Loading…

Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Summary Background In patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, cholecystectomy during the same hospital admission might reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications, compared with the more commonly used strategy of interval cholecystectomy. However, evidence to support same-admissi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Lancet (British edition) 2015-09, Vol.386 (10000), p.1261-1268
Main Authors: da Costa, David W, MD, Bouwense, Stefan A, MD, Schepers, Nicolien J, MD, Besselink, Marc G, PhD, van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, PhD, van Brunschot, Sandra, MD, Bakker, Olaf J, PhD, Bollen, Thomas L, MD, Dejong, Cornelis H, Prof, van Goor, Harry, Prof, Boermeester, Marja A, Prof, Bruno, Marco J, Prof, van Eijck, Casper H, Prof, Timmer, Robin, PhD, Weusten, Bas L, Prof, Consten, Esther C, PhD, Brink, Menno A, PhD, Spanier, B W Marcel, PhD, Bilgen, Ernst Jan Spillenaar, PhD, Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B, PhD, Hofker, H Sijbrand, PhD, Rosman, Camiel, PhD, Voorburg, Annet M, MD, Bosscha, Koop, PhD, van Duijvendijk, Peter, PhD, Gerritsen, Jos J, PhD, Heisterkamp, Joos, PhD, de Hingh, Ignace H, PhD, Witteman, Ben J, Prof, Kruyt, Philip M, MD, Scheepers, Joris J, PhD, Molenaar, I Quintus, PhD, Schaapherder, Alexander F, PhD, Manusama, Eric R, PhD, van der Waaij, Laurens A, PhD, van Unen, Jacco, MD, Dijkgraaf, Marcel G, PhD, van Ramshorst, Bert, PhD, Gooszen, Hein G, Prof, Boerma, Djamila, Dr
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-43b571b94f77437e79c0c2cf1801d8f99e4074a0ff4bf13513fd1aed23ceca4d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-43b571b94f77437e79c0c2cf1801d8f99e4074a0ff4bf13513fd1aed23ceca4d3
container_end_page 1268
container_issue 10000
container_start_page 1261
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 386
creator da Costa, David W, MD
Bouwense, Stefan A, MD
Schepers, Nicolien J, MD
Besselink, Marc G, PhD
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, PhD
van Brunschot, Sandra, MD
Bakker, Olaf J, PhD
Bollen, Thomas L, MD
Dejong, Cornelis H, Prof
van Goor, Harry, Prof
Boermeester, Marja A, Prof
Bruno, Marco J, Prof
van Eijck, Casper H, Prof
Timmer, Robin, PhD
Weusten, Bas L, Prof
Consten, Esther C, PhD
Brink, Menno A, PhD
Spanier, B W Marcel, PhD
Bilgen, Ernst Jan Spillenaar, PhD
Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B, PhD
Hofker, H Sijbrand, PhD
Rosman, Camiel, PhD
Voorburg, Annet M, MD
Bosscha, Koop, PhD
van Duijvendijk, Peter, PhD
Gerritsen, Jos J, PhD
Heisterkamp, Joos, PhD
de Hingh, Ignace H, PhD
Witteman, Ben J, Prof
Kruyt, Philip M, MD
Scheepers, Joris J, PhD
Molenaar, I Quintus, PhD
Schaapherder, Alexander F, PhD
Manusama, Eric R, PhD
van der Waaij, Laurens A, PhD
van Unen, Jacco, MD
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G, PhD
van Ramshorst, Bert, PhD
Gooszen, Hein G, Prof
Boerma, Djamila, Dr
description Summary Background In patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, cholecystectomy during the same hospital admission might reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications, compared with the more commonly used strategy of interval cholecystectomy. However, evidence to support same-admission cholecystectomy is poor, and concerns exist about an increased risk of cholecystectomy-related complications with this approach. In this study, we aimed to compare same-admission and interval cholecystectomy, with the hypothesis that same-admission cholecystectomy would reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications without increasing the difficulty of surgery. Methods For this multicentre, parallel-group, assessor-masked, randomised controlled superiority trial, inpatients recovering from mild gallstone pancreatitis at 23 hospitals in the Netherlands (with hospital discharge foreseen within 48 h) were assessed for eligibility. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were eligible for randomisation if they had a serum C-reactive protein concentration less than 100 mg/L, no need for opioid analgesics, and could tolerate a normal oral diet. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III physical status who were older than 75 years of age, all ASA class IV patients, those with chronic pancreatitis, and those with ongoing alcohol misuse were excluded. A central study coordinator randomly assigned eligible patients (1:1) by computer-based randomisation, with varying block sizes of two and four patients, to cholecystectomy within 3 days of randomisation (same-admission cholecystectomy) or to discharge and cholecystectomy 25–30 days after randomisation (interval cholecystectomy). Randomisation was stratified by centre and by whether or not endoscopic sphincterotomy had been done. Neither investigators nor participants were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was a composite of readmission for recurrent gallstone-related complications (pancreatitis, cholangitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis needing endoscopic intervention, or gallstone colic) or mortality within 6 months after randomisation, analysed by intention to treat. The trial was designed to reduce the incidence of the primary endpoint from 8% in the interval group to 1% in the same-admission group. Safety endpoints included bile duct leakage and other complications necessitating re-intervention. This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCT
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00274-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746892162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673615002743</els_id><sourcerecordid>2231872241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-43b571b94f77437e79c0c2cf1801d8f99e4074a0ff4bf13513fd1aed23ceca4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUGLEzEUxwdR3Lr6EZSAl-5hNC_JJB0PihR1hcUKq-AtpMkbzZqZ1GSm0Kuf3LRdV9iDesoj_N7v5eVfVY-BPgMK8vklBUFrqbicQ3NGKVOi5neqGYhSNEJ9uVvNbpCT6kHOV5RSIWlzvzphshRSwqz6eWl6rI3rfc4-DmSLKU-Z-GHEtDWB2G8xoN3lEe0Y-x3pYiK9D458NSHkMQ5INmawCc3oR5_J_OPqw_J8dfaCGNJPYfQWhzEhSWZwsQxBR2wsNzGEUo7Jm_CwuteZkPHR9XlafX775tPyvL5YvXu_fH1R20bCWAu-bhSsW9EpJbhC1Vpqme1gQcEturZFQZUwtOvEugPeAO8cGHSMW7RGOH5azY_eTYo_JsyjLu-xGIIZME5ZgxJy0TKQ7D9QxgSDljcFfXoLvYpTGsoimjEOiz0Jf6NAgWyllAtRqOZI2RRzTtjpTfK9STsNVO9T14fU9T5SDY0-pK556XtybZ_WPbqbrt8xF-DVEcDyv1uPSWfrcbDofCrBahf9P0e8vGWwwQ_emvAdd5j_bKMz0_Qo2TugORg4_wWIJ9E8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1716966684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>da Costa, David W, MD ; Bouwense, Stefan A, MD ; Schepers, Nicolien J, MD ; Besselink, Marc G, PhD ; van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, PhD ; van Brunschot, Sandra, MD ; Bakker, Olaf J, PhD ; Bollen, Thomas L, MD ; Dejong, Cornelis H, Prof ; van Goor, Harry, Prof ; Boermeester, Marja A, Prof ; Bruno, Marco J, Prof ; van Eijck, Casper H, Prof ; Timmer, Robin, PhD ; Weusten, Bas L, Prof ; Consten, Esther C, PhD ; Brink, Menno A, PhD ; Spanier, B W Marcel, PhD ; Bilgen, Ernst Jan Spillenaar, PhD ; Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B, PhD ; Hofker, H Sijbrand, PhD ; Rosman, Camiel, PhD ; Voorburg, Annet M, MD ; Bosscha, Koop, PhD ; van Duijvendijk, Peter, PhD ; Gerritsen, Jos J, PhD ; Heisterkamp, Joos, PhD ; de Hingh, Ignace H, PhD ; Witteman, Ben J, Prof ; Kruyt, Philip M, MD ; Scheepers, Joris J, PhD ; Molenaar, I Quintus, PhD ; Schaapherder, Alexander F, PhD ; Manusama, Eric R, PhD ; van der Waaij, Laurens A, PhD ; van Unen, Jacco, MD ; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G, PhD ; van Ramshorst, Bert, PhD ; Gooszen, Hein G, Prof ; Boerma, Djamila, Dr</creator><creatorcontrib>da Costa, David W, MD ; Bouwense, Stefan A, MD ; Schepers, Nicolien J, MD ; Besselink, Marc G, PhD ; van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, PhD ; van Brunschot, Sandra, MD ; Bakker, Olaf J, PhD ; Bollen, Thomas L, MD ; Dejong, Cornelis H, Prof ; van Goor, Harry, Prof ; Boermeester, Marja A, Prof ; Bruno, Marco J, Prof ; van Eijck, Casper H, Prof ; Timmer, Robin, PhD ; Weusten, Bas L, Prof ; Consten, Esther C, PhD ; Brink, Menno A, PhD ; Spanier, B W Marcel, PhD ; Bilgen, Ernst Jan Spillenaar, PhD ; Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B, PhD ; Hofker, H Sijbrand, PhD ; Rosman, Camiel, PhD ; Voorburg, Annet M, MD ; Bosscha, Koop, PhD ; van Duijvendijk, Peter, PhD ; Gerritsen, Jos J, PhD ; Heisterkamp, Joos, PhD ; de Hingh, Ignace H, PhD ; Witteman, Ben J, Prof ; Kruyt, Philip M, MD ; Scheepers, Joris J, PhD ; Molenaar, I Quintus, PhD ; Schaapherder, Alexander F, PhD ; Manusama, Eric R, PhD ; van der Waaij, Laurens A, PhD ; van Unen, Jacco, MD ; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G, PhD ; van Ramshorst, Bert, PhD ; Gooszen, Hein G, Prof ; Boerma, Djamila, Dr ; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background In patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, cholecystectomy during the same hospital admission might reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications, compared with the more commonly used strategy of interval cholecystectomy. However, evidence to support same-admission cholecystectomy is poor, and concerns exist about an increased risk of cholecystectomy-related complications with this approach. In this study, we aimed to compare same-admission and interval cholecystectomy, with the hypothesis that same-admission cholecystectomy would reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications without increasing the difficulty of surgery. Methods For this multicentre, parallel-group, assessor-masked, randomised controlled superiority trial, inpatients recovering from mild gallstone pancreatitis at 23 hospitals in the Netherlands (with hospital discharge foreseen within 48 h) were assessed for eligibility. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were eligible for randomisation if they had a serum C-reactive protein concentration less than 100 mg/L, no need for opioid analgesics, and could tolerate a normal oral diet. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III physical status who were older than 75 years of age, all ASA class IV patients, those with chronic pancreatitis, and those with ongoing alcohol misuse were excluded. A central study coordinator randomly assigned eligible patients (1:1) by computer-based randomisation, with varying block sizes of two and four patients, to cholecystectomy within 3 days of randomisation (same-admission cholecystectomy) or to discharge and cholecystectomy 25–30 days after randomisation (interval cholecystectomy). Randomisation was stratified by centre and by whether or not endoscopic sphincterotomy had been done. Neither investigators nor participants were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was a composite of readmission for recurrent gallstone-related complications (pancreatitis, cholangitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis needing endoscopic intervention, or gallstone colic) or mortality within 6 months after randomisation, analysed by intention to treat. The trial was designed to reduce the incidence of the primary endpoint from 8% in the interval group to 1% in the same-admission group. Safety endpoints included bile duct leakage and other complications necessitating re-intervention. This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN72764151, and is complete. Findings Between Dec 22, 2010, and Aug 19, 2013, 266 inpatients from 23 hospitals in the Netherlands were randomly assigned to interval cholecystectomy (n=137) or same-admission cholecystectomy (n=129). One patient from each group was excluded from the final analyses, because of an incorrect diagnosis of pancreatitis in one patient (in the interval group) and discontinued follow-up in the other (in the same-admission group). The primary endpoint occurred in 23 (17%) of 136 patients in the interval group and in six (5%) of 128 patients in the same-admission group (risk ratio 0·28, 95% CI 0·12–0·66; p=0·002). Safety endpoints occurred in four patients: one case of bile duct leakage and one case of postoperative bleeding in each group. All of these were serious adverse events and were judged to be treatment related, but none led to death. Interpretation Compared with interval cholecystectomy, same-admission cholecystectomy reduced the rate of recurrent gallstone-related complications in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, with a very low risk of cholecystectomy-related complications. Funding Dutch Digestive Disease Foundation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00274-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26460661</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Alcohols ; Analgesics ; Bile ; Bile ducts ; Bleeding ; C-reactive protein ; Calculi ; Cholangitis ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy - methods ; Cholecystitis ; Clinical trials ; Colic ; Digestive system diseases ; Endoscopy ; Evidence-based medicine ; Family medical history ; Female ; Gallbladder diseases ; Gallstones ; Gallstones - complications ; Gallstones - surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Leakage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Opioids ; Pancreas ; Pancreatitis ; Pancreatitis - etiology ; Pancreatitis - surgery ; Patient admissions ; Patients ; Randomization ; Risk ; Safety ; Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Systematic review ; Systemic diseases ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2015-09, Vol.386 (10000), p.1261-1268</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 26, 2015</rights><rights>2015. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-43b571b94f77437e79c0c2cf1801d8f99e4074a0ff4bf13513fd1aed23ceca4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-43b571b94f77437e79c0c2cf1801d8f99e4074a0ff4bf13513fd1aed23ceca4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26460661$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>da Costa, David W, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwense, Stefan A, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schepers, Nicolien J, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besselink, Marc G, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brunschot, Sandra, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakker, Olaf J, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollen, Thomas L, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dejong, Cornelis H, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Goor, Harry, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boermeester, Marja A, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Marco J, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eijck, Casper H, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmer, Robin, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weusten, Bas L, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consten, Esther C, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brink, Menno A, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanier, B W Marcel, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilgen, Ernst Jan Spillenaar, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofker, H Sijbrand, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosman, Camiel, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voorburg, Annet M, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosscha, Koop, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Duijvendijk, Peter, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerritsen, Jos J, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heisterkamp, Joos, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Hingh, Ignace H, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witteman, Ben J, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruyt, Philip M, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheepers, Joris J, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, I Quintus, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaapherder, Alexander F, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manusama, Eric R, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Waaij, Laurens A, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Unen, Jacco, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkgraaf, Marcel G, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ramshorst, Bert, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooszen, Hein G, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boerma, Djamila, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Summary Background In patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, cholecystectomy during the same hospital admission might reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications, compared with the more commonly used strategy of interval cholecystectomy. However, evidence to support same-admission cholecystectomy is poor, and concerns exist about an increased risk of cholecystectomy-related complications with this approach. In this study, we aimed to compare same-admission and interval cholecystectomy, with the hypothesis that same-admission cholecystectomy would reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications without increasing the difficulty of surgery. Methods For this multicentre, parallel-group, assessor-masked, randomised controlled superiority trial, inpatients recovering from mild gallstone pancreatitis at 23 hospitals in the Netherlands (with hospital discharge foreseen within 48 h) were assessed for eligibility. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were eligible for randomisation if they had a serum C-reactive protein concentration less than 100 mg/L, no need for opioid analgesics, and could tolerate a normal oral diet. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III physical status who were older than 75 years of age, all ASA class IV patients, those with chronic pancreatitis, and those with ongoing alcohol misuse were excluded. A central study coordinator randomly assigned eligible patients (1:1) by computer-based randomisation, with varying block sizes of two and four patients, to cholecystectomy within 3 days of randomisation (same-admission cholecystectomy) or to discharge and cholecystectomy 25–30 days after randomisation (interval cholecystectomy). Randomisation was stratified by centre and by whether or not endoscopic sphincterotomy had been done. Neither investigators nor participants were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was a composite of readmission for recurrent gallstone-related complications (pancreatitis, cholangitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis needing endoscopic intervention, or gallstone colic) or mortality within 6 months after randomisation, analysed by intention to treat. The trial was designed to reduce the incidence of the primary endpoint from 8% in the interval group to 1% in the same-admission group. Safety endpoints included bile duct leakage and other complications necessitating re-intervention. This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN72764151, and is complete. Findings Between Dec 22, 2010, and Aug 19, 2013, 266 inpatients from 23 hospitals in the Netherlands were randomly assigned to interval cholecystectomy (n=137) or same-admission cholecystectomy (n=129). One patient from each group was excluded from the final analyses, because of an incorrect diagnosis of pancreatitis in one patient (in the interval group) and discontinued follow-up in the other (in the same-admission group). The primary endpoint occurred in 23 (17%) of 136 patients in the interval group and in six (5%) of 128 patients in the same-admission group (risk ratio 0·28, 95% CI 0·12–0·66; p=0·002). Safety endpoints occurred in four patients: one case of bile duct leakage and one case of postoperative bleeding in each group. All of these were serious adverse events and were judged to be treatment related, but none led to death. Interpretation Compared with interval cholecystectomy, same-admission cholecystectomy reduced the rate of recurrent gallstone-related complications in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, with a very low risk of cholecystectomy-related complications. Funding Dutch Digestive Disease Foundation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Bile</subject><subject>Bile ducts</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>C-reactive protein</subject><subject>Calculi</subject><subject>Cholangitis</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy - methods</subject><subject>Cholecystitis</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Colic</subject><subject>Digestive system diseases</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallbladder diseases</subject><subject>Gallstones</subject><subject>Gallstones - complications</subject><subject>Gallstones - surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Leakage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Pancreatitis</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - etiology</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - surgery</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systemic diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUGLEzEUxwdR3Lr6EZSAl-5hNC_JJB0PihR1hcUKq-AtpMkbzZqZ1GSm0Kuf3LRdV9iDesoj_N7v5eVfVY-BPgMK8vklBUFrqbicQ3NGKVOi5neqGYhSNEJ9uVvNbpCT6kHOV5RSIWlzvzphshRSwqz6eWl6rI3rfc4-DmSLKU-Z-GHEtDWB2G8xoN3lEe0Y-x3pYiK9D458NSHkMQ5INmawCc3oR5_J_OPqw_J8dfaCGNJPYfQWhzEhSWZwsQxBR2wsNzGEUo7Jm_CwuteZkPHR9XlafX775tPyvL5YvXu_fH1R20bCWAu-bhSsW9EpJbhC1Vpqme1gQcEturZFQZUwtOvEugPeAO8cGHSMW7RGOH5azY_eTYo_JsyjLu-xGIIZME5ZgxJy0TKQ7D9QxgSDljcFfXoLvYpTGsoimjEOiz0Jf6NAgWyllAtRqOZI2RRzTtjpTfK9STsNVO9T14fU9T5SDY0-pK556XtybZ_WPbqbrt8xF-DVEcDyv1uPSWfrcbDofCrBahf9P0e8vGWwwQ_emvAdd5j_bKMz0_Qo2TugORg4_wWIJ9E8</recordid><startdate>20150926</startdate><enddate>20150926</enddate><creator>da Costa, David W, MD</creator><creator>Bouwense, Stefan A, MD</creator><creator>Schepers, Nicolien J, MD</creator><creator>Besselink, Marc G, PhD</creator><creator>van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, PhD</creator><creator>van Brunschot, Sandra, MD</creator><creator>Bakker, Olaf J, PhD</creator><creator>Bollen, Thomas L, MD</creator><creator>Dejong, Cornelis H, Prof</creator><creator>van Goor, Harry, Prof</creator><creator>Boermeester, Marja A, Prof</creator><creator>Bruno, Marco J, Prof</creator><creator>van Eijck, Casper H, Prof</creator><creator>Timmer, Robin, PhD</creator><creator>Weusten, Bas L, Prof</creator><creator>Consten, Esther C, PhD</creator><creator>Brink, Menno A, PhD</creator><creator>Spanier, B W Marcel, PhD</creator><creator>Bilgen, Ernst Jan Spillenaar, PhD</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B, PhD</creator><creator>Hofker, H Sijbrand, PhD</creator><creator>Rosman, Camiel, PhD</creator><creator>Voorburg, Annet M, MD</creator><creator>Bosscha, Koop, PhD</creator><creator>van Duijvendijk, Peter, PhD</creator><creator>Gerritsen, Jos J, PhD</creator><creator>Heisterkamp, Joos, PhD</creator><creator>de Hingh, Ignace H, PhD</creator><creator>Witteman, Ben J, Prof</creator><creator>Kruyt, Philip M, MD</creator><creator>Scheepers, Joris J, PhD</creator><creator>Molenaar, I Quintus, PhD</creator><creator>Schaapherder, Alexander F, PhD</creator><creator>Manusama, Eric R, PhD</creator><creator>van der Waaij, Laurens A, PhD</creator><creator>van Unen, Jacco, MD</creator><creator>Dijkgraaf, Marcel G, PhD</creator><creator>van Ramshorst, Bert, PhD</creator><creator>Gooszen, Hein G, Prof</creator><creator>Boerma, Djamila, Dr</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150926</creationdate><title>Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial</title><author>da Costa, David W, MD ; Bouwense, Stefan A, MD ; Schepers, Nicolien J, MD ; Besselink, Marc G, PhD ; van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, PhD ; van Brunschot, Sandra, MD ; Bakker, Olaf J, PhD ; Bollen, Thomas L, MD ; Dejong, Cornelis H, Prof ; van Goor, Harry, Prof ; Boermeester, Marja A, Prof ; Bruno, Marco J, Prof ; van Eijck, Casper H, Prof ; Timmer, Robin, PhD ; Weusten, Bas L, Prof ; Consten, Esther C, PhD ; Brink, Menno A, PhD ; Spanier, B W Marcel, PhD ; Bilgen, Ernst Jan Spillenaar, PhD ; Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B, PhD ; Hofker, H Sijbrand, PhD ; Rosman, Camiel, PhD ; Voorburg, Annet M, MD ; Bosscha, Koop, PhD ; van Duijvendijk, Peter, PhD ; Gerritsen, Jos J, PhD ; Heisterkamp, Joos, PhD ; de Hingh, Ignace H, PhD ; Witteman, Ben J, Prof ; Kruyt, Philip M, MD ; Scheepers, Joris J, PhD ; Molenaar, I Quintus, PhD ; Schaapherder, Alexander F, PhD ; Manusama, Eric R, PhD ; van der Waaij, Laurens A, PhD ; van Unen, Jacco, MD ; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G, PhD ; van Ramshorst, Bert, PhD ; Gooszen, Hein G, Prof ; Boerma, Djamila, Dr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-43b571b94f77437e79c0c2cf1801d8f99e4074a0ff4bf13513fd1aed23ceca4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Bile</topic><topic>Bile ducts</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>C-reactive protein</topic><topic>Calculi</topic><topic>Cholangitis</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy - methods</topic><topic>Cholecystitis</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Colic</topic><topic>Digestive system diseases</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallbladder diseases</topic><topic>Gallstones</topic><topic>Gallstones - complications</topic><topic>Gallstones - surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Leakage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Pancreatitis</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - etiology</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - surgery</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systemic diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>da Costa, David W, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwense, Stefan A, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schepers, Nicolien J, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besselink, Marc G, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brunschot, Sandra, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakker, Olaf J, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollen, Thomas L, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dejong, Cornelis H, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Goor, Harry, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boermeester, Marja A, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Marco J, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eijck, Casper H, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmer, Robin, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weusten, Bas L, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consten, Esther C, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brink, Menno A, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanier, B W Marcel, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilgen, Ernst Jan Spillenaar, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofker, H Sijbrand, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosman, Camiel, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voorburg, Annet M, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosscha, Koop, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Duijvendijk, Peter, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerritsen, Jos J, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heisterkamp, Joos, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Hingh, Ignace H, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witteman, Ben J, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruyt, Philip M, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheepers, Joris J, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, I Quintus, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaapherder, Alexander F, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manusama, Eric R, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Waaij, Laurens A, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Unen, Jacco, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkgraaf, Marcel G, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ramshorst, Bert, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooszen, Hein G, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boerma, Djamila, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>da Costa, David W, MD</au><au>Bouwense, Stefan A, MD</au><au>Schepers, Nicolien J, MD</au><au>Besselink, Marc G, PhD</au><au>van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, PhD</au><au>van Brunschot, Sandra, MD</au><au>Bakker, Olaf J, PhD</au><au>Bollen, Thomas L, MD</au><au>Dejong, Cornelis H, Prof</au><au>van Goor, Harry, Prof</au><au>Boermeester, Marja A, Prof</au><au>Bruno, Marco J, Prof</au><au>van Eijck, Casper H, Prof</au><au>Timmer, Robin, PhD</au><au>Weusten, Bas L, Prof</au><au>Consten, Esther C, PhD</au><au>Brink, Menno A, PhD</au><au>Spanier, B W Marcel, PhD</au><au>Bilgen, Ernst Jan Spillenaar, PhD</au><au>Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B, PhD</au><au>Hofker, H Sijbrand, PhD</au><au>Rosman, Camiel, PhD</au><au>Voorburg, Annet M, MD</au><au>Bosscha, Koop, PhD</au><au>van Duijvendijk, Peter, PhD</au><au>Gerritsen, Jos J, PhD</au><au>Heisterkamp, Joos, PhD</au><au>de Hingh, Ignace H, PhD</au><au>Witteman, Ben J, Prof</au><au>Kruyt, Philip M, MD</au><au>Scheepers, Joris J, PhD</au><au>Molenaar, I Quintus, PhD</au><au>Schaapherder, Alexander F, PhD</au><au>Manusama, Eric R, PhD</au><au>van der Waaij, Laurens A, PhD</au><au>van Unen, Jacco, MD</au><au>Dijkgraaf, Marcel G, PhD</au><au>van Ramshorst, Bert, PhD</au><au>Gooszen, Hein G, Prof</au><au>Boerma, Djamila, Dr</au><aucorp>Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2015-09-26</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>386</volume><issue>10000</issue><spage>1261</spage><epage>1268</epage><pages>1261-1268</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background In patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, cholecystectomy during the same hospital admission might reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications, compared with the more commonly used strategy of interval cholecystectomy. However, evidence to support same-admission cholecystectomy is poor, and concerns exist about an increased risk of cholecystectomy-related complications with this approach. In this study, we aimed to compare same-admission and interval cholecystectomy, with the hypothesis that same-admission cholecystectomy would reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications without increasing the difficulty of surgery. Methods For this multicentre, parallel-group, assessor-masked, randomised controlled superiority trial, inpatients recovering from mild gallstone pancreatitis at 23 hospitals in the Netherlands (with hospital discharge foreseen within 48 h) were assessed for eligibility. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were eligible for randomisation if they had a serum C-reactive protein concentration less than 100 mg/L, no need for opioid analgesics, and could tolerate a normal oral diet. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III physical status who were older than 75 years of age, all ASA class IV patients, those with chronic pancreatitis, and those with ongoing alcohol misuse were excluded. A central study coordinator randomly assigned eligible patients (1:1) by computer-based randomisation, with varying block sizes of two and four patients, to cholecystectomy within 3 days of randomisation (same-admission cholecystectomy) or to discharge and cholecystectomy 25–30 days after randomisation (interval cholecystectomy). Randomisation was stratified by centre and by whether or not endoscopic sphincterotomy had been done. Neither investigators nor participants were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was a composite of readmission for recurrent gallstone-related complications (pancreatitis, cholangitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis needing endoscopic intervention, or gallstone colic) or mortality within 6 months after randomisation, analysed by intention to treat. The trial was designed to reduce the incidence of the primary endpoint from 8% in the interval group to 1% in the same-admission group. Safety endpoints included bile duct leakage and other complications necessitating re-intervention. This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN72764151, and is complete. Findings Between Dec 22, 2010, and Aug 19, 2013, 266 inpatients from 23 hospitals in the Netherlands were randomly assigned to interval cholecystectomy (n=137) or same-admission cholecystectomy (n=129). One patient from each group was excluded from the final analyses, because of an incorrect diagnosis of pancreatitis in one patient (in the interval group) and discontinued follow-up in the other (in the same-admission group). The primary endpoint occurred in 23 (17%) of 136 patients in the interval group and in six (5%) of 128 patients in the same-admission group (risk ratio 0·28, 95% CI 0·12–0·66; p=0·002). Safety endpoints occurred in four patients: one case of bile duct leakage and one case of postoperative bleeding in each group. All of these were serious adverse events and were judged to be treatment related, but none led to death. Interpretation Compared with interval cholecystectomy, same-admission cholecystectomy reduced the rate of recurrent gallstone-related complications in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis, with a very low risk of cholecystectomy-related complications. Funding Dutch Digestive Disease Foundation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26460661</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00274-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 2015-09, Vol.386 (10000), p.1261-1268
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746892162
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adult
Aged
Alcohols
Analgesics
Bile
Bile ducts
Bleeding
C-reactive protein
Calculi
Cholangitis
Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy - methods
Cholecystitis
Clinical trials
Colic
Digestive system diseases
Endoscopy
Evidence-based medicine
Family medical history
Female
Gallbladder diseases
Gallstones
Gallstones - complications
Gallstones - surgery
Gastroenterology
Hospitals
Humans
Internal Medicine
Leakage
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Opioids
Pancreas
Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis - etiology
Pancreatitis - surgery
Patient admissions
Patients
Randomization
Risk
Safety
Studies
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Systematic review
Systemic diseases
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T13%3A21%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Same-admission%20versus%20interval%20cholecystectomy%20for%20mild%20gallstone%20pancreatitis%20(PONCHO):%20a%20multicentre%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=da%20Costa,%20David%20W,%20MD&rft.aucorp=Dutch%20Pancreatitis%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2015-09-26&rft.volume=386&rft.issue=10000&rft.spage=1261&rft.epage=1268&rft.pages=1261-1268&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00274-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2231872241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c561t-43b571b94f77437e79c0c2cf1801d8f99e4074a0ff4bf13513fd1aed23ceca4d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1716966684&rft_id=info:pmid/26460661&rfr_iscdi=true