hutchinson ratio, henceforth) could be 1:1.3. Although the flurry of literature that followed confirmed that these ratios occur within a certain range, they were not consistent across guilds and were not always 1:1.3 (Simberloff and Boecklen 1981). Several workers have developed arguments to show the dependence of HR on guild size and variance of resource use organs (reviewed by Schoener 1986, Yom-Tov 1993, Dayan and Simberloff 1994). In this paper, based on minimal assumptions, we show that HR is a function of a) the number of competing species in a community and b) the variances of their traits or characters involved in harvesting. We provide evidence in support of our argument.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Correlations</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Forum</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hawks</subject><subject>Insect morphology</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EtLw0AUhuFBFKxV_AuzEF1Fz9yTlWhRI1QEL7gMJzMTkpJmaiZB-u-ttNCVq7N5eDl8hJwzuOYCzI1Q0gCTB2TCNEACBvQhmQAISBjPsmNyEuMCAIwxckIgDz_0ZbQ1fa_D2Do61J7m42Drpouho284NIHee4qdo1_1-vaUHFXYRn-2u1Py-fjwMcuT-evT8-xunljB-JBoaxGNMF47hZ6VmSnLcvOQV1JmVSWkrLxJU-AILuXofAoZV04pVM4jL8WUXG67qz58jz4OxbKJ1rctdj6MsWBGZFmq2QZebaHtQ4y9r4pV3yyxXxcMir9Fit0iG3mxS2K02FY9draJe865ZFrv2SIOof-39gt8T2h4</recordid><startdate>19991001</startdate><enddate>19991001</enddate><creator>Ganeshaiah, K. N.</creator><creator>Kumar, A. R. V.</creator><creator>Chandrashekara, K.</creator><general>Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991001</creationdate><title>How Much Should the Hutchinson Ratio Be and Why?</title><author>Ganeshaiah, K. N. ; Kumar, A. R. V. ; Chandrashekara, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-6ccaa737e6d5ae1b97bbb160e5449ff344fe78802a0d82ade80925d55a5dea2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Correlations</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Forum</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hawks</topic><topic>Insect morphology</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ganeshaiah, K. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, A. R. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrashekara, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ganeshaiah, K. N.</au><au>Kumar, A. R. V.</au><au>Chandrashekara, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Much Should the Hutchinson Ratio Be and Why?</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><date>1999-10-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>201-203</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><coden>OIKSAA</coden><abstract>While addressing the question "Why are there so many kinds of animals?" Hutchinson suggested a process of how species competing for a common resource spectrum could co-exist (Hutchinson 1959). He proposed that a certain extent of morphological displacement in the harvesting organ (character displacement) of two closely competing species leads to a relatively, non-competitive sharing of their common resource pool facilitating their coexistence. Such a process obviously sets limits on the similarity among the characters of the closely competing species. Expressing these limits of similarity as the ratio of body size or of the trophic organs of the larger to that of the smaller of the competing species, he suggested that typically this ratio (HR for Hutchinson ratio, henceforth) could be 1:1.3. Although the flurry of literature that followed confirmed that these ratios occur within a certain range, they were not consistent across guilds and were not always 1:1.3 (Simberloff and Boecklen 1981). Several workers have developed arguments to show the dependence of HR on guild size and variance of resource use organs (reviewed by Schoener 1986, Yom-Tov 1993, Dayan and Simberloff 1994). In this paper, based on minimal assumptions, we show that HR is a function of a) the number of competing species in a community and b) the variances of their traits or characters involved in harvesting. We provide evidence in support of our argument.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd</pub><doi>10.2307/3547014</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-1299
ispartof Oikos, 1999-10, Vol.87 (1), p.201-203
issn 0030-1299
1600-0706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17399861
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Bats
Biological and medical sciences
Correlations
Ecological competition
Forum
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Hawks
Insect morphology
Population ecology
Population growth
Synecology
title How Much Should the Hutchinson Ratio Be and Why?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T13%3A47%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Much%20Should%20the%20Hutchinson%20Ratio%20Be%20and%20Why?&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Ganeshaiah,%20K.%20N.&rft.date=1999-10-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=201-203&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft.coden=OIKSAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3547014&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3547014%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-6ccaa737e6d5ae1b97bbb160e5449ff344fe78802a0d82ade80925d55a5dea2b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17399861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3547014&rfr_iscdi=true