Loading…
Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate three bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) prediction models for fat-free mass (FFM) using the U.S. National Women’s Gymnastics team ( N = 48; age = 15.8 ± 1.8 years). One model had been developed recently using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DE...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric exercise science 2005-11, Vol.17 (4), p.337-344 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-e9e43a36a846055d6b21dfa70d9a170164d1077a0d9ba3d9d9b318eb137dac633 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 344 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 337 |
container_title | Pediatric exercise science |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Bauer, Patricia W. Pivarnik, James M. Fornetti, Willa C. Jallo, Jennifer J. Nassar, Lawrence |
description | The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate three bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) prediction models for fat-free mass (FFM) using the U.S. National Women’s Gymnastics team (
N
= 48; age = 15.8 ± 1.8 years). One model had been developed recently using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion measure, whereas the other two used hydrodensitometry. In this investigation, FFM predictions were compared with measures obtained via DEXA. FFM measured by DEXA averaged 40.5 ± 7.4 kg (±
SD
), whereas values generated using the three BIA models were within 0.8 kg of this actual measure. Validity coefficients for all models were high (
Rxy
= .95-98). FFM prediction error was lowest with the model using DEXA as the criterion measure (1.3 kg) compared with the other two (1.9 and 2.4 kg). All BIA models underpredicted FFM in the heaviest girls, and the Lohman and Van Loan et al. models overpredicted FFM in the lightest girls. Whereas prediction error was significantly correlated to the girls’ bone mineral density in all BIA models, this relationship was strongest in the two that were developed using hydrodensitometry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1123/pes.17.4.337 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17418647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17418647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-e9e43a36a846055d6b21dfa70d9a170164d1077a0d9ba3d9d9b318eb137dac633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AURQdRsH7s_AEDgisT52UmmWQppalCiy7U7fCaeYGUJFNn0kX_vVPrytXlcQ-Xx2HsDkQKkMmnHYUUdKpSKfUZm0GuZJJVmThnM1FWVVKqSl6yqxC2QkApimzG1nPvQuBf2HcWp86N3LW8ximpPRFfY-zePdmu-e3WzlIfeOs8X_TdRLymAXviy8MwYpjCDbtosQ90-5fX7LNefMxfktXb8nX-vEqarFJTQhUpibLAUhUiz22xycC2qIWtELSAQlkQWmO8NyhtFUNCSRuQ2mJTSHnNHk67O---9xQmM3Shob7Hkdw-GNAKykLpCN7_A7du78f4m8lAQ54LqY5zjyeqOcrw1Jqd7wb0BwPCHM2aaDaOGmWiWfkDgjhqoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2171550343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts</title><source>Human Kinetics</source><creator>Bauer, Patricia W. ; Pivarnik, James M. ; Fornetti, Willa C. ; Jallo, Jennifer J. ; Nassar, Lawrence</creator><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Patricia W. ; Pivarnik, James M. ; Fornetti, Willa C. ; Jallo, Jennifer J. ; Nassar, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate three bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) prediction models for fat-free mass (FFM) using the U.S. National Women’s Gymnastics team (
N
= 48; age = 15.8 ± 1.8 years). One model had been developed recently using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion measure, whereas the other two used hydrodensitometry. In this investigation, FFM predictions were compared with measures obtained via DEXA. FFM measured by DEXA averaged 40.5 ± 7.4 kg (±
SD
), whereas values generated using the three BIA models were within 0.8 kg of this actual measure. Validity coefficients for all models were high (
Rxy
= .95-98). FFM prediction error was lowest with the model using DEXA as the criterion measure (1.3 kg) compared with the other two (1.9 and 2.4 kg). All BIA models underpredicted FFM in the heaviest girls, and the Lohman and Van Loan et al. models overpredicted FFM in the lightest girls. Whereas prediction error was significantly correlated to the girls’ bone mineral density in all BIA models, this relationship was strongest in the two that were developed using hydrodensitometry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1123/pes.17.4.337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Human Kinetics</publisher><ispartof>Pediatric exercise science, 2005-11, Vol.17 (4), p.337-344</ispartof><rights>Copyright Human Kinetics Nov 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-e9e43a36a846055d6b21dfa70d9a170164d1077a0d9ba3d9d9b318eb137dac633</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Patricia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivarnik, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fornetti, Willa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jallo, Jennifer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><title>Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts</title><title>Pediatric exercise science</title><description>The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate three bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) prediction models for fat-free mass (FFM) using the U.S. National Women’s Gymnastics team (
N
= 48; age = 15.8 ± 1.8 years). One model had been developed recently using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion measure, whereas the other two used hydrodensitometry. In this investigation, FFM predictions were compared with measures obtained via DEXA. FFM measured by DEXA averaged 40.5 ± 7.4 kg (±
SD
), whereas values generated using the three BIA models were within 0.8 kg of this actual measure. Validity coefficients for all models were high (
Rxy
= .95-98). FFM prediction error was lowest with the model using DEXA as the criterion measure (1.3 kg) compared with the other two (1.9 and 2.4 kg). All BIA models underpredicted FFM in the heaviest girls, and the Lohman and Van Loan et al. models overpredicted FFM in the lightest girls. Whereas prediction error was significantly correlated to the girls’ bone mineral density in all BIA models, this relationship was strongest in the two that were developed using hydrodensitometry.</description><issn>0899-8493</issn><issn>1543-2920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AURQdRsH7s_AEDgisT52UmmWQppalCiy7U7fCaeYGUJFNn0kX_vVPrytXlcQ-Xx2HsDkQKkMmnHYUUdKpSKfUZm0GuZJJVmThnM1FWVVKqSl6yqxC2QkApimzG1nPvQuBf2HcWp86N3LW8ximpPRFfY-zePdmu-e3WzlIfeOs8X_TdRLymAXviy8MwYpjCDbtosQ90-5fX7LNefMxfktXb8nX-vEqarFJTQhUpibLAUhUiz22xycC2qIWtELSAQlkQWmO8NyhtFUNCSRuQ2mJTSHnNHk67O---9xQmM3Shob7Hkdw-GNAKykLpCN7_A7du78f4m8lAQ54LqY5zjyeqOcrw1Jqd7wb0BwPCHM2aaDaOGmWiWfkDgjhqoA</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Bauer, Patricia W.</creator><creator>Pivarnik, James M.</creator><creator>Fornetti, Willa C.</creator><creator>Jallo, Jennifer J.</creator><creator>Nassar, Lawrence</creator><general>Human Kinetics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts</title><author>Bauer, Patricia W. ; Pivarnik, James M. ; Fornetti, Willa C. ; Jallo, Jennifer J. ; Nassar, Lawrence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-e9e43a36a846055d6b21dfa70d9a170164d1077a0d9ba3d9d9b318eb137dac633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Patricia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivarnik, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fornetti, Willa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jallo, Jennifer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Pediatric exercise science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bauer, Patricia W.</au><au>Pivarnik, James M.</au><au>Fornetti, Willa C.</au><au>Jallo, Jennifer J.</au><au>Nassar, Lawrence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric exercise science</jtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>337-344</pages><issn>0899-8493</issn><eissn>1543-2920</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate three bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) prediction models for fat-free mass (FFM) using the U.S. National Women’s Gymnastics team (
N
= 48; age = 15.8 ± 1.8 years). One model had been developed recently using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion measure, whereas the other two used hydrodensitometry. In this investigation, FFM predictions were compared with measures obtained via DEXA. FFM measured by DEXA averaged 40.5 ± 7.4 kg (±
SD
), whereas values generated using the three BIA models were within 0.8 kg of this actual measure. Validity coefficients for all models were high (
Rxy
= .95-98). FFM prediction error was lowest with the model using DEXA as the criterion measure (1.3 kg) compared with the other two (1.9 and 2.4 kg). All BIA models underpredicted FFM in the heaviest girls, and the Lohman and Van Loan et al. models overpredicted FFM in the lightest girls. Whereas prediction error was significantly correlated to the girls’ bone mineral density in all BIA models, this relationship was strongest in the two that were developed using hydrodensitometry.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Human Kinetics</pub><doi>10.1123/pes.17.4.337</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-8493 |
ispartof | Pediatric exercise science, 2005-11, Vol.17 (4), p.337-344 |
issn | 0899-8493 1543-2920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17418647 |
source | Human Kinetics |
title | Cross Validation of Fat-Free Mass Prediction Models for Elite Female Gymnasts |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A14%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross%20Validation%20of%20Fat-Free%20Mass%20Prediction%20Models%20for%20Elite%20Female%20Gymnasts&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20exercise%20science&rft.au=Bauer,%20Patricia%20W.&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=337-344&rft.issn=0899-8493&rft.eissn=1543-2920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1123/pes.17.4.337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17418647%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-e9e43a36a846055d6b21dfa70d9a170164d1077a0d9ba3d9d9b318eb137dac633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2171550343&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |