Loading…

Electrodialysis versus chromatography for desalting silage juice: Comparison of both processes with regard to energy consumption

In many cases, desalination is an important step during the separation of valuable substances from solutions. In this study, grass silage juice, a renewable resource for the production of lactic acid as well as amino acids, was processed. Electrodialysis and process chromatography were investigated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of membrane science 2005-07, Vol.256 (1), p.78-88
Main Authors: Thang, Vu Hong, Koschuh, Werner, Novalin, Senad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f9bd53139fc64d1b23c19138871da606a5d3452f938308aa622fb83c69a8bdfc3
cites
container_end_page 88
container_issue 1
container_start_page 78
container_title Journal of membrane science
container_volume 256
creator Thang, Vu Hong
Koschuh, Werner
Novalin, Senad
description In many cases, desalination is an important step during the separation of valuable substances from solutions. In this study, grass silage juice, a renewable resource for the production of lactic acid as well as amino acids, was processed. Electrodialysis and process chromatography were investigated as methods for the above task. The main aim of this work is an estimation of the energy demand of both processes in connection with sustainable development. Scale up and calculations for industrial plants were done on the basis of the laboratory results. The energy consumption for desalting step was 134 and 54.76 kWh m −3 of silage juice in electrodialysis and chromatography process, respectively. However, since the commercial products are normally required, the energy consumption for concentration step (evaporation) was taken in consideration. With this regard, the energy demand for lactic acid production was 5.05 kWh kg −1 (in electrodialysis process) and 3.42 kWh kg −1 (in chromatography process). In chromatography, the evaporation took a great part (77.95%) of the total energy whereas in electrodialysis process, this part was only 22.0%. In the present application, it seemed that chromatography could be preferred. However, it must be noted that in present case the salt content is quite high (35 g L −1). Based on the preliminary obtained data, it was assumed that, if the salt content were approximately 15 g L −1, the total energy consumption for ED process would equal to that of chromatography process.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.044
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17481711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376738805001481</els_id><sourcerecordid>17481711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f9bd53139fc64d1b23c19138871da606a5d3452f938308aa622fb83c69a8bdfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFr3DAQhUVpodu0_6AHnXKzq7G8ttxDoSxpGwjkkp6FLI28WmzL0dgJe-tPr8LmnNPw4L3HvI-xryBKENB8O5UTTmRDWQmxLwWUoq7fsR2oVhYSKvme7YRsm6KVSn1kn4hOQkArVLdj_25GtGuKLpjxTIH4EybaiNtjipNZ45DMcjxzHxN3SGZcwzxwCqMZkJ-2YPE7P8RpMSlQnHn0vI_rkS8pWiRC4s8hy4SDSY6vkeOMaThzG2fapmUNcf7MPngzEn55vVfs76-bh8Of4u7-9-3h511hZVuvhe96t5cgO2-b2kFfSQsd5D0tONOIxuydrPeV76SSQhnTVJXvlbRNZ1TvvJVX7PrSm3973JBWPQWyOI5mxriRhrZW0AJkY30x2hSJEnq9pDCZdNYg9AtufdIX3PoFtxagM-4c-3GJYR7xFDDp7MDZogspE9YuhrcL_gM-DI59</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17481711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrodialysis versus chromatography for desalting silage juice: Comparison of both processes with regard to energy consumption</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Thang, Vu Hong ; Koschuh, Werner ; Novalin, Senad</creator><creatorcontrib>Thang, Vu Hong ; Koschuh, Werner ; Novalin, Senad</creatorcontrib><description>In many cases, desalination is an important step during the separation of valuable substances from solutions. In this study, grass silage juice, a renewable resource for the production of lactic acid as well as amino acids, was processed. Electrodialysis and process chromatography were investigated as methods for the above task. The main aim of this work is an estimation of the energy demand of both processes in connection with sustainable development. Scale up and calculations for industrial plants were done on the basis of the laboratory results. The energy consumption for desalting step was 134 and 54.76 kWh m −3 of silage juice in electrodialysis and chromatography process, respectively. However, since the commercial products are normally required, the energy consumption for concentration step (evaporation) was taken in consideration. With this regard, the energy demand for lactic acid production was 5.05 kWh kg −1 (in electrodialysis process) and 3.42 kWh kg −1 (in chromatography process). In chromatography, the evaporation took a great part (77.95%) of the total energy whereas in electrodialysis process, this part was only 22.0%. In the present application, it seemed that chromatography could be preferred. However, it must be noted that in present case the salt content is quite high (35 g L −1). Based on the preliminary obtained data, it was assumed that, if the salt content were approximately 15 g L −1, the total energy consumption for ED process would equal to that of chromatography process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-7388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Electrodialysis ; Energy consumption ; Lactic acid ; Process chromatography ; Silage juice ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Journal of membrane science, 2005-07, Vol.256 (1), p.78-88</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f9bd53139fc64d1b23c19138871da606a5d3452f938308aa622fb83c69a8bdfc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thang, Vu Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koschuh, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novalin, Senad</creatorcontrib><title>Electrodialysis versus chromatography for desalting silage juice: Comparison of both processes with regard to energy consumption</title><title>Journal of membrane science</title><description>In many cases, desalination is an important step during the separation of valuable substances from solutions. In this study, grass silage juice, a renewable resource for the production of lactic acid as well as amino acids, was processed. Electrodialysis and process chromatography were investigated as methods for the above task. The main aim of this work is an estimation of the energy demand of both processes in connection with sustainable development. Scale up and calculations for industrial plants were done on the basis of the laboratory results. The energy consumption for desalting step was 134 and 54.76 kWh m −3 of silage juice in electrodialysis and chromatography process, respectively. However, since the commercial products are normally required, the energy consumption for concentration step (evaporation) was taken in consideration. With this regard, the energy demand for lactic acid production was 5.05 kWh kg −1 (in electrodialysis process) and 3.42 kWh kg −1 (in chromatography process). In chromatography, the evaporation took a great part (77.95%) of the total energy whereas in electrodialysis process, this part was only 22.0%. In the present application, it seemed that chromatography could be preferred. However, it must be noted that in present case the salt content is quite high (35 g L −1). Based on the preliminary obtained data, it was assumed that, if the salt content were approximately 15 g L −1, the total energy consumption for ED process would equal to that of chromatography process.</description><subject>Electrodialysis</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Process chromatography</subject><subject>Silage juice</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0376-7388</issn><issn>1873-3123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFr3DAQhUVpodu0_6AHnXKzq7G8ttxDoSxpGwjkkp6FLI28WmzL0dgJe-tPr8LmnNPw4L3HvI-xryBKENB8O5UTTmRDWQmxLwWUoq7fsR2oVhYSKvme7YRsm6KVSn1kn4hOQkArVLdj_25GtGuKLpjxTIH4EybaiNtjipNZ45DMcjxzHxN3SGZcwzxwCqMZkJ-2YPE7P8RpMSlQnHn0vI_rkS8pWiRC4s8hy4SDSY6vkeOMaThzG2fapmUNcf7MPngzEn55vVfs76-bh8Of4u7-9-3h511hZVuvhe96t5cgO2-b2kFfSQsd5D0tONOIxuydrPeV76SSQhnTVJXvlbRNZ1TvvJVX7PrSm3973JBWPQWyOI5mxriRhrZW0AJkY30x2hSJEnq9pDCZdNYg9AtufdIX3PoFtxagM-4c-3GJYR7xFDDp7MDZogspE9YuhrcL_gM-DI59</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Thang, Vu Hong</creator><creator>Koschuh, Werner</creator><creator>Novalin, Senad</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Electrodialysis versus chromatography for desalting silage juice: Comparison of both processes with regard to energy consumption</title><author>Thang, Vu Hong ; Koschuh, Werner ; Novalin, Senad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f9bd53139fc64d1b23c19138871da606a5d3452f938308aa622fb83c69a8bdfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Electrodialysis</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Process chromatography</topic><topic>Silage juice</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thang, Vu Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koschuh, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novalin, Senad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of membrane science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thang, Vu Hong</au><au>Koschuh, Werner</au><au>Novalin, Senad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrodialysis versus chromatography for desalting silage juice: Comparison of both processes with regard to energy consumption</atitle><jtitle>Journal of membrane science</jtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>256</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>78-88</pages><issn>0376-7388</issn><eissn>1873-3123</eissn><abstract>In many cases, desalination is an important step during the separation of valuable substances from solutions. In this study, grass silage juice, a renewable resource for the production of lactic acid as well as amino acids, was processed. Electrodialysis and process chromatography were investigated as methods for the above task. The main aim of this work is an estimation of the energy demand of both processes in connection with sustainable development. Scale up and calculations for industrial plants were done on the basis of the laboratory results. The energy consumption for desalting step was 134 and 54.76 kWh m −3 of silage juice in electrodialysis and chromatography process, respectively. However, since the commercial products are normally required, the energy consumption for concentration step (evaporation) was taken in consideration. With this regard, the energy demand for lactic acid production was 5.05 kWh kg −1 (in electrodialysis process) and 3.42 kWh kg −1 (in chromatography process). In chromatography, the evaporation took a great part (77.95%) of the total energy whereas in electrodialysis process, this part was only 22.0%. In the present application, it seemed that chromatography could be preferred. However, it must be noted that in present case the salt content is quite high (35 g L −1). Based on the preliminary obtained data, it was assumed that, if the salt content were approximately 15 g L −1, the total energy consumption for ED process would equal to that of chromatography process.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.044</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-7388
ispartof Journal of membrane science, 2005-07, Vol.256 (1), p.78-88
issn 0376-7388
1873-3123
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17481711
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Electrodialysis
Energy consumption
Lactic acid
Process chromatography
Silage juice
Sustainable development
title Electrodialysis versus chromatography for desalting silage juice: Comparison of both processes with regard to energy consumption
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A28%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrodialysis%20versus%20chromatography%20for%20desalting%20silage%20juice:%20Comparison%20of%20both%20processes%20with%20regard%20to%20energy%20consumption&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20membrane%20science&rft.au=Thang,%20Vu%20Hong&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=256&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=78-88&rft.issn=0376-7388&rft.eissn=1873-3123&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17481711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f9bd53139fc64d1b23c19138871da606a5d3452f938308aa622fb83c69a8bdfc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17481711&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true