Loading…
EURADOS intercomparisons for individual monitoring services: Results of the 2012 whole body intercomparison
In 2008, EURADOS (the European Radiation Dosimetry Group) started to organise a self-sustained programme of regular intercomparisons with the aims of encouraging and facilitating the participation of individual monitoring services (IMS) in intercomparisons. To date, three intercomparisons for whole...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiation measurements 2014-12, Vol.71, p.416-420 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-3e16a5d709ed8451d93a493bc39d97a7468cd318afff2108f0824e931b16d77f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-3e16a5d709ed8451d93a493bc39d97a7468cd318afff2108f0824e931b16d77f3 |
container_end_page | 420 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 416 |
container_title | Radiation measurements |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Stadtmann, H. McWhan, A. Figel, M. Dobrzynska, W. Grimbergen, T.W.M. Romero, A.M. |
description | In 2008, EURADOS (the European Radiation Dosimetry Group) started to organise a self-sustained programme of regular intercomparisons with the aims of encouraging and facilitating the participation of individual monitoring services (IMS) in intercomparisons. To date, three intercomparisons for whole body dosemeters (IC2008, IC2010 and IC2012) and one for extremity dosemeters (IC2009) have been carried out. This paper presents the recent results of the 2012 intercomparison for whole body dosemeters. At the 2012 intercomparisons 75 institutes with 87 dosimetry systems (most passive) participated from 28 European and 2 non-European countries. For the irradiations a number of different reference photon radiation qualities (x-ray and nuclide sources) were used. The results show that 90% of all systems fulfil the general performance criteria from ISO 14146. The paper gives a comprehensive overview on the performance of various European dosimetry services and the influence of the dosemeter type and detector material on the resulting response values.
•Constantly increasing number of participants since 2008.•75 participants with 89 different systems.•The median of all response values is very close to unity.•In total 79% of all single results are within the trumpet curve.•Next planed intercomparison: whole-body/photon in 2014. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.04.012 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746897104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1350448714001073</els_id><sourcerecordid>1746897104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-3e16a5d709ed8451d93a493bc39d97a7468cd318afff2108f0824e931b16d77f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUUtrGzEQXkoCzaM_oaBLoZd19dyVeikhrxYCBic5C1kaNXJ3V65m7ZB_n3VtesglMDDD8D2G-arqM6MzRlnzbTUrLvTgcMYpkzM6FeMfqhOmW1NTw9XRNAtFayl1-7E6RVxRSqVp1En15_pxcXE1vydpGKH43K9dSZgHJDGXaRnSNoWN60ifhzTmkobfBKFskwf8ThaAm25EkiMZn4BM9pw8P-UOyDKHl7ea59VxdB3Cp0M_qx5vrh8uf9Z389tflxd3tVdSjbUA1jgVWmogaKlYMMJJI5ZemGBa18pG-yCYdjFGzqiOVHMJRrAla0LbRnFWfd3rrkv-uwEcbZ_QQ9e5AfIGLdtJmJZR-T60aYzWSsgdVO2hvmTEAtGuS-pdebGM2l0OdmUPOdhdDpZOxfjE-3KwcOhdF4sbfML_ZG6o5PzfKT_2OJhes01QLPoEg4eQCvjRhpzecXoFczigyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1669885344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EURADOS intercomparisons for individual monitoring services: Results of the 2012 whole body intercomparison</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Stadtmann, H. ; McWhan, A. ; Figel, M. ; Dobrzynska, W. ; Grimbergen, T.W.M. ; Romero, A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stadtmann, H. ; McWhan, A. ; Figel, M. ; Dobrzynska, W. ; Grimbergen, T.W.M. ; Romero, A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>In 2008, EURADOS (the European Radiation Dosimetry Group) started to organise a self-sustained programme of regular intercomparisons with the aims of encouraging and facilitating the participation of individual monitoring services (IMS) in intercomparisons. To date, three intercomparisons for whole body dosemeters (IC2008, IC2010 and IC2012) and one for extremity dosemeters (IC2009) have been carried out. This paper presents the recent results of the 2012 intercomparison for whole body dosemeters. At the 2012 intercomparisons 75 institutes with 87 dosimetry systems (most passive) participated from 28 European and 2 non-European countries. For the irradiations a number of different reference photon radiation qualities (x-ray and nuclide sources) were used. The results show that 90% of all systems fulfil the general performance criteria from ISO 14146. The paper gives a comprehensive overview on the performance of various European dosimetry services and the influence of the dosemeter type and detector material on the resulting response values.
•Constantly increasing number of participants since 2008.•75 participants with 89 different systems.•The median of all response values is very close to unity.•In total 79% of all single results are within the trumpet curve.•Next planed intercomparison: whole-body/photon in 2014.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.04.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Criteria ; DIS ; Dosimeters ; Dosimetry ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geochronology ; Individual monitoring service ; Intercomparison ; Irradiation ; Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology ; Monitoring ; Nuclides ; OSL ; Personal dosimetry ; Photons ; Radiation measurement ; RPL ; TLD ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>Radiation measurements, 2014-12, Vol.71, p.416-420</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-3e16a5d709ed8451d93a493bc39d97a7468cd318afff2108f0824e931b16d77f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-3e16a5d709ed8451d93a493bc39d97a7468cd318afff2108f0824e931b16d77f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29042204$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stadtmann, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobrzynska, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimbergen, T.W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>EURADOS intercomparisons for individual monitoring services: Results of the 2012 whole body intercomparison</title><title>Radiation measurements</title><description>In 2008, EURADOS (the European Radiation Dosimetry Group) started to organise a self-sustained programme of regular intercomparisons with the aims of encouraging and facilitating the participation of individual monitoring services (IMS) in intercomparisons. To date, three intercomparisons for whole body dosemeters (IC2008, IC2010 and IC2012) and one for extremity dosemeters (IC2009) have been carried out. This paper presents the recent results of the 2012 intercomparison for whole body dosemeters. At the 2012 intercomparisons 75 institutes with 87 dosimetry systems (most passive) participated from 28 European and 2 non-European countries. For the irradiations a number of different reference photon radiation qualities (x-ray and nuclide sources) were used. The results show that 90% of all systems fulfil the general performance criteria from ISO 14146. The paper gives a comprehensive overview on the performance of various European dosimetry services and the influence of the dosemeter type and detector material on the resulting response values.
•Constantly increasing number of participants since 2008.•75 participants with 89 different systems.•The median of all response values is very close to unity.•In total 79% of all single results are within the trumpet curve.•Next planed intercomparison: whole-body/photon in 2014.</description><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>DIS</subject><subject>Dosimeters</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geochronology</subject><subject>Individual monitoring service</subject><subject>Intercomparison</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Nuclides</subject><subject>OSL</subject><subject>Personal dosimetry</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Radiation measurement</subject><subject>RPL</subject><subject>TLD</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>1350-4487</issn><issn>1879-0925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUUtrGzEQXkoCzaM_oaBLoZd19dyVeikhrxYCBic5C1kaNXJ3V65m7ZB_n3VtesglMDDD8D2G-arqM6MzRlnzbTUrLvTgcMYpkzM6FeMfqhOmW1NTw9XRNAtFayl1-7E6RVxRSqVp1En15_pxcXE1vydpGKH43K9dSZgHJDGXaRnSNoWN60ifhzTmkobfBKFskwf8ThaAm25EkiMZn4BM9pw8P-UOyDKHl7ea59VxdB3Cp0M_qx5vrh8uf9Z389tflxd3tVdSjbUA1jgVWmogaKlYMMJJI5ZemGBa18pG-yCYdjFGzqiOVHMJRrAla0LbRnFWfd3rrkv-uwEcbZ_QQ9e5AfIGLdtJmJZR-T60aYzWSsgdVO2hvmTEAtGuS-pdebGM2l0OdmUPOdhdDpZOxfjE-3KwcOhdF4sbfML_ZG6o5PzfKT_2OJhes01QLPoEg4eQCvjRhpzecXoFczigyw</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Stadtmann, H.</creator><creator>McWhan, A.</creator><creator>Figel, M.</creator><creator>Dobrzynska, W.</creator><creator>Grimbergen, T.W.M.</creator><creator>Romero, A.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>EURADOS intercomparisons for individual monitoring services: Results of the 2012 whole body intercomparison</title><author>Stadtmann, H. ; McWhan, A. ; Figel, M. ; Dobrzynska, W. ; Grimbergen, T.W.M. ; Romero, A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-3e16a5d709ed8451d93a493bc39d97a7468cd318afff2108f0824e931b16d77f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>DIS</topic><topic>Dosimeters</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geochronology</topic><topic>Individual monitoring service</topic><topic>Intercomparison</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Nuclides</topic><topic>OSL</topic><topic>Personal dosimetry</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Radiation measurement</topic><topic>RPL</topic><topic>TLD</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stadtmann, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobrzynska, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimbergen, T.W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, A.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Radiation measurements</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stadtmann, H.</au><au>McWhan, A.</au><au>Figel, M.</au><au>Dobrzynska, W.</au><au>Grimbergen, T.W.M.</au><au>Romero, A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EURADOS intercomparisons for individual monitoring services: Results of the 2012 whole body intercomparison</atitle><jtitle>Radiation measurements</jtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>416</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>416-420</pages><issn>1350-4487</issn><eissn>1879-0925</eissn><abstract>In 2008, EURADOS (the European Radiation Dosimetry Group) started to organise a self-sustained programme of regular intercomparisons with the aims of encouraging and facilitating the participation of individual monitoring services (IMS) in intercomparisons. To date, three intercomparisons for whole body dosemeters (IC2008, IC2010 and IC2012) and one for extremity dosemeters (IC2009) have been carried out. This paper presents the recent results of the 2012 intercomparison for whole body dosemeters. At the 2012 intercomparisons 75 institutes with 87 dosimetry systems (most passive) participated from 28 European and 2 non-European countries. For the irradiations a number of different reference photon radiation qualities (x-ray and nuclide sources) were used. The results show that 90% of all systems fulfil the general performance criteria from ISO 14146. The paper gives a comprehensive overview on the performance of various European dosimetry services and the influence of the dosemeter type and detector material on the resulting response values.
•Constantly increasing number of participants since 2008.•75 participants with 89 different systems.•The median of all response values is very close to unity.•In total 79% of all single results are within the trumpet curve.•Next planed intercomparison: whole-body/photon in 2014.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.04.012</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-4487 |
ispartof | Radiation measurements, 2014-12, Vol.71, p.416-420 |
issn | 1350-4487 1879-0925 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746897104 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Criteria DIS Dosimeters Dosimetry Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Geochronology Individual monitoring service Intercomparison Irradiation Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology Monitoring Nuclides OSL Personal dosimetry Photons Radiation measurement RPL TLD X-rays |
title | EURADOS intercomparisons for individual monitoring services: Results of the 2012 whole body intercomparison |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A10%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EURADOS%20intercomparisons%20for%20individual%20monitoring%20services:%20Results%20of%20the%202012%20whole%20body%20intercomparison&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20measurements&rft.au=Stadtmann,%20H.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=416-420&rft.issn=1350-4487&rft.eissn=1879-0925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.04.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1746897104%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-3e16a5d709ed8451d93a493bc39d97a7468cd318afff2108f0824e931b16d77f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1669885344&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |