Loading…

Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate three bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) prediction models for fat-free mass (FFM) using the U.S. National Women’s Gymnastics team ( N = 48; age = 15.8 ± 1.8 years). One model had been developed recently using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric exercise science 2005-11, Vol.17 (4), p.337-344
Main Authors: Bauer, Patricia W., Pivarnik, James M., Fornetti, Willa C., Jallo, Jennifer J., Nassar, Lawrence
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-e9e43a36a846055d6b21dfa70d9a170164d1077a0d9ba3d9d9b318eb137dac633
cites
container_end_page 344
container_issue 4
container_start_page 337
container_title Pediatric exercise science
container_volume 17
creator Bauer, Patricia W.
Pivarnik, James M.
Fornetti, Willa C.
Jallo, Jennifer J.
Nassar, Lawrence
description The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate three bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) prediction models for fat-free mass (FFM) using the U.S. National Women’s Gymnastics team ( N = 48; age = 15.8 ± 1.8 years). One model had been developed recently using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion measure, whereas the other two used hydrodensitometry. In this investigation, FFM predictions were compared with measures obtained via DEXA. FFM measured by DEXA averaged 40.5 ± 7.4 kg (± SD ), whereas values generated using the three BIA models were within 0.8 kg of this actual measure. Validity coefficients for all models were high ( Rxy = .95-98). FFM prediction error was lowest with the model using DEXA as the criterion measure (1.3 kg) compared with the other two (1.9 and 2.4 kg). All BIA models underpredicted FFM in the heaviest girls, and the Lohman and Van Loan et al. models overpredicted FFM in the lightest girls. Whereas prediction error was significantly correlated to the girls’ bone mineral density in all BIA models, this relationship was strongest in the two that were developed using hydrodensitometry.
doi_str_mv 10.1123/pes.17.4.337
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17418647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17418647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-e9e43a36a846055d6b21dfa70d9a170164d1077a0d9ba3d9d9b318eb137dac633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AURQdRsH7s_AEDgisT52UmmWQppalCiy7U7fCaeYGUJFNn0kX_vVPrytXlcQ-Xx2HsDkQKkMmnHYUUdKpSKfUZm0GuZJJVmThnM1FWVVKqSl6yqxC2QkApimzG1nPvQuBf2HcWp86N3LW8ximpPRFfY-zePdmu-e3WzlIfeOs8X_TdRLymAXviy8MwYpjCDbtosQ90-5fX7LNefMxfktXb8nX-vEqarFJTQhUpibLAUhUiz22xycC2qIWtELSAQlkQWmO8NyhtFUNCSRuQ2mJTSHnNHk67O---9xQmM3Shob7Hkdw-GNAKykLpCN7_A7du78f4m8lAQ54LqY5zjyeqOcrw1Jqd7wb0BwPCHM2aaDaOGmWiWfkDgjhqoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2171550343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts</title><source>Human Kinetics</source><creator>Bauer, Patricia W. ; Pivarnik, James M. ; Fornetti, Willa C. ; Jallo, Jennifer J. ; Nassar, Lawrence</creator><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Patricia W. ; Pivarnik, James M. ; Fornetti, Willa C. ; Jallo, Jennifer J. ; Nassar, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate three bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) prediction models for fat-free mass (FFM) using the U.S. National Women’s Gymnastics team ( N = 48; age = 15.8 ± 1.8 years). One model had been developed recently using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion measure, whereas the other two used hydrodensitometry. In this investigation, FFM predictions were compared with measures obtained via DEXA. FFM measured by DEXA averaged 40.5 ± 7.4 kg (± SD ), whereas values generated using the three BIA models were within 0.8 kg of this actual measure. Validity coefficients for all models were high ( Rxy = .95-98). FFM prediction error was lowest with the model using DEXA as the criterion measure (1.3 kg) compared with the other two (1.9 and 2.4 kg). All BIA models underpredicted FFM in the heaviest girls, and the Lohman and Van Loan et al. models overpredicted FFM in the lightest girls. Whereas prediction error was significantly correlated to the girls’ bone mineral density in all BIA models, this relationship was strongest in the two that were developed using hydrodensitometry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1123/pes.17.4.337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Human Kinetics</publisher><ispartof>Pediatric exercise science, 2005-11, Vol.17 (4), p.337-344</ispartof><rights>Copyright Human Kinetics Nov 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-e9e43a36a846055d6b21dfa70d9a170164d1077a0d9ba3d9d9b318eb137dac633</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Patricia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivarnik, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fornetti, Willa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jallo, Jennifer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><title>Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts</title><title>Pediatric exercise science</title><description>The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate three bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) prediction models for fat-free mass (FFM) using the U.S. National Women’s Gymnastics team ( N = 48; age = 15.8 ± 1.8 years). One model had been developed recently using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion measure, whereas the other two used hydrodensitometry. In this investigation, FFM predictions were compared with measures obtained via DEXA. FFM measured by DEXA averaged 40.5 ± 7.4 kg (± SD ), whereas values generated using the three BIA models were within 0.8 kg of this actual measure. Validity coefficients for all models were high ( Rxy = .95-98). FFM prediction error was lowest with the model using DEXA as the criterion measure (1.3 kg) compared with the other two (1.9 and 2.4 kg). All BIA models underpredicted FFM in the heaviest girls, and the Lohman and Van Loan et al. models overpredicted FFM in the lightest girls. Whereas prediction error was significantly correlated to the girls’ bone mineral density in all BIA models, this relationship was strongest in the two that were developed using hydrodensitometry.</description><issn>0899-8493</issn><issn>1543-2920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AURQdRsH7s_AEDgisT52UmmWQppalCiy7U7fCaeYGUJFNn0kX_vVPrytXlcQ-Xx2HsDkQKkMmnHYUUdKpSKfUZm0GuZJJVmThnM1FWVVKqSl6yqxC2QkApimzG1nPvQuBf2HcWp86N3LW8ximpPRFfY-zePdmu-e3WzlIfeOs8X_TdRLymAXviy8MwYpjCDbtosQ90-5fX7LNefMxfktXb8nX-vEqarFJTQhUpibLAUhUiz22xycC2qIWtELSAQlkQWmO8NyhtFUNCSRuQ2mJTSHnNHk67O---9xQmM3Shob7Hkdw-GNAKykLpCN7_A7du78f4m8lAQ54LqY5zjyeqOcrw1Jqd7wb0BwPCHM2aaDaOGmWiWfkDgjhqoA</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Bauer, Patricia W.</creator><creator>Pivarnik, James M.</creator><creator>Fornetti, Willa C.</creator><creator>Jallo, Jennifer J.</creator><creator>Nassar, Lawrence</creator><general>Human Kinetics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts</title><author>Bauer, Patricia W. ; Pivarnik, James M. ; Fornetti, Willa C. ; Jallo, Jennifer J. ; Nassar, Lawrence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-e9e43a36a846055d6b21dfa70d9a170164d1077a0d9ba3d9d9b318eb137dac633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Patricia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivarnik, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fornetti, Willa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jallo, Jennifer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Pediatric exercise science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bauer, Patricia W.</au><au>Pivarnik, James M.</au><au>Fornetti, Willa C.</au><au>Jallo, Jennifer J.</au><au>Nassar, Lawrence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric exercise science</jtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>337-344</pages><issn>0899-8493</issn><eissn>1543-2920</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate three bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) prediction models for fat-free mass (FFM) using the U.S. National Women’s Gymnastics team ( N = 48; age = 15.8 ± 1.8 years). One model had been developed recently using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion measure, whereas the other two used hydrodensitometry. In this investigation, FFM predictions were compared with measures obtained via DEXA. FFM measured by DEXA averaged 40.5 ± 7.4 kg (± SD ), whereas values generated using the three BIA models were within 0.8 kg of this actual measure. Validity coefficients for all models were high ( Rxy = .95-98). FFM prediction error was lowest with the model using DEXA as the criterion measure (1.3 kg) compared with the other two (1.9 and 2.4 kg). All BIA models underpredicted FFM in the heaviest girls, and the Lohman and Van Loan et al. models overpredicted FFM in the lightest girls. Whereas prediction error was significantly correlated to the girls’ bone mineral density in all BIA models, this relationship was strongest in the two that were developed using hydrodensitometry.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Human Kinetics</pub><doi>10.1123/pes.17.4.337</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-8493
ispartof Pediatric exercise science, 2005-11, Vol.17 (4), p.337-344
issn 0899-8493
1543-2920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17418647
source Human Kinetics
title Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A14%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross%20Validation%20of%20Fat-Free%20Mass%20Prediction%20Models%20for%20Elite%20Female%20Gymnasts&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20exercise%20science&rft.au=Bauer,%20Patricia%20W.&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=337-344&rft.issn=0899-8493&rft.eissn=1543-2920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1123/pes.17.4.337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17418647%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-e9e43a36a846055d6b21dfa70d9a170164d1077a0d9ba3d9d9b318eb137dac633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2171550343&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true